Seek Returns logo

GDS vs. INTC: A Head-to-Head Stock Comparison

Updated on

Here’s a clear look at GDS and INTC, comparing key factors like historical performance, profitability, financial strength, growth, dividend, and valuation.

Company Profile

GDS trades as an American Depositary Receipt (ADR), offering U.S. investors a convenient way to access its foreign-listed shares. In contrast, INTC is a standard domestic listing.

SymbolGDSINTC
Company NameGDS Holdings LimitedIntel Corporation
CountryChinaUnited States
GICS SectorInformation TechnologyInformation Technology
GICS IndustryIT ServicesSemiconductors & Semiconductor Equipment
Market Capitalization5.75 billion USD168.91 billion USD
ExchangeNasdaqGMNasdaqGS
Listing DateNovember 2, 2016March 17, 1980
Security TypeADRCommon Stock

Historical Performance

This chart compares the performance of GDS and INTC by tracking the growth of an initial $10,000 investment in each. Use the tabs to select the desired time period. Data is adjusted for dividends and splits.

GDS vs. INTC: Growth of a $10,000 investment over the past one year.

Historical Performance at a Glance

SymbolGDSINTC
5-Day Price Return-9.57%-7.62%
13-Week Price Return-9.85%44.63%
26-Week Price Return7.99%57.45%
52-Week Price Return-19.97%42.54%
Month-to-Date Return-13.70%-11.18%
Year-to-Date Return29.30%77.16%
10-Day Avg. Volume5.28M76.40M
3-Month Avg. Volume10.11M114.78M
3-Month Volatility59.37%67.51%
Beta2.451.36

Profitability

Return on Equity (TTM)

GDS

19.17%

IT Services Industry

Max
37.08%
Q3
19.28%
Median
14.70%
Q1
6.70%
Min
-8.16%

GDS’s Return on Equity of 19.17% is on par with the norm for the IT Services industry, indicating its profitability relative to shareholder equity is typical for the sector.

INTC

0.20%

Semiconductors & Semiconductor Equipment Industry

Max
49.05%
Q3
22.19%
Median
7.96%
Q1
0.99%
Min
-15.65%

INTC’s Return on Equity of 0.20% is in the lower quartile for the Semiconductors & Semiconductor Equipment industry. This indicates a less efficient generation of profit from its equity base when compared to its competitors.

GDS vs. INTC: A comparison of their Return on Equity (TTM) against their respective IT Services and Semiconductors & Semiconductor Equipment industry benchmarks.

Net Profit Margin (TTM)

GDS

42.87%

IT Services Industry

Max
17.01%
Q3
11.02%
Median
6.91%
Q1
3.07%
Min
-5.13%

GDS’s Net Profit Margin of 42.87% is exceptionally high, placing it well beyond the typical range for the IT Services industry. This demonstrates outstanding operational efficiency and a strong competitive advantage in converting revenue into profit.

INTC

0.37%

Semiconductors & Semiconductor Equipment Industry

Max
52.41%
Q3
24.47%
Median
11.88%
Q1
0.60%
Min
-25.46%

Falling into the lower quartile for the Semiconductors & Semiconductor Equipment industry, INTC’s Net Profit Margin of 0.37% indicates weaker profitability. This means the company retains a smaller portion of each dollar in sales as profit compared to its competitors.

GDS vs. INTC: A comparison of their Net Profit Margin (TTM) against their respective IT Services and Semiconductors & Semiconductor Equipment industry benchmarks.

Operating Profit Margin (TTM)

GDS

22.44%

IT Services Industry

Max
23.01%
Q3
15.32%
Median
9.57%
Q1
4.91%
Min
-9.58%

An Operating Profit Margin of 22.44% places GDS in the upper quartile for the IT Services industry. This signals a strong ability to translate revenue into operating profit, outperforming most of its competitors in core business efficiency.

INTC

5.56%

Semiconductors & Semiconductor Equipment Industry

Max
58.09%
Q3
27.76%
Median
12.14%
Q1
3.29%
Min
-32.60%

INTC’s Operating Profit Margin of 5.56% is around the midpoint for the Semiconductors & Semiconductor Equipment industry, indicating that its efficiency in managing core business operations is typical for the sector.

