Seek Returns logo

FND vs. TPR: A Head-to-Head Stock Comparison

Updated on

Here’s a clear look at FND and TPR, comparing key factors like historical performance, profitability, financial strength, growth, dividend, and valuation.

Company Profile

SymbolFNDTPR
Company NameFloor & Decor Holdings, Inc.Tapestry, Inc.
CountryUnited StatesUnited States
GICS SectorConsumer DiscretionaryConsumer Discretionary
GICS IndustrySpecialty RetailTextiles, Apparel & Luxury Goods
Market Capitalization8.83 billion USD20.58 billion USD
ExchangeNYSENYSE
Listing DateApril 27, 2017October 6, 2000
Security TypeCommon StockCommon Stock

Historical Performance

This chart compares the performance of FND and TPR by tracking the growth of an initial $10,000 investment in each. Use the tabs to select the desired time period. Data is adjusted for dividends and splits.

FND vs. TPR: Growth of a $10,000 investment over the past one year.

Historical Performance at a Glance

SymbolFNDTPR
5-Day Price Return-0.50%3.32%
13-Week Price Return3.55%20.03%
26-Week Price Return-16.25%14.12%
52-Week Price Return-23.57%143.64%
Month-to-Date Return6.95%-8.48%
Year-to-Date Return-17.78%51.34%
10-Day Avg. Volume2.22M5.67M
3-Month Avg. Volume2.09M4.18M
3-Month Volatility41.88%46.94%
Beta1.731.62

Profitability

Return on Equity (TTM)

FND

9.60%

Specialty Retail Industry

Max
61.19%
Q3
37.24%
Median
18.81%
Q1
8.92%
Min
-13.03%

FND’s Return on Equity of 9.60% is on par with the norm for the Specialty Retail industry, indicating its profitability relative to shareholder equity is typical for the sector.

TPR

10.99%

Textiles, Apparel & Luxury Goods Industry

Max
53.33%
Q3
26.13%
Median
18.47%
Q1
7.99%
Min
-10.49%

TPR’s Return on Equity of 10.99% is on par with the norm for the Textiles, Apparel & Luxury Goods industry, indicating its profitability relative to shareholder equity is typical for the sector.

FND vs. TPR: A comparison of their Return on Equity (TTM) against their respective Specialty Retail and Textiles, Apparel & Luxury Goods industry benchmarks.

Net Profit Margin (TTM)

FND

4.59%

Specialty Retail Industry

Max
21.28%
Q3
10.68%
Median
6.08%
Q1
2.43%
Min
-4.54%

FND’s Net Profit Margin of 4.59% is aligned with the median group of its peers in the Specialty Retail industry. This indicates its ability to convert revenue into profit is typical for the sector.

TPR

2.61%

Textiles, Apparel & Luxury Goods Industry

Max
23.35%
Q3
13.49%
Median
8.45%
Q1
4.18%
Min
-3.90%

Falling into the lower quartile for the Textiles, Apparel & Luxury Goods industry, TPR’s Net Profit Margin of 2.61% indicates weaker profitability. This means the company retains a smaller portion of each dollar in sales as profit compared to its competitors.

FND vs. TPR: A comparison of their Net Profit Margin (TTM) against their respective Specialty Retail and Textiles, Apparel & Luxury Goods industry benchmarks.

Operating Profit Margin (TTM)

FND

5.91%

Specialty Retail Industry

Max
33.35%
Q3
15.84%
Median
9.34%
Q1
3.83%
Min
-8.97%

FND’s Operating Profit Margin of 5.91% is around the midpoint for the Specialty Retail industry, indicating that its efficiency in managing core business operations is typical for the sector.

TPR

4.21%

Textiles, Apparel & Luxury Goods Industry

Max
29.47%
Q3
20.87%
Median
13.00%
Q1
7.02%
Min
-3.59%

TPR’s Operating Profit Margin of 4.21% is in the lower quartile for the Textiles, Apparel & Luxury Goods industry. This indicates weaker profitability from core operations, which may stem from inefficiencies or competitive pressures on pricing.

FND vs. TPR: A comparison of their Operating Profit Margin (TTM) against their respective Specialty Retail and Textiles, Apparel & Luxury Goods industry benchmarks.

