Seek Returns logo

FTV vs. IBM: A Head-to-Head Stock Comparison

Updated on

Here’s a clear look at FTV and IBM, comparing key factors like historical performance, profitability, financial strength, growth, dividend, and valuation.

Company Profile

SymbolFTVIBM
Company NameFortive CorporationInternational Business Machines Corporation
CountryUnited StatesUnited States
GICS SectorIndustrialsInformation Technology
GICS IndustryMachineryIT Services
Market Capitalization17.31 billion USD281.44 billion USD
ExchangeNYSENYSE
Listing DateJuly 5, 2016January 2, 1962
Security TypeCommon StockCommon Stock

Historical Performance

This chart compares the performance of FTV and IBM by tracking the growth of an initial $10,000 investment in each. Use the tabs to select the desired time period. Data is adjusted for dividends and splits.

FTV vs. IBM: Growth of a $10,000 investment over the past one year.

Historical Performance at a Glance

SymbolFTVIBM
5-Day Price Return0.51%-1.11%
13-Week Price Return7.12%27.52%
26-Week Price Return-29.95%18.21%
52-Week Price Return-32.29%44.93%
Month-to-Date Return2.48%-0.56%
Year-to-Date Return-31.21%39.06%
10-Day Avg. Volume3.18M4.95M
3-Month Avg. Volume3.68M5.47M
3-Month Volatility19.37%27.54%
Beta1.050.68

Profitability

Return on Equity (TTM)

FTV

6.46%

Machinery Industry

Max
30.85%
Q3
19.99%
Median
12.37%
Q1
8.44%
Min
-7.69%

FTV’s Return on Equity of 6.46% is in the lower quartile for the Machinery industry. This indicates a less efficient generation of profit from its equity base when compared to its competitors.

IBM

28.86%

IT Services Industry

Max
37.08%
Q3
19.28%
Median
14.70%
Q1
6.70%
Min
-8.16%

In the upper quartile for the IT Services industry, IBM’s Return on Equity of 28.86% signals a highly effective use of shareholder capital to drive profitability compared to most of its peers.

FTV vs. IBM: A comparison of their Return on Equity (TTM) against their respective Machinery and IT Services industry benchmarks.

Net Profit Margin (TTM)

FTV

10.68%

Machinery Industry

Max
19.28%
Q3
10.99%
Median
7.89%
Q1
5.16%
Min
-1.46%

FTV’s Net Profit Margin of 10.68% is aligned with the median group of its peers in the Machinery industry. This indicates its ability to convert revenue into profit is typical for the sector.

IBM

12.09%

IT Services Industry

Max
17.01%
Q3
11.02%
Median
6.91%
Q1
3.07%
Min
-5.13%

A Net Profit Margin of 12.09% places IBM in the upper quartile for the IT Services industry, signifying strong profitability and more effective cost management than most of its peers.

FTV vs. IBM: A comparison of their Net Profit Margin (TTM) against their respective Machinery and IT Services industry benchmarks.

Operating Profit Margin (TTM)

FTV

16.36%

Machinery Industry

Max
27.20%
Q3
15.91%
Median
11.33%
Q1
7.73%
Min
0.23%

An Operating Profit Margin of 16.36% places FTV in the upper quartile for the Machinery industry. This signals a strong ability to translate revenue into operating profit, outperforming most of its competitors in core business efficiency.

IBM

14.51%

IT Services Industry

Max
23.01%
Q3
15.32%
Median
9.57%
Q1
4.91%
Min
-9.58%

IBM’s Operating Profit Margin of 14.51% is around the midpoint for the IT Services industry, indicating that its efficiency in managing core business operations is typical for the sector.

FTV vs. IBM: A comparison of their Operating Profit Margin (TTM) against their respective Machinery and IT Services industry benchmarks.

Profitability at a Glance

SymbolFTVIBM
Return on Equity (TTM)6.46%28.86%
Return on Assets (TTM)3.75%5.48%
Net Profit Margin (TTM)10.68%12.09%
Operating Profit Margin (TTM)16.36%14.51%
Gross Profit Margin (TTM)60.33%57.81%

Financial Strength

Current Ratio (MRQ)

FTV

0.70

Machinery Industry

Max
3.27
Q3
2.16
Median
1.75
Q1
1.32
Min
0.70

FTV’s Current Ratio of 0.70 falls into the lower quartile for the Machinery industry. This indicates a tighter liquidity situation and a more constrained capacity to handle short-term debt than many of its competitors.

IBM

0.93

IT Services Industry

Max
3.02
Q3
1.91
Median
1.36
Q1
1.02
Min
0.49

IBM’s Current Ratio of 0.93 falls into the lower quartile for the IT Services industry. This indicates a tighter liquidity situation and a more constrained capacity to handle short-term debt than many of its competitors.

FTV vs. IBM: A comparison of their Current Ratio (MRQ) against their respective Machinery and IT Services industry benchmarks.

Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ)

FTV

0.51

Machinery Industry

Max
1.49
Q3
0.75
Median
0.45
Q1
0.23
Min
0.00

FTV’s Debt-to-Equity Ratio of 0.51 is typical for the Machinery industry, indicating its use of leverage is in line with the sector norm. This suggests a balanced approach to its capital structure.

IBM

2.26

IT Services Industry

Max
2.55
Q3
1.30
Median
0.55
Q1
0.14
Min
0.00

IBM’s leverage is in the upper quartile of the IT Services industry, with a Debt-to-Equity Ratio of 2.26. While this approach can boost equity growth, it also exposes the company to greater financial vulnerability.

