Seek Returns logo

G vs. GDS: A Head-to-Head Stock Comparison

Updated on

Here’s a clear look at G and GDS, comparing key factors like historical performance, profitability, financial strength, growth, dividend, and valuation.

Company Profile

G is a standard domestic listing, while GDS trades as an American Depositary Receipt (ADR), offering U.S. investors access to its foreign-listed shares.

SymbolGGDS
Company NameGenpact LimitedGDS Holdings Limited
CountryBermudaChina
GICS SectorIndustrialsInformation Technology
GICS IndustryProfessional ServicesIT Services
Market Capitalization7.67 billion USD6.76 billion USD
ExchangeNYSENasdaqGM
Listing DateAugust 2, 2007November 2, 2016
Security TypeCommon StockADR

Historical Performance

This chart compares the performance of G and GDS by tracking the growth of an initial $10,000 investment in each. Use the tabs to select the desired time period. Data is adjusted for dividends and splits.

G vs. GDS: Growth of a $10,000 investment over the past one year.

Historical Performance at a Glance

SymbolGGDS
5-Day Price Return0.78%-4.28%
13-Week Price Return-0.14%11.79%
26-Week Price Return-20.71%-4.13%
52-Week Price Return13.92%-19.97%
Month-to-Date Return-0.02%-11.83%
Year-to-Date Return2.54%37.28%
10-Day Avg. Volume2.12M10.23M
3-Month Avg. Volume1.70M8.68M
3-Month Volatility24.73%62.39%
Beta0.921.54

Profitability

Return on Equity (TTM)

G

21.92%

Professional Services Industry

Max
52.17%
Q3
30.06%
Median
22.21%
Q1
11.67%
Min
-13.44%

G’s Return on Equity of 21.92% is on par with the norm for the Professional Services industry, indicating its profitability relative to shareholder equity is typical for the sector.

GDS

19.12%

IT Services Industry

Max
29.51%
Q3
16.98%
Median
13.47%
Q1
7.93%
Min
-3.97%

In the upper quartile for the IT Services industry, GDS’s Return on Equity of 19.12% signals a highly effective use of shareholder capital to drive profitability compared to most of its peers.

G vs. GDS: A comparison of their Return on Equity (TTM) against their respective Professional Services and IT Services industry benchmarks.

Net Profit Margin (TTM)

G

10.92%

Professional Services Industry

Max
26.06%
Q3
13.34%
Median
7.88%
Q1
3.50%
Min
-2.93%

G’s Net Profit Margin of 10.92% is aligned with the median group of its peers in the Professional Services industry. This indicates its ability to convert revenue into profit is typical for the sector.

GDS

41.75%

IT Services Industry

Max
19.82%
Q3
11.49%
Median
6.67%
Q1
3.61%
Min
-4.62%

GDS’s Net Profit Margin of 41.75% is exceptionally high, placing it well beyond the typical range for the IT Services industry. This demonstrates outstanding operational efficiency and a strong competitive advantage in converting revenue into profit.

G vs. GDS: A comparison of their Net Profit Margin (TTM) against their respective Professional Services and IT Services industry benchmarks.

Operating Profit Margin (TTM)

G

14.91%

Professional Services Industry

Max
35.84%
Q3
19.38%
Median
12.54%
Q1
7.36%
Min
-5.21%

G’s Operating Profit Margin of 14.91% is around the midpoint for the Professional Services industry, indicating that its efficiency in managing core business operations is typical for the sector.

GDS

21.69%

IT Services Industry

Max
21.69%
Q3
14.50%
Median
10.06%
Q1
6.98%
Min
0.06%

An Operating Profit Margin of 21.69% places GDS in the upper quartile for the IT Services industry. This signals a strong ability to translate revenue into operating profit, outperforming most of its competitors in core business efficiency.

G vs. GDS: A comparison of their Operating Profit Margin (TTM) against their respective Professional Services and IT Services industry benchmarks.

Profitability at a Glance

SymbolGGDS
Return on Equity (TTM)21.92%19.12%
Return on Assets (TTM)10.50%5.88%
Net Profit Margin (TTM)10.92%41.75%
Operating Profit Margin (TTM)14.91%21.69%
Gross Profit Margin (TTM)35.63%21.12%

Financial Strength

Current Ratio (MRQ)

G

1.53

Professional Services Industry

Max
2.45
Q3
1.65
Median
1.26
Q1
1.10
Min
0.47

G’s Current Ratio of 1.53 aligns with the median group of the Professional Services industry, indicating that its short-term liquidity is in line with its sector peers.

GDS

1.47

IT Services Industry

Max
2.42
Q3
1.81
Median
1.47
Q1
1.09
Min
0.44

GDS’s Current Ratio of 1.47 aligns with the median group of the IT Services industry, indicating that its short-term liquidity is in line with its sector peers.

G vs. GDS: A comparison of their Current Ratio (MRQ) against their respective Professional Services and IT Services industry benchmarks.

Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ)

G

0.51

Professional Services Industry

Max
2.63
Q3
1.44
Median
0.91
Q1
0.49
Min
0.00

G’s Debt-to-Equity Ratio of 0.51 is typical for the Professional Services industry, indicating its use of leverage is in line with the sector norm. This suggests a balanced approach to its capital structure.

GDS

1.75

IT Services Industry

Max
2.33
Q3
1.17
Median
0.54
Q1
0.15
Min
0.00

GDS’s leverage is in the upper quartile of the IT Services industry, with a Debt-to-Equity Ratio of 1.75. While this approach can boost equity growth, it also exposes the company to greater financial vulnerability.

