GDDY vs. NET: A Head-to-Head Stock Comparison
UpdatedHere’s a clear look at GDDY and NET, comparing key factors like performance, valuation metrics, dividends, and financial strength. It’s built for investors or anyone curious to see how these two stocks match up.
Company Overview
NET towers over GDDY with a market cap of 54.25 billion USD, roughly 2.08 times the 26.15 billion USD of its peer.
NET dances to a riskier tune, sporting a beta of 1.78, while GDDY keeps it calmer at 1.13.
Symbol | GDDY | NET |
---|---|---|
Company Name | GoDaddy Inc. | Cloudflare, Inc. |
Country | US | US |
Sector | Technology | Technology |
Industry | Software - Infrastructure | Software - Infrastructure |
CEO | Mr. Amanpal Singh Bhutani | Mr. Matthew Prince J.D. |
Price | 183.49 USD | 156.52 USD |
Market Cap | 26.15 billion USD | 54.25 billion USD |
Beta | 1.127 | 1.785 |
Exchange | NYSE | NYSE |
IPO Date | March 31, 2015 | September 13, 2019 |
ADR | No | No |
Performance Comparison
This chart compares the performance of GDDY and NET over the past year by tracking the growth of an initial $10,000 investment in each (starting one year ago).
Hover over the lines to see the investment’s value and total return (%) at specific dates.
Data is adjusted for dividends and splits.
Valuation Metrics Comparison
The section examines key financial ratios to assess the valuation of GDDY and NET based on earnings, cash flow, sales, and book value. Pay attention to the following notable points where extreme values stand out.
- NET shows a negative P/E of -662.24, highlighting a year of losses with no net profit generated. Meanwhile, GDDY at 34.44 has sustained positive earnings, offering a more stable earnings foundation.
Symbol | GDDY | NET |
---|---|---|
Price-to-Earnings Ratio (P/E, TTM) | 34.44 | -662.24 |
Forward PEG Ratio (TTM) | 1.34 | 6.62 |
Price-to-Sales Ratio (P/S, TTM) | 5.61 | 30.65 |
Price-to-Book Ratio (P/B, TTM) | 130.18 | 37.95 |
Price-to-Free Cash Flow Ratio (P/FCF, TTM) | 19.09 | 294.56 |
EV-to-EBITDA (TTM) | 30.44 | 627.17 |
EV-to-Sales (TTM) | 5.48 | 31.37 |
EV-to-Free Cash Flow (TTM) | 18.63 | 301.47 |
Dividend Comparison
Neither GDDY nor NET pays dividends, suggesting both reinvest all profits into growth—likely expansion or innovation—favoring long-term value over immediate income.
Symbol | GDDY | NET |
---|---|---|
Dividend Yield (TTM) | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Financial Strength Metrics Comparison
This section dives into the financial resilience of GDDY and NET, spotlighting key metrics like liquidity, leverage, and debt coverage. Check out the standout observations below where notable differences or extremes pop up.
- GDDY posts a current ratio of 0.56 under 1, where current assets fall short of covering short-term debts—manageable perhaps with solid cash inflows. Compare that to NET, sitting at 3.20, where liabilities are comfortably met.
- GDDY’s quick ratio sits at 0.56 below 0.8, leaving its cash and near-cash assets shy of short-term obligations—potentially a stretch without extra funds. Meanwhile, NET lands at 3.20, with enough liquidity to spare.
- NET’s -27.68 sits under 1.5, where earnings hug interest costs too closely—a squeeze if income dips. Meanwhile, GDDY at 9.41 has room to breathe.
Symbol | GDDY | NET |
---|---|---|
Current Ratio (TTM) | 0.56 | 3.20 |
Quick Ratio (TTM) | 0.56 | 3.20 |
Debt-to-Equity Ratio (TTM) | 0.45 | 1.04 |
Debt-to-Assets Ratio (TTM) | 0.01 | 0.40 |
Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM) | 9.41 | -27.68 |