FUTU vs. MARA: A Head-to-Head Stock Comparison

Updated on August 20, 2025

Here’s a clear look at FUTU and MARA, comparing key factors like historical performance, profitability, financial strength, growth, dividend, and valuation.

Company Profile

FUTU trades as an American Depositary Receipt (ADR), offering U.S. investors a convenient way to access its foreign-listed shares. In contrast, MARA is a standard domestic listing.

Symbol	FUTU	MARA
Company Name	Futu Holdings Limited	MARA Holdings, Inc.
Country	Hong Kong	United States
GICS Sector	Financials	Information Technology
GICS Industry	Capital Markets	Software
Market Capitalization	24.57 billion USD	5.88 billion USD
Exchange	NasdaqGM	NasdaqCM
Listing Date	March 8, 2019	May 4, 2012
Security Type	ADR	Common Stock

Historical Performance

This chart compares the performance of FUTU and MARA by tracking the growth of an initial $10,000 investment in each. Use the tabs to select the desired time period. Data is adjusted for dividends and splits.

FUTU vs. MARA: Growth of a $10,000 investment over the past one year.

Historical Performance at a Glance

Symbol	FUTU	MARA
5-Day Price Return	12.70%	-0.56%
13-Week Price Return	59.36%	-0.56%
26-Week Price Return	81.64%	-5.60%
52-Week Price Return	199.73%	4.96%
Month-to-Date Return	14.84%	-1.37%
Year-to-Date Return	120.63%	-5.43%
10-Day Avg. Volume	2.29M	32.10M
3-Month Avg. Volume	2.65M	44.75M
3-Month Volatility	59.74%	65.79%
Beta	0.54	6.41

Profitability

Return on Equity (TTM)

FUTU

23.06%

Capital Markets Industry

Max: 38.97%
Q3: 21.61%
Median: 13.77%
Q1: 8.31%
Min: -4.25%

In the upper quartile for the Capital Markets industry, FUTU’s Return on Equity of 23.06% signals a highly effective use of shareholder capital to drive profitability compared to most of its peers.

MARA

17.52%

Software Industry

Max: 59.01%
Q3: 21.98%
Median: 7.15%
Q1: -11.12%
Min: -51.24%

MARA’s Return on Equity of 17.52% is on par with the norm for the Software industry, indicating its profitability relative to shareholder equity is typical for the sector.

FUTU vs. MARA: A comparison of their Return on Equity (TTM) against their respective Capital Markets and Software industry benchmarks.

Net Profit Margin (TTM)

FUTU

40.05%

Capital Markets Industry

Max: 66.67%
Q3: 35.11%
Median: 23.49%
Q1: 13.63%
Min: -15.18%

A Net Profit Margin of 40.05% places FUTU in the upper quartile for the Capital Markets industry, signifying strong profitability and more effective cost management than most of its peers.

MARA

85.02%

Software Industry

Max: 48.14%
Q3: 18.23%
Median: 5.60%
Q1: -9.22%
Min: -49.36%

MARA’s Net Profit Margin of 85.02% is exceptionally high, placing it well beyond the typical range for the Software industry. This demonstrates outstanding operational efficiency and a strong competitive advantage in converting revenue into profit.

FUTU vs. MARA: A comparison of their Net Profit Margin (TTM) against their respective Capital Markets and Software industry benchmarks.

Operating Profit Margin (TTM)

FUTU

48.72%

Capital Markets Industry

Max: 86.40%
Q3: 46.46%
Median: 32.80%
Q1: 18.32%
Min: -21.87%

An Operating Profit Margin of 48.72% places FUTU in the upper quartile for the Capital Markets industry. This signals a strong ability to translate revenue into operating profit, outperforming most of its competitors in core business efficiency.

MARA

40.16%

Software Industry

Max: 57.34%
Q3: 20.60%
Median: 7.84%
Q1: -8.72%
Min: -51.37%

An Operating Profit Margin of 40.16% places MARA in the upper quartile for the Software industry. This signals a strong ability to translate revenue into operating profit, outperforming most of its competitors in core business efficiency.

