Seek Returns logo

GDS vs. TTWO: A Head-to-Head Stock Comparison

Updated on

Here’s a clear look at GDS and TTWO, comparing key factors like historical performance, profitability, financial strength, growth, dividend, and valuation.

Company Profile

GDS trades as an American Depositary Receipt (ADR), offering U.S. investors a convenient way to access its foreign-listed shares. In contrast, TTWO is a standard domestic listing.

SymbolGDSTTWO
Company NameGDS Holdings LimitedTake-Two Interactive Software, Inc.
CountryChinaUnited States
GICS SectorInformation TechnologyCommunication Services
GICS IndustryIT ServicesEntertainment
Market Capitalization7.27 billion USD47.61 billion USD
ExchangeNasdaqGMNasdaqGS
Listing DateNovember 2, 2016April 15, 1997
Security TypeADRCommon Stock

Historical Performance

This chart compares the performance of GDS and TTWO by tracking the growth of an initial $10,000 investment in each. Use the tabs to select the desired time period. Data is adjusted for dividends and splits.

GDS vs. TTWO: Growth of a $10,000 investment over the past one year.

Historical Performance at a Glance

SymbolGDSTTWO
5-Day Price Return-8.68%0.44%
13-Week Price Return13.14%6.54%
26-Week Price Return50.00%23.52%
52-Week Price Return-19.97%69.55%
Month-to-Date Return-8.68%-0.11%
Year-to-Date Return60.53%40.19%
10-Day Avg. Volume13.01M1.82M
3-Month Avg. Volume10.11M1.81M
3-Month Volatility62.60%24.38%
Beta2.060.96

Profitability

Return on Equity (TTM)

GDS

19.17%

IT Services Industry

Max
32.78%
Q3
19.28%
Median
13.86%
Q1
5.50%
Min
-10.00%

GDS’s Return on Equity of 19.17% is on par with the norm for the IT Services industry, indicating its profitability relative to shareholder equity is typical for the sector.

TTWO

-98.81%

Entertainment Industry

Max
42.50%
Q3
24.06%
Median
13.69%
Q1
5.35%
Min
-17.95%

TTWO has a negative Return on Equity of -98.81%. This indicates the company is generating a loss for its shareholders, which can be a result of unprofitability or negative shareholder equity and is often a sign of financial distress.

GDS vs. TTWO: A comparison of their Return on Equity (TTM) against their respective IT Services and Entertainment industry benchmarks.

Net Profit Margin (TTM)

GDS

42.87%

IT Services Industry

Max
19.71%
Q3
11.01%
Median
6.66%
Q1
2.96%
Min
-6.22%

GDS’s Net Profit Margin of 42.87% is exceptionally high, placing it well beyond the typical range for the IT Services industry. This demonstrates outstanding operational efficiency and a strong competitive advantage in converting revenue into profit.

TTWO

-72.92%

Entertainment Industry

Max
45.33%
Q3
24.40%
Median
13.94%
Q1
4.28%
Min
-23.67%

TTWO has a negative Net Profit Margin of -72.92%, indicating the company is operating at a net loss as its expenses exceeded its revenues.

GDS vs. TTWO: A comparison of their Net Profit Margin (TTM) against their respective IT Services and Entertainment industry benchmarks.

Operating Profit Margin (TTM)

GDS

22.44%

IT Services Industry

Max
22.44%
Q3
14.90%
Median
8.82%
Q1
4.91%
Min
-9.89%

An Operating Profit Margin of 22.44% places GDS in the upper quartile for the IT Services industry. This signals a strong ability to translate revenue into operating profit, outperforming most of its competitors in core business efficiency.

TTWO

-72.16%

Entertainment Industry

Max
41.77%
Q3
28.26%
Median
16.13%
Q1
8.03%
Min
-3.93%

TTWO has a negative Operating Profit Margin of -72.16%. This signifies the company is unprofitable at the operational level, as its core business expenses exceed its revenue.

GDS vs. TTWO: A comparison of their Operating Profit Margin (TTM) against their respective IT Services and Entertainment industry benchmarks.

Profitability at a Glance

SymbolGDSTTWO
Return on Equity (TTM)19.17%-98.81%
Return on Assets (TTM)6.08%-37.91%
Net Profit Margin (TTM)42.87%-72.92%
Operating Profit Margin (TTM)22.44%-72.16%
Gross Profit Margin (TTM)21.45%56.66%

Financial Strength

Current Ratio (MRQ)

GDS

2.00

IT Services Industry

Max
3.17
Q3
2.00
Median
1.47
Q1
1.05
Min
0.52

GDS’s Current Ratio of 2.00 aligns with the median group of the IT Services industry, indicating that its short-term liquidity is in line with its sector peers.

TTWO

1.16

Entertainment Industry

Max
6.76
Q3
4.02
Median
1.55
Q1
0.86
Min
0.38

TTWO’s Current Ratio of 1.16 aligns with the median group of the Entertainment industry, indicating that its short-term liquidity is in line with its sector peers.

GDS vs. TTWO: A comparison of their Current Ratio (MRQ) against their respective IT Services and Entertainment industry benchmarks.

Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ)

GDS

1.82

IT Services Industry

Max
3.11
Q3
1.55
Median
0.55
Q1
0.17
Min
0.00

GDS’s leverage is in the upper quartile of the IT Services industry, with a Debt-to-Equity Ratio of 1.82. While this approach can boost equity growth, it also exposes the company to greater financial vulnerability.

TTWO

0.88

Entertainment Industry

Max
1.54
Q3
0.77
Median
0.16
Q1
0.02
Min
0.00

TTWO’s leverage is in the upper quartile of the Entertainment industry, with a Debt-to-Equity Ratio of 0.88. While this approach can boost equity growth, it also exposes the company to greater financial vulnerability.

