Seek Returns logo

FTS vs. VST: A Head-to-Head Stock Comparison

Updated on

Here’s a clear look at FTS and VST, comparing key factors like historical performance, profitability, financial strength, growth, dividend, and valuation.

Company Profile

SymbolFTSVST
Company NameFortis Inc.Vistra Corp.
CountryCanadaUnited States
GICS SectorUtilitiesUtilities
GICS IndustryElectric UtilitiesIndependent Power and Renewable Electricity Producers
Market Capitalization25.52 billion USD64.53 billion USD
ExchangeNYSENYSE
Listing DateJanuary 5, 2010October 5, 2016
Security TypeCommon StockCommon Stock

Historical Performance

This chart compares the performance of FTS and VST by tracking the growth of an initial $10,000 investment in each. Use the tabs to select the desired time period. Data is adjusted for dividends and splits.

FTS vs. VST: Growth of a $10,000 investment over the past one year.

Historical Performance at a Glance

SymbolFTSVST
5-Day Price Return0.32%-4.27%
13-Week Price Return5.88%25.25%
26-Week Price Return13.18%12.51%
52-Week Price Return17.93%131.48%
Month-to-Date Return3.32%-8.67%
Year-to-Date Return17.28%38.14%
10-Day Avg. Volume1.59M3.68M
3-Month Avg. Volume1.55M5.34M
3-Month Volatility11.53%39.62%
Beta0.301.35

Profitability

Return on Equity (TTM)

FTS

7.56%

Electric Utilities Industry

Max
23.82%
Q3
14.31%
Median
10.58%
Q1
7.57%
Min
1.03%

FTS’s Return on Equity of 7.56% is in the lower quartile for the Electric Utilities industry. This indicates a less efficient generation of profit from its equity base when compared to its competitors.

VST

46.24%

Independent Power and Renewable Electricity Producers Industry

Max
30.49%
Q3
14.63%
Median
7.41%
Q1
3.67%
Min
-8.17%

VST’s Return on Equity of 46.24% is exceptionally high, placing it well beyond the typical range for the Independent Power and Renewable Electricity Producers industry. This demonstrates a superior ability to generate profit from shareholder investments, though it could also be inflated by high financial leverage.

FTS vs. VST: A comparison of their Return on Equity (TTM) against their respective Electric Utilities and Independent Power and Renewable Electricity Producers industry benchmarks.

Net Profit Margin (TTM)

FTS

14.98%

Electric Utilities Industry

Max
29.46%
Q3
17.23%
Median
11.43%
Q1
7.33%
Min
-2.53%

FTS’s Net Profit Margin of 14.98% is aligned with the median group of its peers in the Electric Utilities industry. This indicates its ability to convert revenue into profit is typical for the sector.

VST

14.92%

Independent Power and Renewable Electricity Producers Industry

Max
32.12%
Q3
16.71%
Median
10.67%
Q1
5.10%
Min
-6.37%

VST’s Net Profit Margin of 14.92% is aligned with the median group of its peers in the Independent Power and Renewable Electricity Producers industry. This indicates its ability to convert revenue into profit is typical for the sector.

FTS vs. VST: A comparison of their Net Profit Margin (TTM) against their respective Electric Utilities and Independent Power and Renewable Electricity Producers industry benchmarks.

Operating Profit Margin (TTM)

FTS

28.90%

Electric Utilities Industry

Max
46.44%
Q3
26.51%
Median
19.26%
Q1
11.77%
Min
2.81%

An Operating Profit Margin of 28.90% places FTS in the upper quartile for the Electric Utilities industry. This signals a strong ability to translate revenue into operating profit, outperforming most of its competitors in core business efficiency.

VST

22.38%

Independent Power and Renewable Electricity Producers Industry

Max
42.59%
Q3
29.96%
Median
18.17%
Q1
12.79%
Min
4.70%

VST’s Operating Profit Margin of 22.38% is around the midpoint for the Independent Power and Renewable Electricity Producers industry, indicating that its efficiency in managing core business operations is typical for the sector.

FTS vs. VST: A comparison of their Operating Profit Margin (TTM) against their respective Electric Utilities and Independent Power and Renewable Electricity Producers industry benchmarks.

