Seek Returns logo

FTNT vs. MRVL: A Head-to-Head Stock Comparison

Updated on

Here’s a clear look at FTNT and MRVL, comparing key factors like historical performance, profitability, financial strength, growth, dividend, and valuation.

Company Profile

SymbolFTNTMRVL
Company NameFortinet, Inc.Marvell Technology, Inc.
CountryUnited StatesUnited States
GICS SectorInformation TechnologyInformation Technology
GICS IndustrySoftwareSemiconductors & Semiconductor Equipment
Market Capitalization60.79 billion USD68.39 billion USD
ExchangeNasdaqGSNasdaqGS
Listing DateNovember 18, 2009June 30, 2000
Security TypeCommon StockCommon Stock

Historical Performance

This chart compares the performance of FTNT and MRVL by tracking the growth of an initial $10,000 investment in each. Use the tabs to select the desired time period. Data is adjusted for dividends and splits.

FTNT vs. MRVL: Growth of a $10,000 investment over the past one year.

Historical Performance at a Glance

SymbolFTNTMRVL
5-Day Price Return5.35%4.57%
13-Week Price Return-22.26%22.98%
26-Week Price Return-24.25%-33.48%
52-Week Price Return12.75%31.09%
Month-to-Date Return-20.59%-1.31%
Year-to-Date Return-16.04%-28.18%
10-Day Avg. Volume13.47M15.73M
3-Month Avg. Volume5.77M20.22M
3-Month Volatility53.69%48.98%
Beta1.091.92

Profitability

Return on Equity (TTM)

FTNT

120.75%

Software Industry

Max
59.01%
Q3
21.98%
Median
7.15%
Q1
-11.12%
Min
-51.24%

FTNT’s Return on Equity of 120.75% is exceptionally high, placing it well beyond the typical range for the Software industry. This demonstrates a superior ability to generate profit from shareholder investments, though it could also be inflated by high financial leverage.

MRVL

-3.62%

Semiconductors & Semiconductor Equipment Industry

Max
52.74%
Q3
23.49%
Median
11.60%
Q1
3.23%
Min
-20.69%

MRVL has a negative Return on Equity of -3.62%. This indicates the company is generating a loss for its shareholders, which can be a result of unprofitability or negative shareholder equity and is often a sign of financial distress.

FTNT vs. MRVL: A comparison of their Return on Equity (TTM) against their respective Software and Semiconductors & Semiconductor Equipment industry benchmarks.

Net Profit Margin (TTM)

FTNT

30.60%

Software Industry

Max
48.14%
Q3
18.23%
Median
5.60%
Q1
-9.22%
Min
-49.36%

A Net Profit Margin of 30.60% places FTNT in the upper quartile for the Software industry, signifying strong profitability and more effective cost management than most of its peers.

MRVL

-7.56%

Semiconductors & Semiconductor Equipment Industry

Max
44.17%
Q3
22.38%
Median
11.95%
Q1
3.21%
Min
-25.16%

MRVL has a negative Net Profit Margin of -7.56%, indicating the company is operating at a net loss as its expenses exceeded its revenues.

FTNT vs. MRVL: A comparison of their Net Profit Margin (TTM) against their respective Software and Semiconductors & Semiconductor Equipment industry benchmarks.

Operating Profit Margin (TTM)

FTNT

32.55%

Software Industry

Max
57.34%
Q3
20.60%
Median
7.84%
Q1
-8.72%
Min
-51.37%

An Operating Profit Margin of 32.55% places FTNT in the upper quartile for the Software industry. This signals a strong ability to translate revenue into operating profit, outperforming most of its competitors in core business efficiency.

MRVL

-4.57%

Semiconductors & Semiconductor Equipment Industry

Max
58.03%
Q3
27.84%
Median
12.45%
Q1
5.15%
Min
-28.61%

MRVL has a negative Operating Profit Margin of -4.57%. This signifies the company is unprofitable at the operational level, as its core business expenses exceed its revenue.

