Seek Returns logo

FTV vs. LRCX: A Head-to-Head Stock Comparison

Updated on

Here’s a clear look at FTV and LRCX, comparing key factors like historical performance, profitability, financial strength, growth, dividend, and valuation.

Company Profile

SymbolFTVLRCX
Company NameFortive CorporationLam Research Corporation
CountryUnited StatesUnited States
GICS SectorIndustrialsInformation Technology
GICS IndustryMachinerySemiconductors & Semiconductor Equipment
Market Capitalization16.49 billion USD135.09 billion USD
ExchangeNYSENasdaqGS
Listing DateJuly 5, 2016May 4, 1984
Security TypeCommon StockCommon Stock

Historical Performance

This chart compares the performance of FTV and LRCX by tracking the growth of an initial $10,000 investment in each. Use the tabs to select the desired time period. Data is adjusted for dividends and splits.

FTV vs. LRCX: Growth of a $10,000 investment over the past one year.

Historical Performance at a Glance

SymbolFTVLRCX
5-Day Price Return2.70%7.66%
13-Week Price Return-33.92%29.78%
26-Week Price Return-38.97%28.87%
52-Week Price Return-28.68%31.63%
Month-to-Date Return1.67%12.55%
Year-to-Date Return-35.03%47.78%
10-Day Avg. Volume5.20M12.99M
3-Month Avg. Volume3.85M11.60M
3-Month Volatility55.22%33.68%
Beta1.091.82

Profitability

Return on Equity (TTM)

FTV

7.44%

Machinery Industry

Max
34.68%
Q3
19.06%
Median
13.13%
Q1
8.53%
Min
-4.87%

FTV’s Return on Equity of 7.44% is in the lower quartile for the Machinery industry. This indicates a less efficient generation of profit from its equity base when compared to its competitors.

LRCX

58.48%

Semiconductors & Semiconductor Equipment Industry

Max
52.74%
Q3
23.49%
Median
11.60%
Q1
3.23%
Min
-20.69%

LRCX’s Return on Equity of 58.48% is exceptionally high, placing it well beyond the typical range for the Semiconductors & Semiconductor Equipment industry. This demonstrates a superior ability to generate profit from shareholder investments, though it could also be inflated by high financial leverage.

FTV vs. LRCX: A comparison of their Return on Equity (TTM) against their respective Machinery and Semiconductors & Semiconductor Equipment industry benchmarks.

Net Profit Margin (TTM)

FTV

12.51%

Machinery Industry

Max
19.74%
Q3
11.24%
Median
8.13%
Q1
5.38%
Min
-1.11%

A Net Profit Margin of 12.51% places FTV in the upper quartile for the Machinery industry, signifying strong profitability and more effective cost management than most of its peers.

LRCX

29.06%

Semiconductors & Semiconductor Equipment Industry

Max
44.17%
Q3
22.38%
Median
11.95%
Q1
3.21%
Min
-25.16%

A Net Profit Margin of 29.06% places LRCX in the upper quartile for the Semiconductors & Semiconductor Equipment industry, signifying strong profitability and more effective cost management than most of its peers.

FTV vs. LRCX: A comparison of their Net Profit Margin (TTM) against their respective Machinery and Semiconductors & Semiconductor Equipment industry benchmarks.

Operating Profit Margin (TTM)

FTV

17.22%

Machinery Industry

Max
26.63%
Q3
16.15%
Median
11.27%
Q1
7.72%
Min
-4.91%

An Operating Profit Margin of 17.22% places FTV in the upper quartile for the Machinery industry. This signals a strong ability to translate revenue into operating profit, outperforming most of its competitors in core business efficiency.

LRCX

32.01%

Semiconductors & Semiconductor Equipment Industry

Max
58.03%
Q3
27.84%
Median
12.45%
Q1
5.15%
Min
-28.61%

An Operating Profit Margin of 32.01% places LRCX in the upper quartile for the Semiconductors & Semiconductor Equipment industry. This signals a strong ability to translate revenue into operating profit, outperforming most of its competitors in core business efficiency.

