Seek Returns logo

GD vs. MTZ: A Head-to-Head Stock Comparison

Updated on

Here’s a clear look at GD and MTZ, comparing key factors like historical performance, profitability, financial strength, growth, dividend, and valuation.

Company Profile

SymbolGDMTZ
Company NameGeneral Dynamics CorporationMasTec, Inc.
CountryUnited StatesUnited States
GICS SectorIndustrialsIndustrials
GICS IndustryAerospace & DefenseConstruction & Engineering
Market Capitalization85.40 billion USD13.61 billion USD
ExchangeNYSENYSE
Listing DateJanuary 2, 1962February 21, 1973
Security TypeCommon StockCommon Stock

Historical Performance

This chart compares the performance of GD and MTZ by tracking the growth of an initial $10,000 investment in each. Use the tabs to select the desired time period. Data is adjusted for dividends and splits.

GD vs. MTZ: Growth of a $10,000 investment over the past one year.

Historical Performance at a Glance

SymbolGDMTZ
5-Day Price Return0.52%-3.08%
13-Week Price Return12.83%9.63%
26-Week Price Return28.97%25.97%
52-Week Price Return7.40%52.42%
Month-to-Date Return1.88%-8.83%
Year-to-Date Return20.49%26.72%
10-Day Avg. Volume0.91M0.84M
3-Month Avg. Volume1.21M0.90M
3-Month Volatility17.95%28.73%
Beta0.481.83

Profitability

Return on Equity (TTM)

GD

17.99%

Aerospace & Defense Industry

Max
43.89%
Q3
22.42%
Median
12.50%
Q1
5.21%
Min
-6.24%

GD’s Return on Equity of 17.99% is on par with the norm for the Aerospace & Defense industry, indicating its profitability relative to shareholder equity is typical for the sector.

MTZ

9.20%

Construction & Engineering Industry

Max
29.61%
Q3
17.18%
Median
10.42%
Q1
8.10%
Min
-0.10%

MTZ’s Return on Equity of 9.20% is on par with the norm for the Construction & Engineering industry, indicating its profitability relative to shareholder equity is typical for the sector.

GD vs. MTZ: A comparison of their Return on Equity (TTM) against their respective Aerospace & Defense and Construction & Engineering industry benchmarks.

Net Profit Margin (TTM)

GD

8.13%

Aerospace & Defense Industry

Max
14.54%
Q3
8.08%
Median
6.17%
Q1
2.49%
Min
-1.63%

A Net Profit Margin of 8.13% places GD in the upper quartile for the Aerospace & Defense industry, signifying strong profitability and more effective cost management than most of its peers.

MTZ

2.04%

Construction & Engineering Industry

Max
11.14%
Q3
6.17%
Median
3.85%
Q1
2.40%
Min
-0.05%

Falling into the lower quartile for the Construction & Engineering industry, MTZ’s Net Profit Margin of 2.04% indicates weaker profitability. This means the company retains a smaller portion of each dollar in sales as profit compared to its competitors.

GD vs. MTZ: A comparison of their Net Profit Margin (TTM) against their respective Aerospace & Defense and Construction & Engineering industry benchmarks.

Operating Profit Margin (TTM)

GD

10.30%

Aerospace & Defense Industry

Max
16.63%
Q3
10.38%
Median
8.29%
Q1
6.21%
Min
0.95%

GD’s Operating Profit Margin of 10.30% is around the midpoint for the Aerospace & Defense industry, indicating that its efficiency in managing core business operations is typical for the sector.

MTZ

3.86%

Construction & Engineering Industry

Max
17.56%
Q3
9.36%
Median
5.46%
Q1
3.47%
Min
-1.93%

MTZ’s Operating Profit Margin of 3.86% is around the midpoint for the Construction & Engineering industry, indicating that its efficiency in managing core business operations is typical for the sector.

GD vs. MTZ: A comparison of their Operating Profit Margin (TTM) against their respective Aerospace & Defense and Construction & Engineering industry benchmarks.

