Seek Returns

Command Palette

Search for a command to run...

FOUR vs. ZS: A Head-to-Head Stock Comparison

Here’s a clear look at FOUR and ZS, comparing key factors like historical performance, profitability, financial strength, growth, dividend, and valuation.

Company Profile

SymbolFOURZS
Company NameShift4 Payments, Inc.Zscaler, Inc.
CountryUnited StatesUnited States
GICS SectorFinancialsInformation Technology
GICS Industry GroupFinancial ServicesSoftware & Services
GICS IndustryFinancial ServicesSoftware
GICS Sub-IndustryTransaction & Payment Processing ServicesSystems Software
Market Capitalization3.72 billion USD21.88 billion USD
CurrencyUSDUSD
ExchangeNYSENasdaqGS
Listing DateJune 5, 2020March 16, 2018
Security TypeCommon StockCommon Stock

ZS’s market capitalization (21.88 billion USD) is significantly greater than FOUR’s (3.72 billion USD), highlighting its more substantial market valuation.

Historical Performance

This chart compares the performance of FOUR and ZS by tracking the growth of an initial $10,000 investment in each. Use the tabs to select the desired time period. Data is adjusted for dividends and splits.

FOUR-55.32%
ZS-28.56%
FOUR vs. ZS: Growth of a $10,000 investment over the past five years.

Historical Performance at a Glance

SymbolFOURZS
5-Day Price Return-7.43%-3.94%
13-Week Price Return-32.03%-36.02%
26-Week Price Return-40.73%-56.16%
52-Week Price Return-43.95%-37.79%
Month-to-Date Return2.90%-4.41%
Year-to-Date Return-28.54%-40.37%
10-Day Avg. Volume1.45M2.69M
3-Month Avg. Volume2.21M2.61M
3-Month Volatility78.12%64.34%
Beta1.461.00

With betas of 1.46 for FOUR and 1.00 for ZS, both stocks show similar sensitivity to overall market movements.

Profitability

Return on Equity (TTM)

FOUR

8.64%

Financial Services Industry
Max
39.62%
Q3
20.29%
Median
12.18%
Q1
6.20%
Min
-10.90%

FOUR’s Return on Equity of 8.64% is on par with the norm for the Financial Services industry, indicating its profitability relative to shareholder equity is typical for the sector.

ZS

-3.48%

Software Industry
Max
66.41%
Q3
24.82%
Median
10.79%
Q1
-3.60%
Min
-39.77%

ZS has a negative Return on Equity of -3.48%. This indicates the company is generating a loss for its shareholders, which can be a result of unprofitability or negative shareholder equity and is often a sign of financial distress.

FOUR vs. ZS: A comparison of their Return on Equity (TTM) against their respective Financial Services and Software industry benchmarks.

Net Profit Margin (TTM)

FOUR

2.85%

Financial Services Industry
Max
55.05%
Q3
28.60%
Median
15.00%
Q1
7.13%
Min
-9.76%

Falling into the lower quartile for the Financial Services industry, FOUR’s Net Profit Margin of 2.85% indicates weaker profitability. This means the company retains a smaller portion of each dollar in sales as profit compared to its competitors.

ZS

-2.25%

Software Industry
Max
48.76%
Q3
19.52%
Median
12.27%
Q1
-2.45%
Min
-35.22%

ZS has a negative Net Profit Margin of -2.25%, indicating the company is operating at a net loss as its expenses exceeded its revenues.

FOUR vs. ZS: A comparison of their Net Profit Margin (TTM) against their respective Financial Services and Software industry benchmarks.

Operating Profit Margin (TTM)

FOUR

8.11%

Financial Services Industry
Max
79.44%
Q3
43.62%
Median
23.94%
Q1
11.10%
Min
-4.07%

FOUR’s Operating Profit Margin of 8.11% is in the lower quartile for the Financial Services industry. This indicates weaker profitability from core operations, which may stem from inefficiencies or competitive pressures on pricing.

