Seek Returns logo

FTAI vs. LUV: A Head-to-Head Stock Comparison

Updated on

Here’s a clear look at FTAI and LUV, comparing key factors like historical performance, profitability, financial strength, growth, dividend, and valuation.

Company Profile

SymbolFTAILUV
Company NameFTAI Aviation Ltd.Southwest Airlines Co.
CountryUnited StatesUnited States
GICS SectorIndustrialsIndustrials
GICS IndustryTrading Companies & DistributorsPassenger Airlines
Market Capitalization14.98 billion USD16.27 billion USD
ExchangeNasdaqGSNYSE
Listing DateMay 14, 2015January 2, 1980
Security TypeCommon StockCommon Stock

Historical Performance

This chart compares the performance of FTAI and LUV by tracking the growth of an initial $10,000 investment in each. Use the tabs to select the desired time period. Data is adjusted for dividends and splits.

FTAI vs. LUV: Growth of a $10,000 investment over the past one year.

Historical Performance at a Glance

SymbolFTAILUV
5-Day Price Return5.74%4.77%
13-Week Price Return29.25%-0.96%
26-Week Price Return22.89%-0.39%
52-Week Price Return40.68%22.03%
Month-to-Date Return6.10%0.13%
Year-to-Date Return1.36%-7.88%
10-Day Avg. Volume1.30M9.27M
3-Month Avg. Volume1.78M12.50M
3-Month Volatility67.10%40.35%
Beta1.691.23

Profitability

Return on Equity (TTM)

FTAI

464.64%

Trading Companies & Distributors Industry

Max
32.33%
Q3
19.92%
Median
14.05%
Q1
11.46%
Min
0.91%

FTAI’s Return on Equity of 464.64% is exceptionally high, placing it well beyond the typical range for the Trading Companies & Distributors industry. This demonstrates a superior ability to generate profit from shareholder investments, though it could also be inflated by high financial leverage.

LUV

4.11%

Passenger Airlines Industry

Max
49.96%
Q3
28.15%
Median
15.41%
Q1
8.29%
Min
-11.01%

LUV’s Return on Equity of 4.11% is in the lower quartile for the Passenger Airlines industry. This indicates a less efficient generation of profit from its equity base when compared to its competitors.

FTAI vs. LUV: A comparison of their Return on Equity (TTM) against their respective Trading Companies & Distributors and Passenger Airlines industry benchmarks.

Net Profit Margin (TTM)

FTAI

21.31%

Trading Companies & Distributors Industry

Max
17.73%
Q3
10.81%
Median
6.13%
Q1
4.33%
Min
2.09%

FTAI’s Net Profit Margin of 21.31% is exceptionally high, placing it well beyond the typical range for the Trading Companies & Distributors industry. This demonstrates outstanding operational efficiency and a strong competitive advantage in converting revenue into profit.

LUV

1.43%

Passenger Airlines Industry

Max
17.65%
Q3
8.90%
Median
5.80%
Q1
2.02%
Min
-3.12%

Falling into the lower quartile for the Passenger Airlines industry, LUV’s Net Profit Margin of 1.43% indicates weaker profitability. This means the company retains a smaller portion of each dollar in sales as profit compared to its competitors.

FTAI vs. LUV: A comparison of their Net Profit Margin (TTM) against their respective Trading Companies & Distributors and Passenger Airlines industry benchmarks.

Operating Profit Margin (TTM)

FTAI

26.26%

Trading Companies & Distributors Industry

Max
25.50%
Q3
15.13%
Median
7.46%
Q1
5.44%
Min
3.55%

FTAI’s Operating Profit Margin of 26.26% is exceptionally high, placing it well above the typical range for the Trading Companies & Distributors industry. This demonstrates outstanding efficiency in managing its core operations, which can be a result of strong pricing power or superior cost control.

LUV

1.15%

Passenger Airlines Industry

Max
22.47%
Q3
12.33%
Median
8.62%
Q1
4.43%
Min
-2.88%

LUV’s Operating Profit Margin of 1.15% is in the lower quartile for the Passenger Airlines industry. This indicates weaker profitability from core operations, which may stem from inefficiencies or competitive pressures on pricing.

