Seek Returns logo

FTV vs. NOVT: A Head-to-Head Stock Comparison

Updated on

Here’s a clear look at FTV and NOVT, comparing key factors like historical performance, profitability, financial strength, growth, dividend, and valuation.

Company Profile

SymbolFTVNOVT
Company NameFortive CorporationNovanta Inc.
CountryUnited StatesUnited States
GICS SectorIndustrialsInformation Technology
GICS IndustryMachineryElectronic Equipment, Instruments & Components
Market Capitalization16.94 billion USD3.63 billion USD
ExchangeNYSENasdaqGS
Listing DateJuly 5, 2016March 24, 1999
Security TypeCommon StockCommon Stock

Historical Performance

This chart compares the performance of FTV and NOVT by tracking the growth of an initial $10,000 investment in each. Use the tabs to select the desired time period. Data is adjusted for dividends and splits.

FTV vs. NOVT: Growth of a $10,000 investment over the past one year.

Historical Performance at a Glance

SymbolFTVNOVT
5-Day Price Return5.06%-4.92%
13-Week Price Return-5.79%-22.32%
26-Week Price Return-32.86%-25.92%
52-Week Price Return-36.55%-43.25%
Month-to-Date Return2.22%-13.97%
Year-to-Date Return-33.23%-34.44%
10-Day Avg. Volume3.76M0.47M
3-Month Avg. Volume3.96M0.32M
3-Month Volatility22.54%40.20%
Beta1.061.54

Profitability

Return on Equity (TTM)

FTV

7.44%

Machinery Industry

Max
33.68%
Q3
20.05%
Median
12.37%
Q1
8.67%
Min
-7.69%

FTV’s Return on Equity of 7.44% is in the lower quartile for the Machinery industry. This indicates a less efficient generation of profit from its equity base when compared to its competitors.

NOVT

8.02%

Electronic Equipment, Instruments & Components Industry

Max
21.57%
Q3
13.27%
Median
8.55%
Q1
4.42%
Min
-4.21%

NOVT’s Return on Equity of 8.02% is on par with the norm for the Electronic Equipment, Instruments & Components industry, indicating its profitability relative to shareholder equity is typical for the sector.

FTV vs. NOVT: A comparison of their Return on Equity (TTM) against their respective Machinery and Electronic Equipment, Instruments & Components industry benchmarks.

Net Profit Margin (TTM)

FTV

12.51%

Machinery Industry

Max
19.72%
Q3
11.07%
Median
7.62%
Q1
5.05%
Min
-1.52%

A Net Profit Margin of 12.51% places FTV in the upper quartile for the Machinery industry, signifying strong profitability and more effective cost management than most of its peers.

NOVT

6.41%

Electronic Equipment, Instruments & Components Industry

Max
17.31%
Q3
10.85%
Median
7.26%
Q1
3.13%
Min
-3.00%

NOVT’s Net Profit Margin of 6.41% is aligned with the median group of its peers in the Electronic Equipment, Instruments & Components industry. This indicates its ability to convert revenue into profit is typical for the sector.

FTV vs. NOVT: A comparison of their Net Profit Margin (TTM) against their respective Machinery and Electronic Equipment, Instruments & Components industry benchmarks.

Operating Profit Margin (TTM)

FTV

17.22%

Machinery Industry

Max
26.63%
Q3
15.99%
Median
11.27%
Q1
7.72%
Min
-0.51%

An Operating Profit Margin of 17.22% places FTV in the upper quartile for the Machinery industry. This signals a strong ability to translate revenue into operating profit, outperforming most of its competitors in core business efficiency.

NOVT

11.14%

Electronic Equipment, Instruments & Components Industry

Max
30.04%
Q3
15.08%
Median
9.55%
Q1
4.27%
Min
-3.83%

NOVT’s Operating Profit Margin of 11.14% is around the midpoint for the Electronic Equipment, Instruments & Components industry, indicating that its efficiency in managing core business operations is typical for the sector.

FTV vs. NOVT: A comparison of their Operating Profit Margin (TTM) against their respective Machinery and Electronic Equipment, Instruments & Components industry benchmarks.

