Seek Returns logo

GDS vs. QXO: A Head-to-Head Stock Comparison

Updated on

Here’s a clear look at GDS and QXO, comparing key factors like historical performance, profitability, financial strength, growth, dividend, and valuation.

Company Profile

GDS trades as an American Depositary Receipt (ADR), offering U.S. investors a convenient way to access its foreign-listed shares. In contrast, QXO is a standard domestic listing.

SymbolGDSQXO
Company NameGDS Holdings LimitedQXO, Inc.
CountryChinaUnited States
GICS SectorInformation TechnologyIndustrials
GICS IndustryIT ServicesTrading Companies & Distributors
Market Capitalization6.88 billion USD14.12 billion USD
ExchangeNasdaqGMNYSE
Listing DateNovember 2, 2016April 17, 2012
Security TypeADRCommon Stock

Historical Performance

This chart compares the performance of GDS and QXO by tracking the growth of an initial $10,000 investment in each. Use the tabs to select the desired time period. Data is adjusted for dividends and splits.

GDS vs. QXO: Growth of a $10,000 investment over the past one year.

Historical Performance at a Glance

SymbolGDSQXO
5-Day Price Return-1.84%8.67%
13-Week Price Return29.01%45.74%
26-Week Price Return42.30%55.42%
52-Week Price Return-19.97%95.72%
Month-to-Date Return-0.79%4.99%
Year-to-Date Return54.47%32.45%
10-Day Avg. Volume6.51M6.16M
3-Month Avg. Volume8.73M8.00M
3-Month Volatility60.94%57.56%
Beta1.562.19

Profitability

Return on Equity (TTM)

GDS

19.12%

IT Services Industry

Max
29.51%
Q3
16.98%
Median
13.47%
Q1
7.93%
Min
-3.97%

In the upper quartile for the IT Services industry, GDS’s Return on Equity of 19.12% signals a highly effective use of shareholder capital to drive profitability compared to most of its peers.

QXO

0.91%

Trading Companies & Distributors Industry

Max
32.33%
Q3
19.92%
Median
14.05%
Q1
11.46%
Min
0.91%

QXO’s Return on Equity of 0.91% is in the lower quartile for the Trading Companies & Distributors industry. This indicates a less efficient generation of profit from its equity base when compared to its competitors.

GDS vs. QXO: A comparison of their Return on Equity (TTM) against their respective IT Services and Trading Companies & Distributors industry benchmarks.

Net Profit Margin (TTM)

GDS

41.75%

IT Services Industry

Max
19.82%
Q3
11.49%
Median
6.67%
Q1
3.61%
Min
-4.62%

GDS’s Net Profit Margin of 41.75% is exceptionally high, placing it well beyond the typical range for the IT Services industry. This demonstrates outstanding operational efficiency and a strong competitive advantage in converting revenue into profit.

QXO

65.39%

Trading Companies & Distributors Industry

Max
17.73%
Q3
10.81%
Median
6.13%
Q1
4.33%
Min
2.09%

QXO’s Net Profit Margin of 65.39% is exceptionally high, placing it well beyond the typical range for the Trading Companies & Distributors industry. This demonstrates outstanding operational efficiency and a strong competitive advantage in converting revenue into profit.

GDS vs. QXO: A comparison of their Net Profit Margin (TTM) against their respective IT Services and Trading Companies & Distributors industry benchmarks.

Operating Profit Margin (TTM)

GDS

21.69%

IT Services Industry

Max
21.69%
Q3
14.50%
Median
10.06%
Q1
6.98%
Min
0.06%

An Operating Profit Margin of 21.69% places GDS in the upper quartile for the IT Services industry. This signals a strong ability to translate revenue into operating profit, outperforming most of its competitors in core business efficiency.

QXO

-197.54%

Trading Companies & Distributors Industry

Max
25.50%
Q3
15.13%
Median
7.46%
Q1
5.44%
Min
3.55%

QXO has a negative Operating Profit Margin of -197.54%. This signifies the company is unprofitable at the operational level, as its core business expenses exceed its revenue.

