Seek Returns logo

GDS vs. GTM: A Head-to-Head Stock Comparison

Updated on

Here’s a clear look at GDS and GTM, comparing key factors like historical performance, profitability, financial strength, growth, dividend, and valuation.

Company Profile

GDS trades as an American Depositary Receipt (ADR), offering U.S. investors a convenient way to access its foreign-listed shares. In contrast, GTM is a standard domestic listing.

SymbolGDSGTM
Company NameGDS Holdings LimitedZoomInfo Technologies Inc.
CountryChinaUnited States
GICS SectorInformation TechnologyCommunication Services
GICS IndustryIT ServicesInteractive Media & Services
Market Capitalization7.79 billion USD3.32 billion USD
ExchangeNasdaqGMNasdaqGS
Listing DateNovember 2, 2016June 4, 2020
Security TypeADRCommon Stock

Historical Performance

This chart compares the performance of GDS and GTM by tracking the growth of an initial $10,000 investment in each. Use the tabs to select the desired time period. Data is adjusted for dividends and splits.

GDS vs. GTM: Growth of a $10,000 investment over the past one year.

Historical Performance at a Glance

SymbolGDSGTM
5-Day Price Return0.71%-10.21%
13-Week Price Return23.16%1.61%
26-Week Price Return53.06%--
52-Week Price Return-19.97%--
Month-to-Date Return-0.90%-4.45%
Year-to-Date Return74.21%3.94%
10-Day Avg. Volume12.52M3.72M
3-Month Avg. Volume10.14M4.51M
3-Month Volatility62.59%50.71%
Beta1.881.92

Profitability

Return on Equity (TTM)

GDS

19.17%

IT Services Industry

Max
32.78%
Q3
19.28%
Median
13.86%
Q1
5.50%
Min
-10.00%

GDS’s Return on Equity of 19.17% is on par with the norm for the IT Services industry, indicating its profitability relative to shareholder equity is typical for the sector.

GTM

5.44%

Interactive Media & Services Industry

Max
49.37%
Q3
33.08%
Median
10.37%
Q1
5.76%
Min
-24.17%

GTM’s Return on Equity of 5.44% is in the lower quartile for the Interactive Media & Services industry. This indicates a less efficient generation of profit from its equity base when compared to its competitors.

GDS vs. GTM: A comparison of their Return on Equity (TTM) against their respective IT Services and Interactive Media & Services industry benchmarks.

Net Profit Margin (TTM)

GDS

42.87%

IT Services Industry

Max
19.71%
Q3
11.01%
Median
6.66%
Q1
2.96%
Min
-6.22%

GDS’s Net Profit Margin of 42.87% is exceptionally high, placing it well beyond the typical range for the IT Services industry. This demonstrates outstanding operational efficiency and a strong competitive advantage in converting revenue into profit.

GTM

7.28%

Interactive Media & Services Industry

Max
49.74%
Q3
29.54%
Median
20.53%
Q1
7.52%
Min
-14.52%

Falling into the lower quartile for the Interactive Media & Services industry, GTM’s Net Profit Margin of 7.28% indicates weaker profitability. This means the company retains a smaller portion of each dollar in sales as profit compared to its competitors.

GDS vs. GTM: A comparison of their Net Profit Margin (TTM) against their respective IT Services and Interactive Media & Services industry benchmarks.

Operating Profit Margin (TTM)

GDS

22.44%

IT Services Industry

Max
22.44%
Q3
14.90%
Median
8.82%
Q1
4.91%
Min
-9.89%

An Operating Profit Margin of 22.44% places GDS in the upper quartile for the IT Services industry. This signals a strong ability to translate revenue into operating profit, outperforming most of its competitors in core business efficiency.

GTM

13.26%

Interactive Media & Services Industry

Max
65.96%
Q3
36.82%
Median
18.53%
Q1
7.69%
Min
-18.13%

GTM’s Operating Profit Margin of 13.26% is around the midpoint for the Interactive Media & Services industry, indicating that its efficiency in managing core business operations is typical for the sector.

