FNF vs. NMR: A Head-to-Head Stock Comparison

Updated on August 22, 2025

Here’s a clear look at FNF and NMR, comparing key factors like historical performance, profitability, financial strength, growth, dividend, and valuation.

Company Profile

FNF is a standard domestic listing, while NMR trades as an American Depositary Receipt (ADR), offering U.S. investors access to its foreign-listed shares.

Symbol	FNF	NMR
Company Name	Fidelity National Financial, Inc.	Nomura Holdings, Inc.
Country	United States	Japan
GICS Sector	Financials	Financials
GICS Industry	Insurance	Capital Markets
Market Capitalization	16.11 billion USD	21.30 billion USD
Exchange	NYSE	NYSE
Listing Date	October 14, 2005	December 17, 2001
Security Type	Common Stock	ADR

Historical Performance

This chart compares the performance of FNF and NMR by tracking the growth of an initial $10,000 investment in each. Use the tabs to select the desired time period. Data is adjusted for dividends and splits.

FNF vs. NMR: Growth of a $10,000 investment over the past one year.

Historical Performance at a Glance

Symbol	FNF	NMR
5-Day Price Return	-1.97%	1.08%
13-Week Price Return	2.17%	25.44%
26-Week Price Return	2.72%	3.96%
52-Week Price Return	3.20%	23.08%
Month-to-Date Return	5.03%	7.16%
Year-to-Date Return	5.58%	15.64%
10-Day Avg. Volume	1.37M	10.71M
3-Month Avg. Volume	1.80M	12.60M
3-Month Volatility	26.63%	20.12%
Beta	1.08	1.48

Profitability

Return on Equity (TTM)

FNF

13.62%

Insurance Industry

Max: 29.03%
Q3: 18.11%
Median: 13.90%
Q1: 10.42%
Min: -0.64%

FNF’s Return on Equity of 13.62% is on par with the norm for the Insurance industry, indicating its profitability relative to shareholder equity is typical for the sector.

NMR

9.87%

Capital Markets Industry

Max: 38.97%
Q3: 21.61%
Median: 13.77%
Q1: 8.31%
Min: -4.25%

NMR’s Return on Equity of 9.87% is on par with the norm for the Capital Markets industry, indicating its profitability relative to shareholder equity is typical for the sector.

FNF vs. NMR: A comparison of their Return on Equity (TTM) against their respective Insurance and Capital Markets industry benchmarks.

Net Profit Margin (TTM)

FNF

7.90%

Insurance Industry

Max: 26.78%
Q3: 14.06%
Median: 9.15%
Q1: 5.48%
Min: -7.05%

FNF’s Net Profit Margin of 7.90% is aligned with the median group of its peers in the Insurance industry. This indicates its ability to convert revenue into profit is typical for the sector.

NMR

7.19%

Capital Markets Industry

Max: 66.67%
Q3: 35.11%
Median: 23.49%
Q1: 13.63%
Min: -15.18%

Falling into the lower quartile for the Capital Markets industry, NMR’s Net Profit Margin of 7.19% indicates weaker profitability. This means the company retains a smaller portion of each dollar in sales as profit compared to its competitors.

FNF vs. NMR: A comparison of their Net Profit Margin (TTM) against their respective Insurance and Capital Markets industry benchmarks.

Operating Profit Margin (TTM)

FNF

12.32%

Insurance Industry

Max: 35.49%
Q3: 19.49%
Median: 14.35%
Q1: 8.53%
Min: -5.25%

In the Insurance industry, Operating Profit Margin is often not the primary measure of operational efficiency.

NMR

9.96%

Capital Markets Industry

Max: 86.40%
Q3: 46.46%
Median: 32.80%
Q1: 18.32%
Min: -21.87%

NMR’s Operating Profit Margin of 9.96% is in the lower quartile for the Capital Markets industry. This indicates weaker profitability from core operations, which may stem from inefficiencies or competitive pressures on pricing.

FNF vs. NMR: A comparison of their Operating Profit Margin (TTM) against their respective Insurance and Capital Markets industry benchmarks.

Profitability at a Glance

Symbol	FNF	NMR
Return on Equity (TTM)	13.62%	9.87%
Return on Assets (TTM)	1.10%	0.58%
Net Profit Margin (TTM)	7.90%	7.19%
Operating Profit Margin (TTM)	12.32%	9.96%
Gross Profit Margin (TTM)	--	39.95%

Financial Strength

Current Ratio (MRQ)

FNF

0.37

Insurance Industry

Max: 2.97
Q3: 1.33
Median: 0.55
Q1: 0.15
Min: 0.00

For the Insurance industry, the Current Ratio is often not the most suitable measure of short-term liquidity.

NMR

0.23

Capital Markets Industry

Max: 3.76
Q3: 1.89
Median: 1.01
Q1: 0.54
Min: -0.41

For the Capital Markets industry, the Current Ratio is often not the most suitable measure of short-term liquidity.

FNF vs. NMR: A comparison of their Current Ratio (MRQ) against their respective Insurance and Capital Markets industry benchmarks.

Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ)

FNF

0.56

Insurance Industry

Max: 1.25
Q3: 0.65
Median: 0.34
Q1: 0.22
Min: 0.00

The Debt-to-Equity Ratio is often not the primary focus for assessing leverage in the Insurance industry.

NMR

10.44

Capital Markets Industry

Max: 6.62
Q3: 2.84
Median: 1.02
Q1: 0.32
Min: 0.00

The Debt-to-Equity Ratio is often not the primary focus for assessing leverage in the Capital Markets industry.