GDS vs. TTWO: A comparison of their Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ) against their respective IT Services and Entertainment industry benchmarks.

Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM)

GDS

0.66

IT Services Industry

Max
129.00
Q3
56.00
Median
11.69
Q1
0.77
Min
-28.15

GDS’s Interest Coverage Ratio of 0.66 is a critical concern. A value below 1.0 means operating earnings are insufficient to cover interest expenses, indicating severe financial strain and high default risk.

TTWO

-44.74

Entertainment Industry

Max
87.17
Q3
35.59
Median
7.06
Q1
1.13
Min
-44.74

TTWO has a negative Interest Coverage Ratio of -44.74. This indicates that its earnings were insufficient to cover even its operational costs, let alone its interest payments, signaling significant financial distress.

GDS vs. TTWO: A comparison of their Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM) against their respective IT Services and Entertainment industry benchmarks.

Financial Strength at a Glance

SymbolGDSTTWO
Current Ratio (MRQ)2.001.16
Quick Ratio (MRQ)1.931.01
Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ)1.820.88
Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM)0.66-44.74

Growth

Revenue Growth

GDS vs. TTWO: A side-by-side comparison of their Revenue Growth for the MRQ (YoY), TTM (YoY), 3-Year CAGR, and 5-Year CAGR periods.

EPS Growth

GDS vs. TTWO: A side-by-side comparison of their EPS Growth for the MRQ (YoY), TTM (YoY), 3-Year CAGR, and 5-Year CAGR periods.

Dividend

Dividend Yield (TTM)

GDS

0.00%

IT Services Industry

Max
2.79%
Q3
1.76%
Median
0.58%
Q1
0.00%
Min
0.00%

GDS currently does not pay a dividend, resulting in a yield of 0%. This is a common strategy for growth-focused companies that prioritize reinvesting earnings, though it may be less typical in mature, income-oriented sectors.

TTWO

0.00%

Entertainment Industry

Max
2.90%
Q3
1.29%
Median
0.59%
Q1
0.00%
Min
0.00%

TTWO currently does not pay a dividend, resulting in a yield of 0%. This is a common strategy for growth-focused companies that prioritize reinvesting earnings, though it may be less typical in mature, income-oriented sectors.

GDS vs. TTWO: A comparison of their Dividend Yield (TTM) against their respective IT Services and Entertainment industry benchmarks.

Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM)

GDS

0.00%

IT Services Industry

Max
107.85%
Q3
52.62%
Median
22.53%
Q1
0.00%
Min
0.00%

GDS has a Dividend Payout Ratio of 0%, indicating it does not currently pay a dividend. This is a common strategy for growth-oriented companies that reinvest all profits back into the business.

TTWO

0.00%

Entertainment Industry

Max
82.30%
Q3
38.45%
Median
29.74%
Q1
0.00%
Min
0.00%

TTWO has a Dividend Payout Ratio of 0%, indicating it does not currently pay a dividend. This is a common strategy for growth-oriented companies that reinvest all profits back into the business.

GDS vs. TTWO: A comparison of their Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM) against their respective IT Services and Entertainment industry benchmarks.

Dividend at a Glance

SymbolGDSTTWO
Dividend Yield (TTM)0.00%0.00%
Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM)0.00%0.00%

Valuation

Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM)

GDS

12.16

IT Services Industry

Max
56.41
Q3
33.17
Median
23.17
Q1
16.18
Min
6.62

In the lower quartile for the IT Services industry, GDS’s P/E Ratio of 12.16 suggests the stock may be undervalued compared to its peers, potentially presenting an attractive entry point for investors.

TTWO

--

Entertainment Industry

Max
92.09
Q3
54.51
Median
28.92
Q1
19.75
Min
2.96

P/E Ratio data for TTWO is currently unavailable.

GDS vs. TTWO: A comparison of their Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM) against their respective IT Services and Entertainment industry benchmarks.

Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM)

GDS

5.21

IT Services Industry

Max
5.99
Q3
4.26
Median
1.93
Q1
0.97
Min
0.12

GDS’s P/S Ratio of 5.21 is in the upper echelon for the IT Services industry. This means the company is valued richly on its revenue stream compared to its peers, suggesting the stock is priced for a high level of future performance.

TTWO

8.26

Entertainment Industry

Max
12.34
Q3
7.67
Median
5.06
Q1
2.72
Min
0.67

TTWO’s P/S Ratio of 8.26 is in the upper echelon for the Entertainment industry. This means the company is valued richly on its revenue stream compared to its peers, suggesting the stock is priced for a high level of future performance.

GDS vs. TTWO: A comparison of their Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM) against their respective IT Services and Entertainment industry benchmarks.

Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ)

GDS

1.61

IT Services Industry

Max
12.34
Q3
7.54
Median
3.84
Q1
2.52
Min
0.88

GDS’s P/B Ratio of 1.61 is in the lower quartile for the IT Services industry. From a value investing perspective, this is favorable, as it suggests the stock is trading at a discount to its net asset value and may offer a greater margin of safety.

TTWO

12.74

Entertainment Industry

Max
22.84
Q3
10.54
Median
6.60
Q1
2.30
Min
0.65

TTWO’s P/B Ratio of 12.74 is in the upper tier for the Entertainment industry. This indicates that investors are paying a premium relative to the company’s net assets, a valuation that hinges on its ability to generate superior profits.

GDS vs. TTWO: A comparison of their Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ) against their respective IT Services and Entertainment industry benchmarks.

Valuation at a Glance

SymbolGDSTTWO
Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM)12.16--
Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM)5.218.26
Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ)1.6112.74
Price-to-Free Cash Flow Ratio (TTM)--212.87