Seek Returns logo

FTS vs. KEP: A Head-to-Head Stock Comparison

Updated on

Here’s a clear look at FTS and KEP, comparing key factors like historical performance, profitability, financial strength, growth, dividend, and valuation.

Company Profile

FTS is a standard domestic listing, while KEP trades as an American Depositary Receipt (ADR), offering U.S. investors access to its foreign-listed shares.

SymbolFTSKEP
Company NameFortis Inc.Korea Electric Power Corporation
CountryCanadaSouth Korea
GICS SectorUtilitiesUtilities
GICS IndustryElectric UtilitiesElectric Utilities
Market Capitalization25.43 billion USD18.22 billion USD
ExchangeNYSENYSE
Listing DateJanuary 5, 2010October 27, 1994
Security TypeCommon StockADR

Historical Performance

This chart compares the performance of FTS and KEP by tracking the growth of an initial $10,000 investment in each. Use the tabs to select the desired time period. Data is adjusted for dividends and splits.

FTS vs. KEP: Growth of a $10,000 investment over the past one year.

Historical Performance at a Glance

SymbolFTSKEP
5-Day Price Return0.48%-5.83%
13-Week Price Return4.07%53.59%
26-Week Price Return11.69%87.89%
52-Week Price Return18.50%-7.95%
Month-to-Date Return2.70%2.59%
Year-to-Date Return16.57%97.26%
10-Day Avg. Volume1.34M4.97M
3-Month Avg. Volume1.55M4.38M
3-Month Volatility12.73%66.85%
Beta0.300.35

Profitability

Return on Equity (TTM)

FTS

7.56%

Electric Utilities Industry

Max
23.82%
Q3
14.31%
Median
10.58%
Q1
7.57%
Min
1.03%

FTS’s Return on Equity of 7.56% is in the lower quartile for the Electric Utilities industry. This indicates a less efficient generation of profit from its equity base when compared to its competitors.

KEP

13.40%

Electric Utilities Industry

Max
23.82%
Q3
14.31%
Median
10.58%
Q1
7.57%
Min
1.03%

KEP’s Return on Equity of 13.40% is on par with the norm for the Electric Utilities industry, indicating its profitability relative to shareholder equity is typical for the sector.

FTS vs. KEP: A comparison of their Return on Equity (TTM) against the Electric Utilities industry benchmark.

Net Profit Margin (TTM)

FTS

14.98%

Electric Utilities Industry

Max
29.46%
Q3
17.23%
Median
11.43%
Q1
7.33%
Min
-2.53%

FTS’s Net Profit Margin of 14.98% is aligned with the median group of its peers in the Electric Utilities industry. This indicates its ability to convert revenue into profit is typical for the sector.

KEP

5.72%

Electric Utilities Industry

Max
29.46%
Q3
17.23%
Median
11.43%
Q1
7.33%
Min
-2.53%

Falling into the lower quartile for the Electric Utilities industry, KEP’s Net Profit Margin of 5.72% indicates weaker profitability. This means the company retains a smaller portion of each dollar in sales as profit compared to its competitors.

FTS vs. KEP: A comparison of their Net Profit Margin (TTM) against the Electric Utilities industry benchmark.

Operating Profit Margin (TTM)

FTS

28.90%

Electric Utilities Industry

Max
46.44%
Q3
26.51%
Median
19.26%
Q1
11.77%
Min
2.81%

An Operating Profit Margin of 28.90% places FTS in the upper quartile for the Electric Utilities industry. This signals a strong ability to translate revenue into operating profit, outperforming most of its competitors in core business efficiency.

KEP

11.77%

Electric Utilities Industry

Max
46.44%
Q3
26.51%
Median
19.26%
Q1
11.77%
Min
2.81%

KEP’s Operating Profit Margin of 11.77% is around the midpoint for the Electric Utilities industry, indicating that its efficiency in managing core business operations is typical for the sector.

