FTV vs. WIT: A Head-to-Head Stock Comparison

Updated on August 21, 2025

Here’s a clear look at FTV and WIT, comparing key factors like historical performance, profitability, financial strength, growth, dividend, and valuation.

Company Profile

FTV is a standard domestic listing, while WIT trades as an American Depositary Receipt (ADR), offering U.S. investors access to its foreign-listed shares.

Symbol	FTV	WIT
Company Name	Fortive Corporation	Wipro Limited
Country	United States	India
GICS Sector	Industrials	Information Technology
GICS Industry	Machinery	IT Services
Market Capitalization	16.49 billion USD	29.41 billion USD
Exchange	NYSE	NYSE
Listing Date	July 5, 2016	October 19, 2000
Security Type	Common Stock	ADR

Historical Performance

This chart compares the performance of FTV and WIT by tracking the growth of an initial $10,000 investment in each. Use the tabs to select the desired time period. Data is adjusted for dividends and splits.

FTV vs. WIT: Growth of a $10,000 investment over the past one year.

Historical Performance at a Glance

Symbol	FTV	WIT
5-Day Price Return	2.70%	-0.47%
13-Week Price Return	-33.92%	-5.64%
26-Week Price Return	-38.97%	-23.56%
52-Week Price Return	-28.68%	-1.27%
Month-to-Date Return	1.67%	-2.66%
Year-to-Date Return	-35.03%	-19.98%
10-Day Avg. Volume	5.20M	6.72M
3-Month Avg. Volume	3.85M	10.84M
3-Month Volatility	55.22%	19.26%
Beta	1.09	0.67

Profitability

Return on Equity (TTM)

FTV

7.44%

Machinery Industry

Max: 34.68%
Q3: 19.06%
Median: 13.13%
Q1: 8.53%
Min: -4.87%

FTV’s Return on Equity of 7.44% is in the lower quartile for the Machinery industry. This indicates a less efficient generation of profit from its equity base when compared to its competitors.

WIT

15.98%

IT Services Industry

Max: 29.51%
Q3: 16.98%
Median: 13.47%
Q1: 7.93%
Min: -3.97%

WIT’s Return on Equity of 15.98% is on par with the norm for the IT Services industry, indicating its profitability relative to shareholder equity is typical for the sector.

FTV vs. WIT: A comparison of their Return on Equity (TTM) against their respective Machinery and IT Services industry benchmarks.

Net Profit Margin (TTM)

FTV

12.51%

Machinery Industry

Max: 19.74%
Q3: 11.24%
Median: 8.13%
Q1: 5.38%
Min: -1.11%

A Net Profit Margin of 12.51% places FTV in the upper quartile for the Machinery industry, signifying strong profitability and more effective cost management than most of its peers.

WIT

15.08%

IT Services Industry

Max: 19.82%
Q3: 11.49%
Median: 6.67%
Q1: 3.61%
Min: -4.62%

A Net Profit Margin of 15.08% places WIT in the upper quartile for the IT Services industry, signifying strong profitability and more effective cost management than most of its peers.

FTV vs. WIT: A comparison of their Net Profit Margin (TTM) against their respective Machinery and IT Services industry benchmarks.

Operating Profit Margin (TTM)

FTV

17.22%

Machinery Industry

Max: 26.63%
Q3: 16.15%
Median: 11.27%
Q1: 7.72%
Min: -4.91%

An Operating Profit Margin of 17.22% places FTV in the upper quartile for the Machinery industry. This signals a strong ability to translate revenue into operating profit, outperforming most of its competitors in core business efficiency.

WIT

16.91%

IT Services Industry

Max: 21.69%
Q3: 14.50%
Median: 10.06%
Q1: 6.98%
Min: 0.06%

An Operating Profit Margin of 16.91% places WIT in the upper quartile for the IT Services industry. This signals a strong ability to translate revenue into operating profit, outperforming most of its competitors in core business efficiency.

