FUTU vs. MTB: A Head-to-Head Stock Comparison

Updated on August 19, 2025

Here’s a clear look at FUTU and MTB, comparing key factors like historical performance, profitability, financial strength, growth, dividend, and valuation.

Company Profile

FUTU trades as an American Depositary Receipt (ADR), offering U.S. investors a convenient way to access its foreign-listed shares. In contrast, MTB is a standard domestic listing.

Symbol	FUTU	MTB
Company Name	Futu Holdings Limited	M&T Bank Corporation
Country	Hong Kong	United States
GICS Sector	Financials	Financials
GICS Industry	Capital Markets	Banks
Market Capitalization	24.57 billion USD	30.19 billion USD
Exchange	NasdaqGM	NYSE
Listing Date	March 8, 2019	March 17, 1980
Security Type	ADR	Common Stock

Historical Performance

This chart compares the performance of FUTU and MTB by tracking the growth of an initial $10,000 investment in each. Use the tabs to select the desired time period. Data is adjusted for dividends and splits.

FUTU vs. MTB: Growth of a $10,000 investment over the past one year.

Historical Performance at a Glance

Symbol	FUTU	MTB
5-Day Price Return	12.70%	5.15%
13-Week Price Return	59.36%	4.61%
26-Week Price Return	81.64%	-4.33%
52-Week Price Return	199.73%	20.75%
Month-to-Date Return	14.84%	2.39%
Year-to-Date Return	120.63%	2.77%
10-Day Avg. Volume	2.29M	0.94M
3-Month Avg. Volume	2.65M	1.19M
3-Month Volatility	59.74%	23.17%
Beta	0.54	0.64

Profitability

Return on Equity (TTM)

FUTU

23.06%

Capital Markets Industry

Max: 38.97%
Q3: 21.61%
Median: 13.77%
Q1: 8.31%
Min: -4.25%

In the upper quartile for the Capital Markets industry, FUTU’s Return on Equity of 23.06% signals a highly effective use of shareholder capital to drive profitability compared to most of its peers.

MTB

7.02%

Banks Industry

Max: 26.37%
Q3: 15.92%
Median: 12.25%
Q1: 8.69%
Min: 0.15%

MTB’s Return on Equity of 7.02% is in the lower quartile for the Banks industry. This indicates a less efficient generation of profit from its equity base when compared to its competitors.

FUTU vs. MTB: A comparison of their Return on Equity (TTM) against their respective Capital Markets and Banks industry benchmarks.

Net Profit Margin (TTM)

FUTU

40.05%

Capital Markets Industry

Max: 66.67%
Q3: 35.11%
Median: 23.49%
Q1: 13.63%
Min: -15.18%

A Net Profit Margin of 40.05% places FUTU in the upper quartile for the Capital Markets industry, signifying strong profitability and more effective cost management than most of its peers.

MTB

30.70%

Banks Industry

Max: 54.20%
Q3: 35.70%
Median: 28.97%
Q1: 22.53%
Min: 6.98%

MTB’s Net Profit Margin of 30.70% is aligned with the median group of its peers in the Banks industry. This indicates its ability to convert revenue into profit is typical for the sector.

FUTU vs. MTB: A comparison of their Net Profit Margin (TTM) against their respective Capital Markets and Banks industry benchmarks.

Operating Profit Margin (TTM)

FUTU

48.72%

Capital Markets Industry

Max: 86.40%
Q3: 46.46%
Median: 32.80%
Q1: 18.32%
Min: -21.87%

An Operating Profit Margin of 48.72% places FUTU in the upper quartile for the Capital Markets industry. This signals a strong ability to translate revenue into operating profit, outperforming most of its competitors in core business efficiency.

MTB

40.64%

Banks Industry

Max: 63.35%
Q3: 44.59%
Median: 37.24%
Q1: 28.25%
Min: 13.37%

MTB’s Operating Profit Margin of 40.64% is around the midpoint for the Banks industry, indicating that its efficiency in managing core business operations is typical for the sector.

FUTU vs. MTB: A comparison of their Operating Profit Margin (TTM) against their respective Capital Markets and Banks industry benchmarks.

Profitability at a Glance

Symbol	FUTU	MTB
Return on Equity (TTM)	23.06%	7.02%
Return on Assets (TTM)	4.34%	0.96%
Net Profit Margin (TTM)	40.05%	30.70%
Operating Profit Margin (TTM)	48.72%	40.64%
Gross Profit Margin (TTM)	82.01%	--

Financial Strength

Current Ratio (MRQ)

FUTU

1.18

Capital Markets Industry

Max: 3.76
Q3: 1.89
Median: 1.01
Q1: 0.54
Min: -0.41

For the Capital Markets industry, the Current Ratio is often not the most suitable measure of short-term liquidity.

MTB

Banks Industry

Max: --
Q3: --
Median: --
Q1: --
Min: --

For the Banks industry, the Current Ratio is often not the most suitable measure of short-term liquidity.

FUTU vs. MTB: A comparison of their Current Ratio (MRQ) against their respective Capital Markets and Banks industry benchmarks.

Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ)

FUTU

0.36

Capital Markets Industry

Max: 6.62
Q3: 2.84
Median: 1.02
Q1: 0.32
Min: 0.00

The Debt-to-Equity Ratio is often not the primary focus for assessing leverage in the Capital Markets industry.

MTB

0.51

Banks Industry

Max: 4.75
Q3: 2.62
Median: 1.02
Q1: 0.39
Min: 0.00

The Debt-to-Equity Ratio is often not the primary focus for assessing leverage in the Banks industry.

