Seek Returns logo

FN vs. NTAP: A Head-to-Head Stock Comparison

Updated on

Here’s a clear look at FN and NTAP, comparing key factors like historical performance, profitability, financial strength, growth, dividend, and valuation.

Company Profile

SymbolFNNTAP
Company NameFabrinetNetApp, Inc.
CountryCayman IslandsUnited States
GICS SectorInformation TechnologyInformation Technology
GICS IndustryElectronic Equipment, Instruments & ComponentsTechnology Hardware, Storage & Peripherals
Market Capitalization12.09 billion USD21.89 billion USD
ExchangeNYSENasdaqGS
Listing DateJune 25, 2010November 21, 1995
Security TypeCommon StockCommon Stock

Historical Performance

This chart compares the performance of FN and NTAP by tracking the growth of an initial $10,000 investment in each. Use the tabs to select the desired time period. Data is adjusted for dividends and splits.

FN vs. NTAP: Growth of a $10,000 investment over the past one year.

Historical Performance at a Glance

SymbolFNNTAP
5-Day Price Return0.66%5.34%
13-Week Price Return56.60%11.15%
26-Week Price Return52.74%-11.80%
52-Week Price Return62.71%-11.01%
Month-to-Date Return4.19%5.06%
Year-to-Date Return53.41%-5.75%
10-Day Avg. Volume0.61M1.35M
3-Month Avg. Volume0.65M2.01M
3-Month Volatility36.59%25.42%
Beta1.051.45

Profitability

Return on Equity (TTM)

FN

17.83%

Electronic Equipment, Instruments & Components Industry

Max
29.99%
Q3
15.78%
Median
9.05%
Q1
5.63%
Min
-9.55%

In the upper quartile for the Electronic Equipment, Instruments & Components industry, FN’s Return on Equity of 17.83% signals a highly effective use of shareholder capital to drive profitability compared to most of its peers.

NTAP

123.03%

Technology Hardware, Storage & Peripherals Industry

Max
47.24%
Q3
29.40%
Median
9.11%
Q1
6.06%
Min
-0.79%

NTAP’s Return on Equity of 123.03% is exceptionally high, placing it well beyond the typical range for the Technology Hardware, Storage & Peripherals industry. This demonstrates a superior ability to generate profit from shareholder investments, though it could also be inflated by high financial leverage.

FN vs. NTAP: A comparison of their Return on Equity (TTM) against their respective Electronic Equipment, Instruments & Components and Technology Hardware, Storage & Peripherals industry benchmarks.

Net Profit Margin (TTM)

FN

10.00%

Electronic Equipment, Instruments & Components Industry

Max
25.55%
Q3
12.80%
Median
7.58%
Q1
3.09%
Min
-8.70%

FN’s Net Profit Margin of 10.00% is aligned with the median group of its peers in the Electronic Equipment, Instruments & Components industry. This indicates its ability to convert revenue into profit is typical for the sector.

NTAP

18.05%

Technology Hardware, Storage & Peripherals Industry

Max
13.86%
Q3
8.17%
Median
4.62%
Q1
3.65%
Min
-0.21%

NTAP’s Net Profit Margin of 18.05% is exceptionally high, placing it well beyond the typical range for the Technology Hardware, Storage & Peripherals industry. This demonstrates outstanding operational efficiency and a strong competitive advantage in converting revenue into profit.

FN vs. NTAP: A comparison of their Net Profit Margin (TTM) against their respective Electronic Equipment, Instruments & Components and Technology Hardware, Storage & Peripherals industry benchmarks.

Operating Profit Margin (TTM)

FN

9.46%

Electronic Equipment, Instruments & Components Industry

Max
30.04%
Q3
16.04%
Median
9.75%
Q1
4.27%
Min
-12.63%

FN’s Operating Profit Margin of 9.46% is around the midpoint for the Electronic Equipment, Instruments & Components industry, indicating that its efficiency in managing core business operations is typical for the sector.

NTAP

20.34%

Technology Hardware, Storage & Peripherals Industry

Max
17.80%
Q3
10.33%
Median
6.31%
Q1
4.86%
Min
2.53%

NTAP’s Operating Profit Margin of 20.34% is exceptionally high, placing it well above the typical range for the Technology Hardware, Storage & Peripherals industry. This demonstrates outstanding efficiency in managing its core operations, which can be a result of strong pricing power or superior cost control.

FN vs. NTAP: A comparison of their Operating Profit Margin (TTM) against their respective Electronic Equipment, Instruments & Components and Technology Hardware, Storage & Peripherals industry benchmarks.