FTV vs. WIT: A comparison of their Operating Profit Margin (TTM) against their respective Machinery and IT Services industry benchmarks.

Profitability at a Glance

Symbol	FTV	WIT
Return on Equity (TTM)	7.44%	15.98%
Return on Assets (TTM)	4.40%	10.44%
Net Profit Margin (TTM)	12.51%	15.08%
Operating Profit Margin (TTM)	17.22%	16.91%
Gross Profit Margin (TTM)	59.78%	30.34%

Financial Strength

Current Ratio (MRQ)

FTV

0.98

Machinery Industry

Max: 3.83
Q3: 2.32
Median: 1.72
Q1: 1.28
Min: 0.78

FTV’s Current Ratio of 0.98 falls into the lower quartile for the Machinery industry. This indicates a tighter liquidity situation and a more constrained capacity to handle short-term debt than many of its competitors.

WIT

2.40

IT Services Industry

Max: 2.42
Q3: 1.81
Median: 1.47
Q1: 1.09
Min: 0.44

WIT’s Current Ratio of 2.40 is in the upper quartile for the IT Services industry. This signifies a strong liquidity position, suggesting the company is well-equipped to cover its immediate liabilities compared to its peers.

FTV vs. WIT: A comparison of their Current Ratio (MRQ) against their respective Machinery and IT Services industry benchmarks.

Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ)

FTV

0.46

Machinery Industry

Max: 1.49
Q3: 0.75
Median: 0.44
Q1: 0.26
Min: 0.00

FTV’s Debt-to-Equity Ratio of 0.46 is typical for the Machinery industry, indicating its use of leverage is in line with the sector norm. This suggests a balanced approach to its capital structure.

WIT

0.18

IT Services Industry

Max: 2.33
Q3: 1.17
Median: 0.54
Q1: 0.15
Min: 0.00

WIT’s Debt-to-Equity Ratio of 0.18 is typical for the IT Services industry, indicating its use of leverage is in line with the sector norm. This suggests a balanced approach to its capital structure.

FTV vs. WIT: A comparison of their Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ) against their respective Machinery and IT Services industry benchmarks.

Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM)

FTV

6.04

Machinery Industry

Max: 67.55
Q3: 33.79
Median: 13.87
Q1: 7.97
Min: -1.43

In the lower quartile for the Machinery industry, FTV’s Interest Coverage Ratio of 6.04 indicates a tighter cushion for servicing debt, suggesting less financial flexibility than many of its competitors.

WIT

IT Services Industry

Max: 144.50
Q3: 84.49
Median: 13.76
Q1: 2.59
Min: -28.13

Interest Coverage Ratio data for WIT is currently unavailable.

FTV vs. WIT: A comparison of their Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM) against their respective Machinery and IT Services industry benchmarks.

Financial Strength at a Glance

Symbol	FTV	WIT
Current Ratio (MRQ)	0.98	2.40
Quick Ratio (MRQ)	0.77	2.34
Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ)	0.46	0.18
Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM)	6.04	--

Growth

Revenue Growth

FTV vs. WIT: A side-by-side comparison of their Revenue Growth for the MRQ (YoY), TTM (YoY), 3-Year CAGR, and 5-Year CAGR periods.

EPS Growth

FTV vs. WIT: A side-by-side comparison of their EPS Growth for the MRQ (YoY), TTM (YoY), 3-Year CAGR, and 5-Year CAGR periods.

Dividend

Dividend Yield (TTM)

FTV

0.67%

Machinery Industry

Max: 5.32%
Q3: 2.84%
Median: 1.87%
Q1: 1.09%
Min: 0.00%

FTV’s Dividend Yield of 0.67% is in the lower quartile for the Machinery industry. This suggests the company’s strategy likely favors retaining earnings for growth over providing a high dividend income.

