FTV vs. JBL: A Head-to-Head Stock Comparison

Updated on August 25, 2025

Here’s a clear look at FTV and JBL, comparing key factors like historical performance, profitability, financial strength, growth, dividend, and valuation.

Company Profile

Symbol	FTV	JBL
Company Name	Fortive Corporation	Jabil Inc.
Country	United States	United States
GICS Sector	Industrials	Information Technology
GICS Industry	Machinery	Electronic Equipment, Instruments & Components
Market Capitalization	16.25 billion USD	21.90 billion USD
Exchange	NYSE	NYSE
Listing Date	July 5, 2016	May 3, 1993
Security Type	Common Stock	Common Stock

Historical Performance

This chart compares the performance of FTV and JBL by tracking the growth of an initial $10,000 investment in each. Use the tabs to select the desired time period. Data is adjusted for dividends and splits.

FTV vs. JBL: Growth of a $10,000 investment over the past one year.

Historical Performance at a Glance

Symbol	FTV	JBL
5-Day Price Return	0.50%	-6.14%
13-Week Price Return	-33.85%	21.86%
26-Week Price Return	-41.18%	20.98%
52-Week Price Return	-31.92%	89.88%
Month-to-Date Return	0.23%	-8.57%
Year-to-Date Return	-35.95%	41.80%
10-Day Avg. Volume	4.68M	1.45M
3-Month Avg. Volume	3.81M	1.36M
3-Month Volatility	54.38%	32.75%
Beta	1.09	1.27

Profitability

Return on Equity (TTM)

FTV

7.44%

Machinery Industry

Max: 34.68%
Q3: 19.06%
Median: 13.13%
Q1: 8.53%
Min: -4.87%

FTV’s Return on Equity of 7.44% is in the lower quartile for the Machinery industry. This indicates a less efficient generation of profit from its equity base when compared to its competitors.

JBL

38.64%

Electronic Equipment, Instruments & Components Industry

Max: 29.99%
Q3: 15.78%
Median: 9.05%
Q1: 5.63%
Min: -9.55%

JBL’s Return on Equity of 38.64% is exceptionally high, placing it well beyond the typical range for the Electronic Equipment, Instruments & Components industry. This demonstrates a superior ability to generate profit from shareholder investments, though it could also be inflated by high financial leverage.

FTV vs. JBL: A comparison of their Return on Equity (TTM) against their respective Machinery and Electronic Equipment, Instruments & Components industry benchmarks.

Net Profit Margin (TTM)

FTV

12.51%

Machinery Industry

Max: 19.74%
Q3: 11.24%
Median: 8.13%
Q1: 5.38%
Min: -1.11%

A Net Profit Margin of 12.51% places FTV in the upper quartile for the Machinery industry, signifying strong profitability and more effective cost management than most of its peers.

JBL

2.02%

Electronic Equipment, Instruments & Components Industry

Max: 25.55%
Q3: 12.80%
Median: 7.58%
Q1: 3.09%
Min: -8.70%

Falling into the lower quartile for the Electronic Equipment, Instruments & Components industry, JBL’s Net Profit Margin of 2.02% indicates weaker profitability. This means the company retains a smaller portion of each dollar in sales as profit compared to its competitors.

FTV vs. JBL: A comparison of their Net Profit Margin (TTM) against their respective Machinery and Electronic Equipment, Instruments & Components industry benchmarks.

Operating Profit Margin (TTM)

FTV

17.22%

Machinery Industry

Max: 26.63%
Q3: 16.15%
Median: 11.27%
Q1: 7.72%
Min: -4.91%

An Operating Profit Margin of 17.22% places FTV in the upper quartile for the Machinery industry. This signals a strong ability to translate revenue into operating profit, outperforming most of its competitors in core business efficiency.

JBL

4.08%

Electronic Equipment, Instruments & Components Industry

Max: 30.04%
Q3: 16.04%
Median: 9.75%
Q1: 4.27%
Min: -12.63%

JBL’s Operating Profit Margin of 4.08% is in the lower quartile for the Electronic Equipment, Instruments & Components industry. This indicates weaker profitability from core operations, which may stem from inefficiencies or competitive pressures on pricing.

FTV vs. JBL: A comparison of their Operating Profit Margin (TTM) against their respective Machinery and Electronic Equipment, Instruments & Components industry benchmarks.