G vs. GDS: A comparison of their Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ) against their respective Professional Services and IT Services industry benchmarks.

Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM)

G

16.29

Professional Services Industry

Max
39.67
Q3
20.05
Median
11.07
Q1
5.36
Min
-2.22

G’s Interest Coverage Ratio of 16.29 is positioned comfortably within the norm for the Professional Services industry, indicating a standard and healthy capacity to cover its interest payments.

GDS

0.66

IT Services Industry

Max
144.50
Q3
84.49
Median
13.76
Q1
2.59
Min
-28.13

GDS’s Interest Coverage Ratio of 0.66 is a critical concern. A value below 1.0 means operating earnings are insufficient to cover interest expenses, indicating severe financial strain and high default risk.

G vs. GDS: A comparison of their Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM) against their respective Professional Services and IT Services industry benchmarks.

Financial Strength at a Glance

SymbolGGDS
Current Ratio (MRQ)1.531.47
Quick Ratio (MRQ)1.451.29
Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ)0.511.75
Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM)16.290.66

Growth

Revenue Growth

G vs. GDS: A side-by-side comparison of their Revenue Growth for the MRQ (YoY), TTM (YoY), 3-Year CAGR, and 5-Year CAGR periods.

EPS Growth

G vs. GDS: A side-by-side comparison of their EPS Growth for the MRQ (YoY), TTM (YoY), 3-Year CAGR, and 5-Year CAGR periods.

Dividend

Dividend Yield (TTM)

G

1.46%

Professional Services Industry

Max
5.28%
Q3
2.51%
Median
1.63%
Q1
0.62%
Min
0.00%

G’s Dividend Yield of 1.46% is consistent with its peers in the Professional Services industry, providing a dividend return that is standard for its sector.

GDS

0.00%

IT Services Industry

Max
2.80%
Q3
1.74%
Median
0.62%
Q1
0.00%
Min
0.00%

GDS currently does not pay a dividend, resulting in a yield of 0%. This is a common strategy for growth-focused companies that prioritize reinvesting earnings, though it may be less typical in mature, income-oriented sectors.

G vs. GDS: A comparison of their Dividend Yield (TTM) against their respective Professional Services and IT Services industry benchmarks.

Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM)

G

21.00%

Professional Services Industry

Max
109.23%
Q3
64.39%
Median
47.00%
Q1
20.35%
Min
0.00%

G’s Dividend Payout Ratio of 21.00% is within the typical range for the Professional Services industry, suggesting a balanced approach between shareholder payouts and company reinvestment.

GDS

0.00%

IT Services Industry

Max
147.75%
Q3
63.58%
Median
24.63%
Q1
0.00%
Min
0.00%

GDS has a Dividend Payout Ratio of 0%, indicating it does not currently pay a dividend. This is a common strategy for growth-oriented companies that reinvest all profits back into the business.

G vs. GDS: A comparison of their Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM) against their respective Professional Services and IT Services industry benchmarks.

Dividend at a Glance

SymbolGGDS
Dividend Yield (TTM)1.46%0.00%
Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM)21.00%0.00%

Valuation

Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM)

G

14.34

Professional Services Industry

Max
49.59
Q3
36.59
Median
28.13
Q1
18.55
Min
10.07

In the lower quartile for the Professional Services industry, G’s P/E Ratio of 14.34 suggests the stock may be undervalued compared to its peers, potentially presenting an attractive entry point for investors.

GDS

10.47

IT Services Industry

Max
41.55
Q3
31.54
Median
23.25
Q1
18.12
Min
6.57

In the lower quartile for the IT Services industry, GDS’s P/E Ratio of 10.47 suggests the stock may be undervalued compared to its peers, potentially presenting an attractive entry point for investors.

G vs. GDS: A comparison of their Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM) against their respective Professional Services and IT Services industry benchmarks.

Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM)

G

1.57

Professional Services Industry

Max
9.54
Q3
5.11
Median
2.10
Q1
0.75
Min
0.11

G’s P/S Ratio of 1.57 aligns with the market consensus for the Professional Services industry. This suggests its valuation, based on sales, is seen as standard and is on par with its competitors.

GDS

4.37

IT Services Industry

Max
6.61
Q3
4.37
Median
2.02
Q1
1.20
Min
0.19

GDS’s P/S Ratio of 4.37 is in the upper echelon for the IT Services industry. This means the company is valued richly on its revenue stream compared to its peers, suggesting the stock is priced for a high level of future performance.

G vs. GDS: A comparison of their Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM) against their respective Professional Services and IT Services industry benchmarks.

Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ)

G

2.98

Professional Services Industry

Max
13.75
Q3
8.87
Median
4.35
Q1
2.43
Min
0.54

G’s P/B Ratio of 2.98 is within the conventional range for the Professional Services industry. This shows a balanced market view, where the stock’s price is neither at a significant premium nor a discount to the book value of its peers.

GDS

1.41

IT Services Industry

Max
11.19
Q3
6.38
Median
3.47
Q1
2.31
Min
0.96

GDS’s P/B Ratio of 1.41 is in the lower quartile for the IT Services industry. From a value investing perspective, this is favorable, as it suggests the stock is trading at a discount to its net asset value and may offer a greater margin of safety.

G vs. GDS: A comparison of their Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ) against their respective Professional Services and IT Services industry benchmarks.

Valuation at a Glance

SymbolGGDS
Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM)14.3410.47
Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM)1.574.37
Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ)2.981.41
Price-to-Free Cash Flow Ratio (TTM)13.74--