Seek Returns logo

FSLR vs. LNG: A Head-to-Head Stock Comparison

Updated on

Here’s a clear look at FSLR and LNG, comparing key factors like historical performance, profitability, financial strength, growth, dividend, and valuation.

Company Profile

SymbolFSLRLNG
Company NameFirst Solar, Inc.Cheniere Energy, Inc.
CountryUnited StatesUnited States
GICS SectorInformation TechnologyEnergy
GICS IndustrySemiconductors & Semiconductor EquipmentOil, Gas & Consumable Fuels
Market Capitalization19.82 billion USD50.83 billion USD
ExchangeNasdaqGSNYSE
Listing DateNovember 17, 2006April 4, 1994
Security TypeCommon StockCommon Stock

Historical Performance

This chart compares the performance of FSLR and LNG by tracking the growth of an initial $10,000 investment in each. Use the tabs to select the desired time period. Data is adjusted for dividends and splits.

FSLR vs. LNG: Growth of a $10,000 investment over the past one year.

Historical Performance at a Glance

SymbolFSLRLNG
5-Day Price Return-0.41%-1.69%
13-Week Price Return18.33%0.35%
26-Week Price Return10.24%5.80%
52-Week Price Return-15.69%26.22%
Month-to-Date Return5.79%-1.95%
Year-to-Date Return4.88%7.64%
10-Day Avg. Volume2.60M1.95M
3-Month Avg. Volume4.42M2.06M
3-Month Volatility78.91%30.45%
Beta1.390.38

Profitability

Return on Equity (TTM)

FSLR

15.57%

Semiconductors & Semiconductor Equipment Industry

Max
52.74%
Q3
23.49%
Median
11.60%
Q1
3.23%
Min
-20.69%

FSLR’s Return on Equity of 15.57% is on par with the norm for the Semiconductors & Semiconductor Equipment industry, indicating its profitability relative to shareholder equity is typical for the sector.

LNG

66.68%

Oil, Gas & Consumable Fuels Industry

Max
35.51%
Q3
17.86%
Median
10.69%
Q1
5.71%
Min
-8.98%

LNG’s Return on Equity of 66.68% is exceptionally high, placing it well beyond the typical range for the Oil, Gas & Consumable Fuels industry. This demonstrates a superior ability to generate profit from shareholder investments, though it could also be inflated by high financial leverage.

FSLR vs. LNG: A comparison of their Return on Equity (TTM) against their respective Semiconductors & Semiconductor Equipment and Oil, Gas & Consumable Fuels industry benchmarks.

Net Profit Margin (TTM)

FSLR

28.95%

Semiconductors & Semiconductor Equipment Industry

Max
44.17%
Q3
22.38%
Median
11.95%
Q1
3.21%
Min
-25.16%

A Net Profit Margin of 28.95% places FSLR in the upper quartile for the Semiconductors & Semiconductor Equipment industry, signifying strong profitability and more effective cost management than most of its peers.

LNG

21.05%

Oil, Gas & Consumable Fuels Industry

Max
44.03%
Q3
20.12%
Median
8.91%
Q1
2.62%
Min
-23.39%

A Net Profit Margin of 21.05% places LNG in the upper quartile for the Oil, Gas & Consumable Fuels industry, signifying strong profitability and more effective cost management than most of its peers.

FSLR vs. LNG: A comparison of their Net Profit Margin (TTM) against their respective Semiconductors & Semiconductor Equipment and Oil, Gas & Consumable Fuels industry benchmarks.

Operating Profit Margin (TTM)

FSLR

31.35%

Semiconductors & Semiconductor Equipment Industry

Max
58.03%
Q3
27.84%
Median
12.45%
Q1
5.15%
Min
-28.61%

An Operating Profit Margin of 31.35% places FSLR in the upper quartile for the Semiconductors & Semiconductor Equipment industry. This signals a strong ability to translate revenue into operating profit, outperforming most of its competitors in core business efficiency.

LNG

37.61%

Oil, Gas & Consumable Fuels Industry

Max
64.72%
Q3
31.93%
Median
19.14%
Q1
5.67%
Min
-27.31%

An Operating Profit Margin of 37.61% places LNG in the upper quartile for the Oil, Gas & Consumable Fuels industry. This signals a strong ability to translate revenue into operating profit, outperforming most of its competitors in core business efficiency.

FSLR vs. LNG: A comparison of their Operating Profit Margin (TTM) against their respective Semiconductors & Semiconductor Equipment and Oil, Gas & Consumable Fuels industry benchmarks.

