Seek Returns logo

FUTU vs. MMC: A Head-to-Head Stock Comparison

Updated on

Here’s a clear look at FUTU and MMC, comparing key factors like historical performance, profitability, financial strength, growth, dividend, and valuation.

Company Profile

FUTU trades as an American Depositary Receipt (ADR), offering U.S. investors a convenient way to access its foreign-listed shares. In contrast, MMC is a standard domestic listing.

SymbolFUTUMMC
Company NameFutu Holdings LimitedMarsh & McLennan Companies, Inc.
CountryHong KongUnited States
GICS SectorFinancialsFinancials
GICS IndustryCapital MarketsInsurance
Market Capitalization24.57 billion USD102.92 billion USD
ExchangeNasdaqGMNYSE
Listing DateMarch 8, 2019February 21, 1973
Security TypeADRCommon Stock

Historical Performance

This chart compares the performance of FUTU and MMC by tracking the growth of an initial $10,000 investment in each. Use the tabs to select the desired time period. Data is adjusted for dividends and splits.

FUTU vs. MMC: Growth of a $10,000 investment over the past one year.

Historical Performance at a Glance

SymbolFUTUMMC
5-Day Price Return12.70%2.97%
13-Week Price Return59.36%-7.79%
26-Week Price Return81.64%-7.37%
52-Week Price Return199.73%-3.68%
Month-to-Date Return14.84%5.10%
Year-to-Date Return120.63%-1.44%
10-Day Avg. Volume2.29M2.76M
3-Month Avg. Volume2.65M2.45M
3-Month Volatility59.74%17.20%
Beta0.540.83

Profitability

Return on Equity (TTM)

FUTU

23.06%

Capital Markets Industry

Max
38.97%
Q3
21.61%
Median
13.77%
Q1
8.31%
Min
-4.25%

In the upper quartile for the Capital Markets industry, FUTU’s Return on Equity of 23.06% signals a highly effective use of shareholder capital to drive profitability compared to most of its peers.

MMC

29.03%

Insurance Industry

Max
29.03%
Q3
18.11%
Median
13.90%
Q1
10.42%
Min
-0.64%

In the upper quartile for the Insurance industry, MMC’s Return on Equity of 29.03% signals a highly effective use of shareholder capital to drive profitability compared to most of its peers.

FUTU vs. MMC: A comparison of their Return on Equity (TTM) against their respective Capital Markets and Insurance industry benchmarks.

Net Profit Margin (TTM)

FUTU

40.05%

Capital Markets Industry

Max
66.67%
Q3
35.11%
Median
23.49%
Q1
13.63%
Min
-15.18%

A Net Profit Margin of 40.05% places FUTU in the upper quartile for the Capital Markets industry, signifying strong profitability and more effective cost management than most of its peers.

MMC

16.00%

Insurance Industry

Max
26.78%
Q3
14.06%
Median
9.15%
Q1
5.48%
Min
-7.05%

A Net Profit Margin of 16.00% places MMC in the upper quartile for the Insurance industry, signifying strong profitability and more effective cost management than most of its peers.

FUTU vs. MMC: A comparison of their Net Profit Margin (TTM) against their respective Capital Markets and Insurance industry benchmarks.

Operating Profit Margin (TTM)

FUTU

48.72%

Capital Markets Industry

Max
86.40%
Q3
46.46%
Median
32.80%
Q1
18.32%
Min
-21.87%

An Operating Profit Margin of 48.72% places FUTU in the upper quartile for the Capital Markets industry. This signals a strong ability to translate revenue into operating profit, outperforming most of its competitors in core business efficiency.

MMC

23.58%

Insurance Industry

Max
35.49%
Q3
19.49%
Median
14.35%
Q1
8.53%
Min
-5.25%

In the Insurance industry, Operating Profit Margin is often not the primary measure of operational efficiency.

FUTU vs. MMC: A comparison of their Operating Profit Margin (TTM) against their respective Capital Markets and Insurance industry benchmarks.

Profitability at a Glance

SymbolFUTUMMC
Return on Equity (TTM)23.06%29.03%
Return on Assets (TTM)4.34%7.44%
Net Profit Margin (TTM)40.05%16.00%
Operating Profit Margin (TTM)48.72%23.58%
Gross Profit Margin (TTM)82.01%--

Financial Strength

Current Ratio (MRQ)

FUTU

1.18

Capital Markets Industry

Max
3.76
Q3
1.89
Median
1.01
Q1
0.54
Min
-0.41

For the Capital Markets industry, the Current Ratio is often not the most suitable measure of short-term liquidity.

MMC

1.20

Insurance Industry

Max
2.97
Q3
1.33
Median
0.55
Q1
0.15
Min
0.00

For the Insurance industry, the Current Ratio is often not the most suitable measure of short-term liquidity.

FUTU vs. MMC: A comparison of their Current Ratio (MRQ) against their respective Capital Markets and Insurance industry benchmarks.

Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ)

FUTU

0.36

Capital Markets Industry

Max
6.62
Q3
2.84
Median
1.02
Q1
0.32
Min
0.00

The Debt-to-Equity Ratio is often not the primary focus for assessing leverage in the Capital Markets industry.

MMC

1.25

Insurance Industry

Max
1.25
Q3
0.65
Median
0.34
Q1
0.22
Min
0.00

The Debt-to-Equity Ratio is often not the primary focus for assessing leverage in the Insurance industry.

FUTU vs. MMC: A comparison of their Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ) against their respective Capital Markets and Insurance industry benchmarks.

Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM)

FUTU

4,725.16

Capital Markets Industry

Max
126.03
Q3
60.98
Median
11.77
Q1
4.95
Min
-36.26

The Interest Coverage Ratio is often not a primary indicator of debt servicing capacity in the Capital Markets industry.

MMC

10.06

Insurance Industry

Max
43.68
Q3
20.84
Median
9.56
Q1
3.34
Min
-5.73

The Interest Coverage Ratio is often not a primary indicator of debt servicing capacity in the Insurance industry.

FUTU vs. MMC: A comparison of their Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM) against their respective Capital Markets and Insurance industry benchmarks.

Financial Strength at a Glance

SymbolFUTUMMC
Current Ratio (MRQ)1.181.20
Quick Ratio (MRQ)1.181.20
Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ)0.361.25
Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM)4,725.1610.06

Growth

Revenue Growth

FUTU vs. MMC: A side-by-side comparison of their Revenue Growth for the MRQ (YoY), TTM (YoY), 3-Year CAGR, and 5-Year CAGR periods.

EPS Growth

FUTU vs. MMC: A side-by-side comparison of their EPS Growth for the MRQ (YoY), TTM (YoY), 3-Year CAGR, and 5-Year CAGR periods.

Dividend

Dividend Yield (TTM)

FUTU

0.00%

Capital Markets Industry

Max
10.26%
Q3
4.86%
Median
2.78%
Q1
1.22%
Min
0.00%

FUTU currently does not pay a dividend, resulting in a yield of 0%. This is a common strategy for growth-focused companies that prioritize reinvesting earnings, though it may be less typical in mature, income-oriented sectors.

MMC

1.58%

Insurance Industry

Max
8.23%
Q3
4.54%
Median
3.42%
Q1
1.97%
Min
0.00%

MMC’s Dividend Yield of 1.58% is in the lower quartile for the Insurance industry. This suggests the company’s strategy likely favors retaining earnings for growth over providing a high dividend income.

FUTU vs. MMC: A comparison of their Dividend Yield (TTM) against their respective Capital Markets and Insurance industry benchmarks.

Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM)

FUTU

0.00%

Capital Markets Industry

Max
200.72%
Q3
101.92%
Median
57.97%
Q1
32.36%
Min
0.00%

FUTU has a Dividend Payout Ratio of 0%, indicating it does not currently pay a dividend. This is a common strategy for growth-oriented companies that reinvest all profits back into the business.

MMC

39.18%

Insurance Industry

Max
168.02%
Q3
85.57%
Median
50.71%
Q1
22.04%
Min
0.00%

MMC’s Dividend Payout Ratio of 39.18% is within the typical range for the Insurance industry, suggesting a balanced approach between shareholder payouts and company reinvestment.

FUTU vs. MMC: A comparison of their Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM) against their respective Capital Markets and Insurance industry benchmarks.

Dividend at a Glance

SymbolFUTUMMC
Dividend Yield (TTM)0.00%1.58%
Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM)0.00%39.18%

Valuation

Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM)

FUTU

8.80

Capital Markets Industry

Max
58.89
Q3
31.00
Median
18.54
Q1
12.09
Min
5.24

In the lower quartile for the Capital Markets industry, FUTU’s P/E Ratio of 8.80 suggests the stock may be undervalued compared to its peers, potentially presenting an attractive entry point for investors.

MMC

24.83

Insurance Industry

Max
28.91
Q3
17.76
Median
13.63
Q1
10.02
Min
2.89

A P/E Ratio of 24.83 places MMC in the upper quartile for the Insurance industry. This high valuation relative to peers suggests the market holds elevated expectations for the company’s future growth.

FUTU vs. MMC: A comparison of their Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM) against their respective Capital Markets and Insurance industry benchmarks.

Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM)

FUTU

4.24

Capital Markets Industry

Max
14.49
Q3
7.41
Median
4.68
Q1
2.25
Min
0.04

FUTU’s P/S Ratio of 4.24 aligns with the market consensus for the Capital Markets industry. This suggests its valuation, based on sales, is seen as standard and is on par with its competitors.

MMC

3.97

Insurance Industry

Max
3.72
Q3
1.98
Median
1.23
Q1
0.81
Min
0.23

With a P/S Ratio of 3.97, MMC trades at a valuation that eclipses even the highest in the Insurance industry. This implies the market has priced in exceptionally optimistic scenarios for future revenue growth, posing considerable valuation risk.

FUTU vs. MMC: A comparison of their Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM) against their respective Capital Markets and Insurance industry benchmarks.

Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ)

FUTU

2.51

Capital Markets Industry

Max
9.48
Q3
4.94
Median
2.42
Q1
1.21
Min
0.38

FUTU’s P/B Ratio of 2.51 is within the conventional range for the Capital Markets industry. This shows a balanced market view, where the stock’s price is neither at a significant premium nor a discount to the book value of its peers.

MMC

6.83

Insurance Industry

Max
4.37
Q3
2.48
Median
1.68
Q1
1.19
Min
0.19

At 6.83, MMC’s P/B Ratio is at an extreme premium to the Insurance industry. This signifies that the market’s valuation is heavily reliant on future potential rather than its current net asset value, which can be a high-risk proposition.

FUTU vs. MMC: A comparison of their Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ) against their respective Capital Markets and Insurance industry benchmarks.

Valuation at a Glance

SymbolFUTUMMC
Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM)8.8024.83
Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM)4.243.97
Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ)2.516.83
Price-to-Free Cash Flow Ratio (TTM)2.8219.23