Seek Returns logo

GDS vs. TER: A Head-to-Head Stock Comparison

Updated on

Here’s a clear look at GDS and TER, comparing key factors like historical performance, profitability, financial strength, growth, dividend, and valuation.

Company Profile

GDS trades as an American Depositary Receipt (ADR), offering U.S. investors a convenient way to access its foreign-listed shares. In contrast, TER is a standard domestic listing.

SymbolGDSTER
Company NameGDS Holdings LimitedTeradyne, Inc.
CountryChinaUnited States
GICS SectorInformation TechnologyInformation Technology
GICS IndustryIT ServicesSemiconductors & Semiconductor Equipment
Market Capitalization6.88 billion USD18.14 billion USD
ExchangeNasdaqGMNasdaqGS
Listing DateNovember 2, 2016February 21, 1973
Security TypeADRCommon Stock

Historical Performance

This chart compares the performance of GDS and TER by tracking the growth of an initial $10,000 investment in each. Use the tabs to select the desired time period. Data is adjusted for dividends and splits.

GDS vs. TER: Growth of a $10,000 investment over the past one year.

Historical Performance at a Glance

SymbolGDSTER
5-Day Price Return-1.84%7.09%
13-Week Price Return29.01%37.26%
26-Week Price Return42.30%-0.05%
52-Week Price Return-19.97%-6.79%
Month-to-Date Return-0.79%6.12%
Year-to-Date Return54.47%-9.46%
10-Day Avg. Volume6.51M4.71M
3-Month Avg. Volume8.73M3.82M
3-Month Volatility60.94%53.16%
Beta1.561.81

Profitability

Return on Equity (TTM)

GDS

19.12%

IT Services Industry

Max
29.51%
Q3
16.98%
Median
13.47%
Q1
7.93%
Min
-3.97%

In the upper quartile for the IT Services industry, GDS’s Return on Equity of 19.12% signals a highly effective use of shareholder capital to drive profitability compared to most of its peers.

TER

16.52%

Semiconductors & Semiconductor Equipment Industry

Max
52.74%
Q3
23.49%
Median
11.60%
Q1
3.23%
Min
-20.69%

TER’s Return on Equity of 16.52% is on par with the norm for the Semiconductors & Semiconductor Equipment industry, indicating its profitability relative to shareholder equity is typical for the sector.

GDS vs. TER: A comparison of their Return on Equity (TTM) against their respective IT Services and Semiconductors & Semiconductor Equipment industry benchmarks.

Net Profit Margin (TTM)

GDS

41.75%

IT Services Industry

Max
19.82%
Q3
11.49%
Median
6.67%
Q1
3.61%
Min
-4.62%

GDS’s Net Profit Margin of 41.75% is exceptionally high, placing it well beyond the typical range for the IT Services industry. This demonstrates outstanding operational efficiency and a strong competitive advantage in converting revenue into profit.

TER

16.59%

Semiconductors & Semiconductor Equipment Industry

Max
44.17%
Q3
22.38%
Median
11.95%
Q1
3.21%
Min
-25.16%

TER’s Net Profit Margin of 16.59% is aligned with the median group of its peers in the Semiconductors & Semiconductor Equipment industry. This indicates its ability to convert revenue into profit is typical for the sector.

GDS vs. TER: A comparison of their Net Profit Margin (TTM) against their respective IT Services and Semiconductors & Semiconductor Equipment industry benchmarks.

Operating Profit Margin (TTM)

GDS

21.69%

IT Services Industry

Max
21.69%
Q3
14.50%
Median
10.06%
Q1
6.98%
Min
0.06%

An Operating Profit Margin of 21.69% places GDS in the upper quartile for the IT Services industry. This signals a strong ability to translate revenue into operating profit, outperforming most of its competitors in core business efficiency.

TER

18.29%

Semiconductors & Semiconductor Equipment Industry

Max
58.03%
Q3
27.84%
Median
12.45%
Q1
5.15%
Min
-28.61%

TER’s Operating Profit Margin of 18.29% is around the midpoint for the Semiconductors & Semiconductor Equipment industry, indicating that its efficiency in managing core business operations is typical for the sector.

