Seek Returns logo

FOXA vs. MSGS: A Head-to-Head Stock Comparison

Updated on

Here’s a clear look at FOXA and MSGS, comparing key factors like historical performance, profitability, financial strength, growth, dividend, and valuation.

Company Profile

SymbolFOXAMSGS
Company NameFox CorporationMadison Square Garden Sports Corp.
CountryUnited StatesUnited States
GICS SectorCommunication ServicesCommunication Services
GICS IndustryMediaEntertainment
Market Capitalization25.90 billion USD5.56 billion USD
ExchangeNasdaqGSNYSE
Listing DateMarch 12, 2019September 17, 2015
Security TypeCommon StockCommon Stock

Historical Performance

This chart compares the performance of FOXA and MSGS by tracking the growth of an initial $10,000 investment in each. Use the tabs to select the desired time period. Data is adjusted for dividends and splits.

FOXA vs. MSGS: Growth of a $10,000 investment over the past one year.

Historical Performance at a Glance

SymbolFOXAMSGS
5-Day Price Return2.76%0.67%
13-Week Price Return10.58%11.39%
26-Week Price Return12.69%18.92%
52-Week Price Return46.21%9.15%
Month-to-Date Return-1.86%2.01%
Year-to-Date Return27.40%2.61%
10-Day Avg. Volume5.25M0.24M
3-Month Avg. Volume3.74M0.21M
3-Month Volatility29.84%21.00%
Beta0.530.64

Profitability

Return on Equity (TTM)

FOXA

19.57%

Media Industry

Max
31.00%
Q3
15.18%
Median
10.91%
Q1
4.47%
Min
-5.88%

In the upper quartile for the Media industry, FOXA’s Return on Equity of 19.57% signals a highly effective use of shareholder capital to drive profitability compared to most of its peers.

MSGS

-6.84%

Entertainment Industry

Max
42.50%
Q3
24.06%
Median
13.69%
Q1
5.35%
Min
-17.95%

MSGS has a negative Return on Equity of -6.84%. This indicates the company is generating a loss for its shareholders, which can be a result of unprofitability or negative shareholder equity and is often a sign of financial distress.

FOXA vs. MSGS: A comparison of their Return on Equity (TTM) against their respective Media and Entertainment industry benchmarks.

Net Profit Margin (TTM)

FOXA

13.88%

Media Industry

Max
20.69%
Q3
11.93%
Median
6.49%
Q1
2.47%
Min
-4.90%

A Net Profit Margin of 13.88% places FOXA in the upper quartile for the Media industry, signifying strong profitability and more effective cost management than most of its peers.

MSGS

-2.16%

Entertainment Industry

Max
45.33%
Q3
24.40%
Median
13.94%
Q1
4.28%
Min
-23.67%

MSGS has a negative Net Profit Margin of -2.16%, indicating the company is operating at a net loss as its expenses exceeded its revenues.

FOXA vs. MSGS: A comparison of their Net Profit Margin (TTM) against their respective Media and Entertainment industry benchmarks.

Operating Profit Margin (TTM)

FOXA

17.66%

Media Industry

Max
24.30%
Q3
13.57%
Median
9.15%
Q1
4.63%
Min
-6.28%

An Operating Profit Margin of 17.66% places FOXA in the upper quartile for the Media industry. This signals a strong ability to translate revenue into operating profit, outperforming most of its competitors in core business efficiency.

MSGS

1.42%

Entertainment Industry

Max
41.77%
Q3
28.26%
Median
16.13%
Q1
8.03%
Min
-3.93%

MSGS’s Operating Profit Margin of 1.42% is in the lower quartile for the Entertainment industry. This indicates weaker profitability from core operations, which may stem from inefficiencies or competitive pressures on pricing.

FOXA vs. MSGS: A comparison of their Operating Profit Margin (TTM) against their respective Media and Entertainment industry benchmarks.

Profitability at a Glance

SymbolFOXAMSGS
Return on Equity (TTM)19.57%-6.84%
Return on Assets (TTM)9.83%-1.56%
Net Profit Margin (TTM)13.88%-2.16%
Operating Profit Margin (TTM)17.66%1.42%
Gross Profit Margin (TTM)35.47%33.84%

Financial Strength

Current Ratio (MRQ)

FOXA

2.91

Media Industry

Max
3.59
Q3
1.97
Median
1.28
Q1
0.86
Min
0.33

FOXA’s Current Ratio of 2.91 is in the upper quartile for the Media industry. This signifies a strong liquidity position, suggesting the company is well-equipped to cover its immediate liabilities compared to its peers.

MSGS

0.45

Entertainment Industry

Max
6.76
Q3
4.02
Median
1.55
Q1
0.86
Min
0.38

MSGS’s Current Ratio of 0.45 falls into the lower quartile for the Entertainment industry. This indicates a tighter liquidity situation and a more constrained capacity to handle short-term debt than many of its competitors.

FOXA vs. MSGS: A comparison of their Current Ratio (MRQ) against their respective Media and Entertainment industry benchmarks.

Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ)

FOXA

0.55

Media Industry

Max
2.13
Q3
1.11
Median
0.55
Q1
0.25
Min
0.00

FOXA’s Debt-to-Equity Ratio of 0.55 is typical for the Media industry, indicating its use of leverage is in line with the sector norm. This suggests a balanced approach to its capital structure.

MSGS

0.15

Entertainment Industry

Max
1.54
Q3
0.77
Median
0.16
Q1
0.02
Min
0.00

MSGS’s Debt-to-Equity Ratio of 0.15 is typical for the Entertainment industry, indicating its use of leverage is in line with the sector norm. This suggests a balanced approach to its capital structure.