Profitability at a Glance

SymbolFTVNOVT
Return on Equity (TTM)7.44%8.02%
Return on Assets (TTM)4.40%4.30%
Net Profit Margin (TTM)12.51%6.41%
Operating Profit Margin (TTM)17.22%11.14%
Gross Profit Margin (TTM)59.78%44.79%

Financial Strength

Current Ratio (MRQ)

FTV

0.98

Machinery Industry

Max
3.13
Q3
2.12
Median
1.72
Q1
1.34
Min
0.77

FTV’s Current Ratio of 0.98 falls into the lower quartile for the Machinery industry. This indicates a tighter liquidity situation and a more constrained capacity to handle short-term debt than many of its competitors.

NOVT

2.54

Electronic Equipment, Instruments & Components Industry

Max
4.57
Q3
2.85
Median
2.03
Q1
1.51
Min
0.62

NOVT’s Current Ratio of 2.54 aligns with the median group of the Electronic Equipment, Instruments & Components industry, indicating that its short-term liquidity is in line with its sector peers.

FTV vs. NOVT: A comparison of their Current Ratio (MRQ) against their respective Machinery and Electronic Equipment, Instruments & Components industry benchmarks.

Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ)

FTV

0.46

Machinery Industry

Max
1.56
Q3
0.79
Median
0.44
Q1
0.27
Min
0.00

FTV’s Debt-to-Equity Ratio of 0.46 is typical for the Machinery industry, indicating its use of leverage is in line with the sector norm. This suggests a balanced approach to its capital structure.

NOVT

0.58

Electronic Equipment, Instruments & Components Industry

Max
1.14
Q3
0.54
Median
0.30
Q1
0.11
Min
0.00

NOVT’s leverage is in the upper quartile of the Electronic Equipment, Instruments & Components industry, with a Debt-to-Equity Ratio of 0.58. While this approach can boost equity growth, it also exposes the company to greater financial vulnerability.

FTV vs. NOVT: A comparison of their Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ) against their respective Machinery and Electronic Equipment, Instruments & Components industry benchmarks.

Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM)

FTV

6.04

Machinery Industry

Max
81.58
Q3
37.68
Median
13.76
Q1
7.97
Min
-1.43

In the lower quartile for the Machinery industry, FTV’s Interest Coverage Ratio of 6.04 indicates a tighter cushion for servicing debt, suggesting less financial flexibility than many of its competitors.

NOVT

3.54

Electronic Equipment, Instruments & Components Industry

Max
79.05
Q3
36.62
Median
12.51
Q1
3.72
Min
-18.73

In the lower quartile for the Electronic Equipment, Instruments & Components industry, NOVT’s Interest Coverage Ratio of 3.54 indicates a tighter cushion for servicing debt, suggesting less financial flexibility than many of its competitors.

FTV vs. NOVT: A comparison of their Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM) against their respective Machinery and Electronic Equipment, Instruments & Components industry benchmarks.

Financial Strength at a Glance

SymbolFTVNOVT
Current Ratio (MRQ)0.982.54
Quick Ratio (MRQ)0.771.49
Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ)0.460.58
Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM)6.043.54

Growth

Revenue Growth

FTV vs. NOVT: A side-by-side comparison of their Revenue Growth for the MRQ (YoY), TTM (YoY), 3-Year CAGR, and 5-Year CAGR periods.

EPS Growth

FTV vs. NOVT: A side-by-side comparison of their EPS Growth for the MRQ (YoY), TTM (YoY), 3-Year CAGR, and 5-Year CAGR periods.

Dividend

Dividend Yield (TTM)

FTV

0.65%

Machinery Industry

Max
4.55%
Q3
2.66%
Median
1.90%
Q1
1.23%
Min
0.00%

FTV’s Dividend Yield of 0.65% is in the lower quartile for the Machinery industry. This suggests the company’s strategy likely favors retaining earnings for growth over providing a high dividend income.