GDS vs. TER: A comparison of their Operating Profit Margin (TTM) against their respective IT Services and Semiconductors & Semiconductor Equipment industry benchmarks.

Profitability at a Glance

SymbolGDSTER
Return on Equity (TTM)19.12%16.52%
Return on Assets (TTM)5.88%12.56%
Net Profit Margin (TTM)41.75%16.59%
Operating Profit Margin (TTM)21.69%18.29%
Gross Profit Margin (TTM)21.12%59.14%

Financial Strength

Current Ratio (MRQ)

GDS

1.47

IT Services Industry

Max
2.42
Q3
1.81
Median
1.47
Q1
1.09
Min
0.44

GDS’s Current Ratio of 1.47 aligns with the median group of the IT Services industry, indicating that its short-term liquidity is in line with its sector peers.

TER

2.35

Semiconductors & Semiconductor Equipment Industry

Max
8.42
Q3
4.70
Median
2.75
Q1
2.07
Min
1.04

TER’s Current Ratio of 2.35 aligns with the median group of the Semiconductors & Semiconductor Equipment industry, indicating that its short-term liquidity is in line with its sector peers.

GDS vs. TER: A comparison of their Current Ratio (MRQ) against their respective IT Services and Semiconductors & Semiconductor Equipment industry benchmarks.

Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ)

GDS

1.75

IT Services Industry

Max
2.33
Q3
1.17
Median
0.54
Q1
0.15
Min
0.00

GDS’s leverage is in the upper quartile of the IT Services industry, with a Debt-to-Equity Ratio of 1.75. While this approach can boost equity growth, it also exposes the company to greater financial vulnerability.

TER

0.00

Semiconductors & Semiconductor Equipment Industry

Max
1.09
Q3
0.45
Median
0.22
Q1
0.01
Min
0.00

Falling into the lower quartile for the Semiconductors & Semiconductor Equipment industry, TER’s Debt-to-Equity Ratio of 0.00 points to a conservative financing strategy. This results in lower financial risk but potentially limits strategic investments compared to more leveraged competitors.

GDS vs. TER: A comparison of their Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ) against their respective IT Services and Semiconductors & Semiconductor Equipment industry benchmarks.

Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM)

GDS

0.66

IT Services Industry

Max
144.50
Q3
84.49
Median
13.76
Q1
2.59
Min
-28.13

GDS’s Interest Coverage Ratio of 0.66 is a critical concern. A value below 1.0 means operating earnings are insufficient to cover interest expenses, indicating severe financial strain and high default risk.

TER

135.68

Semiconductors & Semiconductor Equipment Industry

Max
174.00
Q3
81.10
Median
27.22
Q1
7.28
Min
-4.26

TER’s Interest Coverage Ratio of 135.68 is in the upper quartile for the Semiconductors & Semiconductor Equipment industry, signifying a strong and healthy capacity to meet its interest payments from operating profits.

GDS vs. TER: A comparison of their Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM) against their respective IT Services and Semiconductors & Semiconductor Equipment industry benchmarks.

Financial Strength at a Glance

SymbolGDSTER
Current Ratio (MRQ)1.472.35
Quick Ratio (MRQ)1.291.21
Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ)1.750.00
Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM)0.66135.68

Growth

Revenue Growth

GDS vs. TER: A side-by-side comparison of their Revenue Growth for the MRQ (YoY), TTM (YoY), 3-Year CAGR, and 5-Year CAGR periods.

EPS Growth

GDS vs. TER: A side-by-side comparison of their EPS Growth for the MRQ (YoY), TTM (YoY), 3-Year CAGR, and 5-Year CAGR periods.

Dividend

Dividend Yield (TTM)

GDS

0.00%

IT Services Industry

Max
2.80%
Q3
1.74%
Median
0.62%
Q1
0.00%
Min
0.00%

GDS currently does not pay a dividend, resulting in a yield of 0%. This is a common strategy for growth-focused companies that prioritize reinvesting earnings, though it may be less typical in mature, income-oriented sectors.

