Seek Returns logo

FUTU vs. MCO: A Head-to-Head Stock Comparison

Updated on

Here’s a clear look at FUTU and MCO, comparing key factors like historical performance, profitability, financial strength, growth, dividend, and valuation.

Company Profile

FUTU trades as an American Depositary Receipt (ADR), offering U.S. investors a convenient way to access its foreign-listed shares. In contrast, MCO is a standard domestic listing.

SymbolFUTUMCO
Company NameFutu Holdings LimitedMoody's Corporation
CountryHong KongUnited States
GICS SectorFinancialsFinancials
GICS IndustryCapital MarketsCapital Markets
Market Capitalization24.87 billion USD92.36 billion USD
ExchangeNasdaqGMNYSE
Listing DateMarch 8, 2019October 31, 1994
Security TypeADRCommon Stock

Historical Performance

This chart compares the performance of FUTU and MCO by tracking the growth of an initial $10,000 investment in each. Use the tabs to select the desired time period. Data is adjusted for dividends and splits.

FUTU vs. MCO: Growth of a $10,000 investment over the past one year.

Historical Performance at a Glance

SymbolFUTUMCO
5-Day Price Return2.24%-1.22%
13-Week Price Return63.01%4.64%
26-Week Price Return51.51%-2.38%
52-Week Price Return185.76%9.55%
Month-to-Date Return16.25%-0.15%
Year-to-Date Return123.35%8.78%
10-Day Avg. Volume2.30M0.54M
3-Month Avg. Volume2.44M0.70M
3-Month Volatility58.08%19.01%
Beta0.531.45

Profitability

Return on Equity (TTM)

FUTU

23.06%

Capital Markets Industry

Max
38.97%
Q3
21.61%
Median
13.77%
Q1
8.31%
Min
-4.25%

In the upper quartile for the Capital Markets industry, FUTU’s Return on Equity of 23.06% signals a highly effective use of shareholder capital to drive profitability compared to most of its peers.

MCO

56.41%

Capital Markets Industry

Max
38.97%
Q3
21.61%
Median
13.77%
Q1
8.31%
Min
-4.25%

MCO’s Return on Equity of 56.41% is exceptionally high, placing it well beyond the typical range for the Capital Markets industry. This demonstrates a superior ability to generate profit from shareholder investments, though it could also be inflated by high financial leverage.

FUTU vs. MCO: A comparison of their Return on Equity (TTM) against the Capital Markets industry benchmark.

Net Profit Margin (TTM)

FUTU

40.05%

Capital Markets Industry

Max
66.67%
Q3
35.11%
Median
23.49%
Q1
13.63%
Min
-15.18%

A Net Profit Margin of 40.05% places FUTU in the upper quartile for the Capital Markets industry, signifying strong profitability and more effective cost management than most of its peers.

MCO

29.18%

Capital Markets Industry

Max
66.67%
Q3
35.11%
Median
23.49%
Q1
13.63%
Min
-15.18%

MCO’s Net Profit Margin of 29.18% is aligned with the median group of its peers in the Capital Markets industry. This indicates its ability to convert revenue into profit is typical for the sector.

FUTU vs. MCO: A comparison of their Net Profit Margin (TTM) against the Capital Markets industry benchmark.

Operating Profit Margin (TTM)

FUTU

48.72%

Capital Markets Industry

Max
86.40%
Q3
46.46%
Median
32.80%
Q1
18.32%
Min
-21.87%

An Operating Profit Margin of 48.72% places FUTU in the upper quartile for the Capital Markets industry. This signals a strong ability to translate revenue into operating profit, outperforming most of its competitors in core business efficiency.

MCO

40.55%

Capital Markets Industry

Max
86.40%
Q3
46.46%
Median
32.80%
Q1
18.32%
Min
-21.87%

MCO’s Operating Profit Margin of 40.55% is around the midpoint for the Capital Markets industry, indicating that its efficiency in managing core business operations is typical for the sector.

FUTU vs. MCO: A comparison of their Operating Profit Margin (TTM) against the Capital Markets industry benchmark.

Profitability at a Glance

SymbolFUTUMCO
Return on Equity (TTM)23.06%56.41%
Return on Assets (TTM)4.34%13.79%
Net Profit Margin (TTM)40.05%29.18%
Operating Profit Margin (TTM)48.72%40.55%
Gross Profit Margin (TTM)82.01%72.78%

Financial Strength

Current Ratio (MRQ)

FUTU

1.18

Capital Markets Industry

Max
3.76
Q3
1.89
Median
1.01
Q1
0.54
Min
-0.41

For the Capital Markets industry, the Current Ratio is often not the most suitable measure of short-term liquidity.

MCO

1.75

Capital Markets Industry

Max
3.76
Q3
1.89
Median
1.01
Q1
0.54
Min
-0.41

For the Capital Markets industry, the Current Ratio is often not the most suitable measure of short-term liquidity.

FUTU vs. MCO: A comparison of their Current Ratio (MRQ) against the Capital Markets industry benchmark.

Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ)

FUTU

0.36

Capital Markets Industry

Max
6.62
Q3
2.84
Median
1.02
Q1
0.32
Min
0.00

The Debt-to-Equity Ratio is often not the primary focus for assessing leverage in the Capital Markets industry.

MCO

1.76

Capital Markets Industry

Max
6.62
Q3
2.84
Median
1.02
Q1
0.32
Min
0.00

The Debt-to-Equity Ratio is often not the primary focus for assessing leverage in the Capital Markets industry.

