Seek Returns logo

FTV vs. KSPI: A Head-to-Head Stock Comparison

Updated on

Here’s a clear look at FTV and KSPI, comparing key factors like historical performance, profitability, financial strength, growth, dividend, and valuation.

Company Profile

FTV is a standard domestic listing, while KSPI trades as an American Depositary Receipt (ADR), offering U.S. investors access to its foreign-listed shares.

SymbolFTVKSPI
Company NameFortive CorporationJoint Stock Company Kaspi.kz
CountryUnited StatesKazakhstan
GICS SectorIndustrialsFinancials
GICS IndustryMachineryConsumer Finance
Market Capitalization16.86 billion USD15.68 billion USD
ExchangeNYSENasdaqGS
Listing DateJuly 5, 2016January 19, 2024
Security TypeCommon StockADR

Historical Performance

This chart compares the performance of FTV and KSPI by tracking the growth of an initial $10,000 investment in each. Use the tabs to select the desired time period. Data is adjusted for dividends and splits.

FTV vs. KSPI: Growth of a $10,000 investment over the past one year.

Historical Performance at a Glance

SymbolFTVKSPI
5-Day Price Return0.12%-2.33%
13-Week Price Return-5.94%-6.77%
26-Week Price Return-26.29%-14.59%
52-Week Price Return-34.70%-25.51%
Month-to-Date Return1.74%-5.44%
Year-to-Date Return-33.55%-18.45%
10-Day Avg. Volume2.91M0.75M
3-Month Avg. Volume3.87M0.37M
3-Month Volatility22.43%42.17%
Beta1.060.85

Profitability

Return on Equity (TTM)

FTV

7.44%

Machinery Industry

Max
33.68%
Q3
20.05%
Median
12.37%
Q1
8.67%
Min
-7.69%

FTV’s Return on Equity of 7.44% is in the lower quartile for the Machinery industry. This indicates a less efficient generation of profit from its equity base when compared to its competitors.

KSPI

67.04%

Consumer Finance Industry

Max
32.87%
Q3
21.72%
Median
12.80%
Q1
9.07%
Min
-3.88%

KSPI’s Return on Equity of 67.04% is exceptionally high, placing it well beyond the typical range for the Consumer Finance industry. This demonstrates a superior ability to generate profit from shareholder investments, though it could also be inflated by high financial leverage.

FTV vs. KSPI: A comparison of their Return on Equity (TTM) against their respective Machinery and Consumer Finance industry benchmarks.

Net Profit Margin (TTM)

FTV

12.51%

Machinery Industry

Max
19.72%
Q3
11.07%
Median
7.62%
Q1
5.05%
Min
-1.52%

A Net Profit Margin of 12.51% places FTV in the upper quartile for the Machinery industry, signifying strong profitability and more effective cost management than most of its peers.

KSPI

--

Consumer Finance Industry

Max
19.68%
Q3
17.11%
Median
13.55%
Q1
9.71%
Min
-0.75%

Net Profit Margin data for KSPI is currently unavailable.

FTV vs. KSPI: A comparison of their Net Profit Margin (TTM) against their respective Machinery and Consumer Finance industry benchmarks.

Operating Profit Margin (TTM)

FTV

17.22%

Machinery Industry

Max
26.63%
Q3
15.99%
Median
11.27%
Q1
7.72%
Min
-0.51%

An Operating Profit Margin of 17.22% places FTV in the upper quartile for the Machinery industry. This signals a strong ability to translate revenue into operating profit, outperforming most of its competitors in core business efficiency.

KSPI

--

Consumer Finance Industry

Max
50.11%
Q3
32.02%
Median
19.92%
Q1
14.90%
Min
-5.45%

Operating Profit Margin data for KSPI is currently unavailable.

FTV vs. KSPI: A comparison of their Operating Profit Margin (TTM) against their respective Machinery and Consumer Finance industry benchmarks.

Profitability at a Glance

SymbolFTVKSPI
Return on Equity (TTM)7.44%67.04%
Return on Assets (TTM)4.40%12.37%
Net Profit Margin (TTM)12.51%--
Operating Profit Margin (TTM)17.22%--
Gross Profit Margin (TTM)59.78%--

Financial Strength

Current Ratio (MRQ)

FTV

0.98

Machinery Industry

Max
3.13
Q3
2.12
Median
1.72
Q1
1.34
Min
0.77

FTV’s Current Ratio of 0.98 falls into the lower quartile for the Machinery industry. This indicates a tighter liquidity situation and a more constrained capacity to handle short-term debt than many of its competitors.

KSPI

--

Consumer Finance Industry

Max
7.85
Q3
4.26
Median
2.28
Q1
0.82
Min
0.07

For the Consumer Finance industry, the Current Ratio is often not the most suitable measure of short-term liquidity.

FTV vs. KSPI: A comparison of their Current Ratio (MRQ) against their respective Machinery and Consumer Finance industry benchmarks.

Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ)

FTV

0.46

Machinery Industry

Max
1.56
Q3
0.79
Median
0.44
Q1
0.27
Min
0.00

FTV’s Debt-to-Equity Ratio of 0.46 is typical for the Machinery industry, indicating its use of leverage is in line with the sector norm. This suggests a balanced approach to its capital structure.

KSPI

0.29

Consumer Finance Industry

Max
6.63
Q3
3.60
Median
2.40
Q1
0.99
Min
0.23

The Debt-to-Equity Ratio is often not the primary focus for assessing leverage in the Consumer Finance industry.