Profitability at a Glance

SymbolFNNTAP
Return on Equity (TTM)17.83%123.03%
Return on Assets (TTM)13.14%12.44%
Net Profit Margin (TTM)10.00%18.05%
Operating Profit Margin (TTM)9.46%20.34%
Gross Profit Margin (TTM)12.09%70.19%

Financial Strength

Current Ratio (MRQ)

FN

3.32

Electronic Equipment, Instruments & Components Industry

Max
4.43
Q3
2.88
Median
2.05
Q1
1.52
Min
0.64

FN’s Current Ratio of 3.32 is in the upper quartile for the Electronic Equipment, Instruments & Components industry. This signifies a strong liquidity position, suggesting the company is well-equipped to cover its immediate liabilities compared to its peers.

NTAP

1.26

Technology Hardware, Storage & Peripherals Industry

Max
2.47
Q3
1.98
Median
1.40
Q1
1.26
Min
0.70

NTAP’s Current Ratio of 1.26 aligns with the median group of the Technology Hardware, Storage & Peripherals industry, indicating that its short-term liquidity is in line with its sector peers.

FN vs. NTAP: A comparison of their Current Ratio (MRQ) against their respective Electronic Equipment, Instruments & Components and Technology Hardware, Storage & Peripherals industry benchmarks.

Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ)

FN

0.00

Electronic Equipment, Instruments & Components Industry

Max
1.14
Q3
0.54
Median
0.34
Q1
0.11
Min
0.00

Falling into the lower quartile for the Electronic Equipment, Instruments & Components industry, FN’s Debt-to-Equity Ratio of 0.00 points to a conservative financing strategy. This results in lower financial risk but potentially limits strategic investments compared to more leveraged competitors.

NTAP

3.11

Technology Hardware, Storage & Peripherals Industry

Max
1.47
Q3
0.93
Median
0.32
Q1
0.19
Min
0.00

With a Debt-to-Equity Ratio of 3.11, NTAP operates with exceptionally high leverage compared to the Technology Hardware, Storage & Peripherals industry norm. This suggests an aggressive reliance on debt financing, which can magnify returns but also significantly elevates financial risk.

FN vs. NTAP: A comparison of their Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ) against their respective Electronic Equipment, Instruments & Components and Technology Hardware, Storage & Peripherals industry benchmarks.

Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM)

FN

14.97

Electronic Equipment, Instruments & Components Industry

Max
101.00
Q3
43.88
Median
13.27
Q1
3.73
Min
-18.73

FN’s Interest Coverage Ratio of 14.97 is positioned comfortably within the norm for the Electronic Equipment, Instruments & Components industry, indicating a standard and healthy capacity to cover its interest payments.

NTAP

17.59

Technology Hardware, Storage & Peripherals Industry

Max
204.63
Q3
90.22
Median
21.70
Q1
6.79
Min
-23.93

NTAP’s Interest Coverage Ratio of 17.59 is positioned comfortably within the norm for the Technology Hardware, Storage & Peripherals industry, indicating a standard and healthy capacity to cover its interest payments.

FN vs. NTAP: A comparison of their Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM) against their respective Electronic Equipment, Instruments & Components and Technology Hardware, Storage & Peripherals industry benchmarks.

Financial Strength at a Glance

SymbolFNNTAP
Current Ratio (MRQ)3.321.26
Quick Ratio (MRQ)2.511.22
Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ)0.003.11
Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM)14.9717.59

Growth

Revenue Growth

FN vs. NTAP: A side-by-side comparison of their Revenue Growth for the MRQ (YoY), TTM (YoY), 3-Year CAGR, and 5-Year CAGR periods.

EPS Growth

FN vs. NTAP: A side-by-side comparison of their EPS Growth for the MRQ (YoY), TTM (YoY), 3-Year CAGR, and 5-Year CAGR periods.

Dividend

Dividend Yield (TTM)

FN

0.00%

Electronic Equipment, Instruments & Components Industry

Max
4.86%
Q3
2.53%
Median
1.28%
Q1
0.16%
Min
0.00%

FN currently does not pay a dividend, resulting in a yield of 0%. This is a common strategy for growth-focused companies that prioritize reinvesting earnings, though it may be less typical in mature, income-oriented sectors.

