Seek Returns logo

FSLR vs. SLB: A Head-to-Head Stock Comparison

Updated on

Here’s a clear look at FSLR and SLB, comparing key factors like historical performance, profitability, financial strength, growth, dividend, and valuation.

Company Profile

SymbolFSLRSLB
Company NameFirst Solar, Inc.Schlumberger Limited
CountryUnited StatesUnited States
GICS SectorInformation TechnologyEnergy
GICS IndustrySemiconductors & Semiconductor EquipmentEnergy Equipment & Services
Market Capitalization24.11 billion USD53.06 billion USD
ExchangeNasdaqGSNYSE
Listing DateNovember 17, 2006December 31, 1981
Security TypeCommon StockCommon Stock

Historical Performance

This chart compares the performance of FSLR and SLB by tracking the growth of an initial $10,000 investment in each. Use the tabs to select the desired time period. Data is adjusted for dividends and splits.

FSLR vs. SLB: Growth of a $10,000 investment over the past one year.

Historical Performance at a Glance

SymbolFSLRSLB
5-Day Price Return0.62%-0.69%
13-Week Price Return33.22%1.69%
26-Week Price Return74.55%-18.98%
52-Week Price Return-13.77%-18.73%
Month-to-Date Return12.98%-6.70%
Year-to-Date Return25.13%-10.35%
10-Day Avg. Volume2.44M19.17M
3-Month Avg. Volume3.51M16.05M
3-Month Volatility53.97%30.33%
Beta1.510.99

Profitability

Return on Equity (TTM)

FSLR

15.57%

Semiconductors & Semiconductor Equipment Industry

Max
47.13%
Q3
23.50%
Median
9.94%
Q1
0.86%
Min
-20.69%

FSLR’s Return on Equity of 15.57% is on par with the norm for the Semiconductors & Semiconductor Equipment industry, indicating its profitability relative to shareholder equity is typical for the sector.

SLB

19.85%

Energy Equipment & Services Industry

Max
35.03%
Q3
19.11%
Median
12.78%
Q1
7.55%
Min
-1.07%

In the upper quartile for the Energy Equipment & Services industry, SLB’s Return on Equity of 19.85% signals a highly effective use of shareholder capital to drive profitability compared to most of its peers.

FSLR vs. SLB: A comparison of their Return on Equity (TTM) against their respective Semiconductors & Semiconductor Equipment and Energy Equipment & Services industry benchmarks.

Net Profit Margin (TTM)

FSLR

28.95%

Semiconductors & Semiconductor Equipment Industry

Max
52.41%
Q3
23.88%
Median
10.17%
Q1
1.21%
Min
-32.15%

A Net Profit Margin of 28.95% places FSLR in the upper quartile for the Semiconductors & Semiconductor Equipment industry, signifying strong profitability and more effective cost management than most of its peers.

SLB

11.53%

Energy Equipment & Services Industry

Max
17.17%
Q3
9.96%
Median
6.67%
Q1
3.84%
Min
-0.90%

A Net Profit Margin of 11.53% places SLB in the upper quartile for the Energy Equipment & Services industry, signifying strong profitability and more effective cost management than most of its peers.

FSLR vs. SLB: A comparison of their Net Profit Margin (TTM) against their respective Semiconductors & Semiconductor Equipment and Energy Equipment & Services industry benchmarks.

Operating Profit Margin (TTM)

FSLR

31.35%

Semiconductors & Semiconductor Equipment Industry

Max
58.09%
Q3
27.54%
Median
11.18%
Q1
3.31%
Min
-28.36%

An Operating Profit Margin of 31.35% places FSLR in the upper quartile for the Semiconductors & Semiconductor Equipment industry. This signals a strong ability to translate revenue into operating profit, outperforming most of its competitors in core business efficiency.

SLB

15.24%

Energy Equipment & Services Industry

Max
31.93%
Q3
18.93%
Median
11.31%
Q1
4.98%
Min
0.83%

SLB’s Operating Profit Margin of 15.24% is around the midpoint for the Energy Equipment & Services industry, indicating that its efficiency in managing core business operations is typical for the sector.

FSLR vs. SLB: A comparison of their Operating Profit Margin (TTM) against their respective Semiconductors & Semiconductor Equipment and Energy Equipment & Services industry benchmarks.