GDS vs. QXO: A comparison of their Operating Profit Margin (TTM) against their respective IT Services and Trading Companies & Distributors industry benchmarks.

Profitability at a Glance

SymbolGDSQXO
Return on Equity (TTM)19.12%0.91%
Return on Assets (TTM)5.88%0.90%
Net Profit Margin (TTM)41.75%65.39%
Operating Profit Margin (TTM)21.69%-197.54%
Gross Profit Margin (TTM)21.12%40.51%

Financial Strength

Current Ratio (MRQ)

GDS

1.47

IT Services Industry

Max
2.42
Q3
1.81
Median
1.47
Q1
1.09
Min
0.44

GDS’s Current Ratio of 1.47 aligns with the median group of the IT Services industry, indicating that its short-term liquidity is in line with its sector peers.

QXO

95.23

Trading Companies & Distributors Industry

Max
2.82
Q3
2.13
Median
1.60
Q1
1.43
Min
0.46

QXO’s Current Ratio of 95.23 is exceptionally high, placing it well outside the typical range for the Trading Companies & Distributors industry. This indicates a very strong liquidity position, though such a high ratio may also suggest that the company is not using its assets efficiently to generate profits.

GDS vs. QXO: A comparison of their Current Ratio (MRQ) against their respective IT Services and Trading Companies & Distributors industry benchmarks.

Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ)

GDS

1.75

IT Services Industry

Max
2.33
Q3
1.17
Median
0.54
Q1
0.15
Min
0.00

GDS’s leverage is in the upper quartile of the IT Services industry, with a Debt-to-Equity Ratio of 1.75. While this approach can boost equity growth, it also exposes the company to greater financial vulnerability.

QXO

0.00

Trading Companies & Distributors Industry

Max
1.88
Q3
1.18
Median
0.74
Q1
0.54
Min
0.00

Falling into the lower quartile for the Trading Companies & Distributors industry, QXO’s Debt-to-Equity Ratio of 0.00 points to a conservative financing strategy. This results in lower financial risk but potentially limits strategic investments compared to more leveraged competitors.

GDS vs. QXO: A comparison of their Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ) against their respective IT Services and Trading Companies & Distributors industry benchmarks.

Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM)

GDS

0.66

IT Services Industry

Max
144.50
Q3
84.49
Median
13.76
Q1
2.59
Min
-28.13

GDS’s Interest Coverage Ratio of 0.66 is a critical concern. A value below 1.0 means operating earnings are insufficient to cover interest expenses, indicating severe financial strain and high default risk.

QXO

-23.41

Trading Companies & Distributors Industry

Max
15.13
Q3
7.93
Median
5.75
Q1
2.70
Min
-1.67

QXO has a negative Interest Coverage Ratio of -23.41. This indicates that its earnings were insufficient to cover even its operational costs, let alone its interest payments, signaling significant financial distress.

GDS vs. QXO: A comparison of their Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM) against their respective IT Services and Trading Companies & Distributors industry benchmarks.

Financial Strength at a Glance

SymbolGDSQXO
Current Ratio (MRQ)1.4795.23
Quick Ratio (MRQ)1.2995.16
Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ)1.750.00
Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM)0.66-23.41

Growth

Revenue Growth

GDS vs. QXO: A side-by-side comparison of their Revenue Growth for the MRQ (YoY), TTM (YoY), 3-Year CAGR, and 5-Year CAGR periods.

EPS Growth

GDS vs. QXO: A side-by-side comparison of their EPS Growth for the MRQ (YoY), TTM (YoY), 3-Year CAGR, and 5-Year CAGR periods.

Dividend

Dividend Yield (TTM)

GDS

0.00%

IT Services Industry

Max
2.80%
Q3
1.74%
Median
0.62%
Q1
0.00%
Min
0.00%

GDS currently does not pay a dividend, resulting in a yield of 0%. This is a common strategy for growth-focused companies that prioritize reinvesting earnings, though it may be less typical in mature, income-oriented sectors.