Profitability at a Glance

SymbolFSLRLNG
Return on Equity (TTM)15.57%66.68%
Return on Assets (TTM)10.36%8.79%
Net Profit Margin (TTM)28.95%21.05%
Operating Profit Margin (TTM)31.35%37.61%
Gross Profit Margin (TTM)42.76%47.15%

Financial Strength

Current Ratio (MRQ)

FSLR

1.90

Semiconductors & Semiconductor Equipment Industry

Max
8.42
Q3
4.70
Median
2.75
Q1
2.07
Min
1.04

FSLR’s Current Ratio of 1.90 falls into the lower quartile for the Semiconductors & Semiconductor Equipment industry. This indicates a tighter liquidity situation and a more constrained capacity to handle short-term debt than many of its competitors.

LNG

0.98

Oil, Gas & Consumable Fuels Industry

Max
2.76
Q3
1.64
Median
1.22
Q1
0.84
Min
0.22

LNG’s Current Ratio of 0.98 aligns with the median group of the Oil, Gas & Consumable Fuels industry, indicating that its short-term liquidity is in line with its sector peers.

FSLR vs. LNG: A comparison of their Current Ratio (MRQ) against their respective Semiconductors & Semiconductor Equipment and Oil, Gas & Consumable Fuels industry benchmarks.

Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ)

FSLR

0.12

Semiconductors & Semiconductor Equipment Industry

Max
1.09
Q3
0.45
Median
0.22
Q1
0.01
Min
0.00

FSLR’s Debt-to-Equity Ratio of 0.12 is typical for the Semiconductors & Semiconductor Equipment industry, indicating its use of leverage is in line with the sector norm. This suggests a balanced approach to its capital structure.

LNG

3.37

Oil, Gas & Consumable Fuels Industry

Max
2.24
Q3
1.06
Median
0.60
Q1
0.24
Min
0.00

With a Debt-to-Equity Ratio of 3.37, LNG operates with exceptionally high leverage compared to the Oil, Gas & Consumable Fuels industry norm. This suggests an aggressive reliance on debt financing, which can magnify returns but also significantly elevates financial risk.

FSLR vs. LNG: A comparison of their Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ) against their respective Semiconductors & Semiconductor Equipment and Oil, Gas & Consumable Fuels industry benchmarks.

Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM)

FSLR

39.40

Semiconductors & Semiconductor Equipment Industry

Max
174.00
Q3
81.10
Median
27.22
Q1
7.28
Min
-4.26

FSLR’s Interest Coverage Ratio of 39.40 is positioned comfortably within the norm for the Semiconductors & Semiconductor Equipment industry, indicating a standard and healthy capacity to cover its interest payments.

LNG

7.46

Oil, Gas & Consumable Fuels Industry

Max
54.03
Q3
23.32
Median
7.46
Q1
2.57
Min
-19.25

LNG’s Interest Coverage Ratio of 7.46 is positioned comfortably within the norm for the Oil, Gas & Consumable Fuels industry, indicating a standard and healthy capacity to cover its interest payments.

FSLR vs. LNG: A comparison of their Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM) against their respective Semiconductors & Semiconductor Equipment and Oil, Gas & Consumable Fuels industry benchmarks.

Financial Strength at a Glance

SymbolFSLRLNG
Current Ratio (MRQ)1.900.98
Quick Ratio (MRQ)1.360.85
Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ)0.123.37
Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM)39.407.46

Growth

Revenue Growth

FSLR vs. LNG: A side-by-side comparison of their Revenue Growth for the MRQ (YoY), TTM (YoY), 3-Year CAGR, and 5-Year CAGR periods.

EPS Growth

FSLR vs. LNG: A side-by-side comparison of their EPS Growth for the MRQ (YoY), TTM (YoY), 3-Year CAGR, and 5-Year CAGR periods.

Dividend

Dividend Yield (TTM)

FSLR

0.00%

Semiconductors & Semiconductor Equipment Industry

Max
4.16%
Q3
1.78%
Median
0.74%
Q1
0.00%
Min
0.00%

FSLR currently does not pay a dividend, resulting in a yield of 0%. This is a common strategy for growth-focused companies that prioritize reinvesting earnings, though it may be less typical in mature, income-oriented sectors.

LNG

0.86%

Oil, Gas & Consumable Fuels Industry

Max
13.98%
Q3
7.41%
Median
4.36%
Q1
2.84%
Min
0.00%

LNG’s Dividend Yield of 0.86% is in the lower quartile for the Oil, Gas & Consumable Fuels industry. This suggests the company’s strategy likely favors retaining earnings for growth over providing a high dividend income.

