Seek Returns logo

FTV vs. NTNX: A Head-to-Head Stock Comparison

Updated on

Here’s a clear look at FTV and NTNX, comparing key factors like historical performance, profitability, financial strength, growth, dividend, and valuation.

Company Profile

SymbolFTVNTNX
Company NameFortive CorporationNutanix, Inc.
CountryUnited StatesUnited States
GICS SectorIndustrialsInformation Technology
GICS IndustryMachinerySoftware
Market Capitalization17.06 billion USD20.49 billion USD
ExchangeNYSENasdaqGS
Listing DateJuly 5, 2016September 30, 2016
Security TypeCommon StockCommon Stock

Historical Performance

This chart compares the performance of FTV and NTNX by tracking the growth of an initial $10,000 investment in each. Use the tabs to select the desired time period. Data is adjusted for dividends and splits.

FTV vs. NTNX: Growth of a $10,000 investment over the past one year.

Historical Performance at a Glance

SymbolFTVNTNX
5-Day Price Return3.07%-0.90%
13-Week Price Return-4.98%-0.76%
26-Week Price Return-31.12%9.18%
52-Week Price Return-35.08%29.87%
Month-to-Date Return2.90%2.46%
Year-to-Date Return-32.79%24.58%
10-Day Avg. Volume3.12M3.06M
3-Month Avg. Volume3.93M3.42M
3-Month Volatility22.34%34.74%
Beta1.060.50

Profitability

Return on Equity (TTM)

FTV

7.44%

Machinery Industry

Max
33.68%
Q3
20.05%
Median
12.37%
Q1
8.67%
Min
-7.69%

FTV’s Return on Equity of 7.44% is in the lower quartile for the Machinery industry. This indicates a less efficient generation of profit from its equity base when compared to its competitors.

NTNX

-321.31%

Software Industry

Max
66.28%
Q3
21.28%
Median
9.33%
Q1
-8.77%
Min
-48.16%

NTNX has a negative Return on Equity of -321.31%. This indicates the company is generating a loss for its shareholders, which can be a result of unprofitability or negative shareholder equity and is often a sign of financial distress.

FTV vs. NTNX: A comparison of their Return on Equity (TTM) against their respective Machinery and Software industry benchmarks.

Net Profit Margin (TTM)

FTV

12.51%

Machinery Industry

Max
19.72%
Q3
11.07%
Median
7.62%
Q1
5.05%
Min
-1.52%

A Net Profit Margin of 12.51% places FTV in the upper quartile for the Machinery industry, signifying strong profitability and more effective cost management than most of its peers.

NTNX

7.42%

Software Industry

Max
51.92%
Q3
19.23%
Median
6.98%
Q1
-7.14%
Min
-41.00%

NTNX’s Net Profit Margin of 7.42% is aligned with the median group of its peers in the Software industry. This indicates its ability to convert revenue into profit is typical for the sector.

FTV vs. NTNX: A comparison of their Net Profit Margin (TTM) against their respective Machinery and Software industry benchmarks.

Operating Profit Margin (TTM)

FTV

17.22%

Machinery Industry

Max
26.63%
Q3
15.99%
Median
11.27%
Q1
7.72%
Min
-0.51%

An Operating Profit Margin of 17.22% places FTV in the upper quartile for the Machinery industry. This signals a strong ability to translate revenue into operating profit, outperforming most of its competitors in core business efficiency.

NTNX

6.80%

Software Industry

Max
60.40%
Q3
21.25%
Median
9.90%
Q1
-4.97%
Min
-43.50%

NTNX’s Operating Profit Margin of 6.80% is around the midpoint for the Software industry, indicating that its efficiency in managing core business operations is typical for the sector.

FTV vs. NTNX: A comparison of their Operating Profit Margin (TTM) against their respective Machinery and Software industry benchmarks.

Profitability at a Glance

SymbolFTVNTNX
Return on Equity (TTM)7.44%-321.31%
Return on Assets (TTM)4.40%6.52%
Net Profit Margin (TTM)12.51%7.42%
Operating Profit Margin (TTM)17.22%6.80%
Gross Profit Margin (TTM)59.78%86.81%

Financial Strength

Current Ratio (MRQ)

FTV

0.98

Machinery Industry

Max
3.13
Q3
2.12
Median
1.72
Q1
1.34
Min
0.77

FTV’s Current Ratio of 0.98 falls into the lower quartile for the Machinery industry. This indicates a tighter liquidity situation and a more constrained capacity to handle short-term debt than many of its competitors.

NTNX

1.83

Software Industry

Max
4.29
Q3
2.37
Median
1.40
Q1
1.03
Min
0.25

NTNX’s Current Ratio of 1.83 aligns with the median group of the Software industry, indicating that its short-term liquidity is in line with its sector peers.

FTV vs. NTNX: A comparison of their Current Ratio (MRQ) against their respective Machinery and Software industry benchmarks.

Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ)

FTV

0.46

Machinery Industry

Max
1.56
Q3
0.79
Median
0.44
Q1
0.27
Min
0.00

FTV’s Debt-to-Equity Ratio of 0.46 is typical for the Machinery industry, indicating its use of leverage is in line with the sector norm. This suggests a balanced approach to its capital structure.

NTNX

7.34

Software Industry

Max
2.16
Q3
0.86
Median
0.31
Q1
0.00
Min
0.00

With a Debt-to-Equity Ratio of 7.34, NTNX operates with exceptionally high leverage compared to the Software industry norm. This suggests an aggressive reliance on debt financing, which can magnify returns but also significantly elevates financial risk.