FTV vs. LRCX: A comparison of their Operating Profit Margin (TTM) against their respective Machinery and Semiconductors & Semiconductor Equipment industry benchmarks.

Profitability at a Glance

SymbolFTVLRCX
Return on Equity (TTM)7.44%58.48%
Return on Assets (TTM)4.40%26.56%
Net Profit Margin (TTM)12.51%29.06%
Operating Profit Margin (TTM)17.22%32.01%
Gross Profit Margin (TTM)59.78%48.71%

Financial Strength

Current Ratio (MRQ)

FTV

0.98

Machinery Industry

Max
3.83
Q3
2.32
Median
1.72
Q1
1.28
Min
0.78

FTV’s Current Ratio of 0.98 falls into the lower quartile for the Machinery industry. This indicates a tighter liquidity situation and a more constrained capacity to handle short-term debt than many of its competitors.

LRCX

2.21

Semiconductors & Semiconductor Equipment Industry

Max
8.42
Q3
4.70
Median
2.75
Q1
2.07
Min
1.04

LRCX’s Current Ratio of 2.21 aligns with the median group of the Semiconductors & Semiconductor Equipment industry, indicating that its short-term liquidity is in line with its sector peers.

FTV vs. LRCX: A comparison of their Current Ratio (MRQ) against their respective Machinery and Semiconductors & Semiconductor Equipment industry benchmarks.

Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ)

FTV

0.46

Machinery Industry

Max
1.49
Q3
0.75
Median
0.44
Q1
0.26
Min
0.00

FTV’s Debt-to-Equity Ratio of 0.46 is typical for the Machinery industry, indicating its use of leverage is in line with the sector norm. This suggests a balanced approach to its capital structure.

LRCX

0.45

Semiconductors & Semiconductor Equipment Industry

Max
1.09
Q3
0.45
Median
0.22
Q1
0.01
Min
0.00

LRCX’s leverage is in the upper quartile of the Semiconductors & Semiconductor Equipment industry, with a Debt-to-Equity Ratio of 0.45. While this approach can boost equity growth, it also exposes the company to greater financial vulnerability.

FTV vs. LRCX: A comparison of their Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ) against their respective Machinery and Semiconductors & Semiconductor Equipment industry benchmarks.

Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM)

FTV

6.04

Machinery Industry

Max
67.55
Q3
33.79
Median
13.87
Q1
7.97
Min
-1.43

In the lower quartile for the Machinery industry, FTV’s Interest Coverage Ratio of 6.04 indicates a tighter cushion for servicing debt, suggesting less financial flexibility than many of its competitors.

LRCX

94.65

Semiconductors & Semiconductor Equipment Industry

Max
174.00
Q3
81.10
Median
27.22
Q1
7.28
Min
-4.26

LRCX’s Interest Coverage Ratio of 94.65 is in the upper quartile for the Semiconductors & Semiconductor Equipment industry, signifying a strong and healthy capacity to meet its interest payments from operating profits.

FTV vs. LRCX: A comparison of their Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM) against their respective Machinery and Semiconductors & Semiconductor Equipment industry benchmarks.

Financial Strength at a Glance

SymbolFTVLRCX
Current Ratio (MRQ)0.982.21
Quick Ratio (MRQ)0.771.49
Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ)0.460.45
Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM)6.0494.65

Growth

Revenue Growth

FTV vs. LRCX: A side-by-side comparison of their Revenue Growth for the MRQ (YoY), TTM (YoY), 3-Year CAGR, and 5-Year CAGR periods.

EPS Growth

FTV vs. LRCX: A side-by-side comparison of their EPS Growth for the MRQ (YoY), TTM (YoY), 3-Year CAGR, and 5-Year CAGR periods.

Dividend

Dividend Yield (TTM)

FTV

0.67%

Machinery Industry

Max
5.32%
Q3
2.84%
Median
1.87%
Q1
1.09%
Min
0.00%

FTV’s Dividend Yield of 0.67% is in the lower quartile for the Machinery industry. This suggests the company’s strategy likely favors retaining earnings for growth over providing a high dividend income.

