FUTU vs. IBKR: Futu vs. Interactive Brokers Stock Comparison

Company Profile

Futu (FUTU) and Interactive Brokers (IBKR) are both classified in the Investment Banking & Brokerage sub-industry within the broader Capital Markets industry, placing them in the closest GICS peer bucket.

Interactive Brokers (IBKR) trades as ordinary local shares, while Futu (FUTU) trades as an ADR — compare with FX exposure, depositary-program fees, and dividend-withholding-tax differences in mind.

Price Performance

Cumulative Growth

Trailing Returns

Calendar-Year Returns

Performance Metrics

Risk Profile

Drawdown History

Return Distribution

Risk Metrics

Interactive Brokers (IBKR) has an aggressive beta of 1.37, indicating higher sensitivity to broad-market moves, while Futu (FUTU) is defensive at 0.68 and tends to be less market-sensitive — they sit on opposite ends of the beta spectrum.

Risk-Adjusted Performance

Risk-Return Positioning

Risk-Adjusted Metrics

Profitability

Both Futu (FUTU) at 30.52% and Interactive Brokers (IBKR) at 23.67% sit in the top peer quartile for ROE, suggesting each generates more profit from shareholders’ equity than typical industry peers.

Futu (FUTU) at 46.20% retains a top-quartile share of revenue as profit, ahead of Interactive Brokers (IBKR) at 16.68%, which keeps about the industry-typical share.

Both Futu (FUTU) at 66.75% and Interactive Brokers (IBKR) at 77.70% convert sales into operating profit at a top-quartile rate, pointing to tighter cost discipline before financing and tax.

Profitability Metrics

Growth

Futu (FUTU) at 68.11% clears its industry range for revenue growth, far stronger top-line momentum than Interactive Brokers (IBKR) at 9.73%, which is closer to a typical peer reading.

Futu (FUTU) at 106.38% sits in the top EPS growth quartile, while Interactive Brokers (IBKR) at 28.14% is closer to the peer norm — faster per-share earnings growth for FUTU.

Growth Metrics

Financial Strength

current ratio doesn’t apply on either side: Futu (FUTU) in Financial Services and Interactive Brokers (IBKR) in Financial Services both report balance sheets without a current/non-current split, so their short-term liquidity is better judged through regulatory and funding measures.

debt-to-equity ratio is set aside for both: Futu (FUTU) in Financial Services and Interactive Brokers (IBKR) in Financial Services run businesses where balance-sheet leverage is part of the model, so capital-adequacy and funding measures are the better gauges of balance-sheet risk.

Financial Strength Metrics

Dividends

Futu (FUTU) pays no dividend (yield 0.00%) — it may be reinvesting, using buybacks, or simply not returning cash through dividends. Meanwhile Interactive Brokers (IBKR) reports a yield of 0.46%, ranking against industry peers normally.

Both Futu (FUTU) at 25.80% and Interactive Brokers (IBKR) at 12.79% keep payout ratio within their industries’ typical mid-ranges — dividend policies that share earnings without consuming too much of them.

Dividend Metrics

Valuation

Futu (FUTU) at 9.73 is near its industry’s usual P/E ratio, while Interactive Brokers (IBKR) at 28.94 sits in the richer quartile — IBKR needs stronger growth or earnings quality to justify the premium.

Futu (FUTU) at 0.57 sits in the cheaper P/S ratio quartile while Interactive Brokers (IBKR) at 18.30 prices above its industry range — a wide gap in sales valuation between them.

Futu (FUTU) at 2.75 is valued about in line with its industry on P/B ratio, while Interactive Brokers (IBKR) at 5.53 carries an above-peer premium to book — IBKR is pricier on assets.

Valuation Metrics