TER

0.43%

Semiconductors & Semiconductor Equipment Industry

Max
4.16%
Q3
1.78%
Median
0.74%
Q1
0.00%
Min
0.00%

TER’s Dividend Yield of 0.43% is consistent with its peers in the Semiconductors & Semiconductor Equipment industry, providing a dividend return that is standard for its sector.

GDS vs. TER: A comparison of their Dividend Yield (TTM) against their respective IT Services and Semiconductors & Semiconductor Equipment industry benchmarks.

Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM)

GDS

0.00%

IT Services Industry

Max
147.75%
Q3
63.58%
Median
24.63%
Q1
0.00%
Min
0.00%

GDS has a Dividend Payout Ratio of 0%, indicating it does not currently pay a dividend. This is a common strategy for growth-oriented companies that reinvest all profits back into the business.

TER

16.55%

Semiconductors & Semiconductor Equipment Industry

Max
196.12%
Q3
87.72%
Median
26.57%
Q1
0.00%
Min
0.00%

TER’s Dividend Payout Ratio of 16.55% is within the typical range for the Semiconductors & Semiconductor Equipment industry, suggesting a balanced approach between shareholder payouts and company reinvestment.

GDS vs. TER: A comparison of their Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM) against their respective IT Services and Semiconductors & Semiconductor Equipment industry benchmarks.

Dividend at a Glance

SymbolGDSTER
Dividend Yield (TTM)0.00%0.43%
Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM)0.00%16.55%

Valuation

Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM)

GDS

11.54

IT Services Industry

Max
41.55
Q3
31.54
Median
23.25
Q1
18.12
Min
6.57

In the lower quartile for the IT Services industry, GDS’s P/E Ratio of 11.54 suggests the stock may be undervalued compared to its peers, potentially presenting an attractive entry point for investors.

TER

38.58

Semiconductors & Semiconductor Equipment Industry

Max
109.37
Q3
57.11
Median
28.95
Q1
22.13
Min
11.14

TER’s P/E Ratio of 38.58 is within the middle range for the Semiconductors & Semiconductor Equipment industry. This suggests its valuation is in line with the sector average, representing neither a significant premium nor a discount compared to its peers.

GDS vs. TER: A comparison of their Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM) against their respective IT Services and Semiconductors & Semiconductor Equipment industry benchmarks.

Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM)

GDS

4.82

IT Services Industry

Max
6.61
Q3
4.37
Median
2.02
Q1
1.20
Min
0.19

GDS’s P/S Ratio of 4.82 is in the upper echelon for the IT Services industry. This means the company is valued richly on its revenue stream compared to its peers, suggesting the stock is priced for a high level of future performance.

TER

6.40

Semiconductors & Semiconductor Equipment Industry

Max
16.09
Q3
10.10
Median
4.82
Q1
2.60
Min
0.93

TER’s P/S Ratio of 6.40 aligns with the market consensus for the Semiconductors & Semiconductor Equipment industry. This suggests its valuation, based on sales, is seen as standard and is on par with its competitors.

GDS vs. TER: A comparison of their Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM) against their respective IT Services and Semiconductors & Semiconductor Equipment industry benchmarks.

Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ)

GDS

1.40

IT Services Industry

Max
11.19
Q3
6.38
Median
3.47
Q1
2.31
Min
0.96

GDS’s P/B Ratio of 1.40 is in the lower quartile for the IT Services industry. From a value investing perspective, this is favorable, as it suggests the stock is trading at a discount to its net asset value and may offer a greater margin of safety.

TER

5.08

Semiconductors & Semiconductor Equipment Industry

Max
13.56
Q3
6.75
Median
3.68
Q1
1.89
Min
0.60

TER’s P/B Ratio of 5.08 is within the conventional range for the Semiconductors & Semiconductor Equipment industry. This shows a balanced market view, where the stock’s price is neither at a significant premium nor a discount to the book value of its peers.

GDS vs. TER: A comparison of their Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ) against their respective IT Services and Semiconductors & Semiconductor Equipment industry benchmarks.

Valuation at a Glance

SymbolGDSTER
Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM)11.5438.58
Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM)4.826.40
Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ)1.405.08
Price-to-Free Cash Flow Ratio (TTM)--31.82