Profitability at a Glance

SymbolFSLRSLB
Return on Equity (TTM)15.57%19.85%
Return on Assets (TTM)10.36%8.33%
Net Profit Margin (TTM)28.95%11.53%
Operating Profit Margin (TTM)31.35%15.24%
Gross Profit Margin (TTM)42.76%20.29%

Financial Strength

Current Ratio (MRQ)

FSLR

1.90

Semiconductors & Semiconductor Equipment Industry

Max
6.58
Q3
4.24
Median
2.73
Q1
2.13
Min
1.02

FSLR’s Current Ratio of 1.90 falls into the lower quartile for the Semiconductors & Semiconductor Equipment industry. This indicates a tighter liquidity situation and a more constrained capacity to handle short-term debt than many of its competitors.

SLB

1.31

Energy Equipment & Services Industry

Max
3.41
Q3
2.08
Median
1.38
Q1
1.10
Min
0.68

SLB’s Current Ratio of 1.31 aligns with the median group of the Energy Equipment & Services industry, indicating that its short-term liquidity is in line with its sector peers.

FSLR vs. SLB: A comparison of their Current Ratio (MRQ) against their respective Semiconductors & Semiconductor Equipment and Energy Equipment & Services industry benchmarks.

Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ)

FSLR

0.12

Semiconductors & Semiconductor Equipment Industry

Max
1.09
Q3
0.48
Median
0.25
Q1
0.01
Min
0.00

FSLR’s Debt-to-Equity Ratio of 0.12 is typical for the Semiconductors & Semiconductor Equipment industry, indicating its use of leverage is in line with the sector norm. This suggests a balanced approach to its capital structure.

SLB

0.67

Energy Equipment & Services Industry

Max
2.06
Q3
1.10
Median
0.48
Q1
0.34
Min
0.02

SLB’s Debt-to-Equity Ratio of 0.67 is typical for the Energy Equipment & Services industry, indicating its use of leverage is in line with the sector norm. This suggests a balanced approach to its capital structure.

FSLR vs. SLB: A comparison of their Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ) against their respective Semiconductors & Semiconductor Equipment and Energy Equipment & Services industry benchmarks.

Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM)

FSLR

39.40

Semiconductors & Semiconductor Equipment Industry

Max
174.00
Q3
74.71
Median
26.06
Q1
6.43
Min
-7.80

FSLR’s Interest Coverage Ratio of 39.40 is positioned comfortably within the norm for the Semiconductors & Semiconductor Equipment industry, indicating a standard and healthy capacity to cover its interest payments.

SLB

43.97

Energy Equipment & Services Industry

Max
49.88
Q3
26.65
Median
7.66
Q1
2.15
Min
-17.36

SLB’s Interest Coverage Ratio of 43.97 is in the upper quartile for the Energy Equipment & Services industry, signifying a strong and healthy capacity to meet its interest payments from operating profits.

FSLR vs. SLB: A comparison of their Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM) against their respective Semiconductors & Semiconductor Equipment and Energy Equipment & Services industry benchmarks.

Financial Strength at a Glance

SymbolFSLRSLB
Current Ratio (MRQ)1.901.31
Quick Ratio (MRQ)1.360.98
Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ)0.120.67
Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM)39.4043.97

Growth

Revenue Growth

FSLR vs. SLB: A side-by-side comparison of their Revenue Growth for the MRQ (YoY), TTM (YoY), 3-Year CAGR, and 5-Year CAGR periods.

EPS Growth

FSLR vs. SLB: A side-by-side comparison of their EPS Growth for the MRQ (YoY), TTM (YoY), 3-Year CAGR, and 5-Year CAGR periods.

Dividend

Dividend Yield (TTM)

FSLR

0.00%

Semiconductors & Semiconductor Equipment Industry

Max
3.72%
Q3
1.51%
Median
0.69%
Q1
0.00%
Min
0.00%

FSLR currently does not pay a dividend, resulting in a yield of 0%. This is a common strategy for growth-focused companies that prioritize reinvesting earnings, though it may be less typical in mature, income-oriented sectors.

