Seek Returns logo

FOUR vs. ORCL: A Head-to-Head Stock Comparison

Updated on

Here’s a clear look at FOUR and ORCL, comparing key factors like historical performance, profitability, financial strength, growth, dividend, and valuation.

Company Profile

SymbolFOURORCL
Company NameShift4 Payments, Inc.Oracle Corporation
CountryUnited StatesUnited States
GICS SectorFinancialsInformation Technology
GICS IndustryFinancial ServicesSoftware
Market Capitalization6.95 billion USD823.91 billion USD
ExchangeNYSENYSE
Listing DateJune 5, 2020March 12, 1986
Security TypeCommon StockCommon Stock

Historical Performance

This chart compares the performance of FOUR and ORCL by tracking the growth of an initial $10,000 investment in each. Use the tabs to select the desired time period. Data is adjusted for dividends and splits.

FOUR vs. ORCL: Growth of a $10,000 investment over the past one year.

Historical Performance at a Glance

SymbolFOURORCL
5-Day Price Return-4.36%-8.82%
13-Week Price Return-21.91%28.64%
26-Week Price Return-10.20%90.28%
52-Week Price Return-11.90%66.67%
Month-to-Date Return-14.41%24.37%
Year-to-Date Return-25.42%68.77%
10-Day Avg. Volume2.51M32.16M
3-Month Avg. Volume1.68M18.59M
3-Month Volatility40.59%82.45%
Beta1.721.52

Profitability

Return on Equity (TTM)

FOUR

21.96%

Financial Services Industry

Max
39.28%
Q3
18.88%
Median
9.97%
Q1
4.03%
Min
-10.25%

In the upper quartile for the Financial Services industry, FOUR’s Return on Equity of 21.96% signals a highly effective use of shareholder capital to drive profitability compared to most of its peers.

ORCL

66.28%

Software Industry

Max
66.28%
Q3
21.28%
Median
9.33%
Q1
-8.77%
Min
-48.16%

In the upper quartile for the Software industry, ORCL’s Return on Equity of 66.28% signals a highly effective use of shareholder capital to drive profitability compared to most of its peers.

FOUR vs. ORCL: A comparison of their Return on Equity (TTM) against their respective Financial Services and Software industry benchmarks.

Net Profit Margin (TTM)

FOUR

6.11%

Financial Services Industry

Max
52.16%
Q3
25.35%
Median
12.68%
Q1
6.11%
Min
-11.69%

FOUR’s Net Profit Margin of 6.11% is aligned with the median group of its peers in the Financial Services industry. This indicates its ability to convert revenue into profit is typical for the sector.

ORCL

21.08%

Software Industry

Max
51.92%
Q3
19.23%
Median
6.98%
Q1
-7.14%
Min
-41.00%

A Net Profit Margin of 21.08% places ORCL in the upper quartile for the Software industry, signifying strong profitability and more effective cost management than most of its peers.

FOUR vs. ORCL: A comparison of their Net Profit Margin (TTM) against their respective Financial Services and Software industry benchmarks.

Operating Profit Margin (TTM)

FOUR

7.53%

Financial Services Industry

Max
75.57%
Q3
37.78%
Median
19.09%
Q1
10.04%
Min
-19.42%

FOUR’s Operating Profit Margin of 7.53% is in the lower quartile for the Financial Services industry. This indicates weaker profitability from core operations, which may stem from inefficiencies or competitive pressures on pricing.

ORCL

30.44%

Software Industry

Max
60.40%
Q3
21.25%
Median
9.90%
Q1
-4.97%
Min
-43.50%

An Operating Profit Margin of 30.44% places ORCL in the upper quartile for the Software industry. This signals a strong ability to translate revenue into operating profit, outperforming most of its competitors in core business efficiency.

FOUR vs. ORCL: A comparison of their Operating Profit Margin (TTM) against their respective Financial Services and Software industry benchmarks.

Profitability at a Glance

SymbolFOURORCL
Return on Equity (TTM)21.96%66.28%
Return on Assets (TTM)3.99%7.56%
Net Profit Margin (TTM)6.11%21.08%
Operating Profit Margin (TTM)7.53%30.44%
Gross Profit Margin (TTM)30.55%69.66%

Financial Strength

Current Ratio (MRQ)

FOUR

2.53

Financial Services Industry

Max
4.83
Q3
2.70
Median
1.44
Q1
0.86
Min
0.01

For the Financial Services industry, the Current Ratio is often not the most suitable measure of short-term liquidity.

ORCL

0.62

Software Industry

Max
4.29
Q3
2.37
Median
1.40
Q1
1.03
Min
0.25

ORCL’s Current Ratio of 0.62 falls into the lower quartile for the Software industry. This indicates a tighter liquidity situation and a more constrained capacity to handle short-term debt than many of its competitors.

FOUR vs. ORCL: A comparison of their Current Ratio (MRQ) against their respective Financial Services and Software industry benchmarks.

Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ)

FOUR

2.34

Financial Services Industry

Max
5.07
Q3
2.14
Median
0.66
Q1
0.12
Min
0.00

The Debt-to-Equity Ratio is often not the primary focus for assessing leverage in the Financial Services industry.

ORCL

3.78

Software Industry

Max
2.16
Q3
0.86
Median
0.31
Q1
0.00
Min
0.00

With a Debt-to-Equity Ratio of 3.78, ORCL operates with exceptionally high leverage compared to the Software industry norm. This suggests an aggressive reliance on debt financing, which can magnify returns but also significantly elevates financial risk.