GDS vs. GTM: A comparison of their Operating Profit Margin (TTM) against their respective IT Services and Interactive Media & Services industry benchmarks.

Profitability at a Glance

SymbolGDSGTM
Return on Equity (TTM)19.17%5.44%
Return on Assets (TTM)6.08%1.39%
Net Profit Margin (TTM)42.87%7.28%
Operating Profit Margin (TTM)22.44%13.26%
Gross Profit Margin (TTM)21.45%83.90%

Financial Strength

Current Ratio (MRQ)

GDS

2.00

IT Services Industry

Max
3.17
Q3
2.00
Median
1.47
Q1
1.05
Min
0.52

GDS’s Current Ratio of 2.00 aligns with the median group of the IT Services industry, indicating that its short-term liquidity is in line with its sector peers.

GTM

0.71

Interactive Media & Services Industry

Max
3.92
Q3
2.72
Median
1.85
Q1
1.20
Min
0.25

GTM’s Current Ratio of 0.71 falls into the lower quartile for the Interactive Media & Services industry. This indicates a tighter liquidity situation and a more constrained capacity to handle short-term debt than many of its competitors.

GDS vs. GTM: A comparison of their Current Ratio (MRQ) against their respective IT Services and Interactive Media & Services industry benchmarks.

Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ)

GDS

1.82

IT Services Industry

Max
3.11
Q3
1.55
Median
0.55
Q1
0.17
Min
0.00

GDS’s leverage is in the upper quartile of the IT Services industry, with a Debt-to-Equity Ratio of 1.82. While this approach can boost equity growth, it also exposes the company to greater financial vulnerability.

GTM

0.85

Interactive Media & Services Industry

Max
0.85
Q3
0.49
Median
0.29
Q1
0.04
Min
0.00

GTM’s leverage is in the upper quartile of the Interactive Media & Services industry, with a Debt-to-Equity Ratio of 0.85. While this approach can boost equity growth, it also exposes the company to greater financial vulnerability.

GDS vs. GTM: A comparison of their Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ) against their respective IT Services and Interactive Media & Services industry benchmarks.

Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM)

GDS

0.66

IT Services Industry

Max
129.00
Q3
56.00
Median
11.69
Q1
0.77
Min
-28.15

GDS’s Interest Coverage Ratio of 0.66 is a critical concern. A value below 1.0 means operating earnings are insufficient to cover interest expenses, indicating severe financial strain and high default risk.

GTM

2.05

Interactive Media & Services Industry

Max
23.65
Q3
16.48
Median
6.73
Q1
-0.87
Min
-3.62

GTM’s Interest Coverage Ratio of 2.05 is positioned comfortably within the norm for the Interactive Media & Services industry, indicating a standard and healthy capacity to cover its interest payments.

GDS vs. GTM: A comparison of their Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM) against their respective IT Services and Interactive Media & Services industry benchmarks.

Financial Strength at a Glance

SymbolGDSGTM
Current Ratio (MRQ)2.000.71
Quick Ratio (MRQ)1.930.62
Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ)1.820.85
Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM)0.662.05

Growth

Revenue Growth

GDS vs. GTM: A side-by-side comparison of their Revenue Growth for the MRQ (YoY), TTM (YoY), 3-Year CAGR, and 5-Year CAGR periods.

EPS Growth

GDS vs. GTM: A side-by-side comparison of their EPS Growth for the MRQ (YoY), TTM (YoY), 3-Year CAGR, and 5-Year CAGR periods.

Dividend

Dividend Yield (TTM)

GDS

0.00%

IT Services Industry

Max
2.79%
Q3
1.76%
Median
0.58%
Q1
0.00%
Min
0.00%

GDS currently does not pay a dividend, resulting in a yield of 0%. This is a common strategy for growth-focused companies that prioritize reinvesting earnings, though it may be less typical in mature, income-oriented sectors.

