Seek Returns logo

FND vs. LULU: A Head-to-Head Stock Comparison

Updated on

Here’s a clear look at FND and LULU, comparing key factors like historical performance, profitability, financial strength, growth, dividend, and valuation.

Company Profile

SymbolFNDLULU
Company NameFloor & Decor Holdings, Inc.lululemon athletica inc.
CountryUnited StatesCanada
GICS SectorConsumer DiscretionaryConsumer Discretionary
GICS IndustrySpecialty RetailTextiles, Apparel & Luxury Goods
Market Capitalization8.83 billion USD23.74 billion USD
ExchangeNYSENasdaqGS
Listing DateApril 27, 2017July 27, 2007
Security TypeCommon StockCommon Stock

Historical Performance

This chart compares the performance of FND and LULU by tracking the growth of an initial $10,000 investment in each. Use the tabs to select the desired time period. Data is adjusted for dividends and splits.

FND vs. LULU: Growth of a $10,000 investment over the past one year.

Historical Performance at a Glance

SymbolFNDLULU
5-Day Price Return-0.50%1.50%
13-Week Price Return3.55%-38.80%
26-Week Price Return-16.25%-49.31%
52-Week Price Return-23.57%-23.54%
Month-to-Date Return6.95%-1.20%
Year-to-Date Return-17.78%-48.19%
10-Day Avg. Volume2.22M3.75M
3-Month Avg. Volume2.09M2.99M
3-Month Volatility41.88%50.78%
Beta1.731.10

Profitability

Return on Equity (TTM)

FND

9.60%

Specialty Retail Industry

Max
61.19%
Q3
37.24%
Median
18.81%
Q1
8.92%
Min
-13.03%

FND’s Return on Equity of 9.60% is on par with the norm for the Specialty Retail industry, indicating its profitability relative to shareholder equity is typical for the sector.

LULU

43.48%

Textiles, Apparel & Luxury Goods Industry

Max
53.33%
Q3
26.13%
Median
18.47%
Q1
7.99%
Min
-10.49%

In the upper quartile for the Textiles, Apparel & Luxury Goods industry, LULU’s Return on Equity of 43.48% signals a highly effective use of shareholder capital to drive profitability compared to most of its peers.

FND vs. LULU: A comparison of their Return on Equity (TTM) against their respective Specialty Retail and Textiles, Apparel & Luxury Goods industry benchmarks.

Net Profit Margin (TTM)

FND

4.59%

Specialty Retail Industry

Max
21.28%
Q3
10.68%
Median
6.08%
Q1
2.43%
Min
-4.54%

FND’s Net Profit Margin of 4.59% is aligned with the median group of its peers in the Specialty Retail industry. This indicates its ability to convert revenue into profit is typical for the sector.

LULU

16.82%

Textiles, Apparel & Luxury Goods Industry

Max
23.35%
Q3
13.49%
Median
8.45%
Q1
4.18%
Min
-3.90%

A Net Profit Margin of 16.82% places LULU in the upper quartile for the Textiles, Apparel & Luxury Goods industry, signifying strong profitability and more effective cost management than most of its peers.

FND vs. LULU: A comparison of their Net Profit Margin (TTM) against their respective Specialty Retail and Textiles, Apparel & Luxury Goods industry benchmarks.

Operating Profit Margin (TTM)

FND

5.91%

Specialty Retail Industry

Max
33.35%
Q3
15.84%
Median
9.34%
Q1
3.83%
Min
-8.97%

FND’s Operating Profit Margin of 5.91% is around the midpoint for the Specialty Retail industry, indicating that its efficiency in managing core business operations is typical for the sector.

LULU

23.36%

Textiles, Apparel & Luxury Goods Industry

Max
29.47%
Q3
20.87%
Median
13.00%
Q1
7.02%
Min
-3.59%

An Operating Profit Margin of 23.36% places LULU in the upper quartile for the Textiles, Apparel & Luxury Goods industry. This signals a strong ability to translate revenue into operating profit, outperforming most of its competitors in core business efficiency.

FND vs. LULU: A comparison of their Operating Profit Margin (TTM) against their respective Specialty Retail and Textiles, Apparel & Luxury Goods industry benchmarks.

