FNF vs. MUFG: A Head-to-Head Stock Comparison

Updated on August 22, 2025

Here’s a clear look at FNF and MUFG, comparing key factors like historical performance, profitability, financial strength, growth, dividend, and valuation.

Company Profile

FNF is a standard domestic listing, while MUFG trades as an American Depositary Receipt (ADR), offering U.S. investors access to its foreign-listed shares.

Symbol	FNF	MUFG
Company Name	Fidelity National Financial, Inc.	Mitsubishi UFJ Financial Group, Inc.
Country	United States	Japan
GICS Sector	Financials	Financials
GICS Industry	Insurance	Banks
Market Capitalization	16.11 billion USD	175.11 billion USD
Exchange	NYSE	NYSE
Listing Date	October 14, 2005	April 2, 2001
Security Type	Common Stock	ADR

Historical Performance

This chart compares the performance of FNF and MUFG by tracking the growth of an initial $10,000 investment in each. Use the tabs to select the desired time period. Data is adjusted for dividends and splits.

FNF vs. MUFG: Growth of a $10,000 investment over the past one year.

Historical Performance at a Glance

Symbol	FNF	MUFG
5-Day Price Return	-1.97%	1.28%
13-Week Price Return	2.17%	14.37%
26-Week Price Return	2.72%	17.87%
52-Week Price Return	3.20%	71.92%
Month-to-Date Return	5.03%	6.73%
Year-to-Date Return	5.58%	22.02%
10-Day Avg. Volume	1.37M	55.89M
3-Month Avg. Volume	1.80M	48.08M
3-Month Volatility	26.63%	26.34%
Beta	1.08	0.51

Profitability

Return on Equity (TTM)

FNF

13.62%

Insurance Industry

Max: 29.03%
Q3: 18.11%
Median: 13.90%
Q1: 10.42%
Min: -0.64%

FNF’s Return on Equity of 13.62% is on par with the norm for the Insurance industry, indicating its profitability relative to shareholder equity is typical for the sector.

MUFG

9.14%

Banks Industry

Max: 26.37%
Q3: 15.92%
Median: 12.25%
Q1: 8.69%
Min: 0.15%

MUFG’s Return on Equity of 9.14% is on par with the norm for the Banks industry, indicating its profitability relative to shareholder equity is typical for the sector.

FNF vs. MUFG: A comparison of their Return on Equity (TTM) against their respective Insurance and Banks industry benchmarks.

Net Profit Margin (TTM)

FNF

7.90%

Insurance Industry

Max: 26.78%
Q3: 14.06%
Median: 9.15%
Q1: 5.48%
Min: -7.05%

FNF’s Net Profit Margin of 7.90% is aligned with the median group of its peers in the Insurance industry. This indicates its ability to convert revenue into profit is typical for the sector.

MUFG

25.66%

Banks Industry

Max: 54.20%
Q3: 35.70%
Median: 28.97%
Q1: 22.53%
Min: 6.98%

MUFG’s Net Profit Margin of 25.66% is aligned with the median group of its peers in the Banks industry. This indicates its ability to convert revenue into profit is typical for the sector.

FNF vs. MUFG: A comparison of their Net Profit Margin (TTM) against their respective Insurance and Banks industry benchmarks.

Operating Profit Margin (TTM)

FNF

12.32%

Insurance Industry

Max: 35.49%
Q3: 19.49%
Median: 14.35%
Q1: 8.53%
Min: -5.25%

In the Insurance industry, Operating Profit Margin is often not the primary measure of operational efficiency.

MUFG

30.87%

Banks Industry

Max: 63.35%
Q3: 44.59%
Median: 37.24%
Q1: 28.25%
Min: 13.37%

MUFG’s Operating Profit Margin of 30.87% is around the midpoint for the Banks industry, indicating that its efficiency in managing core business operations is typical for the sector.

FNF vs. MUFG: A comparison of their Operating Profit Margin (TTM) against their respective Insurance and Banks industry benchmarks.

Profitability at a Glance

Symbol	FNF	MUFG
Return on Equity (TTM)	13.62%	9.14%
Return on Assets (TTM)	1.10%	0.46%
Net Profit Margin (TTM)	7.90%	25.66%
Operating Profit Margin (TTM)	12.32%	30.87%
Gross Profit Margin (TTM)	--	--

Financial Strength

Current Ratio (MRQ)

FNF

0.37

Insurance Industry

Max: 2.97
Q3: 1.33
Median: 0.55
Q1: 0.15
Min: 0.00

For the Insurance industry, the Current Ratio is often not the most suitable measure of short-term liquidity.

MUFG

Banks Industry

Max: --
Q3: --
Median: --
Q1: --
Min: --

For the Banks industry, the Current Ratio is often not the most suitable measure of short-term liquidity.

FNF vs. MUFG: A comparison of their Current Ratio (MRQ) against their respective Insurance and Banks industry benchmarks.

Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ)

FNF

0.56

Insurance Industry

Max: 1.25
Q3: 0.65
Median: 0.34
Q1: 0.22
Min: 0.00

The Debt-to-Equity Ratio is often not the primary focus for assessing leverage in the Insurance industry.

MUFG

4.75

Banks Industry

Max: 4.75
Q3: 2.62
Median: 1.02
Q1: 0.39
Min: 0.00

The Debt-to-Equity Ratio is often not the primary focus for assessing leverage in the Banks industry.