Profitability at a Glance

SymbolFNDTPR
Return on Equity (TTM)9.60%10.99%
Return on Assets (TTM)4.07%2.10%
Net Profit Margin (TTM)4.59%2.61%
Operating Profit Margin (TTM)5.91%4.21%
Gross Profit Margin (TTM)43.65%75.44%

Financial Strength

Current Ratio (MRQ)

FND

1.25

Specialty Retail Industry

Max
2.83
Q3
1.89
Median
1.39
Q1
1.11
Min
0.64

FND’s Current Ratio of 1.25 aligns with the median group of the Specialty Retail industry, indicating that its short-term liquidity is in line with its sector peers.

TPR

1.87

Textiles, Apparel & Luxury Goods Industry

Max
3.91
Q3
2.49
Median
1.89
Q1
1.43
Min
0.80

TPR’s Current Ratio of 1.87 aligns with the median group of the Textiles, Apparel & Luxury Goods industry, indicating that its short-term liquidity is in line with its sector peers.

FND vs. TPR: A comparison of their Current Ratio (MRQ) against their respective Specialty Retail and Textiles, Apparel & Luxury Goods industry benchmarks.

Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ)

FND

0.09

Specialty Retail Industry

Max
3.02
Q3
1.57
Median
0.64
Q1
0.20
Min
0.00

Falling into the lower quartile for the Specialty Retail industry, FND’s Debt-to-Equity Ratio of 0.09 points to a conservative financing strategy. This results in lower financial risk but potentially limits strategic investments compared to more leveraged competitors.

TPR

2.79

Textiles, Apparel & Luxury Goods Industry

Max
2.67
Q3
1.29
Median
0.59
Q1
0.24
Min
0.00

With a Debt-to-Equity Ratio of 2.79, TPR operates with exceptionally high leverage compared to the Textiles, Apparel & Luxury Goods industry norm. This suggests an aggressive reliance on debt financing, which can magnify returns but also significantly elevates financial risk.

FND vs. TPR: A comparison of their Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ) against their respective Specialty Retail and Textiles, Apparel & Luxury Goods industry benchmarks.

Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM)

FND

92.38

Specialty Retail Industry

Max
48.12
Q3
35.95
Median
14.13
Q1
3.61
Min
-36.00

With an Interest Coverage Ratio of 92.38, FND demonstrates a superior capacity to service its debt, placing it well above the typical range for the Specialty Retail industry. This stems from either robust earnings or a conservative debt load.

TPR

3.53

Textiles, Apparel & Luxury Goods Industry

Max
57.00
Q3
35.85
Median
9.20
Q1
4.29
Min
-32.49

In the lower quartile for the Textiles, Apparel & Luxury Goods industry, TPR’s Interest Coverage Ratio of 3.53 indicates a tighter cushion for servicing debt, suggesting less financial flexibility than many of its competitors.

FND vs. TPR: A comparison of their Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM) against their respective Specialty Retail and Textiles, Apparel & Luxury Goods industry benchmarks.

Financial Strength at a Glance

SymbolFNDTPR
Current Ratio (MRQ)1.251.87
Quick Ratio (MRQ)0.231.23
Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ)0.092.79
Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM)92.383.53

Growth

Revenue Growth

FND vs. TPR: A side-by-side comparison of their Revenue Growth for the MRQ (YoY), TTM (YoY), 3-Year CAGR, and 5-Year CAGR periods.

EPS Growth

FND vs. TPR: A side-by-side comparison of their EPS Growth for the MRQ (YoY), TTM (YoY), 3-Year CAGR, and 5-Year CAGR periods.

Dividend

Dividend Yield (TTM)

FND

0.00%

Specialty Retail Industry

Max
6.53%
Q3
2.69%
Median
1.08%
Q1
0.00%
Min
0.00%

FND currently does not pay a dividend, resulting in a yield of 0%. This is a common strategy for growth-focused companies that prioritize reinvesting earnings, though it may be less typical in mature, income-oriented sectors.

