FOUR vs. TTWO: A Head-to-Head Stock Comparison

Updated on August 22, 2025

Here’s a clear look at FOUR and TTWO, comparing key factors like historical performance, profitability, financial strength, growth, dividend, and valuation.

Company Profile

Symbol	FOUR	TTWO
Company Name	Shift4 Payments, Inc.	Take-Two Interactive Software, Inc.
Country	United States	United States
GICS Sector	Financials	Communication Services
GICS Industry	Financial Services	Entertainment
Market Capitalization	8.00 billion USD	42.18 billion USD
Exchange	NYSE	NasdaqGS
Listing Date	June 5, 2020	April 15, 1997
Security Type	Common Stock	Common Stock

Historical Performance

This chart compares the performance of FOUR and TTWO by tracking the growth of an initial $10,000 investment in each. Use the tabs to select the desired time period. Data is adjusted for dividends and splits.

FOUR vs. TTWO: Growth of a $10,000 investment over the past one year.

Historical Performance at a Glance

Symbol	FOUR	TTWO
5-Day Price Return	1.56%	-1.93%
13-Week Price Return	0.57%	-2.55%
26-Week Price Return	-24.20%	8.84%
52-Week Price Return	10.81%	51.94%
Month-to-Date Return	-12.14%	2.67%
Year-to-Date Return	-12.80%	24.22%
10-Day Avg. Volume	2.22M	2.28M
3-Month Avg. Volume	1.82M	2.17M
3-Month Volatility	42.64%	23.84%
Beta	1.74	1.01

Profitability

Return on Equity (TTM)

FOUR

21.96%

Financial Services Industry

Max: 40.58%
Q3: 20.06%
Median: 10.67%
Q1: 4.19%
Min: -10.31%

In the upper quartile for the Financial Services industry, FOUR’s Return on Equity of 21.96% signals a highly effective use of shareholder capital to drive profitability compared to most of its peers.

TTWO

-98.81%

Entertainment Industry

Max: 42.50%
Q3: 22.75%
Median: 12.88%
Q1: 7.15%
Min: -6.84%

TTWO has a negative Return on Equity of -98.81%. This indicates the company is generating a loss for its shareholders, which can be a result of unprofitability or negative shareholder equity and is often a sign of financial distress.

FOUR vs. TTWO: A comparison of their Return on Equity (TTM) against their respective Financial Services and Entertainment industry benchmarks.

Net Profit Margin (TTM)

FOUR

6.11%

Financial Services Industry

Max: 52.86%
Q3: 25.58%
Median: 12.23%
Q1: 6.64%
Min: -9.92%

Falling into the lower quartile for the Financial Services industry, FOUR’s Net Profit Margin of 6.11% indicates weaker profitability. This means the company retains a smaller portion of each dollar in sales as profit compared to its competitors.

TTWO

-72.92%

Entertainment Industry

Max: 45.25%
Q3: 23.93%
Median: 14.60%
Q1: 4.89%
Min: -22.94%

TTWO has a negative Net Profit Margin of -72.92%, indicating the company is operating at a net loss as its expenses exceeded its revenues.

FOUR vs. TTWO: A comparison of their Net Profit Margin (TTM) against their respective Financial Services and Entertainment industry benchmarks.

Operating Profit Margin (TTM)

FOUR

7.53%

Financial Services Industry

Max: 77.28%
Q3: 37.68%
Median: 18.17%
Q1: 9.27%
Min: -8.19%

FOUR’s Operating Profit Margin of 7.53% is in the lower quartile for the Financial Services industry. This indicates weaker profitability from core operations, which may stem from inefficiencies or competitive pressures on pricing.

TTWO

-72.16%

Entertainment Industry

Max: 46.83%
Q3: 28.87%
Median: 15.26%
Q1: 8.95%
Min: -5.53%

TTWO has a negative Operating Profit Margin of -72.16%. This signifies the company is unprofitable at the operational level, as its core business expenses exceed its revenue.

FOUR vs. TTWO: A comparison of their Operating Profit Margin (TTM) against their respective Financial Services and Entertainment industry benchmarks.

Profitability at a Glance

Symbol	FOUR	TTWO
Return on Equity (TTM)	21.96%	-98.81%
Return on Assets (TTM)	3.99%	-37.91%
Net Profit Margin (TTM)	6.11%	-72.92%
Operating Profit Margin (TTM)	7.53%	-72.16%
Gross Profit Margin (TTM)	30.55%	56.66%

Financial Strength

Current Ratio (MRQ)

FOUR

2.53

Financial Services Industry

Max: 4.58
Q3: 2.59
Median: 1.33
Q1: 0.69
Min: 0.01

For the Financial Services industry, the Current Ratio is often not the most suitable measure of short-term liquidity.

TTWO

1.16

Entertainment Industry

Max: 6.80
Q3: 3.77
Median: 1.87
Q1: 0.86
Min: 0.39

TTWO’s Current Ratio of 1.16 aligns with the median group of the Entertainment industry, indicating that its short-term liquidity is in line with its sector peers.

FOUR vs. TTWO: A comparison of their Current Ratio (MRQ) against their respective Financial Services and Entertainment industry benchmarks.

Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ)

FOUR

2.34

Financial Services Industry

Max: 4.96
Q3: 2.10
Median: 0.57
Q1: 0.12
Min: 0.00

The Debt-to-Equity Ratio is often not the primary focus for assessing leverage in the Financial Services industry.

TTWO

0.88

Entertainment Industry

Max: 1.65
Q3: 0.71
Median: 0.14
Q1: 0.04
Min: 0.00

TTWO’s leverage is in the upper quartile of the Entertainment industry, with a Debt-to-Equity Ratio of 0.88. While this approach can boost equity growth, it also exposes the company to greater financial vulnerability.

