FTV vs. ZM: A Head-to-Head Stock Comparison
Updated onHere’s a clear look at FTV and ZM, comparing key factors like historical performance, profitability, financial strength, growth, dividend, and valuation.
Company Profile
Symbol | FTV | ZM |
---|---|---|
Company Name | Fortive Corporation | Zoom Communications Inc. |
Country | United States | United States |
GICS Sector | Industrials | Information Technology |
GICS Industry | Machinery | Software |
Market Capitalization | 16.49 billion USD | 21.90 billion USD |
Exchange | NYSE | NasdaqGS |
Listing Date | July 5, 2016 | April 18, 2019 |
Security Type | Common Stock | Common Stock |
Historical Performance
This chart compares the performance of FTV and ZM by tracking the growth of an initial $10,000 investment in each. Use the tabs to select the desired time period. Data is adjusted for dividends and splits.
Historical Performance at a Glance
Symbol | FTV | ZM |
---|---|---|
5-Day Price Return | 2.70% | 1.10% |
13-Week Price Return | -33.92% | -12.44% |
26-Week Price Return | -38.97% | -16.50% |
52-Week Price Return | -28.68% | 30.86% |
Month-to-Date Return | 1.67% | -2.24% |
Year-to-Date Return | -35.03% | -11.30% |
10-Day Avg. Volume | 5.20M | 2.51M |
3-Month Avg. Volume | 3.85M | 2.69M |
3-Month Volatility | 55.22% | 21.31% |
Beta | 1.09 | 0.78 |
Profitability
Return on Equity (TTM)
FTV
7.44%
Machinery Industry
- Max
- 34.68%
- Q3
- 19.06%
- Median
- 13.13%
- Q1
- 8.53%
- Min
- -4.87%
FTV’s Return on Equity of 7.44% is in the lower quartile for the Machinery industry. This indicates a less efficient generation of profit from its equity base when compared to its competitors.
ZM
11.97%
Software Industry
- Max
- 59.01%
- Q3
- 21.98%
- Median
- 7.15%
- Q1
- -11.12%
- Min
- -51.24%
ZM’s Return on Equity of 11.97% is on par with the norm for the Software industry, indicating its profitability relative to shareholder equity is typical for the sector.
Net Profit Margin (TTM)
FTV
12.51%
Machinery Industry
- Max
- 19.74%
- Q3
- 11.24%
- Median
- 8.13%
- Q1
- 5.38%
- Min
- -1.11%
A Net Profit Margin of 12.51% places FTV in the upper quartile for the Machinery industry, signifying strong profitability and more effective cost management than most of its peers.
ZM
22.31%
Software Industry
- Max
- 48.14%
- Q3
- 18.23%
- Median
- 5.60%
- Q1
- -9.22%
- Min
- -49.36%
A Net Profit Margin of 22.31% places ZM in the upper quartile for the Software industry, signifying strong profitability and more effective cost management than most of its peers.
Operating Profit Margin (TTM)
FTV
17.22%
Machinery Industry
- Max
- 26.63%
- Q3
- 16.15%
- Median
- 11.27%
- Q1
- 7.72%
- Min
- -4.91%
An Operating Profit Margin of 17.22% places FTV in the upper quartile for the Machinery industry. This signals a strong ability to translate revenue into operating profit, outperforming most of its competitors in core business efficiency.
ZM
18.13%
Software Industry
- Max
- 57.34%
- Q3
- 20.60%
- Median
- 7.84%
- Q1
- -8.72%
- Min
- -51.37%
ZM’s Operating Profit Margin of 18.13% is around the midpoint for the Software industry, indicating that its efficiency in managing core business operations is typical for the sector.
Profitability at a Glance
Symbol | FTV | ZM |
---|---|---|
Return on Equity (TTM) | 7.44% | 11.97% |
Return on Assets (TTM) | 4.40% | 9.72% |
Net Profit Margin (TTM) | 12.51% | 22.31% |
Operating Profit Margin (TTM) | 17.22% | 18.13% |
Gross Profit Margin (TTM) | 59.78% | 75.85% |
Financial Strength
Current Ratio (MRQ)
FTV
0.98
Machinery Industry
- Max
- 3.83
- Q3
- 2.32
- Median
- 1.72
- Q1
- 1.28
- Min
- 0.78
FTV’s Current Ratio of 0.98 falls into the lower quartile for the Machinery industry. This indicates a tighter liquidity situation and a more constrained capacity to handle short-term debt than many of its competitors.
ZM
4.57
Software Industry
- Max
- 3.83
- Q3
- 2.31
- Median
- 1.45
- Q1
- 1.03
- Min
- 0.24
ZM’s Current Ratio of 4.57 is exceptionally high, placing it well outside the typical range for the Software industry. This indicates a very strong liquidity position, though such a high ratio may also suggest that the company is not using its assets efficiently to generate profits.
Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ)
FTV
0.46
Machinery Industry
- Max
- 1.49
- Q3
- 0.75
- Median
- 0.44
- Q1
- 0.26
- Min
- 0.00
FTV’s Debt-to-Equity Ratio of 0.46 is typical for the Machinery industry, indicating its use of leverage is in line with the sector norm. This suggests a balanced approach to its capital structure.
