Seek Returns logo

FTV vs. UI: A Head-to-Head Stock Comparison

Updated on

Here’s a clear look at FTV and UI, comparing key factors like historical performance, profitability, financial strength, growth, dividend, and valuation.

Company Profile

SymbolFTVUI
Company NameFortive CorporationUbiquiti Inc.
CountryUnited StatesUnited States
GICS SectorIndustrialsInformation Technology
GICS IndustryMachineryCommunications Equipment
Market Capitalization16.94 billion USD40.80 billion USD
ExchangeNYSENYSE
Listing DateJuly 5, 2016October 14, 2011
Security TypeCommon StockCommon Stock

Historical Performance

This chart compares the performance of FTV and UI by tracking the growth of an initial $10,000 investment in each. Use the tabs to select the desired time period. Data is adjusted for dividends and splits.

FTV vs. UI: Growth of a $10,000 investment over the past one year.

Historical Performance at a Glance

SymbolFTVUI
5-Day Price Return5.06%3.45%
13-Week Price Return-5.79%60.47%
26-Week Price Return-32.86%110.18%
52-Week Price Return-36.55%200.36%
Month-to-Date Return2.22%25.08%
Year-to-Date Return-33.23%99.01%
10-Day Avg. Volume3.76M0.20M
3-Month Avg. Volume3.96M0.14M
3-Month Volatility22.54%74.34%
Beta1.061.49

Profitability

Return on Equity (TTM)

FTV

7.44%

Machinery Industry

Max
33.68%
Q3
20.05%
Median
12.37%
Q1
8.67%
Min
-7.69%

FTV’s Return on Equity of 7.44% is in the lower quartile for the Machinery industry. This indicates a less efficient generation of profit from its equity base when compared to its competitors.

UI

179.90%

Communications Equipment Industry

Max
32.30%
Q3
20.90%
Median
9.10%
Q1
4.29%
Min
-13.50%

UI’s Return on Equity of 179.90% is exceptionally high, placing it well beyond the typical range for the Communications Equipment industry. This demonstrates a superior ability to generate profit from shareholder investments, though it could also be inflated by high financial leverage.

FTV vs. UI: A comparison of their Return on Equity (TTM) against their respective Machinery and Communications Equipment industry benchmarks.

Net Profit Margin (TTM)

FTV

12.51%

Machinery Industry

Max
19.72%
Q3
11.07%
Median
7.62%
Q1
5.05%
Min
-1.52%

A Net Profit Margin of 12.51% places FTV in the upper quartile for the Machinery industry, signifying strong profitability and more effective cost management than most of its peers.

UI

27.66%

Communications Equipment Industry

Max
23.65%
Q3
12.56%
Median
5.62%
Q1
2.50%
Min
-3.09%

UI’s Net Profit Margin of 27.66% is exceptionally high, placing it well beyond the typical range for the Communications Equipment industry. This demonstrates outstanding operational efficiency and a strong competitive advantage in converting revenue into profit.

FTV vs. UI: A comparison of their Net Profit Margin (TTM) against their respective Machinery and Communications Equipment industry benchmarks.

Operating Profit Margin (TTM)

FTV

17.22%

Machinery Industry

Max
26.63%
Q3
15.99%
Median
11.27%
Q1
7.72%
Min
-0.51%

An Operating Profit Margin of 17.22% places FTV in the upper quartile for the Machinery industry. This signals a strong ability to translate revenue into operating profit, outperforming most of its competitors in core business efficiency.

UI

32.50%

Communications Equipment Industry

Max
25.23%
Q3
13.72%
Median
6.44%
Q1
3.00%
Min
-10.95%

UI’s Operating Profit Margin of 32.50% is exceptionally high, placing it well above the typical range for the Communications Equipment industry. This demonstrates outstanding efficiency in managing its core operations, which can be a result of strong pricing power or superior cost control.

FTV vs. UI: A comparison of their Operating Profit Margin (TTM) against their respective Machinery and Communications Equipment industry benchmarks.

Profitability at a Glance

SymbolFTVUI
Return on Equity (TTM)7.44%179.90%
Return on Assets (TTM)4.40%55.77%
Net Profit Margin (TTM)12.51%27.66%
Operating Profit Margin (TTM)17.22%32.50%
Gross Profit Margin (TTM)59.78%43.42%

Financial Strength

Current Ratio (MRQ)

FTV

0.98

Machinery Industry

Max
3.13
Q3
2.12
Median
1.72
Q1
1.34
Min
0.77

FTV’s Current Ratio of 0.98 falls into the lower quartile for the Machinery industry. This indicates a tighter liquidity situation and a more constrained capacity to handle short-term debt than many of its competitors.

UI

1.65

Communications Equipment Industry

Max
3.33
Q3
2.13
Median
1.55
Q1
1.15
Min
0.91

UI’s Current Ratio of 1.65 aligns with the median group of the Communications Equipment industry, indicating that its short-term liquidity is in line with its sector peers.

FTV vs. UI: A comparison of their Current Ratio (MRQ) against their respective Machinery and Communications Equipment industry benchmarks.

Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ)

FTV

0.46

Machinery Industry

Max
1.56
Q3
0.79
Median
0.44
Q1
0.27
Min
0.00

FTV’s Debt-to-Equity Ratio of 0.46 is typical for the Machinery industry, indicating its use of leverage is in line with the sector norm. This suggests a balanced approach to its capital structure.

UI

0.37

Communications Equipment Industry

Max
1.44
Q3
0.86
Median
0.53
Q1
0.22
Min
0.00

UI’s Debt-to-Equity Ratio of 0.37 is typical for the Communications Equipment industry, indicating its use of leverage is in line with the sector norm. This suggests a balanced approach to its capital structure.

