Seek Returns logo

FNV vs. MLM: A Head-to-Head Stock Comparison

Updated on

Here’s a clear look at FNV and MLM, comparing key factors like historical performance, profitability, financial strength, growth, dividend, and valuation.

Company Profile

SymbolFNVMLM
Company NameFranco-Nevada CorporationMartin Marietta Materials, Inc.
CountryCanadaUnited States
GICS SectorMaterialsMaterials
GICS IndustryMetals & MiningConstruction Materials
Market Capitalization34.54 billion USD36.22 billion USD
ExchangeNYSENYSE
Listing DateDecember 7, 2007February 17, 1994
Security TypeCommon StockCommon Stock

Historical Performance

This chart compares the performance of FNV and MLM by tracking the growth of an initial $10,000 investment in each. Use the tabs to select the desired time period. Data is adjusted for dividends and splits.

FNV vs. MLM: Growth of a $10,000 investment over the past one year.

Historical Performance at a Glance

SymbolFNVMLM
5-Day Price Return-2.49%-1.94%
13-Week Price Return8.03%5.70%
26-Week Price Return18.30%12.97%
52-Week Price Return43.11%12.36%
Month-to-Date Return8.99%4.47%
Year-to-Date Return42.41%16.28%
10-Day Avg. Volume0.27M0.43M
3-Month Avg. Volume0.30M0.42M
3-Month Volatility25.28%21.04%
Beta0.781.03

Profitability

Return on Equity (TTM)

FNV

12.62%

Metals & Mining Industry

Max
31.09%
Q3
16.14%
Median
7.01%
Q1
1.15%
Min
-19.85%

FNV’s Return on Equity of 12.62% is on par with the norm for the Metals & Mining industry, indicating its profitability relative to shareholder equity is typical for the sector.

MLM

11.88%

Construction Materials Industry

Max
24.78%
Q3
14.96%
Median
10.37%
Q1
4.14%
Min
-2.94%

MLM’s Return on Equity of 11.88% is on par with the norm for the Construction Materials industry, indicating its profitability relative to shareholder equity is typical for the sector.

FNV vs. MLM: A comparison of their Return on Equity (TTM) against their respective Metals & Mining and Construction Materials industry benchmarks.

Net Profit Margin (TTM)

FNV

58.82%

Metals & Mining Industry

Max
40.97%
Q3
17.87%
Median
7.03%
Q1
1.82%
Min
-20.01%

FNV’s Net Profit Margin of 58.82% is exceptionally high, placing it well beyond the typical range for the Metals & Mining industry. This demonstrates outstanding operational efficiency and a strong competitive advantage in converting revenue into profit.

MLM

16.47%

Construction Materials Industry

Max
28.01%
Q3
15.18%
Median
9.09%
Q1
3.32%
Min
-4.30%

A Net Profit Margin of 16.47% places MLM in the upper quartile for the Construction Materials industry, signifying strong profitability and more effective cost management than most of its peers.

FNV vs. MLM: A comparison of their Net Profit Margin (TTM) against their respective Metals & Mining and Construction Materials industry benchmarks.

Operating Profit Margin (TTM)

FNV

71.84%

Metals & Mining Industry

Max
59.48%
Q3
26.06%
Median
10.50%
Q1
2.89%
Min
-21.46%

FNV’s Operating Profit Margin of 71.84% is exceptionally high, placing it well above the typical range for the Metals & Mining industry. This demonstrates outstanding efficiency in managing its core operations, which can be a result of strong pricing power or superior cost control.

MLM

23.04%

Construction Materials Industry

Max
31.67%
Q3
18.49%
Median
11.57%
Q1
7.82%
Min
-1.44%

An Operating Profit Margin of 23.04% places MLM in the upper quartile for the Construction Materials industry. This signals a strong ability to translate revenue into operating profit, outperforming most of its competitors in core business efficiency.