FTNT vs. MRVL: A comparison of their Operating Profit Margin (TTM) against their respective Software and Semiconductors & Semiconductor Equipment industry benchmarks.

Profitability at a Glance

SymbolFTNTMRVL
Return on Equity (TTM)120.75%-3.62%
Return on Assets (TTM)19.56%-2.45%
Net Profit Margin (TTM)30.60%-7.56%
Operating Profit Margin (TTM)32.55%-4.57%
Gross Profit Margin (TTM)81.42%43.17%

Financial Strength

Current Ratio (MRQ)

FTNT

1.33

Software Industry

Max
3.83
Q3
2.31
Median
1.45
Q1
1.03
Min
0.24

FTNT’s Current Ratio of 1.33 aligns with the median group of the Software industry, indicating that its short-term liquidity is in line with its sector peers.

MRVL

1.30

Semiconductors & Semiconductor Equipment Industry

Max
8.42
Q3
4.70
Median
2.75
Q1
2.07
Min
1.04

MRVL’s Current Ratio of 1.30 falls into the lower quartile for the Semiconductors & Semiconductor Equipment industry. This indicates a tighter liquidity situation and a more constrained capacity to handle short-term debt than many of its competitors.

FTNT vs. MRVL: A comparison of their Current Ratio (MRQ) against their respective Software and Semiconductors & Semiconductor Equipment industry benchmarks.

Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ)

FTNT

0.48

Software Industry

Max
2.14
Q3
0.90
Median
0.29
Q1
0.00
Min
0.00

FTNT’s Debt-to-Equity Ratio of 0.48 is typical for the Software industry, indicating its use of leverage is in line with the sector norm. This suggests a balanced approach to its capital structure.

MRVL

0.32

Semiconductors & Semiconductor Equipment Industry

Max
1.09
Q3
0.45
Median
0.22
Q1
0.01
Min
0.00

MRVL’s Debt-to-Equity Ratio of 0.32 is typical for the Semiconductors & Semiconductor Equipment industry, indicating its use of leverage is in line with the sector norm. This suggests a balanced approach to its capital structure.

FTNT vs. MRVL: A comparison of their Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ) against their respective Software and Semiconductors & Semiconductor Equipment industry benchmarks.

Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM)

FTNT

184.75

Software Industry

Max
67.02
Q3
19.86
Median
0.70
Q1
-12.50
Min
-53.00

With an Interest Coverage Ratio of 184.75, FTNT demonstrates a superior capacity to service its debt, placing it well above the typical range for the Software industry. This stems from either robust earnings or a conservative debt load.

MRVL

-4.13

Semiconductors & Semiconductor Equipment Industry

Max
174.00
Q3
81.10
Median
27.22
Q1
7.28
Min
-4.26

MRVL has a negative Interest Coverage Ratio of -4.13. This indicates that its earnings were insufficient to cover even its operational costs, let alone its interest payments, signaling significant financial distress.

FTNT vs. MRVL: A comparison of their Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM) against their respective Software and Semiconductors & Semiconductor Equipment industry benchmarks.

Financial Strength at a Glance

SymbolFTNTMRVL
Current Ratio (MRQ)1.331.30
Quick Ratio (MRQ)1.210.89
Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ)0.480.32
Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM)184.75-4.13

Growth

Revenue Growth

FTNT vs. MRVL: A side-by-side comparison of their Revenue Growth for the MRQ (YoY), TTM (YoY), 3-Year CAGR, and 5-Year CAGR periods.

EPS Growth

FTNT vs. MRVL: A side-by-side comparison of their EPS Growth for the MRQ (YoY), TTM (YoY), 3-Year CAGR, and 5-Year CAGR periods.

Dividend

Dividend Yield (TTM)

FTNT

0.00%

Software Industry

Max
0.08%
Q3
0.03%
Median
0.00%
Q1
0.00%
Min
0.00%

FTNT currently does not pay a dividend, resulting in a yield of 0%. This is a common strategy for growth-focused companies that prioritize reinvesting earnings, though it may be less typical in mature, income-oriented sectors.