FTV vs. UI: A comparison of their Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ) against their respective Machinery and Communications Equipment industry benchmarks.

Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM)

FTV

6.04

Machinery Industry

Max
81.58
Q3
37.68
Median
13.76
Q1
7.97
Min
-1.43

In the lower quartile for the Machinery industry, FTV’s Interest Coverage Ratio of 6.04 indicates a tighter cushion for servicing debt, suggesting less financial flexibility than many of its competitors.

UI

27.30

Communications Equipment Industry

Max
55.49
Q3
34.19
Median
7.59
Q1
3.73
Min
-9.94

UI’s Interest Coverage Ratio of 27.30 is positioned comfortably within the norm for the Communications Equipment industry, indicating a standard and healthy capacity to cover its interest payments.

FTV vs. UI: A comparison of their Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM) against their respective Machinery and Communications Equipment industry benchmarks.

Financial Strength at a Glance

SymbolFTVUI
Current Ratio (MRQ)0.981.65
Quick Ratio (MRQ)0.770.62
Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ)0.460.37
Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM)6.0427.30

Growth

Revenue Growth

FTV vs. UI: A side-by-side comparison of their Revenue Growth for the MRQ (YoY), TTM (YoY), 3-Year CAGR, and 5-Year CAGR periods.

EPS Growth

FTV vs. UI: A side-by-side comparison of their EPS Growth for the MRQ (YoY), TTM (YoY), 3-Year CAGR, and 5-Year CAGR periods.

Dividend

Dividend Yield (TTM)

FTV

0.65%

Machinery Industry

Max
4.55%
Q3
2.66%
Median
1.90%
Q1
1.23%
Min
0.00%

FTV’s Dividend Yield of 0.65% is in the lower quartile for the Machinery industry. This suggests the company’s strategy likely favors retaining earnings for growth over providing a high dividend income.

UI

0.36%

Communications Equipment Industry

Max
8.13%
Q3
3.29%
Median
0.94%
Q1
0.00%
Min
0.00%

UI’s Dividend Yield of 0.36% is consistent with its peers in the Communications Equipment industry, providing a dividend return that is standard for its sector.

FTV vs. UI: A comparison of their Dividend Yield (TTM) against their respective Machinery and Communications Equipment industry benchmarks.

Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM)

FTV

14.22%

Machinery Industry

Max
198.34%
Q3
101.42%
Median
62.79%
Q1
29.85%
Min
0.00%

FTV’s Dividend Payout Ratio of 14.22% is in the lower quartile for the Machinery industry. This suggests a conservative dividend policy, with a strategic focus on reinvesting profits for future growth.

UI

20.39%

Communications Equipment Industry

Max
111.16%
Q3
70.91%
Median
30.78%
Q1
0.00%
Min
0.00%

UI’s Dividend Payout Ratio of 20.39% is within the typical range for the Communications Equipment industry, suggesting a balanced approach between shareholder payouts and company reinvestment.

FTV vs. UI: A comparison of their Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM) against their respective Machinery and Communications Equipment industry benchmarks.

Dividend at a Glance

SymbolFTVUI
Dividend Yield (TTM)0.65%0.36%
Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM)14.22%20.39%

Valuation

Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM)

FTV

21.88

Machinery Industry

Max
47.95
Q3
30.11
Median
22.35
Q1
16.56
Min
6.48

FTV’s P/E Ratio of 21.88 is within the middle range for the Machinery industry. This suggests its valuation is in line with the sector average, representing neither a significant premium nor a discount compared to its peers.

UI

57.28

Communications Equipment Industry

Max
103.74
Q3
61.65
Median
26.20
Q1
18.12
Min
4.19

UI’s P/E Ratio of 57.28 is within the middle range for the Communications Equipment industry. This suggests its valuation is in line with the sector average, representing neither a significant premium nor a discount compared to its peers.

FTV vs. UI: A comparison of their Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM) against their respective Machinery and Communications Equipment industry benchmarks.

Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM)

FTV

2.74

Machinery Industry

Max
4.97
Q3
2.76
Median
1.65
Q1
1.04
Min
0.04

FTV’s P/S Ratio of 2.74 aligns with the market consensus for the Machinery industry. This suggests its valuation, based on sales, is seen as standard and is on par with its competitors.

UI

15.84

Communications Equipment Industry

Max
6.86
Q3
6.24
Median
2.44
Q1
1.02
Min
0.48

With a P/S Ratio of 15.84, UI trades at a valuation that eclipses even the highest in the Communications Equipment industry. This implies the market has priced in exceptionally optimistic scenarios for future revenue growth, posing considerable valuation risk.

FTV vs. UI: A comparison of their Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM) against their respective Machinery and Communications Equipment industry benchmarks.

Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ)

FTV

2.34

Machinery Industry

Max
7.29
Q3
4.06
Median
2.67
Q1
1.54
Min
0.52

FTV’s P/B Ratio of 2.34 is within the conventional range for the Machinery industry. This shows a balanced market view, where the stock’s price is neither at a significant premium nor a discount to the book value of its peers.

UI

37.26

Communications Equipment Industry

Max
6.28
Q3
5.73
Median
3.32
Q1
2.02
Min
0.42

At 37.26, UI’s P/B Ratio is at an extreme premium to the Communications Equipment industry. This signifies that the market’s valuation is heavily reliant on future potential rather than its current net asset value, which can be a high-risk proposition.

FTV vs. UI: A comparison of their Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ) against their respective Machinery and Communications Equipment industry benchmarks.

Valuation at a Glance

SymbolFTVUI
Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM)21.8857.28
Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM)2.7415.84
Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ)2.3437.26
Price-to-Free Cash Flow Ratio (TTM)12.1464.99