FNV vs. MLM: A comparison of their Operating Profit Margin (TTM) against their respective Metals & Mining and Construction Materials industry benchmarks.

Profitability at a Glance

SymbolFNVMLM
Return on Equity (TTM)12.62%11.88%
Return on Assets (TTM)11.94%6.25%
Net Profit Margin (TTM)58.82%16.47%
Operating Profit Margin (TTM)71.84%23.04%
Gross Profit Margin (TTM)71.16%29.44%

Financial Strength

Current Ratio (MRQ)

FNV

4.25

Metals & Mining Industry

Max
4.81
Q3
2.86
Median
1.94
Q1
1.45
Min
0.13

FNV’s Current Ratio of 4.25 is in the upper quartile for the Metals & Mining industry. This signifies a strong liquidity position, suggesting the company is well-equipped to cover its immediate liabilities compared to its peers.

MLM

2.35

Construction Materials Industry

Max
5.14
Q3
2.89
Median
1.92
Q1
1.25
Min
0.79

MLM’s Current Ratio of 2.35 aligns with the median group of the Construction Materials industry, indicating that its short-term liquidity is in line with its sector peers.

FNV vs. MLM: A comparison of their Current Ratio (MRQ) against their respective Metals & Mining and Construction Materials industry benchmarks.

Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ)

FNV

0.00

Metals & Mining Industry

Max
1.11
Q3
0.52
Median
0.29
Q1
0.12
Min
0.00

Falling into the lower quartile for the Metals & Mining industry, FNV’s Debt-to-Equity Ratio of 0.00 points to a conservative financing strategy. This results in lower financial risk but potentially limits strategic investments compared to more leveraged competitors.

MLM

0.58

Construction Materials Industry

Max
0.99
Q3
0.72
Median
0.55
Q1
0.30
Min
0.00

MLM’s Debt-to-Equity Ratio of 0.58 is typical for the Construction Materials industry, indicating its use of leverage is in line with the sector norm. This suggests a balanced approach to its capital structure.

FNV vs. MLM: A comparison of their Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ) against their respective Metals & Mining and Construction Materials industry benchmarks.

Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM)

FNV

1,716.60

Metals & Mining Industry

Max
65.47
Q3
29.91
Median
5.88
Q1
0.91
Min
-26.49

With an Interest Coverage Ratio of 1,716.60, FNV demonstrates a superior capacity to service its debt, placing it well above the typical range for the Metals & Mining industry. This stems from either robust earnings or a conservative debt load.

MLM

16.36

Construction Materials Industry

Max
54.89
Q3
34.04
Median
7.92
Q1
4.28
Min
-6.24

MLM’s Interest Coverage Ratio of 16.36 is positioned comfortably within the norm for the Construction Materials industry, indicating a standard and healthy capacity to cover its interest payments.

FNV vs. MLM: A comparison of their Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM) against their respective Metals & Mining and Construction Materials industry benchmarks.

Financial Strength at a Glance

SymbolFNVMLM
Current Ratio (MRQ)4.252.35
Quick Ratio (MRQ)4.231.21
Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ)0.000.58
Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM)1,716.6016.36

Growth

Revenue Growth

FNV vs. MLM: A side-by-side comparison of their Revenue Growth for the MRQ (YoY), TTM (YoY), 3-Year CAGR, and 5-Year CAGR periods.

EPS Growth

FNV vs. MLM: A side-by-side comparison of their EPS Growth for the MRQ (YoY), TTM (YoY), 3-Year CAGR, and 5-Year CAGR periods.

Dividend

Dividend Yield (TTM)

FNV

0.78%

Metals & Mining Industry

Max
9.36%
Q3
3.78%
Median
1.41%
Q1
0.00%
Min
0.00%

FNV’s Dividend Yield of 0.78% is consistent with its peers in the Metals & Mining industry, providing a dividend return that is standard for its sector.