Profitability at a Glance

SymbolFTSVST
Return on Equity (TTM)7.56%46.24%
Return on Assets (TTM)2.45%6.28%
Net Profit Margin (TTM)14.98%14.92%
Operating Profit Margin (TTM)28.90%22.38%
Gross Profit Margin (TTM)64.92%8.71%

Financial Strength

Current Ratio (MRQ)

FTS

0.58

Electric Utilities Industry

Max
1.81
Q3
1.22
Median
0.99
Q1
0.78
Min
0.34

FTS’s Current Ratio of 0.58 falls into the lower quartile for the Electric Utilities industry. This indicates a tighter liquidity situation and a more constrained capacity to handle short-term debt than many of its competitors.

VST

0.90

Independent Power and Renewable Electricity Producers Industry

Max
1.74
Q3
1.21
Median
0.86
Q1
0.62
Min
0.25

VST’s Current Ratio of 0.90 aligns with the median group of the Independent Power and Renewable Electricity Producers industry, indicating that its short-term liquidity is in line with its sector peers.

FTS vs. VST: A comparison of their Current Ratio (MRQ) against their respective Electric Utilities and Independent Power and Renewable Electricity Producers industry benchmarks.

Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ)

FTS

1.43

Electric Utilities Industry

Max
3.40
Q3
1.83
Median
1.32
Q1
0.64
Min
0.00

FTS’s Debt-to-Equity Ratio of 1.43 is typical for the Electric Utilities industry, indicating its use of leverage is in line with the sector norm. This suggests a balanced approach to its capital structure.

VST

4.00

Independent Power and Renewable Electricity Producers Industry

Max
3.93
Q3
2.66
Median
1.75
Q1
1.05
Min
0.22

With a Debt-to-Equity Ratio of 4.00, VST operates with exceptionally high leverage compared to the Independent Power and Renewable Electricity Producers industry norm. This suggests an aggressive reliance on debt financing, which can magnify returns but also significantly elevates financial risk.

FTS vs. VST: A comparison of their Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ) against their respective Electric Utilities and Independent Power and Renewable Electricity Producers industry benchmarks.

Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM)

FTS

2.62

Electric Utilities Industry

Max
18.68
Q3
10.64
Median
3.32
Q1
2.62
Min
-3.31

FTS’s Interest Coverage Ratio of 2.62 is positioned comfortably within the norm for the Electric Utilities industry, indicating a standard and healthy capacity to cover its interest payments.

VST

5.47

Independent Power and Renewable Electricity Producers Industry

Max
10.03
Q3
7.41
Median
2.59
Q1
1.32
Min
-1.62

VST’s Interest Coverage Ratio of 5.47 is positioned comfortably within the norm for the Independent Power and Renewable Electricity Producers industry, indicating a standard and healthy capacity to cover its interest payments.

FTS vs. VST: A comparison of their Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM) against their respective Electric Utilities and Independent Power and Renewable Electricity Producers industry benchmarks.

Financial Strength at a Glance

SymbolFTSVST
Current Ratio (MRQ)0.580.90
Quick Ratio (MRQ)0.440.73
Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ)1.434.00
Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM)2.625.47

Growth

Revenue Growth

FTS vs. VST: A side-by-side comparison of their Revenue Growth for the MRQ (YoY), TTM (YoY), 3-Year CAGR, and 5-Year CAGR periods.

EPS Growth

FTS vs. VST: A side-by-side comparison of their EPS Growth for the MRQ (YoY), TTM (YoY), 3-Year CAGR, and 5-Year CAGR periods.

Dividend

Dividend Yield (TTM)

FTS

2.40%

Electric Utilities Industry

Max
7.00%
Q3
4.67%
Median
3.84%
Q1
2.48%
Min
0.00%

FTS’s Dividend Yield of 2.40% is in the lower quartile for the Electric Utilities industry. This suggests the company’s strategy likely favors retaining earnings for growth over providing a high dividend income.

VST

0.77%

Independent Power and Renewable Electricity Producers Industry

Max
8.02%
Q3
5.65%
Median
4.08%
Q1
2.47%
Min
0.00%

VST’s Dividend Yield of 0.77% is in the lower quartile for the Independent Power and Renewable Electricity Producers industry. This suggests the company’s strategy likely favors retaining earnings for growth over providing a high dividend income.

