Seek Returns logo

FTV vs. TTWO: A Head-to-Head Stock Comparison

Updated on

Here’s a clear look at FTV and TTWO, comparing key factors like historical performance, profitability, financial strength, growth, dividend, and valuation.

Company Profile

SymbolFTVTTWO
Company NameFortive CorporationTake-Two Interactive Software, Inc.
CountryUnited StatesUnited States
GICS SectorIndustrialsCommunication Services
GICS IndustryMachineryEntertainment
Market Capitalization16.49 billion USD43.56 billion USD
ExchangeNYSENasdaqGS
Listing DateJuly 5, 2016April 15, 1997
Security TypeCommon StockCommon Stock

Historical Performance

This chart compares the performance of FTV and TTWO by tracking the growth of an initial $10,000 investment in each. Use the tabs to select the desired time period. Data is adjusted for dividends and splits.

FTV vs. TTWO: Growth of a $10,000 investment over the past one year.

Historical Performance at a Glance

SymbolFTVTTWO
5-Day Price Return2.70%4.26%
13-Week Price Return-33.92%4.37%
26-Week Price Return-38.97%28.98%
52-Week Price Return-28.68%60.32%
Month-to-Date Return1.67%6.02%
Year-to-Date Return-35.03%28.28%
10-Day Avg. Volume5.20M2.35M
3-Month Avg. Volume3.85M2.25M
3-Month Volatility55.22%24.18%
Beta1.091.01

Profitability

Return on Equity (TTM)

FTV

7.44%

Machinery Industry

Max
34.68%
Q3
19.06%
Median
13.13%
Q1
8.53%
Min
-4.87%

FTV’s Return on Equity of 7.44% is in the lower quartile for the Machinery industry. This indicates a less efficient generation of profit from its equity base when compared to its competitors.

TTWO

-91.27%

Entertainment Industry

Max
42.50%
Q3
22.75%
Median
12.88%
Q1
7.15%
Min
-6.84%

TTWO has a negative Return on Equity of -91.27%. This indicates the company is generating a loss for its shareholders, which can be a result of unprofitability or negative shareholder equity and is often a sign of financial distress.

FTV vs. TTWO: A comparison of their Return on Equity (TTM) against their respective Machinery and Entertainment industry benchmarks.

Net Profit Margin (TTM)

FTV

12.51%

Machinery Industry

Max
19.74%
Q3
11.24%
Median
8.13%
Q1
5.38%
Min
-1.11%

A Net Profit Margin of 12.51% places FTV in the upper quartile for the Machinery industry, signifying strong profitability and more effective cost management than most of its peers.

TTWO

-79.50%

Entertainment Industry

Max
45.25%
Q3
23.93%
Median
14.60%
Q1
4.89%
Min
-22.94%

TTWO has a negative Net Profit Margin of -79.50%, indicating the company is operating at a net loss as its expenses exceeded its revenues.

FTV vs. TTWO: A comparison of their Net Profit Margin (TTM) against their respective Machinery and Entertainment industry benchmarks.

Operating Profit Margin (TTM)

FTV

17.22%

Machinery Industry

Max
26.63%
Q3
16.15%
Median
11.27%
Q1
7.72%
Min
-4.91%

An Operating Profit Margin of 17.22% places FTV in the upper quartile for the Machinery industry. This signals a strong ability to translate revenue into operating profit, outperforming most of its competitors in core business efficiency.

TTWO

-77.94%

Entertainment Industry

Max
46.83%
Q3
28.87%
Median
15.26%
Q1
8.95%
Min
-5.53%

TTWO has a negative Operating Profit Margin of -77.94%. This signifies the company is unprofitable at the operational level, as its core business expenses exceed its revenue.

FTV vs. TTWO: A comparison of their Operating Profit Margin (TTM) against their respective Machinery and Entertainment industry benchmarks.

Profitability at a Glance

SymbolFTVTTWO
Return on Equity (TTM)7.44%-91.27%
Return on Assets (TTM)4.40%-37.42%
Net Profit Margin (TTM)12.51%-79.50%
Operating Profit Margin (TTM)17.22%-77.94%
Gross Profit Margin (TTM)59.78%55.73%

Financial Strength

Current Ratio (MRQ)

FTV

0.98

Machinery Industry

Max
3.83
Q3
2.32
Median
1.72
Q1
1.28
Min
0.78

FTV’s Current Ratio of 0.98 falls into the lower quartile for the Machinery industry. This indicates a tighter liquidity situation and a more constrained capacity to handle short-term debt than many of its competitors.

TTWO

0.78

Entertainment Industry

Max
6.80
Q3
3.77
Median
1.87
Q1
0.86
Min
0.39

TTWO’s Current Ratio of 0.78 falls into the lower quartile for the Entertainment industry. This indicates a tighter liquidity situation and a more constrained capacity to handle short-term debt than many of its competitors.

FTV vs. TTWO: A comparison of their Current Ratio (MRQ) against their respective Machinery and Entertainment industry benchmarks.

Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ)

FTV

0.46

Machinery Industry

Max
1.49
Q3
0.75
Median
0.44
Q1
0.26
Min
0.00

FTV’s Debt-to-Equity Ratio of 0.46 is typical for the Machinery industry, indicating its use of leverage is in line with the sector norm. This suggests a balanced approach to its capital structure.

TTWO

1.71

Entertainment Industry

Max
1.65
Q3
0.71
Median
0.14
Q1
0.04
Min
0.00

With a Debt-to-Equity Ratio of 1.71, TTWO operates with exceptionally high leverage compared to the Entertainment industry norm. This suggests an aggressive reliance on debt financing, which can magnify returns but also significantly elevates financial risk.

