FOUR vs. FTV: A Head-to-Head Stock Comparison

Updated on October 6, 2025

Here’s a clear look at FOUR and FTV, comparing key factors like historical performance, profitability, financial strength, growth, dividend, and valuation.

Company Profile

Symbol	FOUR	FTV
Company Name	Shift4 Payments, Inc.	Fortive Corporation
Country	United States	United States
GICS Sector	Financials	Industrials
GICS Industry	Financial Services	Machinery
Market Capitalization	6.80 billion USD	17.06 billion USD
Exchange	NYSE	NYSE
Listing Date	June 5, 2020	July 5, 2016
Security Type	Common Stock	Common Stock

Historical Performance

This chart compares the performance of FOUR and FTV by tracking the growth of an initial $10,000 investment in each. Use the tabs to select the desired time period. Data is adjusted for dividends and splits.

FOUR vs. FTV: Growth of a $10,000 investment over the past one year.

Historical Performance at a Glance

Symbol	FOUR	FTV
5-Day Price Return	-2.73%	3.07%
13-Week Price Return	-24.50%	-4.98%
26-Week Price Return	-5.94%	-31.12%
52-Week Price Return	-13.55%	-35.08%
Month-to-Date Return	-0.70%	2.90%
Year-to-Date Return	-25.94%	-32.79%
10-Day Avg. Volume	2.65M	3.12M
3-Month Avg. Volume	1.71M	3.93M
3-Month Volatility	40.99%	22.34%
Beta	1.70	1.06

Profitability

Return on Equity (TTM)

FOUR

21.96%

Financial Services Industry

Max: 39.28%
Q3: 18.88%
Median: 9.97%
Q1: 4.03%
Min: -10.25%

In the upper quartile for the Financial Services industry, FOUR’s Return on Equity of 21.96% signals a highly effective use of shareholder capital to drive profitability compared to most of its peers.

FTV

7.44%

Machinery Industry

Max: 33.68%
Q3: 20.05%
Median: 12.37%
Q1: 8.67%
Min: -7.69%

FTV’s Return on Equity of 7.44% is in the lower quartile for the Machinery industry. This indicates a less efficient generation of profit from its equity base when compared to its competitors.

FOUR vs. FTV: A comparison of their Return on Equity (TTM) against their respective Financial Services and Machinery industry benchmarks.

Net Profit Margin (TTM)

FOUR

6.11%

Financial Services Industry

Max: 52.16%
Q3: 25.35%
Median: 12.68%
Q1: 6.11%
Min: -11.69%

FOUR’s Net Profit Margin of 6.11% is aligned with the median group of its peers in the Financial Services industry. This indicates its ability to convert revenue into profit is typical for the sector.

FTV

12.51%

Machinery Industry

Max: 19.72%
Q3: 11.07%
Median: 7.62%
Q1: 5.05%
Min: -1.52%

A Net Profit Margin of 12.51% places FTV in the upper quartile for the Machinery industry, signifying strong profitability and more effective cost management than most of its peers.

FOUR vs. FTV: A comparison of their Net Profit Margin (TTM) against their respective Financial Services and Machinery industry benchmarks.

Operating Profit Margin (TTM)

FOUR

7.53%

Financial Services Industry

Max: 75.57%
Q3: 37.78%
Median: 19.09%
Q1: 10.04%
Min: -19.42%

FOUR’s Operating Profit Margin of 7.53% is in the lower quartile for the Financial Services industry. This indicates weaker profitability from core operations, which may stem from inefficiencies or competitive pressures on pricing.

FTV

17.22%

Machinery Industry

Max: 26.63%
Q3: 15.99%
Median: 11.27%
Q1: 7.72%
Min: -0.51%

An Operating Profit Margin of 17.22% places FTV in the upper quartile for the Machinery industry. This signals a strong ability to translate revenue into operating profit, outperforming most of its competitors in core business efficiency.

FOUR vs. FTV: A comparison of their Operating Profit Margin (TTM) against their respective Financial Services and Machinery industry benchmarks.

Profitability at a Glance

Symbol	FOUR	FTV
Return on Equity (TTM)	21.96%	7.44%
Return on Assets (TTM)	3.99%	4.40%
Net Profit Margin (TTM)	6.11%	12.51%
Operating Profit Margin (TTM)	7.53%	17.22%
Gross Profit Margin (TTM)	30.55%	59.78%

Financial Strength

Current Ratio (MRQ)

FOUR

2.53

Financial Services Industry

Max: 4.83
Q3: 2.70
Median: 1.44
Q1: 0.86
Min: 0.01

For the Financial Services industry, the Current Ratio is often not the most suitable measure of short-term liquidity.

FTV

0.98

Machinery Industry

Max: 3.13
Q3: 2.12
Median: 1.72
Q1: 1.34
Min: 0.77

FTV’s Current Ratio of 0.98 falls into the lower quartile for the Machinery industry. This indicates a tighter liquidity situation and a more constrained capacity to handle short-term debt than many of its competitors.

FOUR vs. FTV: A comparison of their Current Ratio (MRQ) against their respective Financial Services and Machinery industry benchmarks.

Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ)

FOUR

2.34

Financial Services Industry

Max: 5.07
Q3: 2.14
Median: 0.66
Q1: 0.12
Min: 0.00

The Debt-to-Equity Ratio is often not the primary focus for assessing leverage in the Financial Services industry.

FTV

0.46

Machinery Industry

Max: 1.56
Q3: 0.79
Median: 0.44
Q1: 0.27
Min: 0.00

FTV’s Debt-to-Equity Ratio of 0.46 is typical for the Machinery industry, indicating its use of leverage is in line with the sector norm. This suggests a balanced approach to its capital structure.