FTS vs. KEP: A comparison of their Operating Profit Margin (TTM) against the Electric Utilities industry benchmark.

Profitability at a Glance

SymbolFTSKEP
Return on Equity (TTM)7.56%13.40%
Return on Assets (TTM)2.45%2.14%
Net Profit Margin (TTM)14.98%5.72%
Operating Profit Margin (TTM)28.90%11.77%
Gross Profit Margin (TTM)64.92%-19.73%

Financial Strength

Current Ratio (MRQ)

FTS

0.58

Electric Utilities Industry

Max
1.81
Q3
1.22
Median
0.99
Q1
0.78
Min
0.34

FTS’s Current Ratio of 0.58 falls into the lower quartile for the Electric Utilities industry. This indicates a tighter liquidity situation and a more constrained capacity to handle short-term debt than many of its competitors.

KEP

0.47

Electric Utilities Industry

Max
1.81
Q3
1.22
Median
0.99
Q1
0.78
Min
0.34

KEP’s Current Ratio of 0.47 falls into the lower quartile for the Electric Utilities industry. This indicates a tighter liquidity situation and a more constrained capacity to handle short-term debt than many of its competitors.

FTS vs. KEP: A comparison of their Current Ratio (MRQ) against the Electric Utilities industry benchmark.

Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ)

FTS

1.43

Electric Utilities Industry

Max
3.40
Q3
1.83
Median
1.32
Q1
0.64
Min
0.00

FTS’s Debt-to-Equity Ratio of 1.43 is typical for the Electric Utilities industry, indicating its use of leverage is in line with the sector norm. This suggests a balanced approach to its capital structure.

KEP

3.26

Electric Utilities Industry

Max
3.40
Q3
1.83
Median
1.32
Q1
0.64
Min
0.00

KEP’s leverage is in the upper quartile of the Electric Utilities industry, with a Debt-to-Equity Ratio of 3.26. While this approach can boost equity growth, it also exposes the company to greater financial vulnerability.

FTS vs. KEP: A comparison of their Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ) against the Electric Utilities industry benchmark.

Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM)

FTS

2.62

Electric Utilities Industry

Max
18.68
Q3
10.64
Median
3.32
Q1
2.62
Min
-3.31

FTS’s Interest Coverage Ratio of 2.62 is positioned comfortably within the norm for the Electric Utilities industry, indicating a standard and healthy capacity to cover its interest payments.

KEP

2.57

Electric Utilities Industry

Max
18.68
Q3
10.64
Median
3.32
Q1
2.62
Min
-3.31

In the lower quartile for the Electric Utilities industry, KEP’s Interest Coverage Ratio of 2.57 indicates a tighter cushion for servicing debt, suggesting less financial flexibility than many of its competitors.

FTS vs. KEP: A comparison of their Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM) against the Electric Utilities industry benchmark.

Financial Strength at a Glance

SymbolFTSKEP
Current Ratio (MRQ)0.580.47
Quick Ratio (MRQ)0.440.30
Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ)1.433.26
Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM)2.622.57

Growth

Revenue Growth

FTS vs. KEP: A side-by-side comparison of their Revenue Growth for the MRQ (YoY), TTM (YoY), 3-Year CAGR, and 5-Year CAGR periods.

EPS Growth

FTS vs. KEP: A side-by-side comparison of their EPS Growth for the MRQ (YoY), TTM (YoY), 3-Year CAGR, and 5-Year CAGR periods.

Dividend

Dividend Yield (TTM)

FTS

2.40%

Electric Utilities Industry

Max
7.00%
Q3
4.67%
Median
3.84%
Q1
2.48%
Min
0.00%

FTS’s Dividend Yield of 2.40% is in the lower quartile for the Electric Utilities industry. This suggests the company’s strategy likely favors retaining earnings for growth over providing a high dividend income.