MRVL

0.30%

Semiconductors & Semiconductor Equipment Industry

Max
4.16%
Q3
1.78%
Median
0.74%
Q1
0.00%
Min
0.00%

MRVL’s Dividend Yield of 0.30% is consistent with its peers in the Semiconductors & Semiconductor Equipment industry, providing a dividend return that is standard for its sector.

FTNT vs. MRVL: A comparison of their Dividend Yield (TTM) against their respective Software and Semiconductors & Semiconductor Equipment industry benchmarks.

Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM)

FTNT

0.00%

Software Industry

Max
1.32%
Q3
0.53%
Median
0.00%
Q1
0.00%
Min
0.00%

FTNT has a Dividend Payout Ratio of 0%, indicating it does not currently pay a dividend. This is a common strategy for growth-oriented companies that reinvest all profits back into the business.

MRVL

27.43%

Semiconductors & Semiconductor Equipment Industry

Max
196.12%
Q3
87.72%
Median
26.57%
Q1
0.00%
Min
0.00%

MRVL’s Dividend Payout Ratio of 27.43% is within the typical range for the Semiconductors & Semiconductor Equipment industry, suggesting a balanced approach between shareholder payouts and company reinvestment.

FTNT vs. MRVL: A comparison of their Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM) against their respective Software and Semiconductors & Semiconductor Equipment industry benchmarks.

Dividend at a Glance

SymbolFTNTMRVL
Dividend Yield (TTM)0.00%0.30%
Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM)0.00%27.43%

Valuation

Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM)

FTNT

31.29

Software Industry

Max
149.35
Q3
100.21
Median
47.97
Q1
26.77
Min
11.68

FTNT’s P/E Ratio of 31.29 is within the middle range for the Software industry. This suggests its valuation is in line with the sector average, representing neither a significant premium nor a discount compared to its peers.

MRVL

--

Semiconductors & Semiconductor Equipment Industry

Max
109.37
Q3
57.11
Median
28.95
Q1
22.13
Min
11.14

P/E Ratio data for MRVL is currently unavailable.

FTNT vs. MRVL: A comparison of their Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM) against their respective Software and Semiconductors & Semiconductor Equipment industry benchmarks.

Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM)

FTNT

9.58

Software Industry

Max
25.24
Q3
13.52
Median
8.15
Q1
4.87
Min
0.98

FTNT’s P/S Ratio of 9.58 aligns with the market consensus for the Software industry. This suggests its valuation, based on sales, is seen as standard and is on par with its competitors.

MRVL

10.52

Semiconductors & Semiconductor Equipment Industry

Max
16.09
Q3
10.10
Median
4.82
Q1
2.60
Min
0.93

MRVL’s P/S Ratio of 10.52 is in the upper echelon for the Semiconductors & Semiconductor Equipment industry. This means the company is valued richly on its revenue stream compared to its peers, suggesting the stock is priced for a high level of future performance.

FTNT vs. MRVL: A comparison of their Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM) against their respective Software and Semiconductors & Semiconductor Equipment industry benchmarks.

Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ)

FTNT

39.27

Software Industry

Max
30.95
Q3
14.91
Median
7.75
Q1
3.60
Min
0.38

At 39.27, FTNT’s P/B Ratio is at an extreme premium to the Software industry. This signifies that the market’s valuation is heavily reliant on future potential rather than its current net asset value, which can be a high-risk proposition.

MRVL

4.02

Semiconductors & Semiconductor Equipment Industry

Max
13.56
Q3
6.75
Median
3.68
Q1
1.89
Min
0.60

MRVL’s P/B Ratio of 4.02 is within the conventional range for the Semiconductors & Semiconductor Equipment industry. This shows a balanced market view, where the stock’s price is neither at a significant premium nor a discount to the book value of its peers.

FTNT vs. MRVL: A comparison of their Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ) against their respective Software and Semiconductors & Semiconductor Equipment industry benchmarks.

Valuation at a Glance

SymbolFTNTMRVL
Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM)31.29--
Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM)9.5810.52
Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ)39.274.02
Price-to-Free Cash Flow Ratio (TTM)29.8649.92