Seek Returns logo

GDS vs. SAP: A Head-to-Head Stock Comparison

Updated on

Here’s a clear look at GDS and SAP, comparing key factors like historical performance, profitability, financial strength, growth, dividend, and valuation.

Company Profile

Both GDS and SAP are American Depositary Receipts (ADRs). This provides U.S. investors with straightforward access to investing in these foreign-listed companies.

SymbolGDSSAP
Company NameGDS Holdings LimitedSAP SE
CountryChinaGermany
GICS SectorInformation TechnologyInformation Technology
GICS IndustryIT ServicesSoftware
Market Capitalization6.88 billion USD324.71 billion USD
ExchangeNasdaqGMNYSE
Listing DateNovember 2, 2016September 18, 1995
Security TypeADRADR

Historical Performance

This chart compares the performance of GDS and SAP by tracking the growth of an initial $10,000 investment in each. Use the tabs to select the desired time period. Data is adjusted for dividends and splits.

GDS vs. SAP: Growth of a $10,000 investment over the past one year.

Historical Performance at a Glance

SymbolGDSSAP
5-Day Price Return-1.84%-6.77%
13-Week Price Return29.01%-10.08%
26-Week Price Return42.30%-14.39%
52-Week Price Return-19.97%20.78%
Month-to-Date Return-0.79%-7.50%
Year-to-Date Return54.47%-1.82%
10-Day Avg. Volume6.51M1.40M
3-Month Avg. Volume8.73M1.74M
3-Month Volatility60.94%25.67%
Beta1.560.99

Profitability

Return on Equity (TTM)

GDS

19.12%

IT Services Industry

Max
29.51%
Q3
16.98%
Median
13.47%
Q1
7.93%
Min
-3.97%

In the upper quartile for the IT Services industry, GDS’s Return on Equity of 19.12% signals a highly effective use of shareholder capital to drive profitability compared to most of its peers.

SAP

15.09%

Software Industry

Max
59.01%
Q3
21.98%
Median
7.15%
Q1
-11.12%
Min
-51.24%

SAP’s Return on Equity of 15.09% is on par with the norm for the Software industry, indicating its profitability relative to shareholder equity is typical for the sector.

GDS vs. SAP: A comparison of their Return on Equity (TTM) against their respective IT Services and Software industry benchmarks.

Net Profit Margin (TTM)

GDS

41.75%

IT Services Industry

Max
19.82%
Q3
11.49%
Median
6.67%
Q1
3.61%
Min
-4.62%

GDS’s Net Profit Margin of 41.75% is exceptionally high, placing it well beyond the typical range for the IT Services industry. This demonstrates outstanding operational efficiency and a strong competitive advantage in converting revenue into profit.

SAP

18.23%

Software Industry

Max
48.14%
Q3
18.23%
Median
5.60%
Q1
-9.22%
Min
-49.36%

SAP’s Net Profit Margin of 18.23% is aligned with the median group of its peers in the Software industry. This indicates its ability to convert revenue into profit is typical for the sector.

GDS vs. SAP: A comparison of their Net Profit Margin (TTM) against their respective IT Services and Software industry benchmarks.

Operating Profit Margin (TTM)

GDS

21.69%

IT Services Industry

Max
21.69%
Q3
14.50%
Median
10.06%
Q1
6.98%
Min
0.06%

An Operating Profit Margin of 21.69% places GDS in the upper quartile for the IT Services industry. This signals a strong ability to translate revenue into operating profit, outperforming most of its competitors in core business efficiency.

SAP

25.13%

Software Industry

Max
57.34%
Q3
20.60%
Median
7.84%
Q1
-8.72%
Min
-51.37%

An Operating Profit Margin of 25.13% places SAP in the upper quartile for the Software industry. This signals a strong ability to translate revenue into operating profit, outperforming most of its competitors in core business efficiency.

GDS vs. SAP: A comparison of their Operating Profit Margin (TTM) against their respective IT Services and Software industry benchmarks.

Profitability at a Glance

SymbolGDSSAP
Return on Equity (TTM)19.12%15.09%
Return on Assets (TTM)5.88%9.09%
Net Profit Margin (TTM)41.75%18.23%
Operating Profit Margin (TTM)21.69%25.13%
Gross Profit Margin (TTM)21.12%73.80%

Financial Strength

Current Ratio (MRQ)

GDS

1.47

IT Services Industry

Max
2.42
Q3
1.81
Median
1.47
Q1
1.09
Min
0.44

GDS’s Current Ratio of 1.47 aligns with the median group of the IT Services industry, indicating that its short-term liquidity is in line with its sector peers.

SAP

1.03

Software Industry

Max
3.83
Q3
2.31
Median
1.45
Q1
1.03
Min
0.24

SAP’s Current Ratio of 1.03 aligns with the median group of the Software industry, indicating that its short-term liquidity is in line with its sector peers.

GDS vs. SAP: A comparison of their Current Ratio (MRQ) against their respective IT Services and Software industry benchmarks.

Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ)

GDS

1.75

IT Services Industry

Max
2.33
Q3
1.17
Median
0.54
Q1
0.15
Min
0.00

GDS’s leverage is in the upper quartile of the IT Services industry, with a Debt-to-Equity Ratio of 1.75. While this approach can boost equity growth, it also exposes the company to greater financial vulnerability.

SAP

0.21

Software Industry

Max
2.14
Q3
0.90
Median
0.29
Q1
0.00
Min
0.00

SAP’s Debt-to-Equity Ratio of 0.21 is typical for the Software industry, indicating its use of leverage is in line with the sector norm. This suggests a balanced approach to its capital structure.