Profitability at a Glance

Symbol	FTV	JBL
Return on Equity (TTM)	7.44%	38.64%
Return on Assets (TTM)	4.40%	3.25%
Net Profit Margin (TTM)	12.51%	2.02%
Operating Profit Margin (TTM)	17.22%	4.08%
Gross Profit Margin (TTM)	59.78%	8.86%

Financial Strength

Current Ratio (MRQ)

FTV

0.98

Machinery Industry

Max: 3.83
Q3: 2.32
Median: 1.72
Q1: 1.28
Min: 0.78

FTV’s Current Ratio of 0.98 falls into the lower quartile for the Machinery industry. This indicates a tighter liquidity situation and a more constrained capacity to handle short-term debt than many of its competitors.

JBL

0.98

Electronic Equipment, Instruments & Components Industry

Max: 4.43
Q3: 2.88
Median: 2.05
Q1: 1.52
Min: 0.64

JBL’s Current Ratio of 0.98 falls into the lower quartile for the Electronic Equipment, Instruments & Components industry. This indicates a tighter liquidity situation and a more constrained capacity to handle short-term debt than many of its competitors.

FTV vs. JBL: A comparison of their Current Ratio (MRQ) against their respective Machinery and Electronic Equipment, Instruments & Components industry benchmarks.

Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ)

FTV

0.46

Machinery Industry

Max: 1.49
Q3: 0.75
Median: 0.44
Q1: 0.26
Min: 0.00

FTV’s Debt-to-Equity Ratio of 0.46 is typical for the Machinery industry, indicating its use of leverage is in line with the sector norm. This suggests a balanced approach to its capital structure.

JBL

2.24

Electronic Equipment, Instruments & Components Industry

Max: 1.14
Q3: 0.54
Median: 0.34
Q1: 0.11
Min: 0.00

With a Debt-to-Equity Ratio of 2.24, JBL operates with exceptionally high leverage compared to the Electronic Equipment, Instruments & Components industry norm. This suggests an aggressive reliance on debt financing, which can magnify returns but also significantly elevates financial risk.

FTV vs. JBL: A comparison of their Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ) against their respective Machinery and Electronic Equipment, Instruments & Components industry benchmarks.

Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM)

FTV

6.04

Machinery Industry

Max: 67.55
Q3: 33.79
Median: 13.87
Q1: 7.97
Min: -1.43

In the lower quartile for the Machinery industry, FTV’s Interest Coverage Ratio of 6.04 indicates a tighter cushion for servicing debt, suggesting less financial flexibility than many of its competitors.

JBL

11.12

Electronic Equipment, Instruments & Components Industry

Max: 101.00
Q3: 43.88
Median: 13.27
Q1: 3.73
Min: -18.73

JBL’s Interest Coverage Ratio of 11.12 is positioned comfortably within the norm for the Electronic Equipment, Instruments & Components industry, indicating a standard and healthy capacity to cover its interest payments.

FTV vs. JBL: A comparison of their Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM) against their respective Machinery and Electronic Equipment, Instruments & Components industry benchmarks.

Financial Strength at a Glance

Symbol	FTV	JBL
Current Ratio (MRQ)	0.98	0.98
Quick Ratio (MRQ)	0.77	0.47
Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ)	0.46	2.24
Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM)	6.04	11.12

Growth

Revenue Growth

FTV vs. JBL: A side-by-side comparison of their Revenue Growth for the MRQ (YoY), TTM (YoY), 3-Year CAGR, and 5-Year CAGR periods.

EPS Growth

FTV vs. JBL: A side-by-side comparison of their EPS Growth for the MRQ (YoY), TTM (YoY), 3-Year CAGR, and 5-Year CAGR periods.

Dividend

Dividend Yield (TTM)

FTV

0.67%

Machinery Industry

Max: 5.32%
Q3: 2.84%
Median: 1.87%
Q1: 1.09%
Min: 0.00%

FTV’s Dividend Yield of 0.67% is in the lower quartile for the Machinery industry. This suggests the company’s strategy likely favors retaining earnings for growth over providing a high dividend income.

