FTV vs. NTES: A Head-to-Head Stock Comparison

Updated on August 20, 2025

Here’s a clear look at FTV and NTES, comparing key factors like historical performance, profitability, financial strength, growth, dividend, and valuation.

Company Profile

FTV is a standard domestic listing, while NTES trades as an American Depositary Receipt (ADR), offering U.S. investors access to its foreign-listed shares.

Symbol	FTV	NTES
Company Name	Fortive Corporation	NetEase, Inc.
Country	United States	China
GICS Sector	Industrials	Communication Services
GICS Industry	Machinery	Entertainment
Market Capitalization	16.49 billion USD	86.89 billion USD
Exchange	NYSE	NasdaqGS
Listing Date	July 5, 2016	June 30, 2000
Security Type	Common Stock	ADR

Historical Performance

This chart compares the performance of FTV and NTES by tracking the growth of an initial $10,000 investment in each. Use the tabs to select the desired time period. Data is adjusted for dividends and splits.

FTV vs. NTES: Growth of a $10,000 investment over the past one year.

Historical Performance at a Glance

Symbol	FTV	NTES
5-Day Price Return	2.70%	3.04%
13-Week Price Return	-33.92%	26.29%
26-Week Price Return	-38.97%	30.71%
52-Week Price Return	-28.68%	50.64%
Month-to-Date Return	1.67%	3.53%
Year-to-Date Return	-35.03%	51.22%
10-Day Avg. Volume	5.20M	0.87M
3-Month Avg. Volume	3.85M	1.16M
3-Month Volatility	55.22%	37.46%
Beta	1.09	0.66

Profitability

Return on Equity (TTM)

FTV

7.44%

Machinery Industry

Max: 34.68%
Q3: 19.06%
Median: 13.13%
Q1: 8.53%
Min: -4.87%

FTV’s Return on Equity of 7.44% is in the lower quartile for the Machinery industry. This indicates a less efficient generation of profit from its equity base when compared to its competitors.

NTES

23.73%

Entertainment Industry

Max: 42.50%
Q3: 22.75%
Median: 12.88%
Q1: 7.15%
Min: -6.84%

In the upper quartile for the Entertainment industry, NTES’s Return on Equity of 23.73% signals a highly effective use of shareholder capital to drive profitability compared to most of its peers.

FTV vs. NTES: A comparison of their Return on Equity (TTM) against their respective Machinery and Entertainment industry benchmarks.

Net Profit Margin (TTM)

FTV

12.51%

Machinery Industry

Max: 19.74%
Q3: 11.24%
Median: 8.13%
Q1: 5.38%
Min: -1.11%

A Net Profit Margin of 12.51% places FTV in the upper quartile for the Machinery industry, signifying strong profitability and more effective cost management than most of its peers.

NTES

30.17%

Entertainment Industry

Max: 45.25%
Q3: 23.93%
Median: 14.60%
Q1: 4.89%
Min: -22.94%

A Net Profit Margin of 30.17% places NTES in the upper quartile for the Entertainment industry, signifying strong profitability and more effective cost management than most of its peers.

FTV vs. NTES: A comparison of their Net Profit Margin (TTM) against their respective Machinery and Entertainment industry benchmarks.

Operating Profit Margin (TTM)

FTV

17.22%

Machinery Industry

Max: 26.63%
Q3: 16.15%
Median: 11.27%
Q1: 7.72%
Min: -4.91%

An Operating Profit Margin of 17.22% places FTV in the upper quartile for the Machinery industry. This signals a strong ability to translate revenue into operating profit, outperforming most of its competitors in core business efficiency.

NTES

30.21%

Entertainment Industry

Max: 46.83%
Q3: 28.87%
Median: 15.26%
Q1: 8.95%
Min: -5.53%

An Operating Profit Margin of 30.21% places NTES in the upper quartile for the Entertainment industry. This signals a strong ability to translate revenue into operating profit, outperforming most of its competitors in core business efficiency.

