Seek Returns logo

FN vs. UMC: A Head-to-Head Stock Comparison

Updated on

Here’s a clear look at FN and UMC, comparing key factors like historical performance, profitability, financial strength, growth, dividend, and valuation.

Company Profile

FN is a standard domestic listing, while UMC trades as an American Depositary Receipt (ADR), offering U.S. investors access to its foreign-listed shares.

SymbolFNUMC
Company NameFabrinetUnited Microelectronics Corporation
CountryCayman IslandsTaiwan
GICS SectorInformation TechnologyInformation Technology
GICS IndustryElectronic Equipment, Instruments & ComponentsSemiconductors & Semiconductor Equipment
Market Capitalization16.74 billion USD18.66 billion USD
ExchangeNYSENYSE
Listing DateJune 25, 2010September 19, 2000
Security TypeCommon StockADR

Historical Performance

This chart compares the performance of FN and UMC by tracking the growth of an initial $10,000 investment in each. Use the tabs to select the desired time period. Data is adjusted for dividends and splits.

FN vs. UMC: Growth of a $10,000 investment over the past one year.

Historical Performance at a Glance

SymbolFNUMC
5-Day Price Return1.66%-4.64%
13-Week Price Return40.56%11.06%
26-Week Price Return122.59%-0.44%
52-Week Price Return78.06%8.46%
Month-to-Date Return6.05%-2.59%
Year-to-Date Return112.49%4.99%
10-Day Avg. Volume0.84M50.90M
3-Month Avg. Volume0.64M40.13M
3-Month Volatility57.44%21.88%
Beta1.040.27

Profitability

Return on Equity (TTM)

FN

18.02%

Electronic Equipment, Instruments & Components Industry

Max
21.57%
Q3
13.27%
Median
8.55%
Q1
4.42%
Min
-4.21%

In the upper quartile for the Electronic Equipment, Instruments & Components industry, FN’s Return on Equity of 18.02% signals a highly effective use of shareholder capital to drive profitability compared to most of its peers.

UMC

10.95%

Semiconductors & Semiconductor Equipment Industry

Max
47.13%
Q3
23.50%
Median
9.94%
Q1
0.86%
Min
-20.69%

UMC’s Return on Equity of 10.95% is on par with the norm for the Semiconductors & Semiconductor Equipment industry, indicating its profitability relative to shareholder equity is typical for the sector.

FN vs. UMC: A comparison of their Return on Equity (TTM) against their respective Electronic Equipment, Instruments & Components and Semiconductors & Semiconductor Equipment industry benchmarks.

Net Profit Margin (TTM)

FN

9.77%

Electronic Equipment, Instruments & Components Industry

Max
17.31%
Q3
10.85%
Median
7.26%
Q1
3.13%
Min
-3.00%

FN’s Net Profit Margin of 9.77% is aligned with the median group of its peers in the Electronic Equipment, Instruments & Components industry. This indicates its ability to convert revenue into profit is typical for the sector.

UMC

17.01%

Semiconductors & Semiconductor Equipment Industry

Max
52.41%
Q3
23.88%
Median
10.17%
Q1
1.21%
Min
-32.15%

UMC’s Net Profit Margin of 17.01% is aligned with the median group of its peers in the Semiconductors & Semiconductor Equipment industry. This indicates its ability to convert revenue into profit is typical for the sector.

FN vs. UMC: A comparison of their Net Profit Margin (TTM) against their respective Electronic Equipment, Instruments & Components and Semiconductors & Semiconductor Equipment industry benchmarks.

Operating Profit Margin (TTM)

FN

9.51%

Electronic Equipment, Instruments & Components Industry

Max
30.04%
Q3
15.08%
Median
9.55%
Q1
4.27%
Min
-3.83%

FN’s Operating Profit Margin of 9.51% is around the midpoint for the Electronic Equipment, Instruments & Components industry, indicating that its efficiency in managing core business operations is typical for the sector.

UMC

18.50%

Semiconductors & Semiconductor Equipment Industry

Max
58.09%
Q3
27.54%
Median
11.18%
Q1
3.31%
Min
-28.36%

UMC’s Operating Profit Margin of 18.50% is around the midpoint for the Semiconductors & Semiconductor Equipment industry, indicating that its efficiency in managing core business operations is typical for the sector.

FN vs. UMC: A comparison of their Operating Profit Margin (TTM) against their respective Electronic Equipment, Instruments & Components and Semiconductors & Semiconductor Equipment industry benchmarks.