Profitability at a Glance

SymbolGDMTZ
Return on Equity (TTM)17.99%9.20%
Return on Assets (TTM)7.21%2.97%
Net Profit Margin (TTM)8.13%2.04%
Operating Profit Margin (TTM)10.30%3.86%
Gross Profit Margin (TTM)15.40%12.65%

Financial Strength

Current Ratio (MRQ)

GD

1.36

Aerospace & Defense Industry

Max
3.09
Q3
1.98
Median
1.23
Q1
1.03
Min
0.02

GD’s Current Ratio of 1.36 aligns with the median group of the Aerospace & Defense industry, indicating that its short-term liquidity is in line with its sector peers.

MTZ

1.22

Construction & Engineering Industry

Max
1.98
Q3
1.53
Median
1.24
Q1
1.05
Min
0.66

MTZ’s Current Ratio of 1.22 aligns with the median group of the Construction & Engineering industry, indicating that its short-term liquidity is in line with its sector peers.

GD vs. MTZ: A comparison of their Current Ratio (MRQ) against their respective Aerospace & Defense and Construction & Engineering industry benchmarks.

Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ)

GD

0.37

Aerospace & Defense Industry

Max
1.70
Q3
1.04
Median
0.68
Q1
0.41
Min
0.00

Falling into the lower quartile for the Aerospace & Defense industry, GD’s Debt-to-Equity Ratio of 0.37 points to a conservative financing strategy. This results in lower financial risk but potentially limits strategic investments compared to more leveraged competitors.

MTZ

0.77

Construction & Engineering Industry

Max
2.49
Q3
1.19
Median
0.63
Q1
0.29
Min
0.00

MTZ’s Debt-to-Equity Ratio of 0.77 is typical for the Construction & Engineering industry, indicating its use of leverage is in line with the sector norm. This suggests a balanced approach to its capital structure.

GD vs. MTZ: A comparison of their Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ) against their respective Aerospace & Defense and Construction & Engineering industry benchmarks.

Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM)

GD

15.01

Aerospace & Defense Industry

Max
36.57
Q3
19.90
Median
7.04
Q1
2.40
Min
-7.63

GD’s Interest Coverage Ratio of 15.01 is positioned comfortably within the norm for the Aerospace & Defense industry, indicating a standard and healthy capacity to cover its interest payments.

MTZ

2.54

Construction & Engineering Industry

Max
23.59
Q3
14.49
Median
8.20
Q1
5.26
Min
-6.49

In the lower quartile for the Construction & Engineering industry, MTZ’s Interest Coverage Ratio of 2.54 indicates a tighter cushion for servicing debt, suggesting less financial flexibility than many of its competitors.

GD vs. MTZ: A comparison of their Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM) against their respective Aerospace & Defense and Construction & Engineering industry benchmarks.

Financial Strength at a Glance

SymbolGDMTZ
Current Ratio (MRQ)1.361.22
Quick Ratio (MRQ)0.831.14
Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ)0.370.77
Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM)15.012.54

Growth

Revenue Growth

GD vs. MTZ: A side-by-side comparison of their Revenue Growth for the MRQ (YoY), TTM (YoY), 3-Year CAGR, and 5-Year CAGR periods.

EPS Growth

GD vs. MTZ: A side-by-side comparison of their EPS Growth for the MRQ (YoY), TTM (YoY), 3-Year CAGR, and 5-Year CAGR periods.

Dividend

Dividend Yield (TTM)

GD

1.83%

Aerospace & Defense Industry

Max
2.03%
Q3
1.22%
Median
0.43%
Q1
0.00%
Min
0.00%

With a Dividend Yield of 1.83%, GD offers a more attractive income stream than most of its peers in the Aerospace & Defense industry, signaling a strong commitment to shareholder returns.