FTV vs. IBM: A comparison of their Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ) against their respective Machinery and IT Services industry benchmarks.

Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM)

FTV

6.04

Machinery Industry

Max
67.55
Q3
36.46
Median
13.55
Q1
7.73
Min
-1.43

In the lower quartile for the Machinery industry, FTV’s Interest Coverage Ratio of 6.04 indicates a tighter cushion for servicing debt, suggesting less financial flexibility than many of its competitors.

IBM

45.57

IT Services Industry

Max
129.00
Q3
56.00
Median
11.69
Q1
1.68
Min
-28.15

IBM’s Interest Coverage Ratio of 45.57 is positioned comfortably within the norm for the IT Services industry, indicating a standard and healthy capacity to cover its interest payments.

FTV vs. IBM: A comparison of their Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM) against their respective Machinery and IT Services industry benchmarks.

Financial Strength at a Glance

SymbolFTVIBM
Current Ratio (MRQ)0.700.93
Quick Ratio (MRQ)0.510.81
Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ)0.512.26
Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM)6.0445.57

Growth

Revenue Growth

FTV vs. IBM: A side-by-side comparison of their Revenue Growth for the MRQ (YoY), TTM (YoY), 3-Year CAGR, and 5-Year CAGR periods.

EPS Growth

FTV vs. IBM: A side-by-side comparison of their EPS Growth for the MRQ (YoY), TTM (YoY), 3-Year CAGR, and 5-Year CAGR periods.

Dividend

Dividend Yield (TTM)

FTV

0.62%

Machinery Industry

Max
4.98%
Q3
2.83%
Median
1.89%
Q1
1.17%
Min
0.00%

FTV’s Dividend Yield of 0.62% is in the lower quartile for the Machinery industry. This suggests the company’s strategy likely favors retaining earnings for growth over providing a high dividend income.

IBM

2.20%

IT Services Industry

Max
4.66%
Q3
2.02%
Median
0.66%
Q1
0.00%
Min
0.00%

With a Dividend Yield of 2.20%, IBM offers a more attractive income stream than most of its peers in the IT Services industry, signaling a strong commitment to shareholder returns.

FTV vs. IBM: A comparison of their Dividend Yield (TTM) against their respective Machinery and IT Services industry benchmarks.

Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM)

FTV

16.72%

Machinery Industry

Max
209.29%
Q3
102.41%
Median
62.34%
Q1
29.36%
Min
0.00%

FTV’s Dividend Payout Ratio of 16.72% is in the lower quartile for the Machinery industry. This suggests a conservative dividend policy, with a strategic focus on reinvesting profits for future growth.

IBM

78.74%

IT Services Industry

Max
93.78%
Q3
63.22%
Median
24.64%
Q1
0.00%
Min
0.00%

IBM’s Dividend Payout Ratio of 78.74% is in the upper quartile for the IT Services industry. This indicates a strong commitment to shareholder returns but also suggests that a smaller portion of earnings is retained for reinvestment compared to many peers.

FTV vs. IBM: A comparison of their Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM) against their respective Machinery and IT Services industry benchmarks.

Dividend at a Glance

SymbolFTVIBM
Dividend Yield (TTM)0.62%2.20%
Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM)16.72%78.74%

Valuation

Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM)

FTV

27.05

Machinery Industry

Max
46.28
Q3
29.52
Median
24.18
Q1
16.92
Min
7.99

FTV’s P/E Ratio of 27.05 is within the middle range for the Machinery industry. This suggests its valuation is in line with the sector average, representing neither a significant premium nor a discount compared to its peers.

IBM

35.83

IT Services Industry

Max
45.03
Q3
30.25
Median
21.01
Q1
16.50
Min
0.00

A P/E Ratio of 35.83 places IBM in the upper quartile for the IT Services industry. This high valuation relative to peers suggests the market holds elevated expectations for the company’s future growth.

FTV vs. IBM: A comparison of their Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM) against their respective Machinery and IT Services industry benchmarks.

Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM)

FTV

2.89

Machinery Industry

Max
5.25
Q3
2.82
Median
1.74
Q1
0.99
Min
0.27

FTV’s P/S Ratio of 2.89 is in the upper echelon for the Machinery industry. This means the company is valued richly on its revenue stream compared to its peers, suggesting the stock is priced for a high level of future performance.

IBM

4.33

IT Services Industry

Max
5.24
Q3
4.01
Median
2.18
Q1
1.08
Min
0.00

IBM’s P/S Ratio of 4.33 is in the upper echelon for the IT Services industry. This means the company is valued richly on its revenue stream compared to its peers, suggesting the stock is priced for a high level of future performance.

FTV vs. IBM: A comparison of their Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM) against their respective Machinery and IT Services industry benchmarks.

Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ)

FTV

2.52

Machinery Industry

Max
7.18
Q3
4.18
Median
2.71
Q1
1.54
Min
0.52

FTV’s P/B Ratio of 2.52 is within the conventional range for the Machinery industry. This shows a balanced market view, where the stock’s price is neither at a significant premium nor a discount to the book value of its peers.

IBM

9.42

IT Services Industry

Max
9.42
Q3
5.79
Median
3.70
Q1
2.30
Min
0.79

IBM’s P/B Ratio of 9.42 is in the upper tier for the IT Services industry. This indicates that investors are paying a premium relative to the company’s net assets, a valuation that hinges on its ability to generate superior profits.

FTV vs. IBM: A comparison of their Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ) against their respective Machinery and IT Services industry benchmarks.

Valuation at a Glance

SymbolFTVIBM
Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM)27.0535.83
Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM)2.894.33
Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ)2.529.42
Price-to-Free Cash Flow Ratio (TTM)14.7123.67