FTAI vs. LUV: A comparison of their Operating Profit Margin (TTM) against their respective Trading Companies & Distributors and Passenger Airlines industry benchmarks.

Profitability at a Glance

SymbolFTAILUV
Return on Equity (TTM)464.64%4.11%
Return on Assets (TTM)11.31%1.20%
Net Profit Margin (TTM)21.31%1.43%
Operating Profit Margin (TTM)26.26%1.15%
Gross Profit Margin (TTM)48.89%73.31%

Financial Strength

Current Ratio (MRQ)

FTAI

5.01

Trading Companies & Distributors Industry

Max
2.82
Q3
2.13
Median
1.60
Q1
1.43
Min
0.46

FTAI’s Current Ratio of 5.01 is exceptionally high, placing it well outside the typical range for the Trading Companies & Distributors industry. This indicates a very strong liquidity position, though such a high ratio may also suggest that the company is not using its assets efficiently to generate profits.

LUV

0.56

Passenger Airlines Industry

Max
1.46
Q3
0.94
Median
0.76
Q1
0.54
Min
0.17

LUV’s Current Ratio of 0.56 aligns with the median group of the Passenger Airlines industry, indicating that its short-term liquidity is in line with its sector peers.

FTAI vs. LUV: A comparison of their Current Ratio (MRQ) against their respective Trading Companies & Distributors and Passenger Airlines industry benchmarks.

Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ)

FTAI

20.88

Trading Companies & Distributors Industry

Max
1.88
Q3
1.18
Median
0.74
Q1
0.54
Min
0.00

With a Debt-to-Equity Ratio of 20.88, FTAI operates with exceptionally high leverage compared to the Trading Companies & Distributors industry norm. This suggests an aggressive reliance on debt financing, which can magnify returns but also significantly elevates financial risk.

LUV

0.51

Passenger Airlines Industry

Max
9.80
Q3
4.82
Median
1.30
Q1
0.89
Min
0.00

Falling into the lower quartile for the Passenger Airlines industry, LUV’s Debt-to-Equity Ratio of 0.51 points to a conservative financing strategy. This results in lower financial risk but potentially limits strategic investments compared to more leveraged competitors.

FTAI vs. LUV: A comparison of their Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ) against their respective Trading Companies & Distributors and Passenger Airlines industry benchmarks.

Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM)

FTAI

1.06

Trading Companies & Distributors Industry

Max
15.13
Q3
7.93
Median
5.75
Q1
2.70
Min
-1.67

In the lower quartile for the Trading Companies & Distributors industry, FTAI’s Interest Coverage Ratio of 1.06 indicates a tighter cushion for servicing debt, suggesting less financial flexibility than many of its competitors.

LUV

9.27

Passenger Airlines Industry

Max
22.60
Q3
16.29
Median
6.75
Q1
1.94
Min
-8.55

LUV’s Interest Coverage Ratio of 9.27 is positioned comfortably within the norm for the Passenger Airlines industry, indicating a standard and healthy capacity to cover its interest payments.

FTAI vs. LUV: A comparison of their Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM) against their respective Trading Companies & Distributors and Passenger Airlines industry benchmarks.

Financial Strength at a Glance

SymbolFTAILUV
Current Ratio (MRQ)5.010.56
Quick Ratio (MRQ)2.780.45
Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ)20.880.51
Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM)1.069.27

Growth

Revenue Growth

FTAI vs. LUV: A side-by-side comparison of their Revenue Growth for the MRQ (YoY), TTM (YoY), 3-Year CAGR, and 5-Year CAGR periods.

EPS Growth

FTAI vs. LUV: A side-by-side comparison of their EPS Growth for the MRQ (YoY), TTM (YoY), 3-Year CAGR, and 5-Year CAGR periods.

Dividend

Dividend Yield (TTM)

FTAI

0.99%

Trading Companies & Distributors Industry

Max
4.99%
Q3
3.04%
Median
1.94%
Q1
1.22%
Min
0.00%

FTAI’s Dividend Yield of 0.99% is in the lower quartile for the Trading Companies & Distributors industry. This suggests the company’s strategy likely favors retaining earnings for growth over providing a high dividend income.