FOUR vs. TTWO: A comparison of their Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ) against their respective Financial Services and Entertainment industry benchmarks.

Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM)

FOUR

14.17

Financial Services Industry

Max: 136.23
Q3: 56.08
Median: 6.55
Q1: 2.01
Min: -33.27

The Interest Coverage Ratio is often not a primary indicator of debt servicing capacity in the Financial Services industry.

TTWO

-44.74

Entertainment Industry

Max: 62.11
Q3: 31.19
Median: 7.50
Q1: 2.02
Min: -6.33

TTWO has a negative Interest Coverage Ratio of -44.74. This indicates that its earnings were insufficient to cover even its operational costs, let alone its interest payments, signaling significant financial distress.

FOUR vs. TTWO: A comparison of their Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM) against their respective Financial Services and Entertainment industry benchmarks.

Financial Strength at a Glance

Symbol	FOUR	TTWO
Current Ratio (MRQ)	2.53	1.16
Quick Ratio (MRQ)	2.49	1.01
Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ)	2.34	0.88
Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM)	14.17	-44.74

Growth

Revenue Growth

FOUR vs. TTWO: A side-by-side comparison of their Revenue Growth for the MRQ (YoY), TTM (YoY), 3-Year CAGR, and 5-Year CAGR periods.

EPS Growth

FOUR vs. TTWO: A side-by-side comparison of their EPS Growth for the MRQ (YoY), TTM (YoY), 3-Year CAGR, and 5-Year CAGR periods.

Dividend

Dividend Yield (TTM)

FOUR

0.00%

Financial Services Industry

Max: 8.18%
Q3: 3.60%
Median: 1.56%
Q1: 0.00%
Min: 0.00%

FOUR currently does not pay a dividend, resulting in a yield of 0%. This is a common strategy for growth-focused companies that prioritize reinvesting earnings, though it may be less typical in mature, income-oriented sectors.

TTWO

0.00%

Entertainment Industry

Max: 2.54%
Q3: 1.29%
Median: 0.61%
Q1: 0.00%
Min: 0.00%

TTWO currently does not pay a dividend, resulting in a yield of 0%. This is a common strategy for growth-focused companies that prioritize reinvesting earnings, though it may be less typical in mature, income-oriented sectors.

FOUR vs. TTWO: A comparison of their Dividend Yield (TTM) against their respective Financial Services and Entertainment industry benchmarks.

Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM)

FOUR

0.00%

Financial Services Industry

Max: 155.56%
Q3: 63.71%
Median: 18.08%
Q1: 0.00%
Min: 0.00%

FOUR has a Dividend Payout Ratio of 0%, indicating it does not currently pay a dividend. This is a common strategy for growth-oriented companies that reinvest all profits back into the business.

TTWO

0.00%

Entertainment Industry

Max: 82.30%
Q3: 45.76%
Median: 29.16%
Q1: 0.00%
Min: 0.00%

TTWO has a Dividend Payout Ratio of 0%, indicating it does not currently pay a dividend. This is a common strategy for growth-oriented companies that reinvest all profits back into the business.

FOUR vs. TTWO: A comparison of their Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM) against their respective Financial Services and Entertainment industry benchmarks.

Dividend at a Glance

Symbol	FOUR	TTWO
Dividend Yield (TTM)	0.00%	0.00%
Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM)	0.00%	0.00%

Valuation

Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM)

FOUR

36.29

Financial Services Industry

Max: 63.23
Q3: 32.10
Median: 14.41
Q1: 10.81
Min: 0.37

A P/E Ratio of 36.29 places FOUR in the upper quartile for the Financial Services industry. This high valuation relative to peers suggests the market holds elevated expectations for the company’s future growth.

TTWO

Entertainment Industry

Max: 53.51
Q3: 45.31
Median: 33.16
Q1: 18.21
Min: 3.89

P/E Ratio data for TTWO is currently unavailable.

FOUR vs. TTWO: A comparison of their Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM) against their respective Financial Services and Entertainment industry benchmarks.

Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM)

FOUR

2.22

Financial Services Industry

Max: 11.16
Q3: 5.45
Median: 2.61
Q1: 1.25
Min: 0.04

The P/S Ratio is often not a primary valuation tool in the Financial Services industry.

TTWO

7.26

Entertainment Industry

Max: 12.81
Q3: 7.20
Median: 4.68
Q1: 3.32
Min: 0.79

TTWO’s P/S Ratio of 7.26 is in the upper echelon for the Entertainment industry. This means the company is valued richly on its revenue stream compared to its peers, suggesting the stock is priced for a high level of future performance.

FOUR vs. TTWO: A comparison of their Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM) against their respective Financial Services and Entertainment industry benchmarks.

Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ)

FOUR

5.45

Financial Services Industry

Max: 7.09
Q3: 3.79
Median: 1.46
Q1: 0.83
Min: 0.04

FOUR’s P/B Ratio of 5.45 is in the upper tier for the Financial Services industry. This indicates that investors are paying a premium relative to the company’s net assets, a valuation that hinges on its ability to generate superior profits.

TTWO

12.74

Entertainment Industry

Max: 17.11
Q3: 8.38
Median: 5.24
Q1: 2.18
Min: 0.67

TTWO’s P/B Ratio of 12.74 is in the upper tier for the Entertainment industry. This indicates that investors are paying a premium relative to the company’s net assets, a valuation that hinges on its ability to generate superior profits.

FOUR vs. TTWO: A comparison of their Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ) against their respective Financial Services and Entertainment industry benchmarks.

Valuation at a Glance

Symbol	FOUR	TTWO
Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM)	36.29	--
Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM)	2.22	7.26
Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ)	5.45	12.74
Price-to-Free Cash Flow Ratio (TTM)	21.02	187.28