FUTU vs. MTB: A comparison of their Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ) against their respective Capital Markets and Banks industry benchmarks.

Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM)

FUTU

4,725.16

Capital Markets Industry

Max: 126.03
Q3: 60.98
Median: 11.77
Q1: 4.95
Min: -36.26

The Interest Coverage Ratio is often not a primary indicator of debt servicing capacity in the Capital Markets industry.

MTB

Banks Industry

Max: --
Q3: --
Median: --
Q1: --
Min: --

The Interest Coverage Ratio is often not a primary indicator of debt servicing capacity in the Banks industry.

FUTU vs. MTB: A comparison of their Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM) against their respective Capital Markets and Banks industry benchmarks.

Financial Strength at a Glance

Symbol	FUTU	MTB
Current Ratio (MRQ)	1.18	--
Quick Ratio (MRQ)	1.18	--
Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ)	0.36	0.51
Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM)	4,725.16	--

Growth

Revenue Growth

FUTU vs. MTB: A side-by-side comparison of their Revenue Growth for the MRQ (YoY), TTM (YoY), 3-Year CAGR, and 5-Year CAGR periods.

EPS Growth

FUTU vs. MTB: A side-by-side comparison of their EPS Growth for the MRQ (YoY), TTM (YoY), 3-Year CAGR, and 5-Year CAGR periods.

Dividend

Dividend Yield (TTM)

FUTU

0.00%

Capital Markets Industry

Max: 10.26%
Q3: 4.86%
Median: 2.78%
Q1: 1.22%
Min: 0.00%

FUTU currently does not pay a dividend, resulting in a yield of 0%. This is a common strategy for growth-focused companies that prioritize reinvesting earnings, though it may be less typical in mature, income-oriented sectors.

MTB

3.45%

Banks Industry

Max: 10.27%
Q3: 5.83%
Median: 3.81%
Q1: 2.50%
Min: 0.00%

MTB’s Dividend Yield of 3.45% is consistent with its peers in the Banks industry, providing a dividend return that is standard for its sector.

FUTU vs. MTB: A comparison of their Dividend Yield (TTM) against their respective Capital Markets and Banks industry benchmarks.

Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM)

FUTU

0.00%

Capital Markets Industry

Max: 200.72%
Q3: 101.92%
Median: 57.97%
Q1: 32.36%
Min: 0.00%

FUTU has a Dividend Payout Ratio of 0%, indicating it does not currently pay a dividend. This is a common strategy for growth-oriented companies that reinvest all profits back into the business.

MTB

38.42%

Banks Industry

Max: 147.07%
Q3: 80.55%
Median: 54.40%
Q1: 35.71%
Min: 0.00%

MTB’s Dividend Payout Ratio of 38.42% is within the typical range for the Banks industry, suggesting a balanced approach between shareholder payouts and company reinvestment.

FUTU vs. MTB: A comparison of their Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM) against their respective Capital Markets and Banks industry benchmarks.

Dividend at a Glance

Symbol	FUTU	MTB
Dividend Yield (TTM)	0.00%	3.45%
Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM)	0.00%	38.42%

Valuation

Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM)

FUTU

8.80

Capital Markets Industry

Max: 58.89
Q3: 31.00
Median: 18.54
Q1: 12.09
Min: 5.24

In the lower quartile for the Capital Markets industry, FUTU’s P/E Ratio of 8.80 suggests the stock may be undervalued compared to its peers, potentially presenting an attractive entry point for investors.

MTB

11.14

Banks Industry

Max: 20.05
Q3: 12.65
Median: 10.21
Q1: 7.54
Min: 2.74

MTB’s P/E Ratio of 11.14 is within the middle range for the Banks industry. This suggests its valuation is in line with the sector average, representing neither a significant premium nor a discount compared to its peers.

FUTU vs. MTB: A comparison of their Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM) against their respective Capital Markets and Banks industry benchmarks.

Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM)

FUTU

4.24

Capital Markets Industry

Max: 14.49
Q3: 7.41
Median: 4.68
Q1: 2.25
Min: 0.04

FUTU’s P/S Ratio of 4.24 aligns with the market consensus for the Capital Markets industry. This suggests its valuation, based on sales, is seen as standard and is on par with its competitors.

MTB

2.12

Banks Industry

Max: 5.06
Q3: 2.98
Median: 2.24
Q1: 1.59
Min: 0.45

The P/S Ratio is often not a primary valuation tool in the Banks industry.

FUTU vs. MTB: A comparison of their Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM) against their respective Capital Markets and Banks industry benchmarks.

Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ)

FUTU

2.51

Capital Markets Industry

Max: 9.48
Q3: 4.94
Median: 2.42
Q1: 1.21
Min: 0.38

FUTU’s P/B Ratio of 2.51 is within the conventional range for the Capital Markets industry. This shows a balanced market view, where the stock’s price is neither at a significant premium nor a discount to the book value of its peers.

MTB

1.06

Banks Industry

Max: 2.18
Q3: 1.36
Median: 1.09
Q1: 0.81
Min: 0.20

MTB’s P/B Ratio of 1.06 is within the conventional range for the Banks industry. This shows a balanced market view, where the stock’s price is neither at a significant premium nor a discount to the book value of its peers.

FUTU vs. MTB: A comparison of their Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ) against their respective Capital Markets and Banks industry benchmarks.

Valuation at a Glance

Symbol	FUTU	MTB
Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM)	8.80	11.14
Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM)	4.24	2.12
Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ)	2.51	1.06
Price-to-Free Cash Flow Ratio (TTM)	2.82	9.97