FUTU vs. MCO: A comparison of their Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ) against the Capital Markets industry benchmark.

Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM)

FUTU

4,725.16

Capital Markets Industry

Max
126.03
Q3
60.98
Median
11.77
Q1
4.95
Min
-36.26

The Interest Coverage Ratio is often not a primary indicator of debt servicing capacity in the Capital Markets industry.

MCO

17.56

Capital Markets Industry

Max
126.03
Q3
60.98
Median
11.77
Q1
4.95
Min
-36.26

The Interest Coverage Ratio is often not a primary indicator of debt servicing capacity in the Capital Markets industry.

FUTU vs. MCO: A comparison of their Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM) against the Capital Markets industry benchmark.

Financial Strength at a Glance

SymbolFUTUMCO
Current Ratio (MRQ)1.181.75
Quick Ratio (MRQ)1.181.75
Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ)0.361.76
Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM)4,725.1617.56

Growth

Revenue Growth

FUTU vs. MCO: A side-by-side comparison of their Revenue Growth for the MRQ (YoY), TTM (YoY), 3-Year CAGR, and 5-Year CAGR periods.

EPS Growth

FUTU vs. MCO: A side-by-side comparison of their EPS Growth for the MRQ (YoY), TTM (YoY), 3-Year CAGR, and 5-Year CAGR periods.

Dividend

Dividend Yield (TTM)

FUTU

0.00%

Capital Markets Industry

Max
10.26%
Q3
4.86%
Median
2.78%
Q1
1.22%
Min
0.00%

FUTU currently does not pay a dividend, resulting in a yield of 0%. This is a common strategy for growth-focused companies that prioritize reinvesting earnings, though it may be less typical in mature, income-oriented sectors.

MCO

0.73%

Capital Markets Industry

Max
10.26%
Q3
4.86%
Median
2.78%
Q1
1.22%
Min
0.00%

MCO’s Dividend Yield of 0.73% is in the lower quartile for the Capital Markets industry. This suggests the company’s strategy likely favors retaining earnings for growth over providing a high dividend income.

FUTU vs. MCO: A comparison of their Dividend Yield (TTM) against the Capital Markets industry benchmark.

Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM)

FUTU

0.00%

Capital Markets Industry

Max
200.72%
Q3
101.92%
Median
57.97%
Q1
32.36%
Min
0.00%

FUTU has a Dividend Payout Ratio of 0%, indicating it does not currently pay a dividend. This is a common strategy for growth-oriented companies that reinvest all profits back into the business.

MCO

31.75%

Capital Markets Industry

Max
200.72%
Q3
101.92%
Median
57.97%
Q1
32.36%
Min
0.00%

MCO’s Dividend Payout Ratio of 31.75% is in the lower quartile for the Capital Markets industry. This suggests a conservative dividend policy, with a strategic focus on reinvesting profits for future growth.

FUTU vs. MCO: A comparison of their Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM) against the Capital Markets industry benchmark.

Dividend at a Glance

SymbolFUTUMCO
Dividend Yield (TTM)0.00%0.73%
Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM)0.00%31.75%

Valuation

Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM)

FUTU

8.94

Capital Markets Industry

Max
58.89
Q3
31.00
Median
18.54
Q1
12.09
Min
5.24

In the lower quartile for the Capital Markets industry, FUTU’s P/E Ratio of 8.94 suggests the stock may be undervalued compared to its peers, potentially presenting an attractive entry point for investors.

MCO

43.26

Capital Markets Industry

Max
58.89
Q3
31.00
Median
18.54
Q1
12.09
Min
5.24

A P/E Ratio of 43.26 places MCO in the upper quartile for the Capital Markets industry. This high valuation relative to peers suggests the market holds elevated expectations for the company’s future growth.

FUTU vs. MCO: A comparison of their Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM) against the Capital Markets industry benchmark.

Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM)

FUTU

4.31

Capital Markets Industry

Max
14.49
Q3
7.41
Median
4.68
Q1
2.25
Min
0.04

FUTU’s P/S Ratio of 4.31 aligns with the market consensus for the Capital Markets industry. This suggests its valuation, based on sales, is seen as standard and is on par with its competitors.

MCO

12.62

Capital Markets Industry

Max
14.49
Q3
7.41
Median
4.68
Q1
2.25
Min
0.04

MCO’s P/S Ratio of 12.62 is in the upper echelon for the Capital Markets industry. This means the company is valued richly on its revenue stream compared to its peers, suggesting the stock is priced for a high level of future performance.

FUTU vs. MCO: A comparison of their Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM) against the Capital Markets industry benchmark.

Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ)

FUTU

2.50

Capital Markets Industry

Max
9.48
Q3
4.94
Median
2.42
Q1
1.21
Min
0.38

FUTU’s P/B Ratio of 2.50 is within the conventional range for the Capital Markets industry. This shows a balanced market view, where the stock’s price is neither at a significant premium nor a discount to the book value of its peers.

MCO

22.85

Capital Markets Industry

Max
9.48
Q3
4.94
Median
2.42
Q1
1.21
Min
0.38

At 22.85, MCO’s P/B Ratio is at an extreme premium to the Capital Markets industry. This signifies that the market’s valuation is heavily reliant on future potential rather than its current net asset value, which can be a high-risk proposition.

FUTU vs. MCO: A comparison of their Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ) against the Capital Markets industry benchmark.

Valuation at a Glance

SymbolFUTUMCO
Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM)8.9443.26
Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM)4.3112.62
Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ)2.5022.85
Price-to-Free Cash Flow Ratio (TTM)2.8738.90