ZS

-4.86%

Software Industry
Max
55.26%
Q3
25.01%
Median
13.33%
Q1
-3.22%
Min
-43.76%

ZS has a negative Operating Profit Margin of -4.86%. This signifies the company is unprofitable at the operational level, as its core business expenses exceed its revenue.

FOUR vs. ZS: A comparison of their Operating Profit Margin (TTM) against their respective Financial Services and Software industry benchmarks.

Profitability at a Glance

SymbolFOURZS
Return on Equity (TTM)8.64%-3.48%
Return on Assets (TTM)1.60%-1.08%
Net Profit Margin (TTM)2.85%-2.25%
Operating Profit Margin (TTM)8.11%-4.86%
Gross Profit Margin (TTM)34.16%76.56%

Financial Strength

Current Ratio (MRQ)

FOUR

1.66

Financial Services Industry
Max
4.83
Q3
2.66
Median
1.47
Q1
0.90
Min
0.01

For the Financial Services industry, the Current Ratio is often not the most suitable measure of short-term liquidity.

ZS

1.90

Software Industry
Max
3.83
Q3
2.27
Median
1.56
Q1
1.03
Min
0.47

ZS’s Current Ratio of 1.90 aligns with the median group of the Software industry, indicating that its short-term liquidity is in line with its sector peers.

FOUR vs. ZS: A comparison of their Current Ratio (MRQ) against their respective Financial Services and Software industry benchmarks.

Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ)

FOUR

3.15

Financial Services Industry
Max
4.11
Q3
1.96
Median
0.62
Q1
0.13
Min
0.00

The Debt-to-Equity Ratio is often not the primary focus for assessing leverage in the Financial Services industry.

ZS

0.78

Software Industry
Max
2.40
Q3
1.04
Median
0.30
Q1
0.00
Min
0.00

ZS’s Debt-to-Equity Ratio of 0.78 is typical for the Software industry, indicating its use of leverage is in line with the sector norm. This suggests a balanced approach to its capital structure.

FOUR vs. ZS: A comparison of their Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ) against their respective Financial Services and Software industry benchmarks.

Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM)

FOUR

2.38

Financial Services Industry
Max
140.54
Q3
59.26
Median
5.92
Q1
1.27
Min
-44.62

The Interest Coverage Ratio is often not a primary indicator of debt servicing capacity in the Financial Services industry.

ZS

-6.38

Software Industry
Max
45.58
Q3
18.30
Median
2.30
Q1
-7.09
Min
-44.45

ZS has a negative Interest Coverage Ratio of -6.38. This indicates that its earnings were insufficient to cover even its operational costs, let alone its interest payments, signaling significant financial distress.

FOUR vs. ZS: A comparison of their Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM) against their respective Financial Services and Software industry benchmarks.

Financial Strength at a Glance

SymbolFOURZS
Current Ratio (MRQ)1.661.90
Quick Ratio (MRQ)1.561.83
Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ)3.150.78
Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM)2.38-6.38

Growth

Revenue Growth

FOUR vs. ZS: A comparison of their Revenue Growth across different time periods.

Revenue Growth at a Glance

SymbolFOURZS
Revenue Growth (MRQ vs Prior YoY)34.00%25.91%
Revenue Growth (TTM vs Prior YoY)25.50%23.91%
3-Year Revenue CAGR27.99%34.82%
5-Year Revenue CAGR40.37%44.03%

EPS Growth

FOUR vs. ZS: A comparison of their EPS Growth across different time periods.

