Seek Returns logo

FND vs. NCLH: A Head-to-Head Stock Comparison

Updated on

Here’s a clear look at FND and NCLH, comparing key factors like historical performance, profitability, financial strength, growth, dividend, and valuation.

Company Profile

SymbolFNDNCLH
Company NameFloor & Decor Holdings, Inc.Norwegian Cruise Line Holdings Ltd.
CountryUnited StatesUnited States
GICS SectorConsumer DiscretionaryConsumer Discretionary
GICS IndustrySpecialty RetailHotels, Restaurants & Leisure
Market Capitalization7.93 billion USD11.07 billion USD
ExchangeNYSENYSE
Listing DateApril 27, 2017January 18, 2013
Security TypeCommon StockCommon Stock

Historical Performance

This chart compares the performance of FND and NCLH by tracking the growth of an initial $10,000 investment in each. Use the tabs to select the desired time period. Data is adjusted for dividends and splits.

FND vs. NCLH: Growth of a $10,000 investment over the past one year.

Historical Performance at a Glance

SymbolFNDNCLH
5-Day Price Return-2.07%-1.74%
13-Week Price Return-10.25%10.65%
26-Week Price Return-8.46%28.27%
52-Week Price Return-39.01%22.46%
Month-to-Date Return-0.05%-1.26%
Year-to-Date Return-26.12%-5.48%
10-Day Avg. Volume2.17M11.60M
3-Month Avg. Volume2.01M15.01M
3-Month Volatility46.78%40.15%
Beta1.792.11

Profitability

Return on Equity (TTM)

FND

9.60%

Specialty Retail Industry

Max
64.63%
Q3
37.13%
Median
19.07%
Q1
10.79%
Min
-16.66%

FND’s Return on Equity of 9.60% is in the lower quartile for the Specialty Retail industry. This indicates a less efficient generation of profit from its equity base when compared to its competitors.

NCLH

51.86%

Hotels, Restaurants & Leisure Industry

Max
84.03%
Q3
40.12%
Median
17.38%
Q1
7.45%
Min
-33.94%

In the upper quartile for the Hotels, Restaurants & Leisure industry, NCLH’s Return on Equity of 51.86% signals a highly effective use of shareholder capital to drive profitability compared to most of its peers.

FND vs. NCLH: A comparison of their Return on Equity (TTM) against their respective Specialty Retail and Hotels, Restaurants & Leisure industry benchmarks.

Net Profit Margin (TTM)

FND

4.59%

Specialty Retail Industry

Max
21.04%
Q3
10.99%
Median
6.08%
Q1
2.46%
Min
-4.37%

FND’s Net Profit Margin of 4.59% is aligned with the median group of its peers in the Specialty Retail industry. This indicates its ability to convert revenue into profit is typical for the sector.

NCLH

7.52%

Hotels, Restaurants & Leisure Industry

Max
25.61%
Q3
14.65%
Median
8.66%
Q1
3.36%
Min
-9.83%

NCLH’s Net Profit Margin of 7.52% is aligned with the median group of its peers in the Hotels, Restaurants & Leisure industry. This indicates its ability to convert revenue into profit is typical for the sector.

FND vs. NCLH: A comparison of their Net Profit Margin (TTM) against their respective Specialty Retail and Hotels, Restaurants & Leisure industry benchmarks.

Operating Profit Margin (TTM)

FND

5.91%

Specialty Retail Industry

Max
33.35%
Q3
16.40%
Median
9.28%
Q1
4.05%
Min
-10.63%

FND’s Operating Profit Margin of 5.91% is around the midpoint for the Specialty Retail industry, indicating that its efficiency in managing core business operations is typical for the sector.

NCLH

14.77%

Hotels, Restaurants & Leisure Industry

Max
45.80%
Q3
22.44%
Median
14.98%
Q1
6.59%
Min
-15.28%

NCLH’s Operating Profit Margin of 14.77% is around the midpoint for the Hotels, Restaurants & Leisure industry, indicating that its efficiency in managing core business operations is typical for the sector.

FND vs. NCLH: A comparison of their Operating Profit Margin (TTM) against their respective Specialty Retail and Hotels, Restaurants & Leisure industry benchmarks.