FTV vs. NTNX: A comparison of their Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ) against their respective Machinery and Software industry benchmarks.

Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM)

FTV

6.04

Machinery Industry

Max
81.58
Q3
37.68
Median
13.76
Q1
7.97
Min
-1.43

In the lower quartile for the Machinery industry, FTV’s Interest Coverage Ratio of 6.04 indicates a tighter cushion for servicing debt, suggesting less financial flexibility than many of its competitors.

NTNX

-0.00

Software Industry

Max
89.65
Q3
32.64
Median
1.00
Q1
-9.84
Min
-71.23

NTNX has a negative Interest Coverage Ratio of -0.00. This indicates that its earnings were insufficient to cover even its operational costs, let alone its interest payments, signaling significant financial distress.

FTV vs. NTNX: A comparison of their Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM) against their respective Machinery and Software industry benchmarks.

Financial Strength at a Glance

SymbolFTVNTNX
Current Ratio (MRQ)0.981.83
Quick Ratio (MRQ)0.771.76
Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ)0.467.34
Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM)6.04-0.00

Growth

Revenue Growth

FTV vs. NTNX: A side-by-side comparison of their Revenue Growth for the MRQ (YoY), TTM (YoY), 3-Year CAGR, and 5-Year CAGR periods.

EPS Growth

FTV vs. NTNX: A side-by-side comparison of their EPS Growth for the MRQ (YoY), TTM (YoY), 3-Year CAGR, and 5-Year CAGR periods.

Dividend

Dividend Yield (TTM)

FTV

0.64%

Machinery Industry

Max
4.55%
Q3
2.66%
Median
1.90%
Q1
1.23%
Min
0.00%

FTV’s Dividend Yield of 0.64% is in the lower quartile for the Machinery industry. This suggests the company’s strategy likely favors retaining earnings for growth over providing a high dividend income.

NTNX

0.00%

Software Industry

Max
0.22%
Q3
0.11%
Median
0.00%
Q1
0.00%
Min
0.00%

NTNX currently does not pay a dividend, resulting in a yield of 0%. This is a common strategy for growth-focused companies that prioritize reinvesting earnings, though it may be less typical in mature, income-oriented sectors.

FTV vs. NTNX: A comparison of their Dividend Yield (TTM) against their respective Machinery and Software industry benchmarks.

Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM)

FTV

14.22%

Machinery Industry

Max
198.34%
Q3
101.42%
Median
62.79%
Q1
29.85%
Min
0.00%

FTV’s Dividend Payout Ratio of 14.22% is in the lower quartile for the Machinery industry. This suggests a conservative dividend policy, with a strategic focus on reinvesting profits for future growth.

NTNX

0.00%

Software Industry

Max
3.29%
Q3
2.41%
Median
0.00%
Q1
0.00%
Min
0.00%

NTNX has a Dividend Payout Ratio of 0%, indicating it does not currently pay a dividend. This is a common strategy for growth-oriented companies that reinvest all profits back into the business.

FTV vs. NTNX: A comparison of their Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM) against their respective Machinery and Software industry benchmarks.

Dividend at a Glance

SymbolFTVNTNX
Dividend Yield (TTM)0.64%0.00%
Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM)14.22%0.00%

Valuation

Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM)

FTV

22.19

Machinery Industry

Max
47.95
Q3
30.11
Median
22.35
Q1
16.56
Min
6.48

FTV’s P/E Ratio of 22.19 is within the middle range for the Machinery industry. This suggests its valuation is in line with the sector average, representing neither a significant premium nor a discount compared to its peers.

NTNX

108.10

Software Industry

Max
145.74
Q3
94.88
Median
45.35
Q1
26.66
Min
8.80

A P/E Ratio of 108.10 places NTNX in the upper quartile for the Software industry. This high valuation relative to peers suggests the market holds elevated expectations for the company’s future growth.

FTV vs. NTNX: A comparison of their Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM) against their respective Machinery and Software industry benchmarks.

Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM)

FTV

2.78

Machinery Industry

Max
4.97
Q3
2.76
Median
1.65
Q1
1.04
Min
0.04

FTV’s P/S Ratio of 2.78 is in the upper echelon for the Machinery industry. This means the company is valued richly on its revenue stream compared to its peers, suggesting the stock is priced for a high level of future performance.

NTNX

8.02

Software Industry

Max
25.67
Q3
13.68
Median
8.28
Q1
4.95
Min
0.90

NTNX’s P/S Ratio of 8.02 aligns with the market consensus for the Software industry. This suggests its valuation, based on sales, is seen as standard and is on par with its competitors.

FTV vs. NTNX: A comparison of their Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM) against their respective Machinery and Software industry benchmarks.

Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ)

FTV

2.34

Machinery Industry

Max
7.29
Q3
4.06
Median
2.67
Q1
1.54
Min
0.52

FTV’s P/B Ratio of 2.34 is within the conventional range for the Machinery industry. This shows a balanced market view, where the stock’s price is neither at a significant premium nor a discount to the book value of its peers.

NTNX

88.38

Software Industry

Max
30.67
Q3
14.92
Median
8.52
Q1
3.89
Min
0.38

At 88.38, NTNX’s P/B Ratio is at an extreme premium to the Software industry. This signifies that the market’s valuation is heavily reliant on future potential rather than its current net asset value, which can be a high-risk proposition.

FTV vs. NTNX: A comparison of their Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ) against their respective Machinery and Software industry benchmarks.

Valuation at a Glance

SymbolFTVNTNX
Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM)22.19108.10
Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM)2.788.02
Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ)2.3488.38
Price-to-Free Cash Flow Ratio (TTM)12.3127.14