FTNT vs. UI: A Head-to-Head Stock Comparison

Updated on October 4, 2025

Here’s a clear look at FTNT and UI, comparing key factors like historical performance, profitability, financial strength, growth, dividend, and valuation.

Company Profile

Symbol	FTNT	UI
Company Name	Fortinet, Inc.	Ubiquiti Inc.
Country	United States	United States
GICS Sector	Information Technology	Information Technology
GICS Industry	Software	Communications Equipment
Market Capitalization	65.27 billion USD	40.80 billion USD
Exchange	NasdaqGS	NYSE
Listing Date	November 18, 2009	October 14, 2011
Security Type	Common Stock	Common Stock

Historical Performance

This chart compares the performance of FTNT and UI by tracking the growth of an initial $10,000 investment in each. Use the tabs to select the desired time period. Data is adjusted for dividends and splits.

FTNT vs. UI: Growth of a $10,000 investment over the past one year.

Historical Performance at a Glance

Symbol	FTNT	UI
5-Day Price Return	0.57%	3.45%
13-Week Price Return	-20.47%	60.47%
26-Week Price Return	-16.76%	110.18%
52-Week Price Return	8.56%	200.36%
Month-to-Date Return	6.74%	25.08%
Year-to-Date Return	-11.01%	99.01%
10-Day Avg. Volume	6.77M	0.20M
3-Month Avg. Volume	6.42M	0.14M
3-Month Volatility	54.60%	74.34%
Beta	1.08	1.49

Profitability

Return on Equity (TTM)

FTNT

120.75%

Software Industry

Max: 66.28%
Q3: 21.28%
Median: 9.33%
Q1: -8.77%
Min: -48.16%

FTNT’s Return on Equity of 120.75% is exceptionally high, placing it well beyond the typical range for the Software industry. This demonstrates a superior ability to generate profit from shareholder investments, though it could also be inflated by high financial leverage.

UI

179.90%

Communications Equipment Industry

Max: 32.30%
Q3: 20.90%
Median: 9.10%
Q1: 4.29%
Min: -13.50%

UI’s Return on Equity of 179.90% is exceptionally high, placing it well beyond the typical range for the Communications Equipment industry. This demonstrates a superior ability to generate profit from shareholder investments, though it could also be inflated by high financial leverage.

FTNT vs. UI: A comparison of their Return on Equity (TTM) against their respective Software and Communications Equipment industry benchmarks.

Net Profit Margin (TTM)

FTNT

30.60%

Software Industry

Max: 51.92%
Q3: 19.23%
Median: 6.98%
Q1: -7.14%
Min: -41.00%

A Net Profit Margin of 30.60% places FTNT in the upper quartile for the Software industry, signifying strong profitability and more effective cost management than most of its peers.

UI

27.66%

Communications Equipment Industry

Max: 23.65%
Q3: 12.56%
Median: 5.62%
Q1: 2.50%
Min: -3.09%

UI’s Net Profit Margin of 27.66% is exceptionally high, placing it well beyond the typical range for the Communications Equipment industry. This demonstrates outstanding operational efficiency and a strong competitive advantage in converting revenue into profit.

FTNT vs. UI: A comparison of their Net Profit Margin (TTM) against their respective Software and Communications Equipment industry benchmarks.

Operating Profit Margin (TTM)

FTNT

32.55%

Software Industry

Max: 60.40%
Q3: 21.25%
Median: 9.90%
Q1: -4.97%
Min: -43.50%

An Operating Profit Margin of 32.55% places FTNT in the upper quartile for the Software industry. This signals a strong ability to translate revenue into operating profit, outperforming most of its competitors in core business efficiency.

UI

32.50%

Communications Equipment Industry

Max: 25.23%
Q3: 13.72%
Median: 6.44%
Q1: 3.00%
Min: -10.95%

UI’s Operating Profit Margin of 32.50% is exceptionally high, placing it well above the typical range for the Communications Equipment industry. This demonstrates outstanding efficiency in managing its core operations, which can be a result of strong pricing power or superior cost control.