FTS vs. VST: A comparison of their Dividend Yield (TTM) against their respective Electric Utilities and Independent Power and Renewable Electricity Producers industry benchmarks.

Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM)

FTS

47.41%

Electric Utilities Industry

Max
150.16%
Q3
88.91%
Median
65.69%
Q1
34.65%
Min
0.00%

FTS’s Dividend Payout Ratio of 47.41% is within the typical range for the Electric Utilities industry, suggesting a balanced approach between shareholder payouts and company reinvestment.

VST

14.95%

Independent Power and Renewable Electricity Producers Industry

Max
125.56%
Q3
90.24%
Median
50.41%
Q1
17.76%
Min
0.00%

VST’s Dividend Payout Ratio of 14.95% is in the lower quartile for the Independent Power and Renewable Electricity Producers industry. This suggests a conservative dividend policy, with a strategic focus on reinvesting profits for future growth.

FTS vs. VST: A comparison of their Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM) against their respective Electric Utilities and Independent Power and Renewable Electricity Producers industry benchmarks.

Dividend at a Glance

SymbolFTSVST
Dividend Yield (TTM)2.40%0.77%
Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM)47.41%14.95%

Valuation

Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM)

FTS

19.73

Electric Utilities Industry

Max
39.85
Q3
21.79
Median
15.62
Q1
8.97
Min
3.03

FTS’s P/E Ratio of 19.73 is within the middle range for the Electric Utilities industry. This suggests its valuation is in line with the sector average, representing neither a significant premium nor a discount compared to its peers.

VST

27.39

Independent Power and Renewable Electricity Producers Industry

Max
51.94
Q3
27.00
Median
10.10
Q1
7.02
Min
4.18

A P/E Ratio of 27.39 places VST in the upper quartile for the Independent Power and Renewable Electricity Producers industry. This high valuation relative to peers suggests the market holds elevated expectations for the company’s future growth.

FTS vs. VST: A comparison of their Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM) against their respective Electric Utilities and Independent Power and Renewable Electricity Producers industry benchmarks.

Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM)

FTS

2.95

Electric Utilities Industry

Max
5.96
Q3
3.09
Median
1.93
Q1
1.14
Min
0.15

FTS’s P/S Ratio of 2.95 aligns with the market consensus for the Electric Utilities industry. This suggests its valuation, based on sales, is seen as standard and is on par with its competitors.

VST

4.09

Independent Power and Renewable Electricity Producers Industry

Max
6.94
Q3
3.56
Median
2.46
Q1
0.86
Min
0.39

VST’s P/S Ratio of 4.09 is in the upper echelon for the Independent Power and Renewable Electricity Producers industry. This means the company is valued richly on its revenue stream compared to its peers, suggesting the stock is priced for a high level of future performance.

FTS vs. VST: A comparison of their Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM) against their respective Electric Utilities and Independent Power and Renewable Electricity Producers industry benchmarks.

Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ)

FTS

1.38

Electric Utilities Industry

Max
2.99
Q3
1.99
Median
1.46
Q1
1.11
Min
0.18

FTS’s P/B Ratio of 1.38 is within the conventional range for the Electric Utilities industry. This shows a balanced market view, where the stock’s price is neither at a significant premium nor a discount to the book value of its peers.

VST

13.64

Independent Power and Renewable Electricity Producers Industry

Max
3.49
Q3
1.92
Median
1.33
Q1
0.81
Min
0.35

At 13.64, VST’s P/B Ratio is at an extreme premium to the Independent Power and Renewable Electricity Producers industry. This signifies that the market’s valuation is heavily reliant on future potential rather than its current net asset value, which can be a high-risk proposition.

FTS vs. VST: A comparison of their Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ) against their respective Electric Utilities and Independent Power and Renewable Electricity Producers industry benchmarks.

Valuation at a Glance

SymbolFTSVST
Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM)19.7327.39
Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM)2.954.09
Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ)1.3813.64
Price-to-Free Cash Flow Ratio (TTM)923.1842.40