Profitability at a Glance

SymbolFNUMC
Return on Equity (TTM)18.02%10.95%
Return on Assets (TTM)12.76%7.15%
Net Profit Margin (TTM)9.77%17.01%
Operating Profit Margin (TTM)9.51%18.50%
Gross Profit Margin (TTM)11.99%28.92%

Financial Strength

Current Ratio (MRQ)

FN

2.83

Electronic Equipment, Instruments & Components Industry

Max
4.57
Q3
2.85
Median
2.03
Q1
1.51
Min
0.62

FN’s Current Ratio of 2.83 aligns with the median group of the Electronic Equipment, Instruments & Components industry, indicating that its short-term liquidity is in line with its sector peers.

UMC

2.34

Semiconductors & Semiconductor Equipment Industry

Max
6.58
Q3
4.24
Median
2.73
Q1
2.13
Min
1.02

UMC’s Current Ratio of 2.34 aligns with the median group of the Semiconductors & Semiconductor Equipment industry, indicating that its short-term liquidity is in line with its sector peers.

FN vs. UMC: A comparison of their Current Ratio (MRQ) against their respective Electronic Equipment, Instruments & Components and Semiconductors & Semiconductor Equipment industry benchmarks.

Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ)

FN

0.00

Electronic Equipment, Instruments & Components Industry

Max
1.14
Q3
0.54
Median
0.30
Q1
0.11
Min
0.00

Falling into the lower quartile for the Electronic Equipment, Instruments & Components industry, FN’s Debt-to-Equity Ratio of 0.00 points to a conservative financing strategy. This results in lower financial risk but potentially limits strategic investments compared to more leveraged competitors.

UMC

0.25

Semiconductors & Semiconductor Equipment Industry

Max
1.09
Q3
0.48
Median
0.25
Q1
0.01
Min
0.00

UMC’s Debt-to-Equity Ratio of 0.25 is typical for the Semiconductors & Semiconductor Equipment industry, indicating its use of leverage is in line with the sector norm. This suggests a balanced approach to its capital structure.

FN vs. UMC: A comparison of their Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ) against their respective Electronic Equipment, Instruments & Components and Semiconductors & Semiconductor Equipment industry benchmarks.

Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM)

FN

15.04

Electronic Equipment, Instruments & Components Industry

Max
79.05
Q3
36.62
Median
12.51
Q1
3.72
Min
-18.73

FN’s Interest Coverage Ratio of 15.04 is positioned comfortably within the norm for the Electronic Equipment, Instruments & Components industry, indicating a standard and healthy capacity to cover its interest payments.

UMC

313.16

Semiconductors & Semiconductor Equipment Industry

Max
174.00
Q3
74.71
Median
26.06
Q1
6.43
Min
-7.80

With an Interest Coverage Ratio of 313.16, UMC demonstrates a superior capacity to service its debt, placing it well above the typical range for the Semiconductors & Semiconductor Equipment industry. This stems from either robust earnings or a conservative debt load.

FN vs. UMC: A comparison of their Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM) against their respective Electronic Equipment, Instruments & Components and Semiconductors & Semiconductor Equipment industry benchmarks.

Financial Strength at a Glance

SymbolFNUMC
Current Ratio (MRQ)2.832.34
Quick Ratio (MRQ)1.991.88
Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ)0.000.25
Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM)15.04313.16

Growth

Revenue Growth

FN vs. UMC: A side-by-side comparison of their Revenue Growth for the MRQ (YoY), TTM (YoY), 3-Year CAGR, and 5-Year CAGR periods.

EPS Growth

FN vs. UMC: A side-by-side comparison of their EPS Growth for the MRQ (YoY), TTM (YoY), 3-Year CAGR, and 5-Year CAGR periods.

Dividend

Dividend Yield (TTM)

FN

0.00%

Electronic Equipment, Instruments & Components Industry

Max
5.36%
Q3
2.53%
Median
1.28%
Q1
0.16%
Min
0.00%

FN currently does not pay a dividend, resulting in a yield of 0%. This is a common strategy for growth-focused companies that prioritize reinvesting earnings, though it may be less typical in mature, income-oriented sectors.

UMC

6.33%

Semiconductors & Semiconductor Equipment Industry

Max
3.72%
Q3
1.51%
Median
0.69%
Q1
0.00%
Min
0.00%

UMC’s Dividend Yield of 6.33% is exceptionally high, placing it well above the typical range for the Semiconductors & Semiconductor Equipment industry. While this may seem attractive, an unusually high yield can sometimes be a warning sign, reflecting a falling stock price or market concerns about the dividend’s sustainability.