KEP

0.51%

Electric Utilities Industry

Max
7.00%
Q3
4.67%
Median
3.84%
Q1
2.48%
Min
0.00%

KEP’s Dividend Yield of 0.51% is in the lower quartile for the Electric Utilities industry. This suggests the company’s strategy likely favors retaining earnings for growth over providing a high dividend income.

FTS vs. KEP: A comparison of their Dividend Yield (TTM) against the Electric Utilities industry benchmark.

Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM)

FTS

47.41%

Electric Utilities Industry

Max
150.16%
Q3
88.91%
Median
65.69%
Q1
34.65%
Min
0.00%

FTS’s Dividend Payout Ratio of 47.41% is within the typical range for the Electric Utilities industry, suggesting a balanced approach between shareholder payouts and company reinvestment.

KEP

4.33%

Electric Utilities Industry

Max
150.16%
Q3
88.91%
Median
65.69%
Q1
34.65%
Min
0.00%

KEP’s Dividend Payout Ratio of 4.33% is in the lower quartile for the Electric Utilities industry. This suggests a conservative dividend policy, with a strategic focus on reinvesting profits for future growth.

FTS vs. KEP: A comparison of their Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM) against the Electric Utilities industry benchmark.

Dividend at a Glance

SymbolFTSKEP
Dividend Yield (TTM)2.40%0.51%
Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM)47.41%4.33%

Valuation

Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM)

FTS

19.72

Electric Utilities Industry

Max
39.85
Q3
21.79
Median
15.62
Q1
8.97
Min
3.03

FTS’s P/E Ratio of 19.72 is within the middle range for the Electric Utilities industry. This suggests its valuation is in line with the sector average, representing neither a significant premium nor a discount compared to its peers.

KEP

4.71

Electric Utilities Industry

Max
39.85
Q3
21.79
Median
15.62
Q1
8.97
Min
3.03

In the lower quartile for the Electric Utilities industry, KEP’s P/E Ratio of 4.71 suggests the stock may be undervalued compared to its peers, potentially presenting an attractive entry point for investors.

FTS vs. KEP: A comparison of their Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM) against the Electric Utilities industry benchmark.

Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM)

FTS

2.95

Electric Utilities Industry

Max
5.96
Q3
3.09
Median
1.93
Q1
1.14
Min
0.15

FTS’s P/S Ratio of 2.95 aligns with the market consensus for the Electric Utilities industry. This suggests its valuation, based on sales, is seen as standard and is on par with its competitors.

KEP

0.27

Electric Utilities Industry

Max
5.96
Q3
3.09
Median
1.93
Q1
1.14
Min
0.15

In the lower quartile for the Electric Utilities industry, KEP’s P/S Ratio of 0.27 indicates its revenue is valued more conservatively than most of its peers. This could present a compelling opportunity if the market has overlooked its sales-generating capabilities.

FTS vs. KEP: A comparison of their Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM) against the Electric Utilities industry benchmark.

Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ)

FTS

1.38

Electric Utilities Industry

Max
2.99
Q3
1.99
Median
1.46
Q1
1.11
Min
0.18

FTS’s P/B Ratio of 1.38 is within the conventional range for the Electric Utilities industry. This shows a balanced market view, where the stock’s price is neither at a significant premium nor a discount to the book value of its peers.

KEP

0.33

Electric Utilities Industry

Max
2.99
Q3
1.99
Median
1.46
Q1
1.11
Min
0.18

KEP’s P/B Ratio of 0.33 is in the lower quartile for the Electric Utilities industry. From a value investing perspective, this is favorable, as it suggests the stock is trading at a discount to its net asset value and may offer a greater margin of safety.

FTS vs. KEP: A comparison of their Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ) against the Electric Utilities industry benchmark.

Valuation at a Glance

SymbolFTSKEP
Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM)19.724.71
Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM)2.950.27
Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ)1.380.33
Price-to-Free Cash Flow Ratio (TTM)922.785.13