FTV vs. NTES: A comparison of their Operating Profit Margin (TTM) against their respective Machinery and Entertainment industry benchmarks.

Profitability at a Glance

Symbol	FTV	NTES
Return on Equity (TTM)	7.44%	23.73%
Return on Assets (TTM)	4.40%	16.92%
Net Profit Margin (TTM)	12.51%	30.17%
Operating Profit Margin (TTM)	17.22%	30.21%
Gross Profit Margin (TTM)	59.78%	62.71%

Financial Strength

Current Ratio (MRQ)

FTV

0.98

Machinery Industry

Max: 3.83
Q3: 2.32
Median: 1.72
Q1: 1.28
Min: 0.78

FTV’s Current Ratio of 0.98 falls into the lower quartile for the Machinery industry. This indicates a tighter liquidity situation and a more constrained capacity to handle short-term debt than many of its competitors.

NTES

3.21

Entertainment Industry

Max: 6.80
Q3: 3.77
Median: 1.87
Q1: 0.86
Min: 0.39

NTES’s Current Ratio of 3.21 aligns with the median group of the Entertainment industry, indicating that its short-term liquidity is in line with its sector peers.

FTV vs. NTES: A comparison of their Current Ratio (MRQ) against their respective Machinery and Entertainment industry benchmarks.

Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ)

FTV

0.46

Machinery Industry

Max: 1.49
Q3: 0.75
Median: 0.44
Q1: 0.26
Min: 0.00

FTV’s Debt-to-Equity Ratio of 0.46 is typical for the Machinery industry, indicating its use of leverage is in line with the sector norm. This suggests a balanced approach to its capital structure.

NTES

0.07

Entertainment Industry

Max: 1.65
Q3: 0.71
Median: 0.14
Q1: 0.04
Min: 0.00

NTES’s Debt-to-Equity Ratio of 0.07 is typical for the Entertainment industry, indicating its use of leverage is in line with the sector norm. This suggests a balanced approach to its capital structure.

FTV vs. NTES: A comparison of their Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ) against their respective Machinery and Entertainment industry benchmarks.

Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM)

FTV

6.04

Machinery Industry

Max: 67.55
Q3: 33.79
Median: 13.87
Q1: 7.97
Min: -1.43

In the lower quartile for the Machinery industry, FTV’s Interest Coverage Ratio of 6.04 indicates a tighter cushion for servicing debt, suggesting less financial flexibility than many of its competitors.

NTES

161.13

Entertainment Industry

Max: 62.11
Q3: 31.19
Median: 7.50
Q1: 2.02
Min: -6.33

With an Interest Coverage Ratio of 161.13, NTES demonstrates a superior capacity to service its debt, placing it well above the typical range for the Entertainment industry. This stems from either robust earnings or a conservative debt load.

FTV vs. NTES: A comparison of their Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM) against their respective Machinery and Entertainment industry benchmarks.

Financial Strength at a Glance

Symbol	FTV	NTES
Current Ratio (MRQ)	0.98	3.21
Quick Ratio (MRQ)	0.77	3.06
Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ)	0.46	0.07
Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM)	6.04	161.13

Growth

Revenue Growth

FTV vs. NTES: A side-by-side comparison of their Revenue Growth for the MRQ (YoY), TTM (YoY), 3-Year CAGR, and 5-Year CAGR periods.

EPS Growth

FTV vs. NTES: A side-by-side comparison of their EPS Growth for the MRQ (YoY), TTM (YoY), 3-Year CAGR, and 5-Year CAGR periods.

Dividend

Dividend Yield (TTM)

FTV

0.67%

Machinery Industry

Max: 5.32%
Q3: 2.84%
Median: 1.87%
Q1: 1.09%
Min: 0.00%

FTV’s Dividend Yield of 0.67% is in the lower quartile for the Machinery industry. This suggests the company’s strategy likely favors retaining earnings for growth over providing a high dividend income.