FUTU vs. MARA: A comparison of their Operating Profit Margin (TTM) against their respective Capital Markets and Software industry benchmarks.

Profitability at a Glance

Symbol	FUTU	MARA
Return on Equity (TTM)	23.06%	17.52%
Return on Assets (TTM)	4.34%	11.06%
Net Profit Margin (TTM)	40.05%	85.02%
Operating Profit Margin (TTM)	48.72%	40.16%
Gross Profit Margin (TTM)	82.01%	-26.24%

Financial Strength

Current Ratio (MRQ)

FUTU

1.18

Capital Markets Industry

Max: 3.76
Q3: 1.89
Median: 1.01
Q1: 0.54
Min: -0.41

For the Capital Markets industry, the Current Ratio is often not the most suitable measure of short-term liquidity.

MARA

0.54

Software Industry

Max: 3.83
Q3: 2.31
Median: 1.45
Q1: 1.03
Min: 0.24

MARA’s Current Ratio of 0.54 falls into the lower quartile for the Software industry. This indicates a tighter liquidity situation and a more constrained capacity to handle short-term debt than many of its competitors.

FUTU vs. MARA: A comparison of their Current Ratio (MRQ) against their respective Capital Markets and Software industry benchmarks.

Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ)

FUTU

0.36

Capital Markets Industry

Max: 6.62
Q3: 2.84
Median: 1.02
Q1: 0.32
Min: 0.00

The Debt-to-Equity Ratio is often not the primary focus for assessing leverage in the Capital Markets industry.

MARA

0.54

Software Industry

Max: 2.14
Q3: 0.90
Median: 0.29
Q1: 0.00
Min: 0.00

MARA’s Debt-to-Equity Ratio of 0.54 is typical for the Software industry, indicating its use of leverage is in line with the sector norm. This suggests a balanced approach to its capital structure.

FUTU vs. MARA: A comparison of their Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ) against their respective Capital Markets and Software industry benchmarks.

Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM)

FUTU

4,725.16

Capital Markets Industry

Max: 126.03
Q3: 60.98
Median: 11.77
Q1: 4.95
Min: -36.26

The Interest Coverage Ratio is often not a primary indicator of debt servicing capacity in the Capital Markets industry.

MARA

10.78

Software Industry

Max: 67.02
Q3: 19.86
Median: 0.70
Q1: -12.50
Min: -53.00

MARA’s Interest Coverage Ratio of 10.78 is positioned comfortably within the norm for the Software industry, indicating a standard and healthy capacity to cover its interest payments.

FUTU vs. MARA: A comparison of their Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM) against their respective Capital Markets and Software industry benchmarks.

Financial Strength at a Glance

Symbol	FUTU	MARA
Current Ratio (MRQ)	1.18	0.54
Quick Ratio (MRQ)	1.18	0.44
Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ)	0.36	0.54
Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM)	4,725.16	10.78

Growth

Revenue Growth

FUTU vs. MARA: A side-by-side comparison of their Revenue Growth for the MRQ (YoY), TTM (YoY), 3-Year CAGR, and 5-Year CAGR periods.

EPS Growth

FUTU vs. MARA: A side-by-side comparison of their EPS Growth for the MRQ (YoY), TTM (YoY), 3-Year CAGR, and 5-Year CAGR periods.

Dividend

Dividend Yield (TTM)

FUTU

0.00%

Capital Markets Industry

Max: 10.26%
Q3: 4.86%
Median: 2.78%
Q1: 1.22%
Min: 0.00%

FUTU currently does not pay a dividend, resulting in a yield of 0%. This is a common strategy for growth-focused companies that prioritize reinvesting earnings, though it may be less typical in mature, income-oriented sectors.