GDS vs. SAP: A comparison of their Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ) against their respective IT Services and Software industry benchmarks.

Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM)

GDS

0.66

IT Services Industry

Max
144.50
Q3
84.49
Median
13.76
Q1
2.59
Min
-28.13

GDS’s Interest Coverage Ratio of 0.66 is a critical concern. A value below 1.0 means operating earnings are insufficient to cover interest expenses, indicating severe financial strain and high default risk.

SAP

32.64

Software Industry

Max
67.02
Q3
19.86
Median
0.70
Q1
-12.50
Min
-53.00

SAP’s Interest Coverage Ratio of 32.64 is in the upper quartile for the Software industry, signifying a strong and healthy capacity to meet its interest payments from operating profits.

GDS vs. SAP: A comparison of their Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM) against their respective IT Services and Software industry benchmarks.

Financial Strength at a Glance

SymbolGDSSAP
Current Ratio (MRQ)1.471.03
Quick Ratio (MRQ)1.291.03
Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ)1.750.21
Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM)0.6632.64

Growth

Revenue Growth

GDS vs. SAP: A side-by-side comparison of their Revenue Growth for the MRQ (YoY), TTM (YoY), 3-Year CAGR, and 5-Year CAGR periods.

EPS Growth

GDS vs. SAP: A side-by-side comparison of their EPS Growth for the MRQ (YoY), TTM (YoY), 3-Year CAGR, and 5-Year CAGR periods.

Dividend

Dividend Yield (TTM)

GDS

0.00%

IT Services Industry

Max
2.80%
Q3
1.74%
Median
0.62%
Q1
0.00%
Min
0.00%

GDS currently does not pay a dividend, resulting in a yield of 0%. This is a common strategy for growth-focused companies that prioritize reinvesting earnings, though it may be less typical in mature, income-oriented sectors.

SAP

1.01%

Software Industry

Max
0.08%
Q3
0.03%
Median
0.00%
Q1
0.00%
Min
0.00%

SAP’s Dividend Yield of 1.01% is exceptionally high, placing it well above the typical range for the Software industry. While this may seem attractive, an unusually high yield can sometimes be a warning sign, reflecting a falling stock price or market concerns about the dividend’s sustainability.

GDS vs. SAP: A comparison of their Dividend Yield (TTM) against their respective IT Services and Software industry benchmarks.

Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM)

GDS

0.00%

IT Services Industry

Max
147.75%
Q3
63.58%
Median
24.63%
Q1
0.00%
Min
0.00%

GDS has a Dividend Payout Ratio of 0%, indicating it does not currently pay a dividend. This is a common strategy for growth-oriented companies that reinvest all profits back into the business.

SAP

161.64%

Software Industry

Max
1.32%
Q3
0.53%
Median
0.00%
Q1
0.00%
Min
0.00%

At 161.64%, SAP’s Dividend Payout Ratio is exceptionally high, exceeding the typical range for the Software industry. While this provides a significant return to shareholders, it may limit funds for reinvestment and could be difficult to sustain.

GDS vs. SAP: A comparison of their Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM) against their respective IT Services and Software industry benchmarks.

Dividend at a Glance

SymbolGDSSAP
Dividend Yield (TTM)0.00%1.01%
Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM)0.00%161.64%

Valuation

Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM)

GDS

11.54

IT Services Industry

Max
41.55
Q3
31.54
Median
23.25
Q1
18.12
Min
6.57

In the lower quartile for the IT Services industry, GDS’s P/E Ratio of 11.54 suggests the stock may be undervalued compared to its peers, potentially presenting an attractive entry point for investors.

SAP

41.39

Software Industry

Max
149.35
Q3
100.21
Median
47.97
Q1
26.77
Min
11.68

SAP’s P/E Ratio of 41.39 is within the middle range for the Software industry. This suggests its valuation is in line with the sector average, representing neither a significant premium nor a discount compared to its peers.

GDS vs. SAP: A comparison of their Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM) against their respective IT Services and Software industry benchmarks.

Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM)

GDS

4.82

IT Services Industry

Max
6.61
Q3
4.37
Median
2.02
Q1
1.20
Min
0.19

GDS’s P/S Ratio of 4.82 is in the upper echelon for the IT Services industry. This means the company is valued richly on its revenue stream compared to its peers, suggesting the stock is priced for a high level of future performance.

SAP

7.54

Software Industry

Max
25.24
Q3
13.52
Median
8.15
Q1
4.87
Min
0.98

SAP’s P/S Ratio of 7.54 aligns with the market consensus for the Software industry. This suggests its valuation, based on sales, is seen as standard and is on par with its competitors.

GDS vs. SAP: A comparison of their Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM) against their respective IT Services and Software industry benchmarks.

Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ)

GDS

1.40

IT Services Industry

Max
11.19
Q3
6.38
Median
3.47
Q1
2.31
Min
0.96

GDS’s P/B Ratio of 1.40 is in the lower quartile for the IT Services industry. From a value investing perspective, this is favorable, as it suggests the stock is trading at a discount to its net asset value and may offer a greater margin of safety.

SAP

7.74

Software Industry

Max
30.95
Q3
14.91
Median
7.75
Q1
3.60
Min
0.38

SAP’s P/B Ratio of 7.74 is within the conventional range for the Software industry. This shows a balanced market view, where the stock’s price is neither at a significant premium nor a discount to the book value of its peers.

GDS vs. SAP: A comparison of their Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ) against their respective IT Services and Software industry benchmarks.

Valuation at a Glance

SymbolGDSSAP
Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM)11.5441.39
Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM)4.827.54
Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ)1.407.74
Price-to-Free Cash Flow Ratio (TTM)--37.03