EPS Growth at a Glance

SymbolFOURZS
EPS Growth (MRQ vs Prior YoY)-61.47%--
EPS Growth (TTM vs Prior YoY)-50.41%--
3-Year EPS CAGR13.81%--
5-Year EPS CAGR----

Dividend

Dividend Yield (TTM)

FOUR

0.00%

Financial Services Industry
Max
7.50%
Q3
3.57%
Median
1.81%
Q1
0.00%
Min
0.00%

FOUR currently does not pay a dividend, resulting in a yield of 0%. This is a common strategy for growth-focused companies that prioritize reinvesting earnings, though it may be less typical in mature, income-oriented sectors.

ZS

0.00%

Software Industry
Max
1.07%
Q3
0.45%
Median
0.00%
Q1
0.00%
Min
0.00%

ZS currently does not pay a dividend, resulting in a yield of 0%. This is a common strategy for growth-focused companies that prioritize reinvesting earnings, though it may be less typical in mature, income-oriented sectors.

FOUR vs. ZS: A comparison of their Dividend Yield (TTM) against their respective Financial Services and Software industry benchmarks.

Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM)

FOUR

0.00%

Financial Services Industry
Max
124.83%
Q3
56.27%
Median
18.41%
Q1
0.00%
Min
0.00%

FOUR has a Dividend Payout Ratio of 0%, indicating it does not currently pay a dividend. This is a common strategy for growth-oriented companies that reinvest all profits back into the business.

ZS

0.00%

Software Industry
Max
35.09%
Q3
15.51%
Median
0.00%
Q1
0.00%
Min
0.00%

ZS has a Dividend Payout Ratio of 0%, indicating it does not currently pay a dividend. This is a common strategy for growth-oriented companies that reinvest all profits back into the business.

FOUR vs. ZS: A comparison of their Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM) against their respective Financial Services and Software industry benchmarks.

Dividend at a Glance

SymbolFOURZS
Dividend Yield (TTM)0.00%0.00%
Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM)0.00%0.00%

Valuation

Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM)

FOUR

38.63

Financial Services Industry
Max
53.09
Q3
27.28
Median
11.26
Q1
8.46
Min
0.38

A P/E Ratio of 38.63 places FOUR in the upper quartile for the Financial Services industry. This high valuation relative to peers suggests the market holds elevated expectations for the company’s future growth.

ZS

--

Software Industry
Max
118.55
Q3
59.07
Median
30.35
Q1
19.35
Min
9.51

P/E Ratio data for ZS is currently unavailable.

FOUR vs. ZS: A comparison of their Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM) against their respective Financial Services and Software industry benchmarks.

Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM)

FOUR

1.10

Financial Services Industry
Max
7.62
Q3
4.75
Median
2.42
Q1
1.10
Min
0.03

The P/S Ratio is often not a primary valuation tool in the Financial Services industry.

ZS

7.26

Software Industry
Max
17.34
Q3
9.21
Median
5.13
Q1
3.33
Min
0.79

ZS’s P/S Ratio of 7.26 aligns with the market consensus for the Software industry. This suggests its valuation, based on sales, is seen as standard and is on par with its competitors.

FOUR vs. ZS: A comparison of their Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM) against their respective Financial Services and Software industry benchmarks.

Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ)

FOUR

3.87

Financial Services Industry
Max
7.07
Q3
3.46
Median
1.51
Q1
0.98
Min
0.09

FOUR’s P/B Ratio of 3.87 is in the upper tier for the Financial Services industry. This indicates that investors are paying a premium relative to the company’s net assets, a valuation that hinges on its ability to generate superior profits.

ZS

14.57

Software Industry
Max
25.50
Q3
12.31
Median
6.86
Q1
3.39
Min
0.38

ZS’s P/B Ratio of 14.57 is in the upper tier for the Software industry. This indicates that investors are paying a premium relative to the company’s net assets, a valuation that hinges on its ability to generate superior profits.

FOUR vs. ZS: A comparison of their Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ) against their respective Financial Services and Software industry benchmarks.

Valuation at a Glance

SymbolFOURZS
Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM)38.63--
Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM)1.107.26
Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ)3.8714.57
Price-to-Free Cash Flow Ratio (TTM)11.4924.93