Seek Returns logo

FTNT vs. MCHP: A Head-to-Head Stock Comparison

Updated on

Here’s a clear look at FTNT and MCHP, comparing key factors like historical performance, profitability, financial strength, growth, dividend, and valuation.

Company Profile

SymbolFTNTMCHP
Company NameFortinet, Inc.Microchip Technology Incorporated
CountryUnited StatesUnited States
GICS SectorInformation TechnologyInformation Technology
GICS IndustrySoftwareSemiconductors & Semiconductor Equipment
Market Capitalization60.79 billion USD35.48 billion USD
ExchangeNasdaqGSNasdaqGS
Listing DateNovember 18, 2009March 19, 1993
Security TypeCommon StockCommon Stock

Historical Performance

This chart compares the performance of FTNT and MCHP by tracking the growth of an initial $10,000 investment in each. Use the tabs to select the desired time period. Data is adjusted for dividends and splits.

FTNT vs. MCHP: Growth of a $10,000 investment over the past one year.

Historical Performance at a Glance

SymbolFTNTMCHP
5-Day Price Return5.35%-0.71%
13-Week Price Return-22.26%7.86%
26-Week Price Return-24.25%23.80%
52-Week Price Return12.75%-13.96%
Month-to-Date Return-20.59%-2.72%
Year-to-Date Return-16.04%14.65%
10-Day Avg. Volume13.47M11.68M
3-Month Avg. Volume5.77M10.69M
3-Month Volatility53.69%44.06%
Beta1.091.57

Profitability

Return on Equity (TTM)

FTNT

120.75%

Software Industry

Max
59.01%
Q3
21.98%
Median
7.15%
Q1
-11.12%
Min
-51.24%

FTNT’s Return on Equity of 120.75% is exceptionally high, placing it well beyond the typical range for the Software industry. This demonstrates a superior ability to generate profit from shareholder investments, though it could also be inflated by high financial leverage.

MCHP

-0.01%

Semiconductors & Semiconductor Equipment Industry

Max
52.74%
Q3
23.49%
Median
11.60%
Q1
3.23%
Min
-20.69%

MCHP has a negative Return on Equity of -0.01%. This indicates the company is generating a loss for its shareholders, which can be a result of unprofitability or negative shareholder equity and is often a sign of financial distress.

FTNT vs. MCHP: A comparison of their Return on Equity (TTM) against their respective Software and Semiconductors & Semiconductor Equipment industry benchmarks.

Net Profit Margin (TTM)

FTNT

30.60%

Software Industry

Max
48.14%
Q3
18.23%
Median
5.60%
Q1
-9.22%
Min
-49.36%

A Net Profit Margin of 30.60% places FTNT in the upper quartile for the Software industry, signifying strong profitability and more effective cost management than most of its peers.

MCHP

-0.01%

Semiconductors & Semiconductor Equipment Industry

Max
44.17%
Q3
22.38%
Median
11.95%
Q1
3.21%
Min
-25.16%

MCHP has a negative Net Profit Margin of -0.01%, indicating the company is operating at a net loss as its expenses exceeded its revenues.

FTNT vs. MCHP: A comparison of their Net Profit Margin (TTM) against their respective Software and Semiconductors & Semiconductor Equipment industry benchmarks.

Operating Profit Margin (TTM)

FTNT

32.55%

Software Industry

Max
57.34%
Q3
20.60%
Median
7.84%
Q1
-8.72%
Min
-51.37%

An Operating Profit Margin of 32.55% places FTNT in the upper quartile for the Software industry. This signals a strong ability to translate revenue into operating profit, outperforming most of its competitors in core business efficiency.

MCHP

6.69%

Semiconductors & Semiconductor Equipment Industry

Max
58.03%
Q3
27.84%
Median
12.45%
Q1
5.15%
Min
-28.61%

MCHP’s Operating Profit Margin of 6.69% is around the midpoint for the Semiconductors & Semiconductor Equipment industry, indicating that its efficiency in managing core business operations is typical for the sector.