FTNT vs. UI: A comparison of their Operating Profit Margin (TTM) against their respective Software and Communications Equipment industry benchmarks.

Profitability at a Glance

Symbol	FTNT	UI
Return on Equity (TTM)	120.75%	179.90%
Return on Assets (TTM)	19.56%	55.77%
Net Profit Margin (TTM)	30.60%	27.66%
Operating Profit Margin (TTM)	32.55%	32.50%
Gross Profit Margin (TTM)	81.42%	43.42%

Financial Strength

Current Ratio (MRQ)

FTNT

1.33

Software Industry

Max: 4.29
Q3: 2.37
Median: 1.40
Q1: 1.03
Min: 0.25

FTNT’s Current Ratio of 1.33 aligns with the median group of the Software industry, indicating that its short-term liquidity is in line with its sector peers.

UI

1.65

Communications Equipment Industry

Max: 3.33
Q3: 2.13
Median: 1.55
Q1: 1.15
Min: 0.91

UI’s Current Ratio of 1.65 aligns with the median group of the Communications Equipment industry, indicating that its short-term liquidity is in line with its sector peers.

FTNT vs. UI: A comparison of their Current Ratio (MRQ) against their respective Software and Communications Equipment industry benchmarks.

Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ)

FTNT

0.48

Software Industry

Max: 2.16
Q3: 0.86
Median: 0.31
Q1: 0.00
Min: 0.00

FTNT’s Debt-to-Equity Ratio of 0.48 is typical for the Software industry, indicating its use of leverage is in line with the sector norm. This suggests a balanced approach to its capital structure.

UI

0.37

Communications Equipment Industry

Max: 1.44
Q3: 0.86
Median: 0.53
Q1: 0.22
Min: 0.00

UI’s Debt-to-Equity Ratio of 0.37 is typical for the Communications Equipment industry, indicating its use of leverage is in line with the sector norm. This suggests a balanced approach to its capital structure.

FTNT vs. UI: A comparison of their Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ) against their respective Software and Communications Equipment industry benchmarks.

Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM)

FTNT

184.75

Software Industry

Max: 89.65
Q3: 32.64
Median: 1.00
Q1: -9.84
Min: -71.23

With an Interest Coverage Ratio of 184.75, FTNT demonstrates a superior capacity to service its debt, placing it well above the typical range for the Software industry. This stems from either robust earnings or a conservative debt load.

UI

27.30

Communications Equipment Industry

Max: 55.49
Q3: 34.19
Median: 7.59
Q1: 3.73
Min: -9.94

UI’s Interest Coverage Ratio of 27.30 is positioned comfortably within the norm for the Communications Equipment industry, indicating a standard and healthy capacity to cover its interest payments.

FTNT vs. UI: A comparison of their Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM) against their respective Software and Communications Equipment industry benchmarks.

Financial Strength at a Glance

Symbol	FTNT	UI
Current Ratio (MRQ)	1.33	1.65
Quick Ratio (MRQ)	1.21	0.62
Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ)	0.48	0.37
Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM)	184.75	27.30

Growth

Revenue Growth

FTNT vs. UI: A side-by-side comparison of their Revenue Growth for the MRQ (YoY), TTM (YoY), 3-Year CAGR, and 5-Year CAGR periods.

EPS Growth

FTNT vs. UI: A side-by-side comparison of their EPS Growth for the MRQ (YoY), TTM (YoY), 3-Year CAGR, and 5-Year CAGR periods.

Dividend

Dividend Yield (TTM)

FTNT

0.00%

Software Industry

Max: 0.22%
Q3: 0.11%
Median: 0.00%
Q1: 0.00%
Min: 0.00%

FTNT currently does not pay a dividend, resulting in a yield of 0%. This is a common strategy for growth-focused companies that prioritize reinvesting earnings, though it may be less typical in mature, income-oriented sectors.