JBL

0.17%

Electronic Equipment, Instruments & Components Industry

Max: 4.86%
Q3: 2.53%
Median: 1.28%
Q1: 0.16%
Min: 0.00%

JBL’s Dividend Yield of 0.17% is consistent with its peers in the Electronic Equipment, Instruments & Components industry, providing a dividend return that is standard for its sector.

FTV vs. JBL: A comparison of their Dividend Yield (TTM) against their respective Machinery and Electronic Equipment, Instruments & Components industry benchmarks.

Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM)

FTV

14.22%

Machinery Industry

Max: 202.17%
Q3: 98.65%
Median: 55.54%
Q1: 29.03%
Min: 0.00%

FTV’s Dividend Payout Ratio of 14.22% is in the lower quartile for the Machinery industry. This suggests a conservative dividend policy, with a strategic focus on reinvesting profits for future growth.

JBL

6.59%

Electronic Equipment, Instruments & Components Industry

Max: 161.37%
Q3: 67.12%
Median: 34.46%
Q1: 3.82%
Min: 0.00%

JBL’s Dividend Payout Ratio of 6.59% is within the typical range for the Electronic Equipment, Instruments & Components industry, suggesting a balanced approach between shareholder payouts and company reinvestment.

FTV vs. JBL: A comparison of their Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM) against their respective Machinery and Electronic Equipment, Instruments & Components industry benchmarks.

Dividend at a Glance

Symbol	FTV	JBL
Dividend Yield (TTM)	0.67%	0.17%
Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM)	14.22%	6.59%

Valuation

Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM)

FTV

21.25

Machinery Industry

Max: 53.66
Q3: 31.29
Median: 22.00
Q1: 16.18
Min: 7.00

FTV’s P/E Ratio of 21.25 is within the middle range for the Machinery industry. This suggests its valuation is in line with the sector average, representing neither a significant premium nor a discount compared to its peers.

JBL

37.97

Electronic Equipment, Instruments & Components Industry

Max: 73.87
Q3: 41.11
Median: 25.31
Q1: 18.58
Min: 8.59

JBL’s P/E Ratio of 37.97 is within the middle range for the Electronic Equipment, Instruments & Components industry. This suggests its valuation is in line with the sector average, representing neither a significant premium nor a discount compared to its peers.

FTV vs. JBL: A comparison of their Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM) against their respective Machinery and Electronic Equipment, Instruments & Components industry benchmarks.

Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM)

FTV

2.66

Machinery Industry

Max: 5.04
Q3: 2.72
Median: 1.67
Q1: 1.04
Min: 0.24

FTV’s P/S Ratio of 2.66 aligns with the market consensus for the Machinery industry. This suggests its valuation, based on sales, is seen as standard and is on par with its competitors.

JBL

0.77

Electronic Equipment, Instruments & Components Industry

Max: 6.74
Q3: 3.49
Median: 2.03
Q1: 1.16
Min: 0.11

In the lower quartile for the Electronic Equipment, Instruments & Components industry, JBL’s P/S Ratio of 0.77 indicates its revenue is valued more conservatively than most of its peers. This could present a compelling opportunity if the market has overlooked its sales-generating capabilities.

FTV vs. JBL: A comparison of their Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM) against their respective Machinery and Electronic Equipment, Instruments & Components industry benchmarks.

Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ)

FTV

2.34

Machinery Industry

Max: 7.23
Q3: 3.90
Median: 2.52
Q1: 1.47
Min: 0.49

FTV’s P/B Ratio of 2.34 is within the conventional range for the Machinery industry. This shows a balanced market view, where the stock’s price is neither at a significant premium nor a discount to the book value of its peers.

JBL

14.04

Electronic Equipment, Instruments & Components Industry

Max: 6.45
Q3: 3.49
Median: 1.98
Q1: 1.31
Min: 0.35

At 14.04, JBL’s P/B Ratio is at an extreme premium to the Electronic Equipment, Instruments & Components industry. This signifies that the market’s valuation is heavily reliant on future potential rather than its current net asset value, which can be a high-risk proposition.

FTV vs. JBL: A comparison of their Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ) against their respective Machinery and Electronic Equipment, Instruments & Components industry benchmarks.

Valuation at a Glance

Symbol	FTV	JBL
Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM)	21.25	37.97
Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM)	2.66	0.77
Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ)	2.34	14.04
Price-to-Free Cash Flow Ratio (TTM)	11.79	18.82