Seek Returns logo

GDS vs. NTES: A Head-to-Head Stock Comparison

Updated on

Here’s a clear look at GDS and NTES, comparing key factors like historical performance, profitability, financial strength, growth, dividend, and valuation.

Company Profile

Both GDS and NTES are American Depositary Receipts (ADRs). This provides U.S. investors with straightforward access to investing in these foreign-listed companies.

SymbolGDSNTES
Company NameGDS Holdings LimitedNetEase, Inc.
CountryChinaChina
GICS SectorInformation TechnologyCommunication Services
GICS IndustryIT ServicesEntertainment
Market Capitalization6.18 billion USD88.15 billion USD
ExchangeNasdaqGMNasdaqGS
Listing DateNovember 2, 2016June 30, 2000
Security TypeADRADR

Historical Performance

This chart compares the performance of GDS and NTES by tracking the growth of an initial $10,000 investment in each. Use the tabs to select the desired time period. Data is adjusted for dividends and splits.

GDS vs. NTES: Growth of a $10,000 investment over the past one year.

Historical Performance at a Glance

SymbolGDSNTES
5-Day Price Return2.49%5.67%
13-Week Price Return20.44%13.93%
26-Week Price Return-20.91%30.17%
52-Week Price Return-19.97%64.86%
Month-to-Date Return-7.21%4.07%
Year-to-Date Return44.47%52.00%
10-Day Avg. Volume12.84M1.08M
3-Month Avg. Volume8.70M1.00M
3-Month Volatility60.09%25.26%
Beta1.530.66

Profitability

Return on Equity (TTM)

GDS

19.12%

IT Services Industry

Max
29.51%
Q3
16.98%
Median
13.47%
Q1
7.93%
Min
-3.97%

In the upper quartile for the IT Services industry, GDS’s Return on Equity of 19.12% signals a highly effective use of shareholder capital to drive profitability compared to most of its peers.

NTES

24.25%

Entertainment Industry

Max
42.50%
Q3
22.75%
Median
12.88%
Q1
7.15%
Min
-6.84%

In the upper quartile for the Entertainment industry, NTES’s Return on Equity of 24.25% signals a highly effective use of shareholder capital to drive profitability compared to most of its peers.

GDS vs. NTES: A comparison of their Return on Equity (TTM) against their respective IT Services and Entertainment industry benchmarks.

Net Profit Margin (TTM)

GDS

41.75%

IT Services Industry

Max
19.82%
Q3
11.49%
Median
6.67%
Q1
3.61%
Min
-4.62%

GDS’s Net Profit Margin of 41.75% is exceptionally high, placing it well beyond the typical range for the IT Services industry. This demonstrates outstanding operational efficiency and a strong competitive advantage in converting revenue into profit.

NTES

31.19%

Entertainment Industry

Max
45.25%
Q3
23.93%
Median
14.60%
Q1
4.89%
Min
-22.94%

A Net Profit Margin of 31.19% places NTES in the upper quartile for the Entertainment industry, signifying strong profitability and more effective cost management than most of its peers.

GDS vs. NTES: A comparison of their Net Profit Margin (TTM) against their respective IT Services and Entertainment industry benchmarks.

Operating Profit Margin (TTM)

GDS

21.69%

IT Services Industry

Max
21.69%
Q3
14.50%
Median
10.06%
Q1
6.98%
Min
0.06%

An Operating Profit Margin of 21.69% places GDS in the upper quartile for the IT Services industry. This signals a strong ability to translate revenue into operating profit, outperforming most of its competitors in core business efficiency.

NTES

31.43%

Entertainment Industry

Max
46.83%
Q3
28.87%
Median
15.26%
Q1
8.95%
Min
-5.53%

An Operating Profit Margin of 31.43% places NTES in the upper quartile for the Entertainment industry. This signals a strong ability to translate revenue into operating profit, outperforming most of its competitors in core business efficiency.

GDS vs. NTES: A comparison of their Operating Profit Margin (TTM) against their respective IT Services and Entertainment industry benchmarks.

Profitability at a Glance

SymbolGDSNTES
Return on Equity (TTM)19.12%24.25%
Return on Assets (TTM)5.88%17.31%
Net Profit Margin (TTM)41.75%31.19%
Operating Profit Margin (TTM)21.69%31.43%
Gross Profit Margin (TTM)21.12%63.17%

Financial Strength

Current Ratio (MRQ)

GDS

1.47

IT Services Industry

Max
2.42
Q3
1.81
Median
1.47
Q1
1.09
Min
0.44

GDS’s Current Ratio of 1.47 aligns with the median group of the IT Services industry, indicating that its short-term liquidity is in line with its sector peers.

NTES

3.23

Entertainment Industry

Max
6.80
Q3
3.77
Median
1.87
Q1
0.86
Min
0.39

NTES’s Current Ratio of 3.23 aligns with the median group of the Entertainment industry, indicating that its short-term liquidity is in line with its sector peers.

GDS vs. NTES: A comparison of their Current Ratio (MRQ) against their respective IT Services and Entertainment industry benchmarks.

Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ)

GDS

1.75

IT Services Industry

Max
2.33
Q3
1.17
Median
0.54
Q1
0.15
Min
0.00

GDS’s leverage is in the upper quartile of the IT Services industry, with a Debt-to-Equity Ratio of 1.75. While this approach can boost equity growth, it also exposes the company to greater financial vulnerability.

NTES

0.08

Entertainment Industry

Max
1.65
Q3
0.71
Median
0.14
Q1
0.04
Min
0.00

NTES’s Debt-to-Equity Ratio of 0.08 is typical for the Entertainment industry, indicating its use of leverage is in line with the sector norm. This suggests a balanced approach to its capital structure.