FTNT vs. MCHP: A comparison of their Operating Profit Margin (TTM) against their respective Software and Semiconductors & Semiconductor Equipment industry benchmarks.

Profitability at a Glance

SymbolFTNTMCHP
Return on Equity (TTM)120.75%-0.01%
Return on Assets (TTM)19.56%0.00%
Net Profit Margin (TTM)30.60%-0.01%
Operating Profit Margin (TTM)32.55%6.69%
Gross Profit Margin (TTM)81.42%56.07%

Financial Strength

Current Ratio (MRQ)

FTNT

1.33

Software Industry

Max
3.83
Q3
2.31
Median
1.45
Q1
1.03
Min
0.24

FTNT’s Current Ratio of 1.33 aligns with the median group of the Software industry, indicating that its short-term liquidity is in line with its sector peers.

MCHP

2.59

Semiconductors & Semiconductor Equipment Industry

Max
8.42
Q3
4.70
Median
2.75
Q1
2.07
Min
1.04

MCHP’s Current Ratio of 2.59 aligns with the median group of the Semiconductors & Semiconductor Equipment industry, indicating that its short-term liquidity is in line with its sector peers.

FTNT vs. MCHP: A comparison of their Current Ratio (MRQ) against their respective Software and Semiconductors & Semiconductor Equipment industry benchmarks.

Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ)

FTNT

0.48

Software Industry

Max
2.14
Q3
0.90
Median
0.29
Q1
0.00
Min
0.00

FTNT’s Debt-to-Equity Ratio of 0.48 is typical for the Software industry, indicating its use of leverage is in line with the sector norm. This suggests a balanced approach to its capital structure.

MCHP

0.80

Semiconductors & Semiconductor Equipment Industry

Max
1.09
Q3
0.45
Median
0.22
Q1
0.01
Min
0.00

MCHP’s leverage is in the upper quartile of the Semiconductors & Semiconductor Equipment industry, with a Debt-to-Equity Ratio of 0.80. While this approach can boost equity growth, it also exposes the company to greater financial vulnerability.

FTNT vs. MCHP: A comparison of their Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ) against their respective Software and Semiconductors & Semiconductor Equipment industry benchmarks.

Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM)

FTNT

184.75

Software Industry

Max
67.02
Q3
19.86
Median
0.70
Q1
-12.50
Min
-53.00

With an Interest Coverage Ratio of 184.75, FTNT demonstrates a superior capacity to service its debt, placing it well above the typical range for the Software industry. This stems from either robust earnings or a conservative debt load.

MCHP

1.16

Semiconductors & Semiconductor Equipment Industry

Max
174.00
Q3
81.10
Median
27.22
Q1
7.28
Min
-4.26

In the lower quartile for the Semiconductors & Semiconductor Equipment industry, MCHP’s Interest Coverage Ratio of 1.16 indicates a tighter cushion for servicing debt, suggesting less financial flexibility than many of its competitors.

FTNT vs. MCHP: A comparison of their Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM) against their respective Software and Semiconductors & Semiconductor Equipment industry benchmarks.

Financial Strength at a Glance

SymbolFTNTMCHP
Current Ratio (MRQ)1.332.59
Quick Ratio (MRQ)1.211.47
Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ)0.480.80
Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM)184.751.16

Growth

Revenue Growth

FTNT vs. MCHP: A side-by-side comparison of their Revenue Growth for the MRQ (YoY), TTM (YoY), 3-Year CAGR, and 5-Year CAGR periods.

EPS Growth

FTNT vs. MCHP: A side-by-side comparison of their EPS Growth for the MRQ (YoY), TTM (YoY), 3-Year CAGR, and 5-Year CAGR periods.

Dividend

Dividend Yield (TTM)

FTNT

0.00%

Software Industry

Max
0.08%
Q3
0.03%
Median
0.00%
Q1
0.00%
Min
0.00%

FTNT currently does not pay a dividend, resulting in a yield of 0%. This is a common strategy for growth-focused companies that prioritize reinvesting earnings, though it may be less typical in mature, income-oriented sectors.