Profitability at a Glance

SymbolFNDNCLH
Return on Equity (TTM)9.60%51.86%
Return on Assets (TTM)4.07%3.48%
Net Profit Margin (TTM)4.59%7.52%
Operating Profit Margin (TTM)5.91%14.77%
Gross Profit Margin (TTM)43.65%41.35%

Financial Strength

Current Ratio (MRQ)

FND

1.25

Specialty Retail Industry

Max
2.72
Q3
1.81
Median
1.38
Q1
1.15
Min
0.52

FND’s Current Ratio of 1.25 aligns with the median group of the Specialty Retail industry, indicating that its short-term liquidity is in line with its sector peers.

NCLH

0.18

Hotels, Restaurants & Leisure Industry

Max
2.73
Q3
1.63
Median
1.12
Q1
0.73
Min
0.18

NCLH’s Current Ratio of 0.18 falls into the lower quartile for the Hotels, Restaurants & Leisure industry. This indicates a tighter liquidity situation and a more constrained capacity to handle short-term debt than many of its competitors.

FND vs. NCLH: A comparison of their Current Ratio (MRQ) against their respective Specialty Retail and Hotels, Restaurants & Leisure industry benchmarks.

Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ)

FND

0.09

Specialty Retail Industry

Max
3.44
Q3
1.57
Median
0.60
Q1
0.22
Min
0.00

Falling into the lower quartile for the Specialty Retail industry, FND’s Debt-to-Equity Ratio of 0.09 points to a conservative financing strategy. This results in lower financial risk but potentially limits strategic investments compared to more leveraged competitors.

NCLH

8.77

Hotels, Restaurants & Leisure Industry

Max
11.29
Q3
4.71
Median
1.65
Q1
0.27
Min
0.00

NCLH’s leverage is in the upper quartile of the Hotels, Restaurants & Leisure industry, with a Debt-to-Equity Ratio of 8.77. While this approach can boost equity growth, it also exposes the company to greater financial vulnerability.

FND vs. NCLH: A comparison of their Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ) against their respective Specialty Retail and Hotels, Restaurants & Leisure industry benchmarks.

Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM)

FND

92.38

Specialty Retail Industry

Max
48.12
Q3
39.12
Median
14.13
Q1
3.63
Min
-36.00

With an Interest Coverage Ratio of 92.38, FND demonstrates a superior capacity to service its debt, placing it well above the typical range for the Specialty Retail industry. This stems from either robust earnings or a conservative debt load.

NCLH

2.16

Hotels, Restaurants & Leisure Industry

Max
21.72
Q3
11.40
Median
4.02
Q1
1.19
Min
-11.84

NCLH’s Interest Coverage Ratio of 2.16 is positioned comfortably within the norm for the Hotels, Restaurants & Leisure industry, indicating a standard and healthy capacity to cover its interest payments.

FND vs. NCLH: A comparison of their Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM) against their respective Specialty Retail and Hotels, Restaurants & Leisure industry benchmarks.

Financial Strength at a Glance

SymbolFNDNCLH
Current Ratio (MRQ)1.250.18
Quick Ratio (MRQ)0.230.07
Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ)0.098.77
Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM)92.382.16

Growth

Revenue Growth

FND vs. NCLH: A side-by-side comparison of their Revenue Growth for the MRQ (YoY), TTM (YoY), 3-Year CAGR, and 5-Year CAGR periods.

EPS Growth

FND vs. NCLH: A side-by-side comparison of their EPS Growth for the MRQ (YoY), TTM (YoY), 3-Year CAGR, and 5-Year CAGR periods.

Dividend

Dividend Yield (TTM)

FND

0.00%

Specialty Retail Industry

Max
6.48%
Q3
2.84%
Median
1.04%
Q1
0.00%
Min
0.00%

FND currently does not pay a dividend, resulting in a yield of 0%. This is a common strategy for growth-focused companies that prioritize reinvesting earnings, though it may be less typical in mature, income-oriented sectors.