FNF vs. NMR: A comparison of their Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ) against their respective Insurance and Capital Markets industry benchmarks.

Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM)

FNF

9.33

Insurance Industry

Max: 43.68
Q3: 20.84
Median: 9.56
Q1: 3.34
Min: -5.73

The Interest Coverage Ratio is often not a primary indicator of debt servicing capacity in the Insurance industry.

NMR

Capital Markets Industry

Max: 126.03
Q3: 60.98
Median: 11.77
Q1: 4.95
Min: -36.26

The Interest Coverage Ratio is often not a primary indicator of debt servicing capacity in the Capital Markets industry.

FNF vs. NMR: A comparison of their Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM) against their respective Insurance and Capital Markets industry benchmarks.

Financial Strength at a Glance

Symbol	FNF	NMR
Current Ratio (MRQ)	0.37	0.23
Quick Ratio (MRQ)	0.00	0.23
Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ)	0.56	10.44
Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM)	9.33	--

Growth

Revenue Growth

FNF vs. NMR: A side-by-side comparison of their Revenue Growth for the MRQ (YoY), TTM (YoY), 3-Year CAGR, and 5-Year CAGR periods.

EPS Growth

FNF vs. NMR: A side-by-side comparison of their EPS Growth for the MRQ (YoY), TTM (YoY), 3-Year CAGR, and 5-Year CAGR periods.

Dividend

Dividend Yield (TTM)

FNF

3.34%

Insurance Industry

Max: 8.23%
Q3: 4.54%
Median: 3.42%
Q1: 1.97%
Min: 0.00%

FNF’s Dividend Yield of 3.34% is consistent with its peers in the Insurance industry, providing a dividend return that is standard for its sector.

NMR

3.55%

Capital Markets Industry

Max: 10.26%
Q3: 4.86%
Median: 2.78%
Q1: 1.22%
Min: 0.00%

NMR’s Dividend Yield of 3.55% is consistent with its peers in the Capital Markets industry, providing a dividend return that is standard for its sector.

FNF vs. NMR: A comparison of their Dividend Yield (TTM) against their respective Insurance and Capital Markets industry benchmarks.

Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM)

FNF

50.32%

Insurance Industry

Max: 168.02%
Q3: 85.57%
Median: 50.71%
Q1: 22.04%
Min: 0.00%

FNF’s Dividend Payout Ratio of 50.32% is within the typical range for the Insurance industry, suggesting a balanced approach between shareholder payouts and company reinvestment.

NMR

66.06%

Capital Markets Industry

Max: 200.72%
Q3: 101.92%
Median: 57.97%
Q1: 32.36%
Min: 0.00%

NMR’s Dividend Payout Ratio of 66.06% is within the typical range for the Capital Markets industry, suggesting a balanced approach between shareholder payouts and company reinvestment.

FNF vs. NMR: A comparison of their Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM) against their respective Insurance and Capital Markets industry benchmarks.

Dividend at a Glance

Symbol	FNF	NMR
Dividend Yield (TTM)	3.34%	3.55%
Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM)	50.32%	66.06%

Valuation

Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM)

FNF

15.06

Insurance Industry

Max: 28.91
Q3: 17.76
Median: 13.63
Q1: 10.02
Min: 2.89

FNF’s P/E Ratio of 15.06 is within the middle range for the Insurance industry. This suggests its valuation is in line with the sector average, representing neither a significant premium nor a discount compared to its peers.

NMR

9.31

Capital Markets Industry

Max: 58.89
Q3: 31.00
Median: 18.54
Q1: 12.09
Min: 5.24

In the lower quartile for the Capital Markets industry, NMR’s P/E Ratio of 9.31 suggests the stock may be undervalued compared to its peers, potentially presenting an attractive entry point for investors.

FNF vs. NMR: A comparison of their Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM) against their respective Insurance and Capital Markets industry benchmarks.

Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM)

FNF

1.19

Insurance Industry

Max: 3.72
Q3: 1.98
Median: 1.23
Q1: 0.81
Min: 0.23

FNF’s P/S Ratio of 1.19 aligns with the market consensus for the Insurance industry. This suggests its valuation, based on sales, is seen as standard and is on par with its competitors.

NMR

0.67

Capital Markets Industry

Max: 14.49
Q3: 7.41
Median: 4.68
Q1: 2.25
Min: 0.04

In the lower quartile for the Capital Markets industry, NMR’s P/S Ratio of 0.67 indicates its revenue is valued more conservatively than most of its peers. This could present a compelling opportunity if the market has overlooked its sales-generating capabilities.

FNF vs. NMR: A comparison of their Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM) against their respective Insurance and Capital Markets industry benchmarks.

Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ)

FNF

1.95

Insurance Industry

Max: 4.37
Q3: 2.48
Median: 1.68
Q1: 1.19
Min: 0.19

FNF’s P/B Ratio of 1.95 is within the conventional range for the Insurance industry. This shows a balanced market view, where the stock’s price is neither at a significant premium nor a discount to the book value of its peers.

NMR

0.83

Capital Markets Industry

Max: 9.48
Q3: 4.94
Median: 2.42
Q1: 1.21
Min: 0.38

NMR’s P/B Ratio of 0.83 is in the lower quartile for the Capital Markets industry. From a value investing perspective, this is favorable, as it suggests the stock is trading at a discount to its net asset value and may offer a greater margin of safety.

FNF vs. NMR: A comparison of their Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ) against their respective Insurance and Capital Markets industry benchmarks.

Valuation at a Glance

Symbol	FNF	NMR
Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM)	15.06	9.31
Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM)	1.19	0.67
Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ)	1.95	0.83
Price-to-Free Cash Flow Ratio (TTM)	2.41	3.32