Profitability at a Glance

SymbolFNDLULU
Return on Equity (TTM)9.60%43.48%
Return on Assets (TTM)4.07%25.05%
Net Profit Margin (TTM)4.59%16.82%
Operating Profit Margin (TTM)5.91%23.36%
Gross Profit Margin (TTM)43.65%59.34%

Financial Strength

Current Ratio (MRQ)

FND

1.25

Specialty Retail Industry

Max
2.83
Q3
1.89
Median
1.39
Q1
1.11
Min
0.64

FND’s Current Ratio of 1.25 aligns with the median group of the Specialty Retail industry, indicating that its short-term liquidity is in line with its sector peers.

LULU

2.28

Textiles, Apparel & Luxury Goods Industry

Max
3.91
Q3
2.49
Median
1.89
Q1
1.43
Min
0.80

LULU’s Current Ratio of 2.28 aligns with the median group of the Textiles, Apparel & Luxury Goods industry, indicating that its short-term liquidity is in line with its sector peers.

FND vs. LULU: A comparison of their Current Ratio (MRQ) against their respective Specialty Retail and Textiles, Apparel & Luxury Goods industry benchmarks.

Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ)

FND

0.09

Specialty Retail Industry

Max
3.02
Q3
1.57
Median
0.64
Q1
0.20
Min
0.00

Falling into the lower quartile for the Specialty Retail industry, FND’s Debt-to-Equity Ratio of 0.09 points to a conservative financing strategy. This results in lower financial risk but potentially limits strategic investments compared to more leveraged competitors.

LULU

0.00

Textiles, Apparel & Luxury Goods Industry

Max
2.67
Q3
1.29
Median
0.59
Q1
0.24
Min
0.00

Falling into the lower quartile for the Textiles, Apparel & Luxury Goods industry, LULU’s Debt-to-Equity Ratio of 0.00 points to a conservative financing strategy. This results in lower financial risk but potentially limits strategic investments compared to more leveraged competitors.

FND vs. LULU: A comparison of their Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ) against their respective Specialty Retail and Textiles, Apparel & Luxury Goods industry benchmarks.

Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM)

FND

92.38

Specialty Retail Industry

Max
48.12
Q3
35.95
Median
14.13
Q1
3.61
Min
-36.00

With an Interest Coverage Ratio of 92.38, FND demonstrates a superior capacity to service its debt, placing it well above the typical range for the Specialty Retail industry. This stems from either robust earnings or a conservative debt load.

LULU

-47.83

Textiles, Apparel & Luxury Goods Industry

Max
57.00
Q3
35.85
Median
9.20
Q1
4.29
Min
-32.49

LULU has a negative Interest Coverage Ratio of -47.83. This indicates that its earnings were insufficient to cover even its operational costs, let alone its interest payments, signaling significant financial distress.

FND vs. LULU: A comparison of their Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM) against their respective Specialty Retail and Textiles, Apparel & Luxury Goods industry benchmarks.

Financial Strength at a Glance

SymbolFNDLULU
Current Ratio (MRQ)1.252.28
Quick Ratio (MRQ)0.230.98
Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ)0.090.00
Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM)92.38-47.83

Growth

Revenue Growth

FND vs. LULU: A side-by-side comparison of their Revenue Growth for the MRQ (YoY), TTM (YoY), 3-Year CAGR, and 5-Year CAGR periods.

EPS Growth

FND vs. LULU: A side-by-side comparison of their EPS Growth for the MRQ (YoY), TTM (YoY), 3-Year CAGR, and 5-Year CAGR periods.

Dividend

Dividend Yield (TTM)

FND

0.00%

Specialty Retail Industry

Max
6.53%
Q3
2.69%
Median
1.08%
Q1
0.00%
Min
0.00%

FND currently does not pay a dividend, resulting in a yield of 0%. This is a common strategy for growth-focused companies that prioritize reinvesting earnings, though it may be less typical in mature, income-oriented sectors.