GDS vs. NTES: A comparison of their Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ) against their respective IT Services and Entertainment industry benchmarks.

Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM)

GDS

0.66

IT Services Industry

Max
144.50
Q3
84.49
Median
13.76
Q1
2.59
Min
-28.13

GDS’s Interest Coverage Ratio of 0.66 is a critical concern. A value below 1.0 means operating earnings are insufficient to cover interest expenses, indicating severe financial strain and high default risk.

NTES

161.13

Entertainment Industry

Max
62.11
Q3
31.19
Median
7.50
Q1
2.02
Min
-6.33

With an Interest Coverage Ratio of 161.13, NTES demonstrates a superior capacity to service its debt, placing it well above the typical range for the Entertainment industry. This stems from either robust earnings or a conservative debt load.

GDS vs. NTES: A comparison of their Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM) against their respective IT Services and Entertainment industry benchmarks.

Financial Strength at a Glance

SymbolGDSNTES
Current Ratio (MRQ)1.473.23
Quick Ratio (MRQ)1.293.10
Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ)1.750.08
Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM)0.66161.13

Growth

Revenue Growth

GDS vs. NTES: A side-by-side comparison of their Revenue Growth for the MRQ (YoY), TTM (YoY), 3-Year CAGR, and 5-Year CAGR periods.

EPS Growth

GDS vs. NTES: A side-by-side comparison of their EPS Growth for the MRQ (YoY), TTM (YoY), 3-Year CAGR, and 5-Year CAGR periods.

Dividend

Dividend Yield (TTM)

GDS

0.00%

IT Services Industry

Max
2.80%
Q3
1.74%
Median
0.62%
Q1
0.00%
Min
0.00%

GDS currently does not pay a dividend, resulting in a yield of 0%. This is a common strategy for growth-focused companies that prioritize reinvesting earnings, though it may be less typical in mature, income-oriented sectors.

NTES

2.18%

Entertainment Industry

Max
2.54%
Q3
1.29%
Median
0.61%
Q1
0.00%
Min
0.00%

With a Dividend Yield of 2.18%, NTES offers a more attractive income stream than most of its peers in the Entertainment industry, signaling a strong commitment to shareholder returns.

GDS vs. NTES: A comparison of their Dividend Yield (TTM) against their respective IT Services and Entertainment industry benchmarks.

Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM)

GDS

0.00%

IT Services Industry

Max
147.75%
Q3
63.58%
Median
24.63%
Q1
0.00%
Min
0.00%

GDS has a Dividend Payout Ratio of 0%, indicating it does not currently pay a dividend. This is a common strategy for growth-oriented companies that reinvest all profits back into the business.

NTES

36.90%

Entertainment Industry

Max
82.30%
Q3
45.76%
Median
29.16%
Q1
0.00%
Min
0.00%

NTES’s Dividend Payout Ratio of 36.90% is within the typical range for the Entertainment industry, suggesting a balanced approach between shareholder payouts and company reinvestment.

GDS vs. NTES: A comparison of their Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM) against their respective IT Services and Entertainment industry benchmarks.

Dividend at a Glance

SymbolGDSNTES
Dividend Yield (TTM)0.00%2.18%
Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM)0.00%36.90%

Valuation

Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM)

GDS

10.47

IT Services Industry

Max
41.55
Q3
31.54
Median
23.25
Q1
18.12
Min
6.57

In the lower quartile for the IT Services industry, GDS’s P/E Ratio of 10.47 suggests the stock may be undervalued compared to its peers, potentially presenting an attractive entry point for investors.

NTES

16.94

Entertainment Industry

Max
53.51
Q3
45.31
Median
33.16
Q1
18.21
Min
3.89

In the lower quartile for the Entertainment industry, NTES’s P/E Ratio of 16.94 suggests the stock may be undervalued compared to its peers, potentially presenting an attractive entry point for investors.

GDS vs. NTES: A comparison of their Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM) against their respective IT Services and Entertainment industry benchmarks.

Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM)

GDS

4.37

IT Services Industry

Max
6.61
Q3
4.37
Median
2.02
Q1
1.20
Min
0.19

GDS’s P/S Ratio of 4.37 is in the upper echelon for the IT Services industry. This means the company is valued richly on its revenue stream compared to its peers, suggesting the stock is priced for a high level of future performance.

NTES

5.28

Entertainment Industry

Max
12.81
Q3
7.20
Median
4.68
Q1
3.32
Min
0.79

NTES’s P/S Ratio of 5.28 aligns with the market consensus for the Entertainment industry. This suggests its valuation, based on sales, is seen as standard and is on par with its competitors.

GDS vs. NTES: A comparison of their Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM) against their respective IT Services and Entertainment industry benchmarks.

Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ)

GDS

1.41

IT Services Industry

Max
11.19
Q3
6.38
Median
3.47
Q1
2.31
Min
0.96

GDS’s P/B Ratio of 1.41 is in the lower quartile for the IT Services industry. From a value investing perspective, this is favorable, as it suggests the stock is trading at a discount to its net asset value and may offer a greater margin of safety.

NTES

4.09

Entertainment Industry

Max
17.11
Q3
8.38
Median
5.24
Q1
2.18
Min
0.67

NTES’s P/B Ratio of 4.09 is within the conventional range for the Entertainment industry. This shows a balanced market view, where the stock’s price is neither at a significant premium nor a discount to the book value of its peers.

GDS vs. NTES: A comparison of their Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ) against their respective IT Services and Entertainment industry benchmarks.

Valuation at a Glance

SymbolGDSNTES
Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM)10.4716.94
Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM)4.375.28
Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ)1.414.09
Price-to-Free Cash Flow Ratio (TTM)--13.09