MARA

0.00%

Software Industry

Max: 0.08%
Q3: 0.03%
Median: 0.00%
Q1: 0.00%
Min: 0.00%

MARA currently does not pay a dividend, resulting in a yield of 0%. This is a common strategy for growth-focused companies that prioritize reinvesting earnings, though it may be less typical in mature, income-oriented sectors.

FUTU vs. MARA: A comparison of their Dividend Yield (TTM) against their respective Capital Markets and Software industry benchmarks.

Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM)

FUTU

0.00%

Capital Markets Industry

Max: 200.72%
Q3: 101.92%
Median: 57.97%
Q1: 32.36%
Min: 0.00%

FUTU has a Dividend Payout Ratio of 0%, indicating it does not currently pay a dividend. This is a common strategy for growth-oriented companies that reinvest all profits back into the business.

MARA

0.00%

Software Industry

Max: 1.32%
Q3: 0.53%
Median: 0.00%
Q1: 0.00%
Min: 0.00%

MARA has a Dividend Payout Ratio of 0%, indicating it does not currently pay a dividend. This is a common strategy for growth-oriented companies that reinvest all profits back into the business.

FUTU vs. MARA: A comparison of their Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM) against their respective Capital Markets and Software industry benchmarks.

Dividend at a Glance

Symbol	FUTU	MARA
Dividend Yield (TTM)	0.00%	0.00%
Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM)	0.00%	0.00%

Valuation

Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM)

FUTU

8.80

Capital Markets Industry

Max: 58.89
Q3: 31.00
Median: 18.54
Q1: 12.09
Min: 5.24

In the lower quartile for the Capital Markets industry, FUTU’s P/E Ratio of 8.80 suggests the stock may be undervalued compared to its peers, potentially presenting an attractive entry point for investors.

MARA

8.67

Software Industry

Max: 149.35
Q3: 100.21
Median: 47.97
Q1: 26.77
Min: 11.68

MARA’s P/E Ratio of 8.67 is below the typical range for the Software industry. This may indicate that the stock is potentially undervalued, or it could reflect market concerns about the company’s future prospects.

FUTU vs. MARA: A comparison of their Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM) against their respective Capital Markets and Software industry benchmarks.

Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM)

FUTU

4.24

Capital Markets Industry

Max: 14.49
Q3: 7.41
Median: 4.68
Q1: 2.25
Min: 0.04

FUTU’s P/S Ratio of 4.24 aligns with the market consensus for the Capital Markets industry. This suggests its valuation, based on sales, is seen as standard and is on par with its competitors.

MARA

7.37

Software Industry

Max: 25.24
Q3: 13.52
Median: 8.15
Q1: 4.87
Min: 0.98

MARA’s P/S Ratio of 7.37 aligns with the market consensus for the Software industry. This suggests its valuation, based on sales, is seen as standard and is on par with its competitors.

FUTU vs. MARA: A comparison of their Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM) against their respective Capital Markets and Software industry benchmarks.

Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ)

FUTU

2.51

Capital Markets Industry

Max: 9.48
Q3: 4.94
Median: 2.42
Q1: 1.21
Min: 0.38

FUTU’s P/B Ratio of 2.51 is within the conventional range for the Capital Markets industry. This shows a balanced market view, where the stock’s price is neither at a significant premium nor a discount to the book value of its peers.

MARA

1.15

Software Industry

Max: 30.95
Q3: 14.91
Median: 7.75
Q1: 3.60
Min: 0.38

MARA’s P/B Ratio of 1.15 is in the lower quartile for the Software industry. From a value investing perspective, this is favorable, as it suggests the stock is trading at a discount to its net asset value and may offer a greater margin of safety.

FUTU vs. MARA: A comparison of their Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ) against their respective Capital Markets and Software industry benchmarks.

Valuation at a Glance

Symbol	FUTU	MARA
Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM)	8.80	8.67
Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM)	4.24	7.37
Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ)	2.51	1.15
Price-to-Free Cash Flow Ratio (TTM)	2.82	1,471.15