LUV

2.65%

Passenger Airlines Industry

Max
6.71%
Q3
3.95%
Median
1.10%
Q1
0.00%
Min
0.00%

LUV’s Dividend Yield of 2.65% is consistent with its peers in the Passenger Airlines industry, providing a dividend return that is standard for its sector.

FTAI vs. LUV: A comparison of their Dividend Yield (TTM) against their respective Trading Companies & Distributors and Passenger Airlines industry benchmarks.

Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM)

FTAI

32.60%

Trading Companies & Distributors Industry

Max
95.14%
Q3
62.08%
Median
51.17%
Q1
26.24%
Min
0.00%

FTAI’s Dividend Payout Ratio of 32.60% is within the typical range for the Trading Companies & Distributors industry, suggesting a balanced approach between shareholder payouts and company reinvestment.

LUV

59.15%

Passenger Airlines Industry

Max
71.59%
Q3
38.54%
Median
8.16%
Q1
0.00%
Min
0.00%

LUV’s Dividend Payout Ratio of 59.15% is in the upper quartile for the Passenger Airlines industry. This indicates a strong commitment to shareholder returns but also suggests that a smaller portion of earnings is retained for reinvestment compared to many peers.

FTAI vs. LUV: A comparison of their Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM) against their respective Trading Companies & Distributors and Passenger Airlines industry benchmarks.

Dividend at a Glance

SymbolFTAILUV
Dividend Yield (TTM)0.99%2.65%
Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM)32.60%59.15%

Valuation

Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM)

FTAI

32.79

Trading Companies & Distributors Industry

Max
48.55
Q3
26.73
Median
17.17
Q1
10.78
Min
1.62

A P/E Ratio of 32.79 places FTAI in the upper quartile for the Trading Companies & Distributors industry. This high valuation relative to peers suggests the market holds elevated expectations for the company’s future growth.

LUV

41.16

Passenger Airlines Industry

Max
13.29
Q3
11.94
Median
8.78
Q1
7.42
Min
3.07

At 41.16, LUV’s P/E Ratio is exceptionally high, exceeding the typical maximum for the Passenger Airlines industry. This suggests the stock may be significantly overvalued compared to its peers and implies high market expectations that could be difficult to meet.

FTAI vs. LUV: A comparison of their Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM) against their respective Trading Companies & Distributors and Passenger Airlines industry benchmarks.

Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM)

FTAI

6.99

Trading Companies & Distributors Industry

Max
4.88
Q3
2.56
Median
1.02
Q1
0.60
Min
0.29

With a P/S Ratio of 6.99, FTAI trades at a valuation that eclipses even the highest in the Trading Companies & Distributors industry. This implies the market has priced in exceptionally optimistic scenarios for future revenue growth, posing considerable valuation risk.

LUV

0.59

Passenger Airlines Industry

Max
1.09
Q3
0.74
Median
0.61
Q1
0.44
Min
0.09

LUV’s P/S Ratio of 0.59 aligns with the market consensus for the Passenger Airlines industry. This suggests its valuation, based on sales, is seen as standard and is on par with its competitors.

FTAI vs. LUV: A comparison of their Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM) against their respective Trading Companies & Distributors and Passenger Airlines industry benchmarks.

Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ)

FTAI

71.53

Trading Companies & Distributors Industry

Max
8.77
Q3
4.33
Median
2.00
Q1
1.11
Min
0.35

At 71.53, FTAI’s P/B Ratio is at an extreme premium to the Trading Companies & Distributors industry. This signifies that the market’s valuation is heavily reliant on future potential rather than its current net asset value, which can be a high-risk proposition.

LUV

2.31

Passenger Airlines Industry

Max
3.44
Q3
2.89
Median
1.84
Q1
1.22
Min
0.56

LUV’s P/B Ratio of 2.31 is within the conventional range for the Passenger Airlines industry. This shows a balanced market view, where the stock’s price is neither at a significant premium nor a discount to the book value of its peers.

FTAI vs. LUV: A comparison of their Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ) against their respective Trading Companies & Distributors and Passenger Airlines industry benchmarks.

Valuation at a Glance

SymbolFTAILUV
Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM)32.7941.16
Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM)6.990.59
Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ)71.532.31
Price-to-Free Cash Flow Ratio (TTM)--43.02