GDS vs. INTC: A comparison of their Operating Profit Margin (TTM) against their respective IT Services and Semiconductors & Semiconductor Equipment industry benchmarks.

Profitability at a Glance

SymbolGDSINTC
Return on Equity (TTM)19.17%0.20%
Return on Assets (TTM)6.08%0.10%
Net Profit Margin (TTM)42.87%0.37%
Operating Profit Margin (TTM)22.44%5.56%
Gross Profit Margin (TTM)21.45%35.58%

Financial Strength

Current Ratio (MRQ)

GDS

2.00

IT Services Industry

Max
3.02
Q3
1.91
Median
1.36
Q1
1.02
Min
0.49

GDS’s Current Ratio of 2.00 is in the upper quartile for the IT Services industry. This signifies a strong liquidity position, suggesting the company is well-equipped to cover its immediate liabilities compared to its peers.

INTC

1.60

Semiconductors & Semiconductor Equipment Industry

Max
6.57
Q3
4.28
Median
2.86
Q1
2.22
Min
1.02

INTC’s Current Ratio of 1.60 falls into the lower quartile for the Semiconductors & Semiconductor Equipment industry. This indicates a tighter liquidity situation and a more constrained capacity to handle short-term debt than many of its competitors.

GDS vs. INTC: A comparison of their Current Ratio (MRQ) against their respective IT Services and Semiconductors & Semiconductor Equipment industry benchmarks.

Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ)

GDS

1.82

IT Services Industry

Max
2.55
Q3
1.30
Median
0.55
Q1
0.14
Min
0.00

GDS’s leverage is in the upper quartile of the IT Services industry, with a Debt-to-Equity Ratio of 1.82. While this approach can boost equity growth, it also exposes the company to greater financial vulnerability.

INTC

0.44

Semiconductors & Semiconductor Equipment Industry

Max
1.18
Q3
0.48
Median
0.24
Q1
0.01
Min
0.00

INTC’s Debt-to-Equity Ratio of 0.44 is typical for the Semiconductors & Semiconductor Equipment industry, indicating its use of leverage is in line with the sector norm. This suggests a balanced approach to its capital structure.

GDS vs. INTC: A comparison of their Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ) against their respective IT Services and Semiconductors & Semiconductor Equipment industry benchmarks.

Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM)

GDS

0.66

IT Services Industry

Max
129.00
Q3
56.00
Median
11.69
Q1
1.68
Min
-28.15

GDS’s Interest Coverage Ratio of 0.66 is a critical concern. A value below 1.0 means operating earnings are insufficient to cover interest expenses, indicating severe financial strain and high default risk.

INTC

151.43

Semiconductors & Semiconductor Equipment Industry

Max
174.00
Q3
81.21
Median
22.37
Q1
6.43
Min
-7.80

INTC’s Interest Coverage Ratio of 151.43 is in the upper quartile for the Semiconductors & Semiconductor Equipment industry, signifying a strong and healthy capacity to meet its interest payments from operating profits.

GDS vs. INTC: A comparison of their Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM) against their respective IT Services and Semiconductors & Semiconductor Equipment industry benchmarks.

Financial Strength at a Glance

SymbolGDSINTC
Current Ratio (MRQ)2.001.60
Quick Ratio (MRQ)1.931.25
Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ)1.820.44
Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM)0.66151.43

Growth

Revenue Growth

GDS vs. INTC: A side-by-side comparison of their Revenue Growth for the MRQ (YoY), TTM (YoY), 3-Year CAGR, and 5-Year CAGR periods.

EPS Growth

GDS vs. INTC: A side-by-side comparison of their EPS Growth for the MRQ (YoY), TTM (YoY), 3-Year CAGR, and 5-Year CAGR periods.

Dividend

Dividend Yield (TTM)

GDS

0.00%

IT Services Industry

Max
4.66%
Q3
2.02%
Median
0.66%
Q1
0.00%
Min
0.00%

GDS currently does not pay a dividend, resulting in a yield of 0%. This is a common strategy for growth-focused companies that prioritize reinvesting earnings, though it may be less typical in mature, income-oriented sectors.