NTAP

1.97%

Technology Hardware, Storage & Peripherals Industry

Max
4.50%
Q3
3.66%
Median
1.90%
Q1
0.00%
Min
0.00%

NTAP’s Dividend Yield of 1.97% is consistent with its peers in the Technology Hardware, Storage & Peripherals industry, providing a dividend return that is standard for its sector.

FN vs. NTAP: A comparison of their Dividend Yield (TTM) against their respective Electronic Equipment, Instruments & Components and Technology Hardware, Storage & Peripherals industry benchmarks.

Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM)

FN

0.00%

Electronic Equipment, Instruments & Components Industry

Max
161.37%
Q3
67.12%
Median
34.46%
Q1
3.82%
Min
0.00%

FN has a Dividend Payout Ratio of 0%, indicating it does not currently pay a dividend. This is a common strategy for growth-oriented companies that reinvest all profits back into the business.

NTAP

35.75%

Technology Hardware, Storage & Peripherals Industry

Max
142.87%
Q3
66.07%
Median
42.79%
Q1
0.00%
Min
0.00%

NTAP’s Dividend Payout Ratio of 35.75% is within the typical range for the Technology Hardware, Storage & Peripherals industry, suggesting a balanced approach between shareholder payouts and company reinvestment.

FN vs. NTAP: A comparison of their Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM) against their respective Electronic Equipment, Instruments & Components and Technology Hardware, Storage & Peripherals industry benchmarks.

Dividend at a Glance

SymbolFNNTAP
Dividend Yield (TTM)0.00%1.97%
Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM)0.00%35.75%

Valuation

Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM)

FN

38.24

Electronic Equipment, Instruments & Components Industry

Max
73.87
Q3
41.11
Median
25.31
Q1
18.58
Min
8.59

FN’s P/E Ratio of 38.24 is within the middle range for the Electronic Equipment, Instruments & Components industry. This suggests its valuation is in line with the sector average, representing neither a significant premium nor a discount compared to its peers.

NTAP

18.19

Technology Hardware, Storage & Peripherals Industry

Max
43.16
Q3
27.56
Median
17.85
Q1
12.48
Min
6.21

NTAP’s P/E Ratio of 18.19 is within the middle range for the Technology Hardware, Storage & Peripherals industry. This suggests its valuation is in line with the sector average, representing neither a significant premium nor a discount compared to its peers.

FN vs. NTAP: A comparison of their Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM) against their respective Electronic Equipment, Instruments & Components and Technology Hardware, Storage & Peripherals industry benchmarks.

Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM)

FN

3.83

Electronic Equipment, Instruments & Components Industry

Max
6.74
Q3
3.49
Median
2.03
Q1
1.16
Min
0.11

FN’s P/S Ratio of 3.83 is in the upper echelon for the Electronic Equipment, Instruments & Components industry. This means the company is valued richly on its revenue stream compared to its peers, suggesting the stock is priced for a high level of future performance.

NTAP

3.28

Technology Hardware, Storage & Peripherals Industry

Max
4.27
Q3
1.99
Median
0.93
Q1
0.45
Min
0.04

NTAP’s P/S Ratio of 3.28 is in the upper echelon for the Technology Hardware, Storage & Peripherals industry. This means the company is valued richly on its revenue stream compared to its peers, suggesting the stock is priced for a high level of future performance.

FN vs. NTAP: A comparison of their Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM) against their respective Electronic Equipment, Instruments & Components and Technology Hardware, Storage & Peripherals industry benchmarks.

Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ)

FN

3.68

Electronic Equipment, Instruments & Components Industry

Max
6.45
Q3
3.49
Median
1.98
Q1
1.31
Min
0.35

FN’s P/B Ratio of 3.68 is in the upper tier for the Electronic Equipment, Instruments & Components industry. This indicates that investors are paying a premium relative to the company’s net assets, a valuation that hinges on its ability to generate superior profits.

NTAP

17.30

Technology Hardware, Storage & Peripherals Industry

Max
12.51
Q3
6.11
Median
1.73
Q1
1.01
Min
0.31

At 17.30, NTAP’s P/B Ratio is at an extreme premium to the Technology Hardware, Storage & Peripherals industry. This signifies that the market’s valuation is heavily reliant on future potential rather than its current net asset value, which can be a high-risk proposition.

FN vs. NTAP: A comparison of their Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ) against their respective Electronic Equipment, Instruments & Components and Technology Hardware, Storage & Peripherals industry benchmarks.

Valuation at a Glance

SymbolFNNTAP
Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM)38.2418.19
Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM)3.833.28
Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ)3.6817.30
Price-to-Free Cash Flow Ratio (TTM)45.8316.13