Seek Returns logo

FOUR vs. GDDY: A Head-to-Head Stock Comparison

Updated on

Here’s a clear look at FOUR and GDDY, comparing key factors like historical performance, profitability, financial strength, growth, dividend, and valuation.

Company Profile

SymbolFOURGDDY
Company NameShift4 Payments, Inc.GoDaddy Inc.
CountryUnited StatesUnited States
GICS SectorFinancialsInformation Technology
GICS IndustryFinancial ServicesIT Services
Market Capitalization7.97 billion USD19.84 billion USD
ExchangeNYSENYSE
Listing DateJune 5, 2020March 31, 2015
Security TypeCommon StockCommon Stock

Historical Performance

This chart compares the performance of FOUR and GDDY by tracking the growth of an initial $10,000 investment in each. Use the tabs to select the desired time period. Data is adjusted for dividends and splits.

FOUR vs. GDDY: Growth of a $10,000 investment over the past one year.

Historical Performance at a Glance

SymbolFOURGDDY
5-Day Price Return8.13%-4.61%
13-Week Price Return0.02%-23.36%
26-Week Price Return-24.97%-32.07%
52-Week Price Return23.46%-9.55%
Month-to-Date Return-12.53%-11.30%
Year-to-Date Return-13.19%-27.39%
10-Day Avg. Volume3.53M2.99M
3-Month Avg. Volume1.88M1.64M
3-Month Volatility44.54%30.05%
Beta1.731.01

Profitability

Return on Equity (TTM)

FOUR

21.96%

Financial Services Industry

Max
40.58%
Q3
20.06%
Median
10.67%
Q1
4.19%
Min
-10.31%

In the upper quartile for the Financial Services industry, FOUR’s Return on Equity of 21.96% signals a highly effective use of shareholder capital to drive profitability compared to most of its peers.

GDDY

195.66%

IT Services Industry

Max
29.51%
Q3
16.98%
Median
13.47%
Q1
7.93%
Min
-3.97%

GDDY’s Return on Equity of 195.66% is exceptionally high, placing it well beyond the typical range for the IT Services industry. This demonstrates a superior ability to generate profit from shareholder investments, though it could also be inflated by high financial leverage.

FOUR vs. GDDY: A comparison of their Return on Equity (TTM) against their respective Financial Services and IT Services industry benchmarks.

Net Profit Margin (TTM)

FOUR

6.11%

Financial Services Industry

Max
52.86%
Q3
25.58%
Median
12.23%
Q1
6.64%
Min
-9.92%

Falling into the lower quartile for the Financial Services industry, FOUR’s Net Profit Margin of 6.11% indicates weaker profitability. This means the company retains a smaller portion of each dollar in sales as profit compared to its competitors.

GDDY

17.01%

IT Services Industry

Max
19.82%
Q3
11.49%
Median
6.67%
Q1
3.61%
Min
-4.62%

A Net Profit Margin of 17.01% places GDDY in the upper quartile for the IT Services industry, signifying strong profitability and more effective cost management than most of its peers.

FOUR vs. GDDY: A comparison of their Net Profit Margin (TTM) against their respective Financial Services and IT Services industry benchmarks.

Operating Profit Margin (TTM)

FOUR

7.53%

Financial Services Industry

Max
77.28%
Q3
37.68%
Median
18.17%
Q1
9.27%
Min
-8.19%

FOUR’s Operating Profit Margin of 7.53% is in the lower quartile for the Financial Services industry. This indicates weaker profitability from core operations, which may stem from inefficiencies or competitive pressures on pricing.

GDDY

21.50%

IT Services Industry

Max
21.69%
Q3
14.50%
Median
10.06%
Q1
6.98%
Min
0.06%

An Operating Profit Margin of 21.50% places GDDY in the upper quartile for the IT Services industry. This signals a strong ability to translate revenue into operating profit, outperforming most of its competitors in core business efficiency.

FOUR vs. GDDY: A comparison of their Operating Profit Margin (TTM) against their respective Financial Services and IT Services industry benchmarks.

Profitability at a Glance

SymbolFOURGDDY
Return on Equity (TTM)21.96%195.66%
Return on Assets (TTM)3.99%10.00%
Net Profit Margin (TTM)6.11%17.01%
Operating Profit Margin (TTM)7.53%21.50%
Gross Profit Margin (TTM)30.55%63.97%

Financial Strength

Current Ratio (MRQ)

FOUR

2.53

Financial Services Industry

Max
4.58
Q3
2.59
Median
1.33
Q1
0.69
Min
0.01

For the Financial Services industry, the Current Ratio is often not the most suitable measure of short-term liquidity.

GDDY

0.64

IT Services Industry

Max
2.42
Q3
1.81
Median
1.47
Q1
1.09
Min
0.44

GDDY’s Current Ratio of 0.64 falls into the lower quartile for the IT Services industry. This indicates a tighter liquidity situation and a more constrained capacity to handle short-term debt than many of its competitors.

FOUR vs. GDDY: A comparison of their Current Ratio (MRQ) against their respective Financial Services and IT Services industry benchmarks.

Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ)

FOUR

2.34

Financial Services Industry

Max
4.96
Q3
2.10
Median
0.57
Q1
0.12
Min
0.00

The Debt-to-Equity Ratio is often not the primary focus for assessing leverage in the Financial Services industry.

GDDY

9.37

IT Services Industry

Max
2.33
Q3
1.17
Median
0.54
Q1
0.15
Min
0.00

With a Debt-to-Equity Ratio of 9.37, GDDY operates with exceptionally high leverage compared to the IT Services industry norm. This suggests an aggressive reliance on debt financing, which can magnify returns but also significantly elevates financial risk.

