Seek Returns logo

FTV vs. GDDY: A Head-to-Head Stock Comparison

Updated on

Here’s a clear look at FTV and GDDY, comparing key factors like historical performance, profitability, financial strength, growth, dividend, and valuation.

Company Profile

SymbolFTVGDDY
Company NameFortive CorporationGoDaddy Inc.
CountryUnited StatesUnited States
GICS SectorIndustrialsInformation Technology
GICS IndustryMachineryIT Services
Market Capitalization16.49 billion USD19.84 billion USD
ExchangeNYSENYSE
Listing DateJuly 5, 2016March 31, 2015
Security TypeCommon StockCommon Stock

Historical Performance

This chart compares the performance of FTV and GDDY by tracking the growth of an initial $10,000 investment in each. Use the tabs to select the desired time period. Data is adjusted for dividends and splits.

FTV vs. GDDY: Growth of a $10,000 investment over the past one year.

Historical Performance at a Glance

SymbolFTVGDDY
5-Day Price Return2.70%-4.61%
13-Week Price Return-33.92%-23.36%
26-Week Price Return-38.97%-32.07%
52-Week Price Return-28.68%-9.55%
Month-to-Date Return1.67%-11.30%
Year-to-Date Return-35.03%-27.39%
10-Day Avg. Volume5.20M2.99M
3-Month Avg. Volume3.85M1.64M
3-Month Volatility55.22%30.05%
Beta1.091.01

Profitability

Return on Equity (TTM)

FTV

7.44%

Machinery Industry

Max
34.68%
Q3
19.06%
Median
13.13%
Q1
8.53%
Min
-4.87%

FTV’s Return on Equity of 7.44% is in the lower quartile for the Machinery industry. This indicates a less efficient generation of profit from its equity base when compared to its competitors.

GDDY

195.66%

IT Services Industry

Max
29.51%
Q3
16.98%
Median
13.47%
Q1
7.93%
Min
-3.97%

GDDY’s Return on Equity of 195.66% is exceptionally high, placing it well beyond the typical range for the IT Services industry. This demonstrates a superior ability to generate profit from shareholder investments, though it could also be inflated by high financial leverage.

FTV vs. GDDY: A comparison of their Return on Equity (TTM) against their respective Machinery and IT Services industry benchmarks.

Net Profit Margin (TTM)

FTV

12.51%

Machinery Industry

Max
19.74%
Q3
11.24%
Median
8.13%
Q1
5.38%
Min
-1.11%

A Net Profit Margin of 12.51% places FTV in the upper quartile for the Machinery industry, signifying strong profitability and more effective cost management than most of its peers.

GDDY

17.01%

IT Services Industry

Max
19.82%
Q3
11.49%
Median
6.67%
Q1
3.61%
Min
-4.62%

A Net Profit Margin of 17.01% places GDDY in the upper quartile for the IT Services industry, signifying strong profitability and more effective cost management than most of its peers.

FTV vs. GDDY: A comparison of their Net Profit Margin (TTM) against their respective Machinery and IT Services industry benchmarks.

Operating Profit Margin (TTM)

FTV

17.22%

Machinery Industry

Max
26.63%
Q3
16.15%
Median
11.27%
Q1
7.72%
Min
-4.91%

An Operating Profit Margin of 17.22% places FTV in the upper quartile for the Machinery industry. This signals a strong ability to translate revenue into operating profit, outperforming most of its competitors in core business efficiency.

GDDY

21.50%

IT Services Industry

Max
21.69%
Q3
14.50%
Median
10.06%
Q1
6.98%
Min
0.06%

An Operating Profit Margin of 21.50% places GDDY in the upper quartile for the IT Services industry. This signals a strong ability to translate revenue into operating profit, outperforming most of its competitors in core business efficiency.

FTV vs. GDDY: A comparison of their Operating Profit Margin (TTM) against their respective Machinery and IT Services industry benchmarks.

Profitability at a Glance

SymbolFTVGDDY
Return on Equity (TTM)7.44%195.66%
Return on Assets (TTM)4.40%10.00%
Net Profit Margin (TTM)12.51%17.01%
Operating Profit Margin (TTM)17.22%21.50%
Gross Profit Margin (TTM)59.78%63.97%

Financial Strength

Current Ratio (MRQ)

FTV

0.98

Machinery Industry

Max
3.83
Q3
2.32
Median
1.72
Q1
1.28
Min
0.78

FTV’s Current Ratio of 0.98 falls into the lower quartile for the Machinery industry. This indicates a tighter liquidity situation and a more constrained capacity to handle short-term debt than many of its competitors.

GDDY

0.64

IT Services Industry

Max
2.42
Q3
1.81
Median
1.47
Q1
1.09
Min
0.44

GDDY’s Current Ratio of 0.64 falls into the lower quartile for the IT Services industry. This indicates a tighter liquidity situation and a more constrained capacity to handle short-term debt than many of its competitors.

FTV vs. GDDY: A comparison of their Current Ratio (MRQ) against their respective Machinery and IT Services industry benchmarks.

Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ)

FTV

0.46

Machinery Industry

Max
1.49
Q3
0.75
Median
0.44
Q1
0.26
Min
0.00

FTV’s Debt-to-Equity Ratio of 0.46 is typical for the Machinery industry, indicating its use of leverage is in line with the sector norm. This suggests a balanced approach to its capital structure.

GDDY

9.37

IT Services Industry

Max
2.33
Q3
1.17
Median
0.54
Q1
0.15
Min
0.00

With a Debt-to-Equity Ratio of 9.37, GDDY operates with exceptionally high leverage compared to the IT Services industry norm. This suggests an aggressive reliance on debt financing, which can magnify returns but also significantly elevates financial risk.