SLB

3.00%

Energy Equipment & Services Industry

Max
8.36%
Q3
4.38%
Median
2.41%
Q1
0.32%
Min
0.00%

SLB’s Dividend Yield of 3.00% is consistent with its peers in the Energy Equipment & Services industry, providing a dividend return that is standard for its sector.

FSLR vs. SLB: A comparison of their Dividend Yield (TTM) against their respective Semiconductors & Semiconductor Equipment and Energy Equipment & Services industry benchmarks.

Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM)

FSLR

0.00%

Semiconductors & Semiconductor Equipment Industry

Max
205.27%
Q3
88.01%
Median
27.13%
Q1
0.00%
Min
0.00%

FSLR has a Dividend Payout Ratio of 0%, indicating it does not currently pay a dividend. This is a common strategy for growth-oriented companies that reinvest all profits back into the business.

SLB

38.00%

Energy Equipment & Services Industry

Max
169.85%
Q3
94.25%
Median
39.49%
Q1
15.00%
Min
0.00%

SLB’s Dividend Payout Ratio of 38.00% is within the typical range for the Energy Equipment & Services industry, suggesting a balanced approach between shareholder payouts and company reinvestment.

FSLR vs. SLB: A comparison of their Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM) against their respective Semiconductors & Semiconductor Equipment and Energy Equipment & Services industry benchmarks.

Dividend at a Glance

SymbolFSLRSLB
Dividend Yield (TTM)0.00%3.00%
Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM)0.00%38.00%

Valuation

Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM)

FSLR

19.36

Semiconductors & Semiconductor Equipment Industry

Max
106.30
Q3
61.93
Median
38.96
Q1
23.71
Min
13.06

In the lower quartile for the Semiconductors & Semiconductor Equipment industry, FSLR’s P/E Ratio of 19.36 suggests the stock may be undervalued compared to its peers, potentially presenting an attractive entry point for investors.

SLB

12.68

Energy Equipment & Services Industry

Max
22.89
Q3
18.22
Median
13.03
Q1
11.98
Min
7.14

SLB’s P/E Ratio of 12.68 is within the middle range for the Energy Equipment & Services industry. This suggests its valuation is in line with the sector average, representing neither a significant premium nor a discount compared to its peers.

FSLR vs. SLB: A comparison of their Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM) against their respective Semiconductors & Semiconductor Equipment and Energy Equipment & Services industry benchmarks.

Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM)

FSLR

5.61

Semiconductors & Semiconductor Equipment Industry

Max
19.99
Q3
10.21
Median
5.23
Q1
2.88
Min
1.13

FSLR’s P/S Ratio of 5.61 aligns with the market consensus for the Semiconductors & Semiconductor Equipment industry. This suggests its valuation, based on sales, is seen as standard and is on par with its competitors.

SLB

1.46

Energy Equipment & Services Industry

Max
2.84
Q3
1.60
Median
0.87
Q1
0.54
Min
0.23

SLB’s P/S Ratio of 1.46 aligns with the market consensus for the Energy Equipment & Services industry. This suggests its valuation, based on sales, is seen as standard and is on par with its competitors.

FSLR vs. SLB: A comparison of their Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM) against their respective Semiconductors & Semiconductor Equipment and Energy Equipment & Services industry benchmarks.

Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ)

FSLR

2.08

Semiconductors & Semiconductor Equipment Industry

Max
14.22
Q3
6.94
Median
4.29
Q1
1.99
Min
0.67

FSLR’s P/B Ratio of 2.08 is within the conventional range for the Semiconductors & Semiconductor Equipment industry. This shows a balanced market view, where the stock’s price is neither at a significant premium nor a discount to the book value of its peers.

SLB

2.25

Energy Equipment & Services Industry

Max
4.44
Q3
2.60
Median
1.77
Q1
1.17
Min
0.24

SLB’s P/B Ratio of 2.25 is within the conventional range for the Energy Equipment & Services industry. This shows a balanced market view, where the stock’s price is neither at a significant premium nor a discount to the book value of its peers.

FSLR vs. SLB: A comparison of their Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ) against their respective Semiconductors & Semiconductor Equipment and Energy Equipment & Services industry benchmarks.

Valuation at a Glance

SymbolFSLRSLB
Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM)19.3612.68
Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM)5.611.46
Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ)2.082.25
Price-to-Free Cash Flow Ratio (TTM)48.9410.81