LULU

0.00%

Textiles, Apparel & Luxury Goods Industry

Max
6.59%
Q3
3.60%
Median
2.59%
Q1
0.95%
Min
0.00%

LULU currently does not pay a dividend, resulting in a yield of 0%. This is a common strategy for growth-focused companies that prioritize reinvesting earnings, though it may be less typical in mature, income-oriented sectors.

FND vs. LULU: A comparison of their Dividend Yield (TTM) against their respective Specialty Retail and Textiles, Apparel & Luxury Goods industry benchmarks.

Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM)

FND

0.00%

Specialty Retail Industry

Max
165.81%
Q3
80.94%
Median
31.61%
Q1
0.00%
Min
0.00%

FND has a Dividend Payout Ratio of 0%, indicating it does not currently pay a dividend. This is a common strategy for growth-oriented companies that reinvest all profits back into the business.

LULU

0.00%

Textiles, Apparel & Luxury Goods Industry

Max
195.44%
Q3
106.47%
Median
58.77%
Q1
36.52%
Min
0.00%

LULU has a Dividend Payout Ratio of 0%, indicating it does not currently pay a dividend. This is a common strategy for growth-oriented companies that reinvest all profits back into the business.

FND vs. LULU: A comparison of their Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM) against their respective Specialty Retail and Textiles, Apparel & Luxury Goods industry benchmarks.

Dividend at a Glance

SymbolFNDLULU
Dividend Yield (TTM)0.00%0.00%
Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM)0.00%0.00%

Valuation

Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM)

FND

42.33

Specialty Retail Industry

Max
48.56
Q3
29.15
Median
22.00
Q1
15.46
Min
7.95

A P/E Ratio of 42.33 places FND in the upper quartile for the Specialty Retail industry. This high valuation relative to peers suggests the market holds elevated expectations for the company’s future growth.

LULU

13.67

Textiles, Apparel & Luxury Goods Industry

Max
63.29
Q3
34.64
Median
18.01
Q1
13.88
Min
6.04

In the lower quartile for the Textiles, Apparel & Luxury Goods industry, LULU’s P/E Ratio of 13.67 suggests the stock may be undervalued compared to its peers, potentially presenting an attractive entry point for investors.

FND vs. LULU: A comparison of their Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM) against their respective Specialty Retail and Textiles, Apparel & Luxury Goods industry benchmarks.

Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM)

FND

1.94

Specialty Retail Industry

Max
5.08
Q3
2.69
Median
1.23
Q1
0.48
Min
0.09

FND’s P/S Ratio of 1.94 aligns with the market consensus for the Specialty Retail industry. This suggests its valuation, based on sales, is seen as standard and is on par with its competitors.

LULU

2.30

Textiles, Apparel & Luxury Goods Industry

Max
5.46
Q3
3.13
Median
1.72
Q1
0.83
Min
0.26

LULU’s P/S Ratio of 2.30 aligns with the market consensus for the Textiles, Apparel & Luxury Goods industry. This suggests its valuation, based on sales, is seen as standard and is on par with its competitors.

FND vs. LULU: A comparison of their Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM) against their respective Specialty Retail and Textiles, Apparel & Luxury Goods industry benchmarks.

Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ)

FND

3.55

Specialty Retail Industry

Max
16.93
Q3
7.98
Median
3.69
Q1
1.79
Min
0.21

FND’s P/B Ratio of 3.55 is within the conventional range for the Specialty Retail industry. This shows a balanced market view, where the stock’s price is neither at a significant premium nor a discount to the book value of its peers.

LULU

7.80

Textiles, Apparel & Luxury Goods Industry

Max
9.76
Q3
6.00
Median
3.26
Q1
1.97
Min
0.69

LULU’s P/B Ratio of 7.80 is in the upper tier for the Textiles, Apparel & Luxury Goods industry. This indicates that investors are paying a premium relative to the company’s net assets, a valuation that hinges on its ability to generate superior profits.

FND vs. LULU: A comparison of their Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ) against their respective Specialty Retail and Textiles, Apparel & Luxury Goods industry benchmarks.

Valuation at a Glance

SymbolFNDLULU
Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM)42.3313.67
Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM)1.942.30
Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ)3.557.80
Price-to-Free Cash Flow Ratio (TTM)71.5615.57