FOUR vs. ORCL: A comparison of their Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ) against their respective Financial Services and Software industry benchmarks.

Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM)

FOUR

14.17

Financial Services Industry

Max
136.23
Q3
56.08
Median
6.55
Q1
2.01
Min
-33.27

The Interest Coverage Ratio is often not a primary indicator of debt servicing capacity in the Financial Services industry.

ORCL

4.92

Software Industry

Max
89.65
Q3
32.64
Median
1.00
Q1
-9.84
Min
-71.23

ORCL’s Interest Coverage Ratio of 4.92 is positioned comfortably within the norm for the Software industry, indicating a standard and healthy capacity to cover its interest payments.

FOUR vs. ORCL: A comparison of their Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM) against their respective Financial Services and Software industry benchmarks.

Financial Strength at a Glance

SymbolFOURORCL
Current Ratio (MRQ)2.530.62
Quick Ratio (MRQ)2.490.50
Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ)2.343.78
Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM)14.174.92

Growth

Revenue Growth

FOUR vs. ORCL: A side-by-side comparison of their Revenue Growth for the MRQ (YoY), TTM (YoY), 3-Year CAGR, and 5-Year CAGR periods.

EPS Growth

FOUR vs. ORCL: A side-by-side comparison of their EPS Growth for the MRQ (YoY), TTM (YoY), 3-Year CAGR, and 5-Year CAGR periods.

Dividend

Dividend Yield (TTM)

FOUR

0.00%

Financial Services Industry

Max
8.12%
Q3
3.37%
Median
1.70%
Q1
0.00%
Min
0.00%

FOUR currently does not pay a dividend, resulting in a yield of 0%. This is a common strategy for growth-focused companies that prioritize reinvesting earnings, though it may be less typical in mature, income-oriented sectors.

ORCL

0.63%

Software Industry

Max
0.22%
Q3
0.11%
Median
0.00%
Q1
0.00%
Min
0.00%

ORCL’s Dividend Yield of 0.63% is exceptionally high, placing it well above the typical range for the Software industry. While this may seem attractive, an unusually high yield can sometimes be a warning sign, reflecting a falling stock price or market concerns about the dividend’s sustainability.

FOUR vs. ORCL: A comparison of their Dividend Yield (TTM) against their respective Financial Services and Software industry benchmarks.

Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM)

FOUR

0.00%

Financial Services Industry

Max
132.10%
Q3
64.32%
Median
18.23%
Q1
0.00%
Min
0.00%

FOUR has a Dividend Payout Ratio of 0%, indicating it does not currently pay a dividend. This is a common strategy for growth-oriented companies that reinvest all profits back into the business.

ORCL

40.62%

Software Industry

Max
3.29%
Q3
2.41%
Median
0.00%
Q1
0.00%
Min
0.00%

At 40.62%, ORCL’s Dividend Payout Ratio is exceptionally high, exceeding the typical range for the Software industry. While this provides a significant return to shareholders, it may limit funds for reinvestment and could be difficult to sustain.

FOUR vs. ORCL: A comparison of their Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM) against their respective Financial Services and Software industry benchmarks.

Dividend at a Glance

SymbolFOURORCL
Dividend Yield (TTM)0.00%0.63%
Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM)0.00%40.62%

Valuation

Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM)

FOUR

30.76

Financial Services Industry

Max
45.81
Q3
30.21
Median
16.29
Q1
10.14
Min
0.70

A P/E Ratio of 30.76 places FOUR in the upper quartile for the Financial Services industry. This high valuation relative to peers suggests the market holds elevated expectations for the company’s future growth.

ORCL

64.02

Software Industry

Max
145.74
Q3
94.88
Median
45.35
Q1
26.66
Min
8.80

ORCL’s P/E Ratio of 64.02 is within the middle range for the Software industry. This suggests its valuation is in line with the sector average, representing neither a significant premium nor a discount compared to its peers.

FOUR vs. ORCL: A comparison of their Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM) against their respective Financial Services and Software industry benchmarks.

Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM)

FOUR

1.88

Financial Services Industry

Max
10.88
Q3
5.34
Median
2.64
Q1
1.24
Min
0.06

The P/S Ratio is often not a primary valuation tool in the Financial Services industry.

ORCL

13.50

Software Industry

Max
25.67
Q3
13.68
Median
8.28
Q1
4.95
Min
0.90

ORCL’s P/S Ratio of 13.50 aligns with the market consensus for the Software industry. This suggests its valuation, based on sales, is seen as standard and is on par with its competitors.

FOUR vs. ORCL: A comparison of their Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM) against their respective Financial Services and Software industry benchmarks.

Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ)

FOUR

5.45

Financial Services Industry

Max
7.93
Q3
3.78
Median
1.49
Q1
0.88
Min
0.08

FOUR’s P/B Ratio of 5.45 is in the upper tier for the Financial Services industry. This indicates that investors are paying a premium relative to the company’s net assets, a valuation that hinges on its ability to generate superior profits.

ORCL

26.30

Software Industry

Max
30.67
Q3
14.92
Median
8.52
Q1
3.89
Min
0.38

ORCL’s P/B Ratio of 26.30 is in the upper tier for the Software industry. This indicates that investors are paying a premium relative to the company’s net assets, a valuation that hinges on its ability to generate superior profits.

FOUR vs. ORCL: A comparison of their Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ) against their respective Financial Services and Software industry benchmarks.

Valuation at a Glance

SymbolFOURORCL
Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM)30.7664.02
Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM)1.8813.50
Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ)5.4526.30
Price-to-Free Cash Flow Ratio (TTM)17.8293.95