NTES

2.02%

Entertainment Industry

Max: 2.54%
Q3: 1.29%
Median: 0.61%
Q1: 0.00%
Min: 0.00%

With a Dividend Yield of 2.02%, NTES offers a more attractive income stream than most of its peers in the Entertainment industry, signaling a strong commitment to shareholder returns.

FTV vs. NTES: A comparison of their Dividend Yield (TTM) against their respective Machinery and Entertainment industry benchmarks.

Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM)

FTV

14.22%

Machinery Industry

Max: 202.17%
Q3: 98.65%
Median: 55.54%
Q1: 29.03%
Min: 0.00%

FTV’s Dividend Payout Ratio of 14.22% is in the lower quartile for the Machinery industry. This suggests a conservative dividend policy, with a strategic focus on reinvesting profits for future growth.

NTES

36.47%

Entertainment Industry

Max: 82.30%
Q3: 45.76%
Median: 29.16%
Q1: 0.00%
Min: 0.00%

NTES’s Dividend Payout Ratio of 36.47% is within the typical range for the Entertainment industry, suggesting a balanced approach between shareholder payouts and company reinvestment.

FTV vs. NTES: A comparison of their Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM) against their respective Machinery and Entertainment industry benchmarks.

Dividend at a Glance

Symbol	FTV	NTES
Dividend Yield (TTM)	0.67%	2.02%
Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM)	14.22%	36.47%

Valuation

Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM)

FTV

21.32

Machinery Industry

Max: 53.66
Q3: 31.29
Median: 22.00
Q1: 16.18
Min: 7.00

FTV’s P/E Ratio of 21.32 is within the middle range for the Machinery industry. This suggests its valuation is in line with the sector average, representing neither a significant premium nor a discount compared to its peers.

NTES

18.03

Entertainment Industry

Max: 53.51
Q3: 45.31
Median: 33.16
Q1: 18.21
Min: 3.89

In the lower quartile for the Entertainment industry, NTES’s P/E Ratio of 18.03 suggests the stock may be undervalued compared to its peers, potentially presenting an attractive entry point for investors.

FTV vs. NTES: A comparison of their Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM) against their respective Machinery and Entertainment industry benchmarks.

Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM)

FTV

2.67

Machinery Industry

Max: 5.04
Q3: 2.72
Median: 1.67
Q1: 1.04
Min: 0.24

FTV’s P/S Ratio of 2.67 aligns with the market consensus for the Machinery industry. This suggests its valuation, based on sales, is seen as standard and is on par with its competitors.

NTES

5.44

Entertainment Industry

Max: 12.81
Q3: 7.20
Median: 4.68
Q1: 3.32
Min: 0.79

NTES’s P/S Ratio of 5.44 aligns with the market consensus for the Entertainment industry. This suggests its valuation, based on sales, is seen as standard and is on par with its competitors.

FTV vs. NTES: A comparison of their Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM) against their respective Machinery and Entertainment industry benchmarks.

Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ)

FTV

2.34

Machinery Industry

Max: 7.23
Q3: 3.90
Median: 2.52
Q1: 1.47
Min: 0.49

FTV’s P/B Ratio of 2.34 is within the conventional range for the Machinery industry. This shows a balanced market view, where the stock’s price is neither at a significant premium nor a discount to the book value of its peers.

NTES

3.25

Entertainment Industry

Max: 17.11
Q3: 8.38
Median: 5.24
Q1: 2.18
Min: 0.67

NTES’s P/B Ratio of 3.25 is within the conventional range for the Entertainment industry. This shows a balanced market view, where the stock’s price is neither at a significant premium nor a discount to the book value of its peers.

FTV vs. NTES: A comparison of their Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ) against their respective Machinery and Entertainment industry benchmarks.

Valuation at a Glance

Symbol	FTV	NTES
Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM)	21.32	18.03
Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM)	2.67	5.44
Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ)	2.34	3.25
Price-to-Free Cash Flow Ratio (TTM)	11.83	14.64