ZM
0.00
Software Industry
- Max
- 2.14
- Q3
- 0.90
- Median
- 0.29
- Q1
- 0.00
- Min
- 0.00
ZM’s Debt-to-Equity Ratio of 0.00 is typical for the Software industry, indicating its use of leverage is in line with the sector norm. This suggests a balanced approach to its capital structure.
Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM)
FTV
6.04
Machinery Industry
- Max
- 67.55
- Q3
- 33.79
- Median
- 13.87
- Q1
- 7.97
- Min
- -1.43
In the lower quartile for the Machinery industry, FTV’s Interest Coverage Ratio of 6.04 indicates a tighter cushion for servicing debt, suggesting less financial flexibility than many of its competitors.
ZM
7.63
Software Industry
- Max
- 67.02
- Q3
- 19.86
- Median
- 0.70
- Q1
- -12.50
- Min
- -53.00
ZM’s Interest Coverage Ratio of 7.63 is positioned comfortably within the norm for the Software industry, indicating a standard and healthy capacity to cover its interest payments.
Financial Strength at a Glance
Symbol | FTV | ZM |
---|---|---|
Current Ratio (MRQ) | 0.98 | 4.57 |
Quick Ratio (MRQ) | 0.77 | 4.47 |
Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ) | 0.46 | 0.00 |
Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM) | 6.04 | 7.63 |
Growth
Revenue Growth
EPS Growth
Dividend
Dividend Yield (TTM)
FTV
0.67%
Machinery Industry
- Max
- 5.32%
- Q3
- 2.84%
- Median
- 1.87%
- Q1
- 1.09%
- Min
- 0.00%
FTV’s Dividend Yield of 0.67% is in the lower quartile for the Machinery industry. This suggests the company’s strategy likely favors retaining earnings for growth over providing a high dividend income.
ZM
0.00%
Software Industry
- Max
- 0.08%
- Q3
- 0.03%
- Median
- 0.00%
- Q1
- 0.00%
- Min
- 0.00%
ZM currently does not pay a dividend, resulting in a yield of 0%. This is a common strategy for growth-focused companies that prioritize reinvesting earnings, though it may be less typical in mature, income-oriented sectors.
Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM)
FTV
14.22%
Machinery Industry
- Max
- 202.17%
- Q3
- 98.65%
- Median
- 55.54%
- Q1
- 29.03%
- Min
- 0.00%
FTV’s Dividend Payout Ratio of 14.22% is in the lower quartile for the Machinery industry. This suggests a conservative dividend policy, with a strategic focus on reinvesting profits for future growth.
ZM
0.00%
Software Industry
- Max
- 1.32%
- Q3
- 0.53%
- Median
- 0.00%
- Q1
- 0.00%
- Min
- 0.00%
ZM has a Dividend Payout Ratio of 0%, indicating it does not currently pay a dividend. This is a common strategy for growth-oriented companies that reinvest all profits back into the business.
Dividend at a Glance
Symbol | FTV | ZM |
---|---|---|
Dividend Yield (TTM) | 0.67% | 0.00% |
Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM) | 14.22% | 0.00% |
Valuation
Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM)
FTV
21.32
Machinery Industry
- Max
- 53.66
- Q3
- 31.29
- Median
- 22.00
- Q1
- 16.18
- Min
- 7.00
FTV’s P/E Ratio of 21.32 is within the middle range for the Machinery industry. This suggests its valuation is in line with the sector average, representing neither a significant premium nor a discount compared to its peers.
ZM
21.69
Software Industry
- Max
- 149.35
- Q3
- 100.21
- Median
- 47.97
- Q1
- 26.77
- Min
- 11.68
In the lower quartile for the Software industry, ZM’s P/E Ratio of 21.69 suggests the stock may be undervalued compared to its peers, potentially presenting an attractive entry point for investors.
Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM)
FTV
2.67
Machinery Industry
- Max
- 5.04
- Q3
- 2.72
- Median
- 1.67
- Q1
- 1.04
- Min
- 0.24
FTV’s P/S Ratio of 2.67 aligns with the market consensus for the Machinery industry. This suggests its valuation, based on sales, is seen as standard and is on par with its competitors.
ZM
4.84
Software Industry
- Max
- 25.24
- Q3
- 13.52
- Median
- 8.15
- Q1
- 4.87
- Min
- 0.98
In the lower quartile for the Software industry, ZM’s P/S Ratio of 4.84 indicates its revenue is valued more conservatively than most of its peers. This could present a compelling opportunity if the market has overlooked its sales-generating capabilities.
Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ)
FTV
2.34
Machinery Industry
- Max
- 7.23
- Q3
- 3.90
- Median
- 2.52
- Q1
- 1.47
- Min
- 0.49
FTV’s P/B Ratio of 2.34 is within the conventional range for the Machinery industry. This shows a balanced market view, where the stock’s price is neither at a significant premium nor a discount to the book value of its peers.
ZM
2.66
Software Industry
- Max
- 30.95
- Q3
- 14.91
- Median
- 7.75
- Q1
- 3.60
- Min
- 0.38
ZM’s P/B Ratio of 2.66 is in the lower quartile for the Software industry. From a value investing perspective, this is favorable, as it suggests the stock is trading at a discount to its net asset value and may offer a greater margin of safety.
Valuation at a Glance
Symbol | FTV | ZM |
---|---|---|
Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM) | 21.32 | 21.69 |
Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM) | 2.67 | 4.84 |
Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ) | 2.34 | 2.66 |
Price-to-Free Cash Flow Ratio (TTM) | 11.83 | 13.36 |