FSLR vs. LNG: A comparison of their Dividend Yield (TTM) against their respective Semiconductors & Semiconductor Equipment and Oil, Gas & Consumable Fuels industry benchmarks.

Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM)

FSLR

0.00%

Semiconductors & Semiconductor Equipment Industry

Max
196.12%
Q3
87.72%
Median
26.57%
Q1
0.00%
Min
0.00%

FSLR has a Dividend Payout Ratio of 0%, indicating it does not currently pay a dividend. This is a common strategy for growth-oriented companies that reinvest all profits back into the business.

LNG

11.25%

Oil, Gas & Consumable Fuels Industry

Max
180.73%
Q3
92.90%
Median
63.90%
Q1
27.41%
Min
0.00%

LNG’s Dividend Payout Ratio of 11.25% is in the lower quartile for the Oil, Gas & Consumable Fuels industry. This suggests a conservative dividend policy, with a strategic focus on reinvesting profits for future growth.

FSLR vs. LNG: A comparison of their Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM) against their respective Semiconductors & Semiconductor Equipment and Oil, Gas & Consumable Fuels industry benchmarks.

Dividend at a Glance

SymbolFSLRLNG
Dividend Yield (TTM)0.00%0.86%
Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM)0.00%11.25%

Valuation

Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM)

FSLR

15.85

Semiconductors & Semiconductor Equipment Industry

Max
109.37
Q3
57.11
Median
28.95
Q1
22.13
Min
11.14

In the lower quartile for the Semiconductors & Semiconductor Equipment industry, FSLR’s P/E Ratio of 15.85 suggests the stock may be undervalued compared to its peers, potentially presenting an attractive entry point for investors.

LNG

13.04

Oil, Gas & Consumable Fuels Industry

Max
41.71
Q3
21.35
Median
12.26
Q1
7.77
Min
0.00

LNG’s P/E Ratio of 13.04 is within the middle range for the Oil, Gas & Consumable Fuels industry. This suggests its valuation is in line with the sector average, representing neither a significant premium nor a discount compared to its peers.

FSLR vs. LNG: A comparison of their Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM) against their respective Semiconductors & Semiconductor Equipment and Oil, Gas & Consumable Fuels industry benchmarks.

Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM)

FSLR

4.59

Semiconductors & Semiconductor Equipment Industry

Max
16.09
Q3
10.10
Median
4.82
Q1
2.60
Min
0.93

FSLR’s P/S Ratio of 4.59 aligns with the market consensus for the Semiconductors & Semiconductor Equipment industry. This suggests its valuation, based on sales, is seen as standard and is on par with its competitors.

LNG

2.75

Oil, Gas & Consumable Fuels Industry

Max
5.87
Q3
2.89
Median
1.29
Q1
0.54
Min
0.00

LNG’s P/S Ratio of 2.75 aligns with the market consensus for the Oil, Gas & Consumable Fuels industry. This suggests its valuation, based on sales, is seen as standard and is on par with its competitors.

FSLR vs. LNG: A comparison of their Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM) against their respective Semiconductors & Semiconductor Equipment and Oil, Gas & Consumable Fuels industry benchmarks.

Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ)

FSLR

2.08

Semiconductors & Semiconductor Equipment Industry

Max
13.56
Q3
6.75
Median
3.68
Q1
1.89
Min
0.60

FSLR’s P/B Ratio of 2.08 is within the conventional range for the Semiconductors & Semiconductor Equipment industry. This shows a balanced market view, where the stock’s price is neither at a significant premium nor a discount to the book value of its peers.

LNG

8.05

Oil, Gas & Consumable Fuels Industry

Max
3.83
Q3
2.12
Median
1.34
Q1
0.91
Min
0.34

At 8.05, LNG’s P/B Ratio is at an extreme premium to the Oil, Gas & Consumable Fuels industry. This signifies that the market’s valuation is heavily reliant on future potential rather than its current net asset value, which can be a high-risk proposition.

FSLR vs. LNG: A comparison of their Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ) against their respective Semiconductors & Semiconductor Equipment and Oil, Gas & Consumable Fuels industry benchmarks.

Valuation at a Glance

SymbolFSLRLNG
Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM)15.8513.04
Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM)4.592.75
Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ)2.088.05
Price-to-Free Cash Flow Ratio (TTM)40.0715.86