LRCX

0.85%

Semiconductors & Semiconductor Equipment Industry

Max
4.16%
Q3
1.78%
Median
0.74%
Q1
0.00%
Min
0.00%

LRCX’s Dividend Yield of 0.85% is consistent with its peers in the Semiconductors & Semiconductor Equipment industry, providing a dividend return that is standard for its sector.

FTV vs. LRCX: A comparison of their Dividend Yield (TTM) against their respective Machinery and Semiconductors & Semiconductor Equipment industry benchmarks.

Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM)

FTV

14.22%

Machinery Industry

Max
202.17%
Q3
98.65%
Median
55.54%
Q1
29.03%
Min
0.00%

FTV’s Dividend Payout Ratio of 14.22% is in the lower quartile for the Machinery industry. This suggests a conservative dividend policy, with a strategic focus on reinvesting profits for future growth.

LRCX

21.45%

Semiconductors & Semiconductor Equipment Industry

Max
196.12%
Q3
87.72%
Median
26.57%
Q1
0.00%
Min
0.00%

LRCX’s Dividend Payout Ratio of 21.45% is within the typical range for the Semiconductors & Semiconductor Equipment industry, suggesting a balanced approach between shareholder payouts and company reinvestment.

FTV vs. LRCX: A comparison of their Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM) against their respective Machinery and Semiconductors & Semiconductor Equipment industry benchmarks.

Dividend at a Glance

SymbolFTVLRCX
Dividend Yield (TTM)0.67%0.85%
Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM)14.22%21.45%

Valuation

Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM)

FTV

21.32

Machinery Industry

Max
53.66
Q3
31.29
Median
22.00
Q1
16.18
Min
7.00

FTV’s P/E Ratio of 21.32 is within the middle range for the Machinery industry. This suggests its valuation is in line with the sector average, representing neither a significant premium nor a discount compared to its peers.

LRCX

25.28

Semiconductors & Semiconductor Equipment Industry

Max
109.37
Q3
57.11
Median
28.95
Q1
22.13
Min
11.14

LRCX’s P/E Ratio of 25.28 is within the middle range for the Semiconductors & Semiconductor Equipment industry. This suggests its valuation is in line with the sector average, representing neither a significant premium nor a discount compared to its peers.

FTV vs. LRCX: A comparison of their Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM) against their respective Machinery and Semiconductors & Semiconductor Equipment industry benchmarks.

Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM)

FTV

2.67

Machinery Industry

Max
5.04
Q3
2.72
Median
1.67
Q1
1.04
Min
0.24

FTV’s P/S Ratio of 2.67 aligns with the market consensus for the Machinery industry. This suggests its valuation, based on sales, is seen as standard and is on par with its competitors.

LRCX

7.35

Semiconductors & Semiconductor Equipment Industry

Max
16.09
Q3
10.10
Median
4.82
Q1
2.60
Min
0.93

LRCX’s P/S Ratio of 7.35 aligns with the market consensus for the Semiconductors & Semiconductor Equipment industry. This suggests its valuation, based on sales, is seen as standard and is on par with its competitors.

FTV vs. LRCX: A comparison of their Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM) against their respective Machinery and Semiconductors & Semiconductor Equipment industry benchmarks.

Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ)

FTV

2.34

Machinery Industry

Max
7.23
Q3
3.90
Median
2.52
Q1
1.47
Min
0.49

FTV’s P/B Ratio of 2.34 is within the conventional range for the Machinery industry. This shows a balanced market view, where the stock’s price is neither at a significant premium nor a discount to the book value of its peers.

LRCX

12.63

Semiconductors & Semiconductor Equipment Industry

Max
13.56
Q3
6.75
Median
3.68
Q1
1.89
Min
0.60

LRCX’s P/B Ratio of 12.63 is in the upper tier for the Semiconductors & Semiconductor Equipment industry. This indicates that investors are paying a premium relative to the company’s net assets, a valuation that hinges on its ability to generate superior profits.

FTV vs. LRCX: A comparison of their Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ) against their respective Machinery and Semiconductors & Semiconductor Equipment industry benchmarks.

Valuation at a Glance

SymbolFTVLRCX
Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM)21.3225.28
Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM)2.677.35
Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ)2.3412.63
Price-to-Free Cash Flow Ratio (TTM)11.8325.08