FTV vs. GDDY: A comparison of their Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ) against their respective Machinery and IT Services industry benchmarks.

Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM)

FTV

6.04

Machinery Industry

Max
67.55
Q3
33.79
Median
13.87
Q1
7.97
Min
-1.43

In the lower quartile for the Machinery industry, FTV’s Interest Coverage Ratio of 6.04 indicates a tighter cushion for servicing debt, suggesting less financial flexibility than many of its competitors.

GDDY

5.84

IT Services Industry

Max
144.50
Q3
84.49
Median
13.76
Q1
2.59
Min
-28.13

GDDY’s Interest Coverage Ratio of 5.84 is positioned comfortably within the norm for the IT Services industry, indicating a standard and healthy capacity to cover its interest payments.

FTV vs. GDDY: A comparison of their Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM) against their respective Machinery and IT Services industry benchmarks.

Financial Strength at a Glance

SymbolFTVGDDY
Current Ratio (MRQ)0.980.64
Quick Ratio (MRQ)0.770.41
Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ)0.469.37
Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM)6.045.84

Growth

Revenue Growth

FTV vs. GDDY: A side-by-side comparison of their Revenue Growth for the MRQ (YoY), TTM (YoY), 3-Year CAGR, and 5-Year CAGR periods.

EPS Growth

FTV vs. GDDY: A side-by-side comparison of their EPS Growth for the MRQ (YoY), TTM (YoY), 3-Year CAGR, and 5-Year CAGR periods.

Dividend

Dividend Yield (TTM)

FTV

0.67%

Machinery Industry

Max
5.32%
Q3
2.84%
Median
1.87%
Q1
1.09%
Min
0.00%

FTV’s Dividend Yield of 0.67% is in the lower quartile for the Machinery industry. This suggests the company’s strategy likely favors retaining earnings for growth over providing a high dividend income.

GDDY

0.00%

IT Services Industry

Max
2.80%
Q3
1.74%
Median
0.62%
Q1
0.00%
Min
0.00%

GDDY currently does not pay a dividend, resulting in a yield of 0%. This is a common strategy for growth-focused companies that prioritize reinvesting earnings, though it may be less typical in mature, income-oriented sectors.

FTV vs. GDDY: A comparison of their Dividend Yield (TTM) against their respective Machinery and IT Services industry benchmarks.

Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM)

FTV

14.22%

Machinery Industry

Max
202.17%
Q3
98.65%
Median
55.54%
Q1
29.03%
Min
0.00%

FTV’s Dividend Payout Ratio of 14.22% is in the lower quartile for the Machinery industry. This suggests a conservative dividend policy, with a strategic focus on reinvesting profits for future growth.

GDDY

0.00%

IT Services Industry

Max
147.75%
Q3
63.58%
Median
24.63%
Q1
0.00%
Min
0.00%

GDDY has a Dividend Payout Ratio of 0%, indicating it does not currently pay a dividend. This is a common strategy for growth-oriented companies that reinvest all profits back into the business.

FTV vs. GDDY: A comparison of their Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM) against their respective Machinery and IT Services industry benchmarks.

Dividend at a Glance

SymbolFTVGDDY
Dividend Yield (TTM)0.67%0.00%
Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM)14.22%0.00%

Valuation

Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM)

FTV

21.32

Machinery Industry

Max
53.66
Q3
31.29
Median
22.00
Q1
16.18
Min
7.00

FTV’s P/E Ratio of 21.32 is within the middle range for the Machinery industry. This suggests its valuation is in line with the sector average, representing neither a significant premium nor a discount compared to its peers.

GDDY

24.51

IT Services Industry

Max
41.55
Q3
31.54
Median
23.25
Q1
18.12
Min
6.57

GDDY’s P/E Ratio of 24.51 is within the middle range for the IT Services industry. This suggests its valuation is in line with the sector average, representing neither a significant premium nor a discount compared to its peers.

FTV vs. GDDY: A comparison of their Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM) against their respective Machinery and IT Services industry benchmarks.

Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM)

FTV

2.67

Machinery Industry

Max
5.04
Q3
2.72
Median
1.67
Q1
1.04
Min
0.24

FTV’s P/S Ratio of 2.67 aligns with the market consensus for the Machinery industry. This suggests its valuation, based on sales, is seen as standard and is on par with its competitors.

GDDY

4.17

IT Services Industry

Max
6.61
Q3
4.37
Median
2.02
Q1
1.20
Min
0.19

GDDY’s P/S Ratio of 4.17 aligns with the market consensus for the IT Services industry. This suggests its valuation, based on sales, is seen as standard and is on par with its competitors.

FTV vs. GDDY: A comparison of their Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM) against their respective Machinery and IT Services industry benchmarks.

Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ)

FTV

2.34

Machinery Industry

Max
7.23
Q3
3.90
Median
2.52
Q1
1.47
Min
0.49

FTV’s P/B Ratio of 2.34 is within the conventional range for the Machinery industry. This shows a balanced market view, where the stock’s price is neither at a significant premium nor a discount to the book value of its peers.

GDDY

63.44

IT Services Industry

Max
11.19
Q3
6.38
Median
3.47
Q1
2.31
Min
0.96

At 63.44, GDDY’s P/B Ratio is at an extreme premium to the IT Services industry. This signifies that the market’s valuation is heavily reliant on future potential rather than its current net asset value, which can be a high-risk proposition.

FTV vs. GDDY: A comparison of their Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ) against their respective Machinery and IT Services industry benchmarks.

Valuation at a Glance

SymbolFTVGDDY
Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM)21.3224.51
Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM)2.674.17
Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ)2.3463.44
Price-to-Free Cash Flow Ratio (TTM)11.8313.64