QXO

0.51%

Trading Companies & Distributors Industry

Max
4.99%
Q3
3.04%
Median
1.94%
Q1
1.22%
Min
0.00%

QXO’s Dividend Yield of 0.51% is in the lower quartile for the Trading Companies & Distributors industry. This suggests the company’s strategy likely favors retaining earnings for growth over providing a high dividend income.

GDS vs. QXO: A comparison of their Dividend Yield (TTM) against their respective IT Services and Trading Companies & Distributors industry benchmarks.

Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM)

GDS

0.00%

IT Services Industry

Max
147.75%
Q3
63.58%
Median
24.63%
Q1
0.00%
Min
0.00%

GDS has a Dividend Payout Ratio of 0%, indicating it does not currently pay a dividend. This is a common strategy for growth-oriented companies that reinvest all profits back into the business.

QXO

0.00%

Trading Companies & Distributors Industry

Max
95.14%
Q3
62.08%
Median
51.17%
Q1
26.24%
Min
0.00%

QXO has a Dividend Payout Ratio of 0%, indicating it does not currently pay a dividend. This is a common strategy for growth-oriented companies that reinvest all profits back into the business.

GDS vs. QXO: A comparison of their Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM) against their respective IT Services and Trading Companies & Distributors industry benchmarks.

Dividend at a Glance

SymbolGDSQXO
Dividend Yield (TTM)0.00%0.51%
Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM)0.00%0.00%

Valuation

Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM)

GDS

11.54

IT Services Industry

Max
41.55
Q3
31.54
Median
23.25
Q1
18.12
Min
6.57

In the lower quartile for the IT Services industry, GDS’s P/E Ratio of 11.54 suggests the stock may be undervalued compared to its peers, potentially presenting an attractive entry point for investors.

QXO

388.26

Trading Companies & Distributors Industry

Max
48.55
Q3
26.73
Median
17.17
Q1
10.78
Min
1.62

At 388.26, QXO’s P/E Ratio is exceptionally high, exceeding the typical maximum for the Trading Companies & Distributors industry. This suggests the stock may be significantly overvalued compared to its peers and implies high market expectations that could be difficult to meet.

GDS vs. QXO: A comparison of their Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM) against their respective IT Services and Trading Companies & Distributors industry benchmarks.

Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM)

GDS

4.82

IT Services Industry

Max
6.61
Q3
4.37
Median
2.02
Q1
1.20
Min
0.19

GDS’s P/S Ratio of 4.82 is in the upper echelon for the IT Services industry. This means the company is valued richly on its revenue stream compared to its peers, suggesting the stock is priced for a high level of future performance.

QXO

253.89

Trading Companies & Distributors Industry

Max
4.88
Q3
2.56
Median
1.02
Q1
0.60
Min
0.29

With a P/S Ratio of 253.89, QXO trades at a valuation that eclipses even the highest in the Trading Companies & Distributors industry. This implies the market has priced in exceptionally optimistic scenarios for future revenue growth, posing considerable valuation risk.

GDS vs. QXO: A comparison of their Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM) against their respective IT Services and Trading Companies & Distributors industry benchmarks.

Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ)

GDS

1.40

IT Services Industry

Max
11.19
Q3
6.38
Median
3.47
Q1
2.31
Min
0.96

GDS’s P/B Ratio of 1.40 is in the lower quartile for the IT Services industry. From a value investing perspective, this is favorable, as it suggests the stock is trading at a discount to its net asset value and may offer a greater margin of safety.

QXO

1.10

Trading Companies & Distributors Industry

Max
8.77
Q3
4.33
Median
2.00
Q1
1.11
Min
0.35

QXO’s P/B Ratio of 1.10 is in the lower quartile for the Trading Companies & Distributors industry. From a value investing perspective, this is favorable, as it suggests the stock is trading at a discount to its net asset value and may offer a greater margin of safety.

GDS vs. QXO: A comparison of their Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ) against their respective IT Services and Trading Companies & Distributors industry benchmarks.

Valuation at a Glance

SymbolGDSQXO
Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM)11.54388.26
Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM)4.82253.89
Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ)1.401.10
Price-to-Free Cash Flow Ratio (TTM)--117.17