FOUR vs. GDDY: A comparison of their Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ) against their respective Financial Services and IT Services industry benchmarks.

Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM)

FOUR

14.17

Financial Services Industry

Max
136.23
Q3
56.08
Median
6.55
Q1
2.01
Min
-33.27

The Interest Coverage Ratio is often not a primary indicator of debt servicing capacity in the Financial Services industry.

GDDY

5.84

IT Services Industry

Max
144.50
Q3
84.49
Median
13.76
Q1
2.59
Min
-28.13

GDDY’s Interest Coverage Ratio of 5.84 is positioned comfortably within the norm for the IT Services industry, indicating a standard and healthy capacity to cover its interest payments.

FOUR vs. GDDY: A comparison of their Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM) against their respective Financial Services and IT Services industry benchmarks.

Financial Strength at a Glance

SymbolFOURGDDY
Current Ratio (MRQ)2.530.64
Quick Ratio (MRQ)2.490.41
Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ)2.349.37
Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM)14.175.84

Growth

Revenue Growth

FOUR vs. GDDY: A side-by-side comparison of their Revenue Growth for the MRQ (YoY), TTM (YoY), 3-Year CAGR, and 5-Year CAGR periods.

EPS Growth

FOUR vs. GDDY: A side-by-side comparison of their EPS Growth for the MRQ (YoY), TTM (YoY), 3-Year CAGR, and 5-Year CAGR periods.

Dividend

Dividend Yield (TTM)

FOUR

0.00%

Financial Services Industry

Max
8.18%
Q3
3.60%
Median
1.56%
Q1
0.00%
Min
0.00%

FOUR currently does not pay a dividend, resulting in a yield of 0%. This is a common strategy for growth-focused companies that prioritize reinvesting earnings, though it may be less typical in mature, income-oriented sectors.

GDDY

0.00%

IT Services Industry

Max
2.80%
Q3
1.74%
Median
0.62%
Q1
0.00%
Min
0.00%

GDDY currently does not pay a dividend, resulting in a yield of 0%. This is a common strategy for growth-focused companies that prioritize reinvesting earnings, though it may be less typical in mature, income-oriented sectors.

FOUR vs. GDDY: A comparison of their Dividend Yield (TTM) against their respective Financial Services and IT Services industry benchmarks.

Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM)

FOUR

0.00%

Financial Services Industry

Max
155.56%
Q3
63.71%
Median
18.08%
Q1
0.00%
Min
0.00%

FOUR has a Dividend Payout Ratio of 0%, indicating it does not currently pay a dividend. This is a common strategy for growth-oriented companies that reinvest all profits back into the business.

GDDY

0.00%

IT Services Industry

Max
147.75%
Q3
63.58%
Median
24.63%
Q1
0.00%
Min
0.00%

GDDY has a Dividend Payout Ratio of 0%, indicating it does not currently pay a dividend. This is a common strategy for growth-oriented companies that reinvest all profits back into the business.

FOUR vs. GDDY: A comparison of their Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM) against their respective Financial Services and IT Services industry benchmarks.

Dividend at a Glance

SymbolFOURGDDY
Dividend Yield (TTM)0.00%0.00%
Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM)0.00%0.00%

Valuation

Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM)

FOUR

35.99

Financial Services Industry

Max
63.23
Q3
32.10
Median
14.41
Q1
10.81
Min
0.37

A P/E Ratio of 35.99 places FOUR in the upper quartile for the Financial Services industry. This high valuation relative to peers suggests the market holds elevated expectations for the company’s future growth.

GDDY

24.51

IT Services Industry

Max
41.55
Q3
31.54
Median
23.25
Q1
18.12
Min
6.57

GDDY’s P/E Ratio of 24.51 is within the middle range for the IT Services industry. This suggests its valuation is in line with the sector average, representing neither a significant premium nor a discount compared to its peers.

FOUR vs. GDDY: A comparison of their Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM) against their respective Financial Services and IT Services industry benchmarks.

Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM)

FOUR

2.20

Financial Services Industry

Max
11.16
Q3
5.45
Median
2.61
Q1
1.25
Min
0.04

The P/S Ratio is often not a primary valuation tool in the Financial Services industry.

GDDY

4.17

IT Services Industry

Max
6.61
Q3
4.37
Median
2.02
Q1
1.20
Min
0.19

GDDY’s P/S Ratio of 4.17 aligns with the market consensus for the IT Services industry. This suggests its valuation, based on sales, is seen as standard and is on par with its competitors.

FOUR vs. GDDY: A comparison of their Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM) against their respective Financial Services and IT Services industry benchmarks.

Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ)

FOUR

5.45

Financial Services Industry

Max
7.09
Q3
3.79
Median
1.46
Q1
0.83
Min
0.04

FOUR’s P/B Ratio of 5.45 is in the upper tier for the Financial Services industry. This indicates that investors are paying a premium relative to the company’s net assets, a valuation that hinges on its ability to generate superior profits.

GDDY

63.44

IT Services Industry

Max
11.19
Q3
6.38
Median
3.47
Q1
2.31
Min
0.96

At 63.44, GDDY’s P/B Ratio is at an extreme premium to the IT Services industry. This signifies that the market’s valuation is heavily reliant on future potential rather than its current net asset value, which can be a high-risk proposition.

FOUR vs. GDDY: A comparison of their Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ) against their respective Financial Services and IT Services industry benchmarks.

Valuation at a Glance

SymbolFOURGDDY
Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM)35.9924.51
Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM)2.204.17
Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ)5.4563.44
Price-to-Free Cash Flow Ratio (TTM)20.8513.64