FTV vs. TTWO: A comparison of their Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ) against their respective Machinery and Entertainment industry benchmarks.

Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM)

FTV

6.04

Machinery Industry

Max
67.55
Q3
33.79
Median
13.87
Q1
7.97
Min
-1.43

In the lower quartile for the Machinery industry, FTV’s Interest Coverage Ratio of 6.04 indicates a tighter cushion for servicing debt, suggesting less financial flexibility than many of its competitors.

TTWO

-44.74

Entertainment Industry

Max
62.11
Q3
31.19
Median
7.50
Q1
2.02
Min
-6.33

TTWO has a negative Interest Coverage Ratio of -44.74. This indicates that its earnings were insufficient to cover even its operational costs, let alone its interest payments, signaling significant financial distress.

FTV vs. TTWO: A comparison of their Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM) against their respective Machinery and Entertainment industry benchmarks.

Financial Strength at a Glance

SymbolFTVTTWO
Current Ratio (MRQ)0.980.78
Quick Ratio (MRQ)0.770.67
Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ)0.461.71
Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM)6.04-44.74

Growth

Revenue Growth

FTV vs. TTWO: A side-by-side comparison of their Revenue Growth for the MRQ (YoY), TTM (YoY), 3-Year CAGR, and 5-Year CAGR periods.

EPS Growth

FTV vs. TTWO: A side-by-side comparison of their EPS Growth for the MRQ (YoY), TTM (YoY), 3-Year CAGR, and 5-Year CAGR periods.

Dividend

Dividend Yield (TTM)

FTV

0.67%

Machinery Industry

Max
5.32%
Q3
2.84%
Median
1.87%
Q1
1.09%
Min
0.00%

FTV’s Dividend Yield of 0.67% is in the lower quartile for the Machinery industry. This suggests the company’s strategy likely favors retaining earnings for growth over providing a high dividend income.

TTWO

0.00%

Entertainment Industry

Max
2.54%
Q3
1.29%
Median
0.61%
Q1
0.00%
Min
0.00%

TTWO currently does not pay a dividend, resulting in a yield of 0%. This is a common strategy for growth-focused companies that prioritize reinvesting earnings, though it may be less typical in mature, income-oriented sectors.

FTV vs. TTWO: A comparison of their Dividend Yield (TTM) against their respective Machinery and Entertainment industry benchmarks.

Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM)

FTV

14.22%

Machinery Industry

Max
202.17%
Q3
98.65%
Median
55.54%
Q1
29.03%
Min
0.00%

FTV’s Dividend Payout Ratio of 14.22% is in the lower quartile for the Machinery industry. This suggests a conservative dividend policy, with a strategic focus on reinvesting profits for future growth.

TTWO

0.00%

Entertainment Industry

Max
82.30%
Q3
45.76%
Median
29.16%
Q1
0.00%
Min
0.00%

TTWO has a Dividend Payout Ratio of 0%, indicating it does not currently pay a dividend. This is a common strategy for growth-oriented companies that reinvest all profits back into the business.

FTV vs. TTWO: A comparison of their Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM) against their respective Machinery and Entertainment industry benchmarks.

Dividend at a Glance

SymbolFTVTTWO
Dividend Yield (TTM)0.67%0.00%
Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM)14.22%0.00%

Valuation

Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM)

FTV

21.32

Machinery Industry

Max
53.66
Q3
31.29
Median
22.00
Q1
16.18
Min
7.00

FTV’s P/E Ratio of 21.32 is within the middle range for the Machinery industry. This suggests its valuation is in line with the sector average, representing neither a significant premium nor a discount compared to its peers.

TTWO

--

Entertainment Industry

Max
53.51
Q3
45.31
Median
33.16
Q1
18.21
Min
3.89

P/E Ratio data for TTWO is currently unavailable.

FTV vs. TTWO: A comparison of their Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM) against their respective Machinery and Entertainment industry benchmarks.

Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM)

FTV

2.67

Machinery Industry

Max
5.04
Q3
2.72
Median
1.67
Q1
1.04
Min
0.24

FTV’s P/S Ratio of 2.67 aligns with the market consensus for the Machinery industry. This suggests its valuation, based on sales, is seen as standard and is on par with its competitors.

TTWO

7.62

Entertainment Industry

Max
12.81
Q3
7.20
Median
4.68
Q1
3.32
Min
0.79

TTWO’s P/S Ratio of 7.62 is in the upper echelon for the Entertainment industry. This means the company is valued richly on its revenue stream compared to its peers, suggesting the stock is priced for a high level of future performance.

FTV vs. TTWO: A comparison of their Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM) against their respective Machinery and Entertainment industry benchmarks.

Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ)

FTV

2.34

Machinery Industry

Max
7.23
Q3
3.90
Median
2.52
Q1
1.47
Min
0.49

FTV’s P/B Ratio of 2.34 is within the conventional range for the Machinery industry. This shows a balanced market view, where the stock’s price is neither at a significant premium nor a discount to the book value of its peers.

TTWO

17.11

Entertainment Industry

Max
17.11
Q3
8.38
Median
5.24
Q1
2.18
Min
0.67

TTWO’s P/B Ratio of 17.11 is in the upper tier for the Entertainment industry. This indicates that investors are paying a premium relative to the company’s net assets, a valuation that hinges on its ability to generate superior profits.

FTV vs. TTWO: A comparison of their Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ) against their respective Machinery and Entertainment industry benchmarks.

Valuation at a Glance

SymbolFTVTTWO
Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM)21.32--
Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM)2.677.62
Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ)2.3417.11
Price-to-Free Cash Flow Ratio (TTM)11.83190.77