FTV vs. KSPI: A comparison of their Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ) against their respective Machinery and Consumer Finance industry benchmarks.

Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM)

FTV

6.04

Machinery Industry

Max
81.58
Q3
37.68
Median
13.76
Q1
7.97
Min
-1.43

In the lower quartile for the Machinery industry, FTV’s Interest Coverage Ratio of 6.04 indicates a tighter cushion for servicing debt, suggesting less financial flexibility than many of its competitors.

KSPI

--

Consumer Finance Industry

Max
49.63
Q3
28.11
Median
4.75
Q1
2.86
Min
-15.69

The Interest Coverage Ratio is often not a primary indicator of debt servicing capacity in the Consumer Finance industry.

FTV vs. KSPI: A comparison of their Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM) against their respective Machinery and Consumer Finance industry benchmarks.

Financial Strength at a Glance

SymbolFTVKSPI
Current Ratio (MRQ)0.98--
Quick Ratio (MRQ)0.77--
Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ)0.460.29
Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM)6.04--

Growth

Revenue Growth

FTV vs. KSPI: A side-by-side comparison of their Revenue Growth for the MRQ (YoY), TTM (YoY), 3-Year CAGR, and 5-Year CAGR periods.

EPS Growth

FTV vs. KSPI: A side-by-side comparison of their EPS Growth for the MRQ (YoY), TTM (YoY), 3-Year CAGR, and 5-Year CAGR periods.

Dividend

Dividend Yield (TTM)

FTV

0.65%

Machinery Industry

Max
4.55%
Q3
2.66%
Median
1.90%
Q1
1.23%
Min
0.00%

FTV’s Dividend Yield of 0.65% is in the lower quartile for the Machinery industry. This suggests the company’s strategy likely favors retaining earnings for growth over providing a high dividend income.

KSPI

3.80%

Consumer Finance Industry

Max
7.21%
Q3
3.38%
Median
2.39%
Q1
0.67%
Min
0.00%

With a Dividend Yield of 3.80%, KSPI offers a more attractive income stream than most of its peers in the Consumer Finance industry, signaling a strong commitment to shareholder returns.

FTV vs. KSPI: A comparison of their Dividend Yield (TTM) against their respective Machinery and Consumer Finance industry benchmarks.

Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM)

FTV

14.22%

Machinery Industry

Max
198.34%
Q3
101.42%
Median
62.79%
Q1
29.85%
Min
0.00%

FTV’s Dividend Payout Ratio of 14.22% is in the lower quartile for the Machinery industry. This suggests a conservative dividend policy, with a strategic focus on reinvesting profits for future growth.

KSPI

78.77%

Consumer Finance Industry

Max
145.89%
Q3
88.89%
Median
25.97%
Q1
9.25%
Min
0.00%

KSPI’s Dividend Payout Ratio of 78.77% is within the typical range for the Consumer Finance industry, suggesting a balanced approach between shareholder payouts and company reinvestment.

FTV vs. KSPI: A comparison of their Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM) against their respective Machinery and Consumer Finance industry benchmarks.

Dividend at a Glance

SymbolFTVKSPI
Dividend Yield (TTM)0.65%3.80%
Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM)14.22%78.77%

Valuation

Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM)

FTV

21.99

Machinery Industry

Max
47.95
Q3
30.11
Median
22.35
Q1
16.56
Min
6.48

FTV’s P/E Ratio of 21.99 is within the middle range for the Machinery industry. This suggests its valuation is in line with the sector average, representing neither a significant premium nor a discount compared to its peers.

KSPI

7.77

Consumer Finance Industry

Max
35.93
Q3
20.63
Median
12.65
Q1
9.73
Min
3.96

In the lower quartile for the Consumer Finance industry, KSPI’s P/E Ratio of 7.77 suggests the stock may be undervalued compared to its peers, potentially presenting an attractive entry point for investors.

FTV vs. KSPI: A comparison of their Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM) against their respective Machinery and Consumer Finance industry benchmarks.

Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM)

FTV

2.75

Machinery Industry

Max
4.97
Q3
2.76
Median
1.65
Q1
1.04
Min
0.04

FTV’s P/S Ratio of 2.75 aligns with the market consensus for the Machinery industry. This suggests its valuation, based on sales, is seen as standard and is on par with its competitors.

KSPI

--

Consumer Finance Industry

Max
3.79
Q3
2.71
Median
1.91
Q1
1.14
Min
0.61

P/S Ratio data for KSPI is currently unavailable.

FTV vs. KSPI: A comparison of their Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM) against their respective Machinery and Consumer Finance industry benchmarks.

Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ)

FTV

2.34

Machinery Industry

Max
7.29
Q3
4.06
Median
2.67
Q1
1.54
Min
0.52

FTV’s P/B Ratio of 2.34 is within the conventional range for the Machinery industry. This shows a balanced market view, where the stock’s price is neither at a significant premium nor a discount to the book value of its peers.

KSPI

4.60

Consumer Finance Industry

Max
3.80
Q3
2.83
Median
2.02
Q1
1.18
Min
0.26

At 4.60, KSPI’s P/B Ratio is at an extreme premium to the Consumer Finance industry. This signifies that the market’s valuation is heavily reliant on future potential rather than its current net asset value, which can be a high-risk proposition.

FTV vs. KSPI: A comparison of their Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ) against their respective Machinery and Consumer Finance industry benchmarks.

Valuation at a Glance

SymbolFTVKSPI
Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM)21.997.77
Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM)2.75--
Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ)2.344.60
Price-to-Free Cash Flow Ratio (TTM)12.2010.40