Seek Returns logo

GDS vs. MCHP: A Head-to-Head Stock Comparison

Updated on

Here’s a clear look at GDS and MCHP, comparing key factors like historical performance, profitability, financial strength, growth, dividend, and valuation.

Company Profile

GDS trades as an American Depositary Receipt (ADR), offering U.S. investors a convenient way to access its foreign-listed shares. In contrast, MCHP is a standard domestic listing.

SymbolGDSMCHP
Company NameGDS Holdings LimitedMicrochip Technology Incorporated
CountryChinaUnited States
GICS SectorInformation TechnologyInformation Technology
GICS IndustryIT ServicesSemiconductors & Semiconductor Equipment
Market Capitalization7.81 billion USD34.77 billion USD
ExchangeNasdaqGMNasdaqGS
Listing DateNovember 2, 2016March 19, 1993
Security TypeADRCommon Stock

Historical Performance

This chart compares the performance of GDS and MCHP by tracking the growth of an initial $10,000 investment in each. Use the tabs to select the desired time period. Data is adjusted for dividends and splits.

GDS vs. MCHP: Growth of a $10,000 investment over the past one year.

Historical Performance at a Glance

SymbolGDSMCHP
5-Day Price Return-0.25%-1.13%
13-Week Price Return41.88%-10.56%
26-Week Price Return50.68%26.23%
52-Week Price Return-19.97%-20.15%
Month-to-Date Return18.72%-0.17%
Year-to-Date Return75.79%11.79%
10-Day Avg. Volume12.22M7.31M
3-Month Avg. Volume10.28M8.61M
3-Month Volatility64.12%34.03%
Beta1.881.47

Profitability

Return on Equity (TTM)

GDS

19.17%

IT Services Industry

Max
32.78%
Q3
19.28%
Median
13.86%
Q1
5.50%
Min
-10.00%

GDS’s Return on Equity of 19.17% is on par with the norm for the IT Services industry, indicating its profitability relative to shareholder equity is typical for the sector.

MCHP

-2.26%

Semiconductors & Semiconductor Equipment Industry

Max
47.13%
Q3
23.50%
Median
9.94%
Q1
0.86%
Min
-20.69%

MCHP has a negative Return on Equity of -2.26%. This indicates the company is generating a loss for its shareholders, which can be a result of unprofitability or negative shareholder equity and is often a sign of financial distress.

GDS vs. MCHP: A comparison of their Return on Equity (TTM) against their respective IT Services and Semiconductors & Semiconductor Equipment industry benchmarks.

Net Profit Margin (TTM)

GDS

42.87%

IT Services Industry

Max
19.71%
Q3
11.01%
Median
6.66%
Q1
2.96%
Min
-6.22%

GDS’s Net Profit Margin of 42.87% is exceptionally high, placing it well beyond the typical range for the IT Services industry. This demonstrates outstanding operational efficiency and a strong competitive advantage in converting revenue into profit.

MCHP

-3.50%

Semiconductors & Semiconductor Equipment Industry

Max
52.41%
Q3
23.88%
Median
10.17%
Q1
1.21%
Min
-32.15%

MCHP has a negative Net Profit Margin of -3.50%, indicating the company is operating at a net loss as its expenses exceeded its revenues.

GDS vs. MCHP: A comparison of their Net Profit Margin (TTM) against their respective IT Services and Semiconductors & Semiconductor Equipment industry benchmarks.

Operating Profit Margin (TTM)

GDS

22.44%

IT Services Industry

Max
22.44%
Q3
14.90%
Median
8.82%
Q1
4.91%
Min
-9.89%

An Operating Profit Margin of 22.44% places GDS in the upper quartile for the IT Services industry. This signals a strong ability to translate revenue into operating profit, outperforming most of its competitors in core business efficiency.

MCHP

2.54%

Semiconductors & Semiconductor Equipment Industry

Max
58.09%
Q3
27.54%
Median
11.18%
Q1
3.31%
Min
-28.36%

MCHP’s Operating Profit Margin of 2.54% is in the lower quartile for the Semiconductors & Semiconductor Equipment industry. This indicates weaker profitability from core operations, which may stem from inefficiencies or competitive pressures on pricing.