NCLH

0.00%

Hotels, Restaurants & Leisure Industry

Max
6.81%
Q3
2.73%
Median
0.74%
Q1
0.00%
Min
0.00%

NCLH currently does not pay a dividend, resulting in a yield of 0%. This is a common strategy for growth-focused companies that prioritize reinvesting earnings, though it may be less typical in mature, income-oriented sectors.

FND vs. NCLH: A comparison of their Dividend Yield (TTM) against their respective Specialty Retail and Hotels, Restaurants & Leisure industry benchmarks.

Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM)

FND

0.00%

Specialty Retail Industry

Max
192.64%
Q3
79.43%
Median
26.55%
Q1
0.00%
Min
0.00%

FND has a Dividend Payout Ratio of 0%, indicating it does not currently pay a dividend. This is a common strategy for growth-oriented companies that reinvest all profits back into the business.

NCLH

0.00%

Hotels, Restaurants & Leisure Industry

Max
128.39%
Q3
61.60%
Median
21.91%
Q1
0.00%
Min
0.00%

NCLH has a Dividend Payout Ratio of 0%, indicating it does not currently pay a dividend. This is a common strategy for growth-oriented companies that reinvest all profits back into the business.

FND vs. NCLH: A comparison of their Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM) against their respective Specialty Retail and Hotels, Restaurants & Leisure industry benchmarks.

Dividend at a Glance

SymbolFNDNCLH
Dividend Yield (TTM)0.00%0.00%
Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM)0.00%0.00%

Valuation

Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM)

FND

37.78

Specialty Retail Industry

Max
47.04
Q3
27.74
Median
23.51
Q1
13.77
Min
7.47

A P/E Ratio of 37.78 places FND in the upper quartile for the Specialty Retail industry. This high valuation relative to peers suggests the market holds elevated expectations for the company’s future growth.

NCLH

15.36

Hotels, Restaurants & Leisure Industry

Max
56.96
Q3
33.82
Median
21.30
Q1
15.75
Min
6.06

In the lower quartile for the Hotels, Restaurants & Leisure industry, NCLH’s P/E Ratio of 15.36 suggests the stock may be undervalued compared to its peers, potentially presenting an attractive entry point for investors.

FND vs. NCLH: A comparison of their Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM) against their respective Specialty Retail and Hotels, Restaurants & Leisure industry benchmarks.

Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM)

FND

1.73

Specialty Retail Industry

Max
5.77
Q3
2.79
Median
1.21
Q1
0.53
Min
0.09

FND’s P/S Ratio of 1.73 aligns with the market consensus for the Specialty Retail industry. This suggests its valuation, based on sales, is seen as standard and is on par with its competitors.

NCLH

1.16

Hotels, Restaurants & Leisure Industry

Max
7.19
Q3
3.99
Median
1.93
Q1
1.26
Min
0.17

In the lower quartile for the Hotels, Restaurants & Leisure industry, NCLH’s P/S Ratio of 1.16 indicates its revenue is valued more conservatively than most of its peers. This could present a compelling opportunity if the market has overlooked its sales-generating capabilities.

FND vs. NCLH: A comparison of their Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM) against their respective Specialty Retail and Hotels, Restaurants & Leisure industry benchmarks.

Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ)

FND

3.55

Specialty Retail Industry

Max
16.93
Q3
7.92
Median
3.98
Q1
1.86
Min
0.55

FND’s P/B Ratio of 3.55 is within the conventional range for the Specialty Retail industry. This shows a balanced market view, where the stock’s price is neither at a significant premium nor a discount to the book value of its peers.

NCLH

5.77

Hotels, Restaurants & Leisure Industry

Max
24.89
Q3
11.60
Median
4.91
Q1
2.29
Min
0.37

NCLH’s P/B Ratio of 5.77 is within the conventional range for the Hotels, Restaurants & Leisure industry. This shows a balanced market view, where the stock’s price is neither at a significant premium nor a discount to the book value of its peers.

FND vs. NCLH: A comparison of their Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ) against their respective Specialty Retail and Hotels, Restaurants & Leisure industry benchmarks.

Valuation at a Glance

SymbolFNDNCLH
Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM)37.7815.36
Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM)1.731.16
Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ)3.555.77
Price-to-Free Cash Flow Ratio (TTM)63.8720.57