INTC

0.00%

Semiconductors & Semiconductor Equipment Industry

Max
3.58%
Q3
1.59%
Median
0.61%
Q1
0.00%
Min
0.00%

INTC currently does not pay a dividend, resulting in a yield of 0%. This is a common strategy for growth-focused companies that prioritize reinvesting earnings, though it may be less typical in mature, income-oriented sectors.

GDS vs. INTC: A comparison of their Dividend Yield (TTM) against their respective IT Services and Semiconductors & Semiconductor Equipment industry benchmarks.

Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM)

GDS

0.00%

IT Services Industry

Max
93.78%
Q3
63.22%
Median
24.64%
Q1
0.00%
Min
0.00%

GDS has a Dividend Payout Ratio of 0%, indicating it does not currently pay a dividend. This is a common strategy for growth-oriented companies that reinvest all profits back into the business.

INTC

35.44%

Semiconductors & Semiconductor Equipment Industry

Max
211.90%
Q3
88.01%
Median
25.84%
Q1
0.00%
Min
0.00%

INTC’s Dividend Payout Ratio of 35.44% is within the typical range for the Semiconductors & Semiconductor Equipment industry, suggesting a balanced approach between shareholder payouts and company reinvestment.

GDS vs. INTC: A comparison of their Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM) against their respective IT Services and Semiconductors & Semiconductor Equipment industry benchmarks.

Dividend at a Glance

SymbolGDSINTC
Dividend Yield (TTM)0.00%0.00%
Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM)0.00%35.44%

Valuation

Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM)

GDS

9.32

IT Services Industry

Max
45.03
Q3
30.25
Median
21.01
Q1
16.50
Min
0.00

In the lower quartile for the IT Services industry, GDS’s P/E Ratio of 9.32 suggests the stock may be undervalued compared to its peers, potentially presenting an attractive entry point for investors.

INTC

857.40

Semiconductors & Semiconductor Equipment Industry

Max
95.58
Q3
58.67
Median
34.77
Q1
25.45
Min
12.63

At 857.40, INTC’s P/E Ratio is exceptionally high, exceeding the typical maximum for the Semiconductors & Semiconductor Equipment industry. This suggests the stock may be significantly overvalued compared to its peers and implies high market expectations that could be difficult to meet.

GDS vs. INTC: A comparison of their Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM) against their respective IT Services and Semiconductors & Semiconductor Equipment industry benchmarks.

Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM)

GDS

3.99

IT Services Industry

Max
5.24
Q3
4.01
Median
2.18
Q1
1.08
Min
0.00

GDS’s P/S Ratio of 3.99 aligns with the market consensus for the IT Services industry. This suggests its valuation, based on sales, is seen as standard and is on par with its competitors.

INTC

3.18

Semiconductors & Semiconductor Equipment Industry

Max
18.34
Q3
10.38
Median
5.38
Q1
2.49
Min
0.32

INTC’s P/S Ratio of 3.18 aligns with the market consensus for the Semiconductors & Semiconductor Equipment industry. This suggests its valuation, based on sales, is seen as standard and is on par with its competitors.

GDS vs. INTC: A comparison of their Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM) against their respective IT Services and Semiconductors & Semiconductor Equipment industry benchmarks.

Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ)

GDS

1.61

IT Services Industry

Max
9.42
Q3
5.79
Median
3.70
Q1
2.30
Min
0.79

GDS’s P/B Ratio of 1.61 is in the lower quartile for the IT Services industry. From a value investing perspective, this is favorable, as it suggests the stock is trading at a discount to its net asset value and may offer a greater margin of safety.

INTC

1.51

Semiconductors & Semiconductor Equipment Industry

Max
16.22
Q3
8.33
Median
4.39
Q1
1.79
Min
0.30

INTC’s P/B Ratio of 1.51 is in the lower quartile for the Semiconductors & Semiconductor Equipment industry. From a value investing perspective, this is favorable, as it suggests the stock is trading at a discount to its net asset value and may offer a greater margin of safety.

GDS vs. INTC: A comparison of their Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ) against their respective IT Services and Semiconductors & Semiconductor Equipment industry benchmarks.

Valuation at a Glance

SymbolGDSINTC
Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM)9.32857.40
Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM)3.993.18
Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ)1.611.51
Price-to-Free Cash Flow Ratio (TTM)--1,403.01