MCHP

2.78%

Semiconductors & Semiconductor Equipment Industry

Max
4.16%
Q3
1.78%
Median
0.74%
Q1
0.00%
Min
0.00%

With a Dividend Yield of 2.78%, MCHP offers a more attractive income stream than most of its peers in the Semiconductors & Semiconductor Equipment industry, signaling a strong commitment to shareholder returns.

FTNT vs. MCHP: A comparison of their Dividend Yield (TTM) against their respective Software and Semiconductors & Semiconductor Equipment industry benchmarks.

Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM)

FTNT

0.00%

Software Industry

Max
1.32%
Q3
0.53%
Median
0.00%
Q1
0.00%
Min
0.00%

FTNT has a Dividend Payout Ratio of 0%, indicating it does not currently pay a dividend. This is a common strategy for growth-oriented companies that reinvest all profits back into the business.

MCHP

123.62%

Semiconductors & Semiconductor Equipment Industry

Max
196.12%
Q3
87.72%
Median
26.57%
Q1
0.00%
Min
0.00%

MCHP’s Dividend Payout Ratio of 123.62% is in the upper quartile for the Semiconductors & Semiconductor Equipment industry. This indicates a strong commitment to shareholder returns but also suggests that a smaller portion of earnings is retained for reinvestment compared to many peers.

FTNT vs. MCHP: A comparison of their Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM) against their respective Software and Semiconductors & Semiconductor Equipment industry benchmarks.

Dividend at a Glance

SymbolFTNTMCHP
Dividend Yield (TTM)0.00%2.78%
Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM)0.00%123.62%

Valuation

Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM)

FTNT

31.29

Software Industry

Max
149.35
Q3
100.21
Median
47.97
Q1
26.77
Min
11.68

FTNT’s P/E Ratio of 31.29 is within the middle range for the Software industry. This suggests its valuation is in line with the sector average, representing neither a significant premium nor a discount compared to its peers.

MCHP

--

Semiconductors & Semiconductor Equipment Industry

Max
109.37
Q3
57.11
Median
28.95
Q1
22.13
Min
11.14

P/E Ratio data for MCHP is currently unavailable.

FTNT vs. MCHP: A comparison of their Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM) against their respective Software and Semiconductors & Semiconductor Equipment industry benchmarks.

Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM)

FTNT

9.58

Software Industry

Max
25.24
Q3
13.52
Median
8.15
Q1
4.87
Min
0.98

FTNT’s P/S Ratio of 9.58 aligns with the market consensus for the Software industry. This suggests its valuation, based on sales, is seen as standard and is on par with its competitors.

MCHP

7.99

Semiconductors & Semiconductor Equipment Industry

Max
16.09
Q3
10.10
Median
4.82
Q1
2.60
Min
0.93

MCHP’s P/S Ratio of 7.99 aligns with the market consensus for the Semiconductors & Semiconductor Equipment industry. This suggests its valuation, based on sales, is seen as standard and is on par with its competitors.

FTNT vs. MCHP: A comparison of their Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM) against their respective Software and Semiconductors & Semiconductor Equipment industry benchmarks.

Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ)

FTNT

39.27

Software Industry

Max
30.95
Q3
14.91
Median
7.75
Q1
3.60
Min
0.38

At 39.27, FTNT’s P/B Ratio is at an extreme premium to the Software industry. This signifies that the market’s valuation is heavily reliant on future potential rather than its current net asset value, which can be a high-risk proposition.

MCHP

3.68

Semiconductors & Semiconductor Equipment Industry

Max
13.56
Q3
6.75
Median
3.68
Q1
1.89
Min
0.60

MCHP’s P/B Ratio of 3.68 is within the conventional range for the Semiconductors & Semiconductor Equipment industry. This shows a balanced market view, where the stock’s price is neither at a significant premium nor a discount to the book value of its peers.

FTNT vs. MCHP: A comparison of their Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ) against their respective Software and Semiconductors & Semiconductor Equipment industry benchmarks.

Valuation at a Glance

SymbolFTNTMCHP
Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM)31.29--
Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM)9.587.99
Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ)39.273.68
Price-to-Free Cash Flow Ratio (TTM)29.8645.53