TPR

1.46%

Textiles, Apparel & Luxury Goods Industry

Max
6.59%
Q3
3.60%
Median
2.59%
Q1
0.95%
Min
0.00%

TPR’s Dividend Yield of 1.46% is consistent with its peers in the Textiles, Apparel & Luxury Goods industry, providing a dividend return that is standard for its sector.

FND vs. TPR: A comparison of their Dividend Yield (TTM) against their respective Specialty Retail and Textiles, Apparel & Luxury Goods industry benchmarks.

Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM)

FND

0.00%

Specialty Retail Industry

Max
165.81%
Q3
80.94%
Median
31.61%
Q1
0.00%
Min
0.00%

FND has a Dividend Payout Ratio of 0%, indicating it does not currently pay a dividend. This is a common strategy for growth-oriented companies that reinvest all profits back into the business.

TPR

35.71%

Textiles, Apparel & Luxury Goods Industry

Max
195.44%
Q3
106.47%
Median
58.77%
Q1
36.52%
Min
0.00%

TPR’s Dividend Payout Ratio of 35.71% is in the lower quartile for the Textiles, Apparel & Luxury Goods industry. This suggests a conservative dividend policy, with a strategic focus on reinvesting profits for future growth.

FND vs. TPR: A comparison of their Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM) against their respective Specialty Retail and Textiles, Apparel & Luxury Goods industry benchmarks.

Dividend at a Glance

SymbolFNDTPR
Dividend Yield (TTM)0.00%1.46%
Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM)0.00%35.71%

Valuation

Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM)

FND

42.33

Specialty Retail Industry

Max
48.56
Q3
29.15
Median
22.00
Q1
15.46
Min
7.95

A P/E Ratio of 42.33 places FND in the upper quartile for the Specialty Retail industry. This high valuation relative to peers suggests the market holds elevated expectations for the company’s future growth.

TPR

111.89

Textiles, Apparel & Luxury Goods Industry

Max
63.29
Q3
34.64
Median
18.01
Q1
13.88
Min
6.04

At 111.89, TPR’s P/E Ratio is exceptionally high, exceeding the typical maximum for the Textiles, Apparel & Luxury Goods industry. This suggests the stock may be significantly overvalued compared to its peers and implies high market expectations that could be difficult to meet.

FND vs. TPR: A comparison of their Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM) against their respective Specialty Retail and Textiles, Apparel & Luxury Goods industry benchmarks.

Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM)

FND

1.94

Specialty Retail Industry

Max
5.08
Q3
2.69
Median
1.23
Q1
0.48
Min
0.09

FND’s P/S Ratio of 1.94 aligns with the market consensus for the Specialty Retail industry. This suggests its valuation, based on sales, is seen as standard and is on par with its competitors.

TPR

2.92

Textiles, Apparel & Luxury Goods Industry

Max
5.46
Q3
3.13
Median
1.72
Q1
0.83
Min
0.26

TPR’s P/S Ratio of 2.92 aligns with the market consensus for the Textiles, Apparel & Luxury Goods industry. This suggests its valuation, based on sales, is seen as standard and is on par with its competitors.

FND vs. TPR: A comparison of their Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM) against their respective Specialty Retail and Textiles, Apparel & Luxury Goods industry benchmarks.

Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ)

FND

3.55

Specialty Retail Industry

Max
16.93
Q3
7.98
Median
3.69
Q1
1.79
Min
0.21

FND’s P/B Ratio of 3.55 is within the conventional range for the Specialty Retail industry. This shows a balanced market view, where the stock’s price is neither at a significant premium nor a discount to the book value of its peers.

TPR

21.26

Textiles, Apparel & Luxury Goods Industry

Max
9.76
Q3
6.00
Median
3.26
Q1
1.97
Min
0.69

At 21.26, TPR’s P/B Ratio is at an extreme premium to the Textiles, Apparel & Luxury Goods industry. This signifies that the market’s valuation is heavily reliant on future potential rather than its current net asset value, which can be a high-risk proposition.

FND vs. TPR: A comparison of their Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ) against their respective Specialty Retail and Textiles, Apparel & Luxury Goods industry benchmarks.

Valuation at a Glance

SymbolFNDTPR
Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM)42.33111.89
Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM)1.942.92
Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ)3.5521.26
Price-to-Free Cash Flow Ratio (TTM)71.5619.15