GDS vs. MCHP: A comparison of their Operating Profit Margin (TTM) against their respective IT Services and Semiconductors & Semiconductor Equipment industry benchmarks.

Profitability at a Glance

SymbolGDSMCHP
Return on Equity (TTM)19.17%-2.26%
Return on Assets (TTM)6.08%-0.96%
Net Profit Margin (TTM)42.87%-3.50%
Operating Profit Margin (TTM)22.44%2.54%
Gross Profit Margin (TTM)21.45%54.48%

Financial Strength

Current Ratio (MRQ)

GDS

2.00

IT Services Industry

Max
3.17
Q3
2.00
Median
1.47
Q1
1.05
Min
0.52

GDS’s Current Ratio of 2.00 aligns with the median group of the IT Services industry, indicating that its short-term liquidity is in line with its sector peers.

MCHP

2.31

Semiconductors & Semiconductor Equipment Industry

Max
6.58
Q3
4.24
Median
2.73
Q1
2.13
Min
1.02

MCHP’s Current Ratio of 2.31 aligns with the median group of the Semiconductors & Semiconductor Equipment industry, indicating that its short-term liquidity is in line with its sector peers.

GDS vs. MCHP: A comparison of their Current Ratio (MRQ) against their respective IT Services and Semiconductors & Semiconductor Equipment industry benchmarks.

Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ)

GDS

1.82

IT Services Industry

Max
3.11
Q3
1.55
Median
0.55
Q1
0.17
Min
0.00

GDS’s leverage is in the upper quartile of the IT Services industry, with a Debt-to-Equity Ratio of 1.82. While this approach can boost equity growth, it also exposes the company to greater financial vulnerability.

MCHP

0.80

Semiconductors & Semiconductor Equipment Industry

Max
1.09
Q3
0.48
Median
0.25
Q1
0.01
Min
0.00

MCHP’s leverage is in the upper quartile of the Semiconductors & Semiconductor Equipment industry, with a Debt-to-Equity Ratio of 0.80. While this approach can boost equity growth, it also exposes the company to greater financial vulnerability.

GDS vs. MCHP: A comparison of their Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ) against their respective IT Services and Semiconductors & Semiconductor Equipment industry benchmarks.

Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM)

GDS

0.66

IT Services Industry

Max
129.00
Q3
56.00
Median
11.69
Q1
0.77
Min
-28.15

GDS’s Interest Coverage Ratio of 0.66 is a critical concern. A value below 1.0 means operating earnings are insufficient to cover interest expenses, indicating severe financial strain and high default risk.

MCHP

1.16

Semiconductors & Semiconductor Equipment Industry

Max
174.00
Q3
74.71
Median
26.06
Q1
6.43
Min
-7.80

In the lower quartile for the Semiconductors & Semiconductor Equipment industry, MCHP’s Interest Coverage Ratio of 1.16 indicates a tighter cushion for servicing debt, suggesting less financial flexibility than many of its competitors.

GDS vs. MCHP: A comparison of their Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM) against their respective IT Services and Semiconductors & Semiconductor Equipment industry benchmarks.

Financial Strength at a Glance

SymbolGDSMCHP
Current Ratio (MRQ)2.002.31
Quick Ratio (MRQ)1.931.33
Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ)1.820.80
Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM)0.661.16

Growth

Revenue Growth

GDS vs. MCHP: A side-by-side comparison of their Revenue Growth for the MRQ (YoY), TTM (YoY), 3-Year CAGR, and 5-Year CAGR periods.

EPS Growth

GDS vs. MCHP: A side-by-side comparison of their EPS Growth for the MRQ (YoY), TTM (YoY), 3-Year CAGR, and 5-Year CAGR periods.

Dividend

Dividend Yield (TTM)

GDS

0.00%

IT Services Industry

Max
2.79%
Q3
1.76%
Median
0.58%
Q1
0.00%
Min
0.00%

GDS currently does not pay a dividend, resulting in a yield of 0%. This is a common strategy for growth-focused companies that prioritize reinvesting earnings, though it may be less typical in mature, income-oriented sectors.