MLM

0.53%

Construction Materials Industry

Max
5.91%
Q3
4.64%
Median
2.57%
Q1
1.11%
Min
0.00%

MLM’s Dividend Yield of 0.53% is in the lower quartile for the Construction Materials industry. This suggests the company’s strategy likely favors retaining earnings for growth over providing a high dividend income.

FNV vs. MLM: A comparison of their Dividend Yield (TTM) against their respective Metals & Mining and Construction Materials industry benchmarks.

Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM)

FNV

33.17%

Metals & Mining Industry

Max
138.08%
Q3
63.28%
Median
38.78%
Q1
12.84%
Min
0.00%

FNV’s Dividend Payout Ratio of 33.17% is within the typical range for the Metals & Mining industry, suggesting a balanced approach between shareholder payouts and company reinvestment.

MLM

17.62%

Construction Materials Industry

Max
174.17%
Q3
91.80%
Median
44.42%
Q1
23.07%
Min
0.00%

MLM’s Dividend Payout Ratio of 17.62% is in the lower quartile for the Construction Materials industry. This suggests a conservative dividend policy, with a strategic focus on reinvesting profits for future growth.

FNV vs. MLM: A comparison of their Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM) against their respective Metals & Mining and Construction Materials industry benchmarks.

Dividend at a Glance

SymbolFNVMLM
Dividend Yield (TTM)0.78%0.53%
Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM)33.17%17.62%

Valuation

Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM)

FNV

42.55

Metals & Mining Industry

Max
57.44
Q3
32.87
Median
18.04
Q1
9.84
Min
0.00

A P/E Ratio of 42.55 places FNV in the upper quartile for the Metals & Mining industry. This high valuation relative to peers suggests the market holds elevated expectations for the company’s future growth.

MLM

33.15

Construction Materials Industry

Max
49.05
Q3
24.51
Median
12.09
Q1
7.70
Min
4.06

A P/E Ratio of 33.15 places MLM in the upper quartile for the Construction Materials industry. This high valuation relative to peers suggests the market holds elevated expectations for the company’s future growth.

FNV vs. MLM: A comparison of their Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM) against their respective Metals & Mining and Construction Materials industry benchmarks.

Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM)

FNV

25.03

Metals & Mining Industry

Max
6.52
Q3
3.19
Median
1.97
Q1
0.59
Min
0.14

With a P/S Ratio of 25.03, FNV trades at a valuation that eclipses even the highest in the Metals & Mining industry. This implies the market has priced in exceptionally optimistic scenarios for future revenue growth, posing considerable valuation risk.

MLM

5.46

Construction Materials Industry

Max
4.03
Q3
2.26
Median
1.31
Q1
0.66
Min
0.19

With a P/S Ratio of 5.46, MLM trades at a valuation that eclipses even the highest in the Construction Materials industry. This implies the market has priced in exceptionally optimistic scenarios for future revenue growth, posing considerable valuation risk.

FNV vs. MLM: A comparison of their Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM) against their respective Metals & Mining and Construction Materials industry benchmarks.

Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ)

FNV

4.70

Metals & Mining Industry

Max
3.92
Q3
2.15
Median
1.40
Q1
0.84
Min
0.25

At 4.70, FNV’s P/B Ratio is at an extreme premium to the Metals & Mining industry. This signifies that the market’s valuation is heavily reliant on future potential rather than its current net asset value, which can be a high-risk proposition.

MLM

3.53

Construction Materials Industry

Max
3.19
Q3
1.80
Median
1.08
Q1
0.72
Min
0.11

At 3.53, MLM’s P/B Ratio is at an extreme premium to the Construction Materials industry. This signifies that the market’s valuation is heavily reliant on future potential rather than its current net asset value, which can be a high-risk proposition.

FNV vs. MLM: A comparison of their Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ) against their respective Metals & Mining and Construction Materials industry benchmarks.

Valuation at a Glance

SymbolFNVMLM
Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM)42.5533.15
Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM)25.035.46
Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ)4.703.53
Price-to-Free Cash Flow Ratio (TTM)74.7037.32