NOVT

0.00%

Electronic Equipment, Instruments & Components Industry

Max
5.36%
Q3
2.53%
Median
1.28%
Q1
0.16%
Min
0.00%

NOVT currently does not pay a dividend, resulting in a yield of 0%. This is a common strategy for growth-focused companies that prioritize reinvesting earnings, though it may be less typical in mature, income-oriented sectors.

FTV vs. NOVT: A comparison of their Dividend Yield (TTM) against their respective Machinery and Electronic Equipment, Instruments & Components industry benchmarks.

Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM)

FTV

14.22%

Machinery Industry

Max
198.34%
Q3
101.42%
Median
62.79%
Q1
29.85%
Min
0.00%

FTV’s Dividend Payout Ratio of 14.22% is in the lower quartile for the Machinery industry. This suggests a conservative dividend policy, with a strategic focus on reinvesting profits for future growth.

NOVT

0.00%

Electronic Equipment, Instruments & Components Industry

Max
218.94%
Q3
90.25%
Median
38.81%
Q1
3.69%
Min
0.00%

NOVT has a Dividend Payout Ratio of 0%, indicating it does not currently pay a dividend. This is a common strategy for growth-oriented companies that reinvest all profits back into the business.

FTV vs. NOVT: A comparison of their Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM) against their respective Machinery and Electronic Equipment, Instruments & Components industry benchmarks.

Dividend at a Glance

SymbolFTVNOVT
Dividend Yield (TTM)0.65%0.00%
Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM)14.22%0.00%

Valuation

Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM)

FTV

21.88

Machinery Industry

Max
47.95
Q3
30.11
Median
22.35
Q1
16.56
Min
6.48

FTV’s P/E Ratio of 21.88 is within the middle range for the Machinery industry. This suggests its valuation is in line with the sector average, representing neither a significant premium nor a discount compared to its peers.

NOVT

59.03

Electronic Equipment, Instruments & Components Industry

Max
74.74
Q3
42.40
Median
26.55
Q1
20.05
Min
10.12

A P/E Ratio of 59.03 places NOVT in the upper quartile for the Electronic Equipment, Instruments & Components industry. This high valuation relative to peers suggests the market holds elevated expectations for the company’s future growth.

FTV vs. NOVT: A comparison of their Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM) against their respective Machinery and Electronic Equipment, Instruments & Components industry benchmarks.

Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM)

FTV

2.74

Machinery Industry

Max
4.97
Q3
2.76
Median
1.65
Q1
1.04
Min
0.04

FTV’s P/S Ratio of 2.74 aligns with the market consensus for the Machinery industry. This suggests its valuation, based on sales, is seen as standard and is on par with its competitors.

NOVT

3.79

Electronic Equipment, Instruments & Components Industry

Max
6.79
Q3
3.58
Median
2.05
Q1
1.29
Min
0.20

NOVT’s P/S Ratio of 3.79 is in the upper echelon for the Electronic Equipment, Instruments & Components industry. This means the company is valued richly on its revenue stream compared to its peers, suggesting the stock is priced for a high level of future performance.

FTV vs. NOVT: A comparison of their Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM) against their respective Machinery and Electronic Equipment, Instruments & Components industry benchmarks.

Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ)

FTV

2.34

Machinery Industry

Max
7.29
Q3
4.06
Median
2.67
Q1
1.54
Min
0.52

FTV’s P/B Ratio of 2.34 is within the conventional range for the Machinery industry. This shows a balanced market view, where the stock’s price is neither at a significant premium nor a discount to the book value of its peers.

NOVT

5.83

Electronic Equipment, Instruments & Components Industry

Max
6.92
Q3
3.80
Median
2.23
Q1
1.42
Min
0.44

NOVT’s P/B Ratio of 5.83 is in the upper tier for the Electronic Equipment, Instruments & Components industry. This indicates that investors are paying a premium relative to the company’s net assets, a valuation that hinges on its ability to generate superior profits.

FTV vs. NOVT: A comparison of their Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ) against their respective Machinery and Electronic Equipment, Instruments & Components industry benchmarks.

Valuation at a Glance

SymbolFTVNOVT
Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM)21.8859.03
Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM)2.743.79
Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ)2.345.83
Price-to-Free Cash Flow Ratio (TTM)12.1430.73