FNF vs. MUFG: A comparison of their Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ) against their respective Insurance and Banks industry benchmarks.

Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM)

FNF

9.33

Insurance Industry

Max: 43.68
Q3: 20.84
Median: 9.56
Q1: 3.34
Min: -5.73

The Interest Coverage Ratio is often not a primary indicator of debt servicing capacity in the Insurance industry.

MUFG

Banks Industry

Max: --
Q3: --
Median: --
Q1: --
Min: --

The Interest Coverage Ratio is often not a primary indicator of debt servicing capacity in the Banks industry.

FNF vs. MUFG: A comparison of their Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM) against their respective Insurance and Banks industry benchmarks.

Financial Strength at a Glance

Symbol	FNF	MUFG
Current Ratio (MRQ)	0.37	--
Quick Ratio (MRQ)	0.00	--
Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ)	0.56	4.75
Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM)	9.33	--

Growth

Revenue Growth

FNF vs. MUFG: A side-by-side comparison of their Revenue Growth for the MRQ (YoY), TTM (YoY), 3-Year CAGR, and 5-Year CAGR periods.

EPS Growth

FNF vs. MUFG: A side-by-side comparison of their EPS Growth for the MRQ (YoY), TTM (YoY), 3-Year CAGR, and 5-Year CAGR periods.

Dividend

Dividend Yield (TTM)

FNF

3.34%

Insurance Industry

Max: 8.23%
Q3: 4.54%
Median: 3.42%
Q1: 1.97%
Min: 0.00%

FNF’s Dividend Yield of 3.34% is consistent with its peers in the Insurance industry, providing a dividend return that is standard for its sector.

MUFG

2.09%

Banks Industry

Max: 10.27%
Q3: 5.83%
Median: 3.81%
Q1: 2.50%
Min: 0.00%

MUFG’s Dividend Yield of 2.09% is in the lower quartile for the Banks industry. This suggests the company’s strategy likely favors retaining earnings for growth over providing a high dividend income.

FNF vs. MUFG: A comparison of their Dividend Yield (TTM) against their respective Insurance and Banks industry benchmarks.

Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM)

FNF

50.32%

Insurance Industry

Max: 168.02%
Q3: 85.57%
Median: 50.71%
Q1: 22.04%
Min: 0.00%

FNF’s Dividend Payout Ratio of 50.32% is within the typical range for the Insurance industry, suggesting a balanced approach between shareholder payouts and company reinvestment.

MUFG

65.29%

Banks Industry

Max: 147.07%
Q3: 80.55%
Median: 54.40%
Q1: 35.71%
Min: 0.00%

MUFG’s Dividend Payout Ratio of 65.29% is within the typical range for the Banks industry, suggesting a balanced approach between shareholder payouts and company reinvestment.

FNF vs. MUFG: A comparison of their Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM) against their respective Insurance and Banks industry benchmarks.

Dividend at a Glance

Symbol	FNF	MUFG
Dividend Yield (TTM)	3.34%	2.09%
Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM)	50.32%	65.29%

Valuation

Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM)

FNF

15.06

Insurance Industry

Max: 28.91
Q3: 17.76
Median: 13.63
Q1: 10.02
Min: 2.89

FNF’s P/E Ratio of 15.06 is within the middle range for the Insurance industry. This suggests its valuation is in line with the sector average, representing neither a significant premium nor a discount compared to its peers.

MUFG

13.68

Banks Industry

Max: 20.05
Q3: 12.65
Median: 10.21
Q1: 7.54
Min: 2.74

A P/E Ratio of 13.68 places MUFG in the upper quartile for the Banks industry. This high valuation relative to peers suggests the market holds elevated expectations for the company’s future growth.

FNF vs. MUFG: A comparison of their Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM) against their respective Insurance and Banks industry benchmarks.

Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM)

FNF

1.19

Insurance Industry

Max: 3.72
Q3: 1.98
Median: 1.23
Q1: 0.81
Min: 0.23

FNF’s P/S Ratio of 1.19 aligns with the market consensus for the Insurance industry. This suggests its valuation, based on sales, is seen as standard and is on par with its competitors.

MUFG

2.18

Banks Industry

Max: 5.06
Q3: 2.98
Median: 2.24
Q1: 1.59
Min: 0.45

The P/S Ratio is often not a primary valuation tool in the Banks industry.

FNF vs. MUFG: A comparison of their Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM) against their respective Insurance and Banks industry benchmarks.

Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ)

FNF

1.95

Insurance Industry

Max: 4.37
Q3: 2.48
Median: 1.68
Q1: 1.19
Min: 0.19

FNF’s P/B Ratio of 1.95 is within the conventional range for the Insurance industry. This shows a balanced market view, where the stock’s price is neither at a significant premium nor a discount to the book value of its peers.

MUFG

1.18

Banks Industry

Max: 2.18
Q3: 1.36
Median: 1.09
Q1: 0.81
Min: 0.20

MUFG’s P/B Ratio of 1.18 is within the conventional range for the Banks industry. This shows a balanced market view, where the stock’s price is neither at a significant premium nor a discount to the book value of its peers.

FNF vs. MUFG: A comparison of their Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ) against their respective Insurance and Banks industry benchmarks.

Valuation at a Glance

Symbol	FNF	MUFG
Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM)	15.06	13.68
Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM)	1.19	2.18
Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ)	1.95	1.18
Price-to-Free Cash Flow Ratio (TTM)	2.41	4.45