GTM

0.00%

Interactive Media & Services Industry

Max
3.07%
Q3
1.27%
Median
0.28%
Q1
0.00%
Min
0.00%

GTM currently does not pay a dividend, resulting in a yield of 0%. This is a common strategy for growth-focused companies that prioritize reinvesting earnings, though it may be less typical in mature, income-oriented sectors.

GDS vs. GTM: A comparison of their Dividend Yield (TTM) against their respective IT Services and Interactive Media & Services industry benchmarks.

Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM)

GDS

0.00%

IT Services Industry

Max
107.85%
Q3
52.62%
Median
22.53%
Q1
0.00%
Min
0.00%

GDS has a Dividend Payout Ratio of 0%, indicating it does not currently pay a dividend. This is a common strategy for growth-oriented companies that reinvest all profits back into the business.

GTM

0.00%

Interactive Media & Services Industry

Max
101.53%
Q3
40.64%
Median
0.00%
Q1
0.00%
Min
0.00%

GTM has a Dividend Payout Ratio of 0%, indicating it does not currently pay a dividend. This is a common strategy for growth-oriented companies that reinvest all profits back into the business.

GDS vs. GTM: A comparison of their Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM) against their respective IT Services and Interactive Media & Services industry benchmarks.

Dividend at a Glance

SymbolGDSGTM
Dividend Yield (TTM)0.00%0.00%
Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM)0.00%0.00%

Valuation

Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM)

GDS

12.94

IT Services Industry

Max
56.41
Q3
33.17
Median
23.17
Q1
16.18
Min
6.62

In the lower quartile for the IT Services industry, GDS’s P/E Ratio of 12.94 suggests the stock may be undervalued compared to its peers, potentially presenting an attractive entry point for investors.

GTM

37.24

Interactive Media & Services Industry

Max
50.72
Q3
41.60
Median
25.84
Q1
18.18
Min
1.76

GTM’s P/E Ratio of 37.24 is within the middle range for the Interactive Media & Services industry. This suggests its valuation is in line with the sector average, representing neither a significant premium nor a discount compared to its peers.

GDS vs. GTM: A comparison of their Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM) against their respective IT Services and Interactive Media & Services industry benchmarks.

Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM)

GDS

5.55

IT Services Industry

Max
5.99
Q3
4.26
Median
1.93
Q1
0.97
Min
0.12

GDS’s P/S Ratio of 5.55 is in the upper echelon for the IT Services industry. This means the company is valued richly on its revenue stream compared to its peers, suggesting the stock is priced for a high level of future performance.

GTM

2.71

Interactive Media & Services Industry

Max
23.76
Q3
11.40
Median
7.69
Q1
2.49
Min
0.00

GTM’s P/S Ratio of 2.71 aligns with the market consensus for the Interactive Media & Services industry. This suggests its valuation, based on sales, is seen as standard and is on par with its competitors.

GDS vs. GTM: A comparison of their Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM) against their respective IT Services and Interactive Media & Services industry benchmarks.

Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ)

GDS

1.62

IT Services Industry

Max
12.34
Q3
7.54
Median
3.84
Q1
2.52
Min
0.88

GDS’s P/B Ratio of 1.62 is in the lower quartile for the IT Services industry. From a value investing perspective, this is favorable, as it suggests the stock is trading at a discount to its net asset value and may offer a greater margin of safety.

GTM

2.21

Interactive Media & Services Industry

Max
16.71
Q3
9.00
Median
3.97
Q1
2.19
Min
0.33

GTM’s P/B Ratio of 2.21 is within the conventional range for the Interactive Media & Services industry. This shows a balanced market view, where the stock’s price is neither at a significant premium nor a discount to the book value of its peers.

GDS vs. GTM: A comparison of their Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ) against their respective IT Services and Interactive Media & Services industry benchmarks.

Valuation at a Glance

SymbolGDSGTM
Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM)12.9437.24
Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM)5.552.71
Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ)1.622.21
Price-to-Free Cash Flow Ratio (TTM)--11.97