FOUR vs. FTV: A comparison of their Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ) against their respective Financial Services and Machinery industry benchmarks.

Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM)

FOUR

14.17

Financial Services Industry

Max: 136.23
Q3: 56.08
Median: 6.55
Q1: 2.01
Min: -33.27

The Interest Coverage Ratio is often not a primary indicator of debt servicing capacity in the Financial Services industry.

FTV

6.04

Machinery Industry

Max: 81.58
Q3: 37.68
Median: 13.76
Q1: 7.97
Min: -1.43

In the lower quartile for the Machinery industry, FTV’s Interest Coverage Ratio of 6.04 indicates a tighter cushion for servicing debt, suggesting less financial flexibility than many of its competitors.

FOUR vs. FTV: A comparison of their Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM) against their respective Financial Services and Machinery industry benchmarks.

Financial Strength at a Glance

Symbol	FOUR	FTV
Current Ratio (MRQ)	2.53	0.98
Quick Ratio (MRQ)	2.49	0.77
Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ)	2.34	0.46
Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM)	14.17	6.04

Growth

Revenue Growth

FOUR vs. FTV: A side-by-side comparison of their Revenue Growth for the MRQ (YoY), TTM (YoY), 3-Year CAGR, and 5-Year CAGR periods.

EPS Growth

FOUR vs. FTV: A side-by-side comparison of their EPS Growth for the MRQ (YoY), TTM (YoY), 3-Year CAGR, and 5-Year CAGR periods.

Dividend

Dividend Yield (TTM)

FOUR

0.00%

Financial Services Industry

Max: 8.12%
Q3: 3.37%
Median: 1.70%
Q1: 0.00%
Min: 0.00%

FOUR currently does not pay a dividend, resulting in a yield of 0%. This is a common strategy for growth-focused companies that prioritize reinvesting earnings, though it may be less typical in mature, income-oriented sectors.

FTV

0.64%

Machinery Industry

Max: 4.55%
Q3: 2.66%
Median: 1.90%
Q1: 1.23%
Min: 0.00%

FTV’s Dividend Yield of 0.64% is in the lower quartile for the Machinery industry. This suggests the company’s strategy likely favors retaining earnings for growth over providing a high dividend income.

FOUR vs. FTV: A comparison of their Dividend Yield (TTM) against their respective Financial Services and Machinery industry benchmarks.

Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM)

FOUR

0.00%

Financial Services Industry

Max: 132.10%
Q3: 64.32%
Median: 18.23%
Q1: 0.00%
Min: 0.00%

FOUR has a Dividend Payout Ratio of 0%, indicating it does not currently pay a dividend. This is a common strategy for growth-oriented companies that reinvest all profits back into the business.

FTV

14.22%

Machinery Industry

Max: 198.34%
Q3: 101.42%
Median: 62.79%
Q1: 29.85%
Min: 0.00%

FTV’s Dividend Payout Ratio of 14.22% is in the lower quartile for the Machinery industry. This suggests a conservative dividend policy, with a strategic focus on reinvesting profits for future growth.

FOUR vs. FTV: A comparison of their Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM) against their respective Financial Services and Machinery industry benchmarks.

Dividend at a Glance

Symbol	FOUR	FTV
Dividend Yield (TTM)	0.00%	0.64%
Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM)	0.00%	14.22%

Valuation

Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM)

FOUR

30.85

Financial Services Industry

Max: 45.81
Q3: 30.21
Median: 16.29
Q1: 10.14
Min: 0.70

A P/E Ratio of 30.85 places FOUR in the upper quartile for the Financial Services industry. This high valuation relative to peers suggests the market holds elevated expectations for the company’s future growth.

FTV

22.19

Machinery Industry

Max: 47.95
Q3: 30.11
Median: 22.35
Q1: 16.56
Min: 6.48

FTV’s P/E Ratio of 22.19 is within the middle range for the Machinery industry. This suggests its valuation is in line with the sector average, representing neither a significant premium nor a discount compared to its peers.

FOUR vs. FTV: A comparison of their Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM) against their respective Financial Services and Machinery industry benchmarks.

Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM)

FOUR

1.88

Financial Services Industry

Max: 10.88
Q3: 5.34
Median: 2.64
Q1: 1.24
Min: 0.06

The P/S Ratio is often not a primary valuation tool in the Financial Services industry.

FTV

2.78

Machinery Industry

Max: 4.97
Q3: 2.76
Median: 1.65
Q1: 1.04
Min: 0.04

FTV’s P/S Ratio of 2.78 is in the upper echelon for the Machinery industry. This means the company is valued richly on its revenue stream compared to its peers, suggesting the stock is priced for a high level of future performance.

FOUR vs. FTV: A comparison of their Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM) against their respective Financial Services and Machinery industry benchmarks.

Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ)

FOUR

5.45

Financial Services Industry

Max: 7.93
Q3: 3.78
Median: 1.49
Q1: 0.88
Min: 0.08

FOUR’s P/B Ratio of 5.45 is in the upper tier for the Financial Services industry. This indicates that investors are paying a premium relative to the company’s net assets, a valuation that hinges on its ability to generate superior profits.

FTV

2.34

Machinery Industry

Max: 7.29
Q3: 4.06
Median: 2.67
Q1: 1.54
Min: 0.52

FTV’s P/B Ratio of 2.34 is within the conventional range for the Machinery industry. This shows a balanced market view, where the stock’s price is neither at a significant premium nor a discount to the book value of its peers.

FOUR vs. FTV: A comparison of their Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ) against their respective Financial Services and Machinery industry benchmarks.

Valuation at a Glance

Symbol	FOUR	FTV
Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM)	30.85	22.19
Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM)	1.88	2.78
Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ)	5.45	2.34
Price-to-Free Cash Flow Ratio (TTM)	17.87	12.31