FOXA vs. MSGS: A comparison of their Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ) against their respective Media and Entertainment industry benchmarks.

Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM)

FOXA

5.69

Media Industry

Max
58.38
Q3
25.12
Median
4.52
Q1
2.14
Min
-10.82

FOXA’s Interest Coverage Ratio of 5.69 is positioned comfortably within the norm for the Media industry, indicating a standard and healthy capacity to cover its interest payments.

MSGS

0.29

Entertainment Industry

Max
87.17
Q3
35.59
Median
7.06
Q1
1.13
Min
-44.74

MSGS’s Interest Coverage Ratio of 0.29 is a critical concern. A value below 1.0 means operating earnings are insufficient to cover interest expenses, indicating severe financial strain and high default risk.

FOXA vs. MSGS: A comparison of their Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM) against their respective Media and Entertainment industry benchmarks.

Financial Strength at a Glance

SymbolFOXAMSGS
Current Ratio (MRQ)2.910.45
Quick Ratio (MRQ)2.760.37
Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ)0.550.15
Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM)5.690.29

Growth

Revenue Growth

FOXA vs. MSGS: A side-by-side comparison of their Revenue Growth for the MRQ (YoY), TTM (YoY), 3-Year CAGR, and 5-Year CAGR periods.

EPS Growth

FOXA vs. MSGS: A side-by-side comparison of their EPS Growth for the MRQ (YoY), TTM (YoY), 3-Year CAGR, and 5-Year CAGR periods.

Dividend

Dividend Yield (TTM)

FOXA

1.05%

Media Industry

Max
8.07%
Q3
3.69%
Median
1.37%
Q1
0.00%
Min
0.00%

FOXA’s Dividend Yield of 1.05% is consistent with its peers in the Media industry, providing a dividend return that is standard for its sector.

MSGS

0.01%

Entertainment Industry

Max
2.90%
Q3
1.29%
Median
0.59%
Q1
0.00%
Min
0.00%

MSGS’s Dividend Yield of 0.01% is consistent with its peers in the Entertainment industry, providing a dividend return that is standard for its sector.

FOXA vs. MSGS: A comparison of their Dividend Yield (TTM) against their respective Media and Entertainment industry benchmarks.

Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM)

FOXA

12.24%

Media Industry

Max
199.37%
Q3
102.15%
Median
47.09%
Q1
12.24%
Min
0.00%

FOXA’s Dividend Payout Ratio of 12.24% is within the typical range for the Media industry, suggesting a balanced approach between shareholder payouts and company reinvestment.

MSGS

0.33%

Entertainment Industry

Max
82.30%
Q3
38.45%
Median
29.74%
Q1
0.00%
Min
0.00%

MSGS’s Dividend Payout Ratio of 0.33% is within the typical range for the Entertainment industry, suggesting a balanced approach between shareholder payouts and company reinvestment.

FOXA vs. MSGS: A comparison of their Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM) against their respective Media and Entertainment industry benchmarks.

Dividend at a Glance

SymbolFOXAMSGS
Dividend Yield (TTM)1.05%0.01%
Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM)12.24%0.33%

Valuation

Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM)

FOXA

11.62

Media Industry

Max
73.10
Q3
36.19
Median
15.22
Q1
11.43
Min
5.11

FOXA’s P/E Ratio of 11.62 is within the middle range for the Media industry. This suggests its valuation is in line with the sector average, representing neither a significant premium nor a discount compared to its peers.

MSGS

--

Entertainment Industry

Max
92.09
Q3
54.51
Median
28.92
Q1
19.75
Min
2.96

P/E Ratio data for MSGS is currently unavailable.

FOXA vs. MSGS: A comparison of their Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM) against their respective Media and Entertainment industry benchmarks.

Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM)

FOXA

1.61

Media Industry

Max
3.52
Q3
2.14
Median
1.10
Q1
0.85
Min
0.21

FOXA’s P/S Ratio of 1.61 aligns with the market consensus for the Media industry. This suggests its valuation, based on sales, is seen as standard and is on par with its competitors.

MSGS

5.39

Entertainment Industry

Max
12.34
Q3
7.67
Median
5.06
Q1
2.72
Min
0.67

MSGS’s P/S Ratio of 5.39 aligns with the market consensus for the Entertainment industry. This suggests its valuation, based on sales, is seen as standard and is on par with its competitors.

FOXA vs. MSGS: A comparison of their Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM) against their respective Media and Entertainment industry benchmarks.

Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ)

FOXA

2.02

Media Industry

Max
4.43
Q3
2.53
Median
1.71
Q1
1.21
Min
0.56

FOXA’s P/B Ratio of 2.02 is within the conventional range for the Media industry. This shows a balanced market view, where the stock’s price is neither at a significant premium nor a discount to the book value of its peers.

MSGS

1.98

Entertainment Industry

Max
22.84
Q3
10.54
Median
6.60
Q1
2.30
Min
0.65

MSGS’s P/B Ratio of 1.98 is in the lower quartile for the Entertainment industry. From a value investing perspective, this is favorable, as it suggests the stock is trading at a discount to its net asset value and may offer a greater margin of safety.

FOXA vs. MSGS: A comparison of their Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ) against their respective Media and Entertainment industry benchmarks.

Valuation at a Glance

SymbolFOXAMSGS
Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM)11.62--
Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM)1.615.39
Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ)2.021.98
Price-to-Free Cash Flow Ratio (TTM)7.6748.94