UI

0.36%

Communications Equipment Industry

Max: 8.13%
Q3: 3.29%
Median: 0.94%
Q1: 0.00%
Min: 0.00%

UI’s Dividend Yield of 0.36% is consistent with its peers in the Communications Equipment industry, providing a dividend return that is standard for its sector.

FTNT vs. UI: A comparison of their Dividend Yield (TTM) against their respective Software and Communications Equipment industry benchmarks.

Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM)

FTNT

0.00%

Software Industry

Max: 3.29%
Q3: 2.41%
Median: 0.00%
Q1: 0.00%
Min: 0.00%

FTNT has a Dividend Payout Ratio of 0%, indicating it does not currently pay a dividend. This is a common strategy for growth-oriented companies that reinvest all profits back into the business.

UI

20.39%

Communications Equipment Industry

Max: 111.16%
Q3: 70.91%
Median: 30.78%
Q1: 0.00%
Min: 0.00%

UI’s Dividend Payout Ratio of 20.39% is within the typical range for the Communications Equipment industry, suggesting a balanced approach between shareholder payouts and company reinvestment.

FTNT vs. UI: A comparison of their Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM) against their respective Software and Communications Equipment industry benchmarks.

Dividend at a Glance

Symbol	FTNT	UI
Dividend Yield (TTM)	0.00%	0.36%
Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM)	0.00%	20.39%

Valuation

Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM)

FTNT

33.44

Software Industry

Max: 145.74
Q3: 94.88
Median: 45.35
Q1: 26.66
Min: 8.80

FTNT’s P/E Ratio of 33.44 is within the middle range for the Software industry. This suggests its valuation is in line with the sector average, representing neither a significant premium nor a discount compared to its peers.

UI

57.28

Communications Equipment Industry

Max: 103.74
Q3: 61.65
Median: 26.20
Q1: 18.12
Min: 4.19

UI’s P/E Ratio of 57.28 is within the middle range for the Communications Equipment industry. This suggests its valuation is in line with the sector average, representing neither a significant premium nor a discount compared to its peers.

FTNT vs. UI: A comparison of their Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM) against their respective Software and Communications Equipment industry benchmarks.

Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM)

FTNT

10.23

Software Industry

Max: 25.67
Q3: 13.68
Median: 8.28
Q1: 4.95
Min: 0.90

FTNT’s P/S Ratio of 10.23 aligns with the market consensus for the Software industry. This suggests its valuation, based on sales, is seen as standard and is on par with its competitors.

UI

15.84

Communications Equipment Industry

Max: 6.86
Q3: 6.24
Median: 2.44
Q1: 1.02
Min: 0.48

With a P/S Ratio of 15.84, UI trades at a valuation that eclipses even the highest in the Communications Equipment industry. This implies the market has priced in exceptionally optimistic scenarios for future revenue growth, posing considerable valuation risk.

FTNT vs. UI: A comparison of their Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM) against their respective Software and Communications Equipment industry benchmarks.

Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ)

FTNT

39.27

Software Industry

Max: 30.67
Q3: 14.92
Median: 8.52
Q1: 3.89
Min: 0.38

At 39.27, FTNT’s P/B Ratio is at an extreme premium to the Software industry. This signifies that the market’s valuation is heavily reliant on future potential rather than its current net asset value, which can be a high-risk proposition.

UI

37.26

Communications Equipment Industry

Max: 6.28
Q3: 5.73
Median: 3.32
Q1: 2.02
Min: 0.42

At 37.26, UI’s P/B Ratio is at an extreme premium to the Communications Equipment industry. This signifies that the market’s valuation is heavily reliant on future potential rather than its current net asset value, which can be a high-risk proposition.

FTNT vs. UI: A comparison of their Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ) against their respective Software and Communications Equipment industry benchmarks.

Valuation at a Glance

Symbol	FTNT	UI
Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM)	33.44	57.28
Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM)	10.23	15.84
Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ)	39.27	37.26
Price-to-Free Cash Flow Ratio (TTM)	31.91	64.99