WIT

0.20%

IT Services Industry

Max: 2.80%
Q3: 1.74%
Median: 0.62%
Q1: 0.00%
Min: 0.00%

WIT’s Dividend Yield of 0.20% is consistent with its peers in the IT Services industry, providing a dividend return that is standard for its sector.

FTV vs. WIT: A comparison of their Dividend Yield (TTM) against their respective Machinery and IT Services industry benchmarks.

Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM)

FTV

14.22%

Machinery Industry

Max: 202.17%
Q3: 98.65%
Median: 55.54%
Q1: 29.03%
Min: 0.00%

FTV’s Dividend Payout Ratio of 14.22% is in the lower quartile for the Machinery industry. This suggests a conservative dividend policy, with a strategic focus on reinvesting profits for future growth.

WIT

175.79%

IT Services Industry

Max: 147.75%
Q3: 63.58%
Median: 24.63%
Q1: 0.00%
Min: 0.00%

At 175.79%, WIT’s Dividend Payout Ratio is exceptionally high, exceeding the typical range for the IT Services industry. While this provides a significant return to shareholders, it may limit funds for reinvestment and could be difficult to sustain.

FTV vs. WIT: A comparison of their Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM) against their respective Machinery and IT Services industry benchmarks.

Dividend at a Glance

Symbol	FTV	WIT
Dividend Yield (TTM)	0.67%	0.20%
Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM)	14.22%	175.79%

Valuation

Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM)

FTV

21.32

Machinery Industry

Max: 53.66
Q3: 31.29
Median: 22.00
Q1: 16.18
Min: 7.00

FTV’s P/E Ratio of 21.32 is within the middle range for the Machinery industry. This suggests its valuation is in line with the sector average, representing neither a significant premium nor a discount compared to its peers.

WIT

19.13

IT Services Industry

Max: 41.55
Q3: 31.54
Median: 23.25
Q1: 18.12
Min: 6.57

WIT’s P/E Ratio of 19.13 is within the middle range for the IT Services industry. This suggests its valuation is in line with the sector average, representing neither a significant premium nor a discount compared to its peers.

FTV vs. WIT: A comparison of their Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM) against their respective Machinery and IT Services industry benchmarks.

Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM)

FTV

2.67

Machinery Industry

Max: 5.04
Q3: 2.72
Median: 1.67
Q1: 1.04
Min: 0.24

FTV’s P/S Ratio of 2.67 aligns with the market consensus for the Machinery industry. This suggests its valuation, based on sales, is seen as standard and is on par with its competitors.

WIT

2.89

IT Services Industry

Max: 6.61
Q3: 4.37
Median: 2.02
Q1: 1.20
Min: 0.19

WIT’s P/S Ratio of 2.89 aligns with the market consensus for the IT Services industry. This suggests its valuation, based on sales, is seen as standard and is on par with its competitors.

FTV vs. WIT: A comparison of their Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM) against their respective Machinery and IT Services industry benchmarks.

Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ)

FTV

2.34

Machinery Industry

Max: 7.23
Q3: 3.90
Median: 2.52
Q1: 1.47
Min: 0.49

FTV’s P/B Ratio of 2.34 is within the conventional range for the Machinery industry. This shows a balanced market view, where the stock’s price is neither at a significant premium nor a discount to the book value of its peers.

WIT

3.21

IT Services Industry

Max: 11.19
Q3: 6.38
Median: 3.47
Q1: 2.31
Min: 0.96

WIT’s P/B Ratio of 3.21 is within the conventional range for the IT Services industry. This shows a balanced market view, where the stock’s price is neither at a significant premium nor a discount to the book value of its peers.

FTV vs. WIT: A comparison of their Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ) against their respective Machinery and IT Services industry benchmarks.

Valuation at a Glance

Symbol	FTV	WIT
Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM)	21.32	19.13
Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM)	2.67	2.89
Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ)	2.34	3.21
Price-to-Free Cash Flow Ratio (TTM)	11.83	16.54