MCHP

2.91%

Semiconductors & Semiconductor Equipment Industry

Max
3.72%
Q3
1.51%
Median
0.69%
Q1
0.00%
Min
0.00%

With a Dividend Yield of 2.91%, MCHP offers a more attractive income stream than most of its peers in the Semiconductors & Semiconductor Equipment industry, signaling a strong commitment to shareholder returns.

GDS vs. MCHP: A comparison of their Dividend Yield (TTM) against their respective IT Services and Semiconductors & Semiconductor Equipment industry benchmarks.

Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM)

GDS

0.00%

IT Services Industry

Max
107.85%
Q3
52.62%
Median
22.53%
Q1
0.00%
Min
0.00%

GDS has a Dividend Payout Ratio of 0%, indicating it does not currently pay a dividend. This is a common strategy for growth-oriented companies that reinvest all profits back into the business.

MCHP

123.62%

Semiconductors & Semiconductor Equipment Industry

Max
205.27%
Q3
88.01%
Median
27.13%
Q1
0.00%
Min
0.00%

MCHP’s Dividend Payout Ratio of 123.62% is in the upper quartile for the Semiconductors & Semiconductor Equipment industry. This indicates a strong commitment to shareholder returns but also suggests that a smaller portion of earnings is retained for reinvestment compared to many peers.

GDS vs. MCHP: A comparison of their Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM) against their respective IT Services and Semiconductors & Semiconductor Equipment industry benchmarks.

Dividend at a Glance

SymbolGDSMCHP
Dividend Yield (TTM)0.00%2.91%
Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM)0.00%123.62%

Valuation

Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM)

GDS

12.57

IT Services Industry

Max
56.41
Q3
33.17
Median
23.17
Q1
16.18
Min
6.62

In the lower quartile for the IT Services industry, GDS’s P/E Ratio of 12.57 suggests the stock may be undervalued compared to its peers, potentially presenting an attractive entry point for investors.

MCHP

--

Semiconductors & Semiconductor Equipment Industry

Max
106.30
Q3
61.93
Median
38.96
Q1
23.71
Min
13.06

P/E Ratio data for MCHP is currently unavailable.

GDS vs. MCHP: A comparison of their Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM) against their respective IT Services and Semiconductors & Semiconductor Equipment industry benchmarks.

Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM)

GDS

5.39

IT Services Industry

Max
5.99
Q3
4.26
Median
1.93
Q1
0.97
Min
0.12

GDS’s P/S Ratio of 5.39 is in the upper echelon for the IT Services industry. This means the company is valued richly on its revenue stream compared to its peers, suggesting the stock is priced for a high level of future performance.

MCHP

8.14

Semiconductors & Semiconductor Equipment Industry

Max
19.99
Q3
10.21
Median
5.23
Q1
2.88
Min
1.13

MCHP’s P/S Ratio of 8.14 aligns with the market consensus for the Semiconductors & Semiconductor Equipment industry. This suggests its valuation, based on sales, is seen as standard and is on par with its competitors.

GDS vs. MCHP: A comparison of their Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM) against their respective IT Services and Semiconductors & Semiconductor Equipment industry benchmarks.

Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ)

GDS

1.61

IT Services Industry

Max
12.34
Q3
7.54
Median
3.84
Q1
2.52
Min
0.88

GDS’s P/B Ratio of 1.61 is in the lower quartile for the IT Services industry. From a value investing perspective, this is favorable, as it suggests the stock is trading at a discount to its net asset value and may offer a greater margin of safety.

MCHP

5.54

Semiconductors & Semiconductor Equipment Industry

Max
14.22
Q3
6.94
Median
4.29
Q1
1.99
Min
0.67

MCHP’s P/B Ratio of 5.54 is within the conventional range for the Semiconductors & Semiconductor Equipment industry. This shows a balanced market view, where the stock’s price is neither at a significant premium nor a discount to the book value of its peers.

GDS vs. MCHP: A comparison of their Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ) against their respective IT Services and Semiconductors & Semiconductor Equipment industry benchmarks.

Valuation at a Glance

SymbolGDSMCHP
Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM)12.57--
Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM)5.398.14
Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ)1.615.54
Price-to-Free Cash Flow Ratio (TTM)--47.51