MTZ

0.00%

Construction & Engineering Industry

Max
6.28%
Q3
3.25%
Median
2.02%
Q1
0.23%
Min
0.00%

MTZ currently does not pay a dividend, resulting in a yield of 0%. This is a common strategy for growth-focused companies that prioritize reinvesting earnings, though it may be less typical in mature, income-oriented sectors.

GD vs. MTZ: A comparison of their Dividend Yield (TTM) against their respective Aerospace & Defense and Construction & Engineering industry benchmarks.

Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM)

GD

38.28%

Aerospace & Defense Industry

Max
83.87%
Q3
49.90%
Median
16.48%
Q1
0.00%
Min
0.00%

GD’s Dividend Payout Ratio of 38.28% is within the typical range for the Aerospace & Defense industry, suggesting a balanced approach between shareholder payouts and company reinvestment.

MTZ

0.00%

Construction & Engineering Industry

Max
139.17%
Q3
69.47%
Median
40.99%
Q1
10.51%
Min
0.00%

MTZ has a Dividend Payout Ratio of 0%, indicating it does not currently pay a dividend. This is a common strategy for growth-oriented companies that reinvest all profits back into the business.

GD vs. MTZ: A comparison of their Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM) against their respective Aerospace & Defense and Construction & Engineering industry benchmarks.

Dividend at a Glance

SymbolGDMTZ
Dividend Yield (TTM)1.83%0.00%
Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM)38.28%0.00%

Valuation

Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM)

GD

20.88

Aerospace & Defense Industry

Max
65.97
Q3
54.11
Median
34.53
Q1
23.66
Min
0.00

In the lower quartile for the Aerospace & Defense industry, GD’s P/E Ratio of 20.88 suggests the stock may be undervalued compared to its peers, potentially presenting an attractive entry point for investors.

MTZ

51.22

Construction & Engineering Industry

Max
36.96
Q3
24.81
Median
15.45
Q1
12.51
Min
2.74

At 51.22, MTZ’s P/E Ratio is exceptionally high, exceeding the typical maximum for the Construction & Engineering industry. This suggests the stock may be significantly overvalued compared to its peers and implies high market expectations that could be difficult to meet.

GD vs. MTZ: A comparison of their Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM) against their respective Aerospace & Defense and Construction & Engineering industry benchmarks.

Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM)

GD

1.70

Aerospace & Defense Industry

Max
8.07
Q3
4.49
Median
2.42
Q1
1.39
Min
0.00

GD’s P/S Ratio of 1.70 aligns with the market consensus for the Aerospace & Defense industry. This suggests its valuation, based on sales, is seen as standard and is on par with its competitors.

MTZ

1.04

Construction & Engineering Industry

Max
3.22
Q3
1.63
Median
0.61
Q1
0.48
Min
0.11

MTZ’s P/S Ratio of 1.04 aligns with the market consensus for the Construction & Engineering industry. This suggests its valuation, based on sales, is seen as standard and is on par with its competitors.

GD vs. MTZ: A comparison of their Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM) against their respective Aerospace & Defense and Construction & Engineering industry benchmarks.

Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ)

GD

3.32

Aerospace & Defense Industry

Max
13.67
Q3
7.92
Median
4.65
Q1
2.68
Min
0.82

GD’s P/B Ratio of 3.32 is within the conventional range for the Aerospace & Defense industry. This shows a balanced market view, where the stock’s price is neither at a significant premium nor a discount to the book value of its peers.

MTZ

4.56

Construction & Engineering Industry

Max
5.74
Q3
3.33
Median
1.49
Q1
1.20
Min
0.23

MTZ’s P/B Ratio of 4.56 is in the upper tier for the Construction & Engineering industry. This indicates that investors are paying a premium relative to the company’s net assets, a valuation that hinges on its ability to generate superior profits.

GD vs. MTZ: A comparison of their Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ) against their respective Aerospace & Defense and Construction & Engineering industry benchmarks.

Valuation at a Glance

SymbolGDMTZ
Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM)20.8851.22
Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM)1.701.04
Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ)3.324.56
Price-to-Free Cash Flow Ratio (TTM)19.3414.77