FN vs. UMC: A comparison of their Dividend Yield (TTM) against their respective Electronic Equipment, Instruments & Components and Semiconductors & Semiconductor Equipment industry benchmarks.

Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM)

FN

0.00%

Electronic Equipment, Instruments & Components Industry

Max
218.94%
Q3
90.25%
Median
38.81%
Q1
3.69%
Min
0.00%

FN has a Dividend Payout Ratio of 0%, indicating it does not currently pay a dividend. This is a common strategy for growth-oriented companies that reinvest all profits back into the business.

UMC

152.43%

Semiconductors & Semiconductor Equipment Industry

Max
205.27%
Q3
88.01%
Median
27.13%
Q1
0.00%
Min
0.00%

UMC’s Dividend Payout Ratio of 152.43% is in the upper quartile for the Semiconductors & Semiconductor Equipment industry. This indicates a strong commitment to shareholder returns but also suggests that a smaller portion of earnings is retained for reinvestment compared to many peers.

FN vs. UMC: A comparison of their Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM) against their respective Electronic Equipment, Instruments & Components and Semiconductors & Semiconductor Equipment industry benchmarks.

Dividend at a Glance

SymbolFNUMC
Dividend Yield (TTM)0.00%6.33%
Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM)0.00%152.43%

Valuation

Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM)

FN

45.84

Electronic Equipment, Instruments & Components Industry

Max
74.74
Q3
42.40
Median
26.55
Q1
20.05
Min
10.12

A P/E Ratio of 45.84 places FN in the upper quartile for the Electronic Equipment, Instruments & Components industry. This high valuation relative to peers suggests the market holds elevated expectations for the company’s future growth.

UMC

14.07

Semiconductors & Semiconductor Equipment Industry

Max
106.30
Q3
61.93
Median
38.96
Q1
23.71
Min
13.06

In the lower quartile for the Semiconductors & Semiconductor Equipment industry, UMC’s P/E Ratio of 14.07 suggests the stock may be undervalued compared to its peers, potentially presenting an attractive entry point for investors.

FN vs. UMC: A comparison of their Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM) against their respective Electronic Equipment, Instruments & Components and Semiconductors & Semiconductor Equipment industry benchmarks.

Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM)

FN

4.48

Electronic Equipment, Instruments & Components Industry

Max
6.79
Q3
3.58
Median
2.05
Q1
1.29
Min
0.20

FN’s P/S Ratio of 4.48 is in the upper echelon for the Electronic Equipment, Instruments & Components industry. This means the company is valued richly on its revenue stream compared to its peers, suggesting the stock is priced for a high level of future performance.

UMC

2.39

Semiconductors & Semiconductor Equipment Industry

Max
19.99
Q3
10.21
Median
5.23
Q1
2.88
Min
1.13

In the lower quartile for the Semiconductors & Semiconductor Equipment industry, UMC’s P/S Ratio of 2.39 indicates its revenue is valued more conservatively than most of its peers. This could present a compelling opportunity if the market has overlooked its sales-generating capabilities.

FN vs. UMC: A comparison of their Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM) against their respective Electronic Equipment, Instruments & Components and Semiconductors & Semiconductor Equipment industry benchmarks.

Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ)

FN

6.22

Electronic Equipment, Instruments & Components Industry

Max
6.92
Q3
3.80
Median
2.23
Q1
1.42
Min
0.44

FN’s P/B Ratio of 6.22 is in the upper tier for the Electronic Equipment, Instruments & Components industry. This indicates that investors are paying a premium relative to the company’s net assets, a valuation that hinges on its ability to generate superior profits.

UMC

1.58

Semiconductors & Semiconductor Equipment Industry

Max
14.22
Q3
6.94
Median
4.29
Q1
1.99
Min
0.67

UMC’s P/B Ratio of 1.58 is in the lower quartile for the Semiconductors & Semiconductor Equipment industry. From a value investing perspective, this is favorable, as it suggests the stock is trading at a discount to its net asset value and may offer a greater margin of safety.

FN vs. UMC: A comparison of their Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ) against their respective Electronic Equipment, Instruments & Components and Semiconductors & Semiconductor Equipment industry benchmarks.

Valuation at a Glance

SymbolFNUMC
Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM)45.8414.07
Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM)4.482.39
Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ)6.221.58
Price-to-Free Cash Flow Ratio (TTM)80.1112.43